Abstract
Background
The most common diagnostic procedure in the United States for mammographically detected nonpalpable lesions is a combination of a vacuum-assisted biopsy device and a prone-type biopsy table. We have used an upright-type stereotactic mammography unit without a digital imaging system instead of the prone table.
Patients and methods
Five-hundred ten biopsies of 506 mammographically detected nonpalpable breast lesions in 488 patients, consisting of 445 lesions with microcalcifications alone, 39 masses without calcifications, and 22 with both masses and microcalcifications, were attempted using a combination of a vacuum-assisted device (Mammotome) and an upright unit without a digital imaging system in a sitting position between May 1999 and February 2007.
Results
Breast tissue was obtained in 497 biopsies. Microcalcifications were confirmed radiographically in the tissue of 447 out of 459 biopsies from lesions with microcalcifications (97.4 %). One hundred thirty-seven were diagnosed as malignant, 10 as atypical ductal hyperplasia, 345 as benign, and 1 was not diagnosable. The underestimation rate was 28.0 %. Overall, 26 patients (5.1 %) had vasovagal reactions, while 19 (3.8 %) experienced mild subcutaneous bleeding. Two hundred fifty of 350 lesions, for which biopsy diagnoses were benign, were followed for a median period of 33 months. Four lesions turned out to be malignant. The false-negative rate was 2.8 %.
Conclusion
The biopsy technique using the combination of the Mammotome and an upright unit without a digital imaging system is cost-effective, safe, and accurate, and should be regarded as one of the standard biopsy methods for mammographically detected nonpalpable lesions.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Gotzsche PC, Nielsen M. Screening for breast cancer with mammography. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2006;4:CD001877.
Ohsumi S, Takashima S, Aogi K, Ishizaki M, Mandai K. Breast biopsy for mammographically detected non-palpable lesions using a vacuum-assisted biopsy device (Mammotome) and an upright-type stereotactic mammography unit. Jpn J Clin Oncol. 2001;31:527–31.
Nisbet AP, Borthwick-Clarke A, Scott N. 11-gauge vacuum assisted directional biopsy of breast calcifications, using upright stereotactic guidance. Eur J Radiol. 2000;36:144–6.
Welle GJ, Clark M, Loos S, Pauls D, Warden D, Sheffield M, et al. Stereotactic breast biopsy: recumbent biopsy using add-on upright equipment. Am J Roentogenol. 2000;175:59–63.
Georgian-Smith D, D’Orsi C, Morris E, Clark CF Jr, Liberty E, Lehman CD. Stereotactic biopsy of the breast using an upright unit, a vacuum-suction needle, and a lateral arm-support system. Am J Roentogenol. 2002;178:1017–24.
American College of Radiology. Illustrated breast imaging reporting and data system (BI-RADS), 3rd ed. Reston: American College of Radiology; 1998.
Page DL, Anderson TJ, Roger LW. Epithelial hyperplasia. In: Page DL, Anderson TJ (eds) Diagnostic histopathology of the breast. Edinburgh: Churchill Livingstone; 1987. p. 120–56.
Liberman L, Smolkin JH, Dershaw DD, Morris EA, Abramson AF, Rosen PP. Calcification retrieval at stereotactic, 11-gauge, directional, vacuum-assisted breast biopsy. Radiology. 1998;208:251–60.
Brem RF, Behrndt VS, Sanow L, Gatewood OM. Atypical ductal hyperplasia: Histologic underestimation of carcinoma in tissue harvested from impalpable breast lesions using 11-gauge stereotactically guided directional vacuum-assisted biopsy. Am J Roentogenol. 1999;172:1405–7.
Won B, Reynolds HE, Lazaridis CL, Jackson VP. Stereotactic biopsy of ductal carcinoma in situ of breast using an 11-gauge vacuum-assisted device: persistent underestimation of disease. Am J Roentogenol. 1999;173:227–9.
Pfarl G, Helbich TH, Riedl CC, Wagner T, Gnant M, Rudas M, et al. Stereotactic 11-gauge vacuum-assisted breast biopsy: a validation study. Am J Roentogenol. 2002;179:1503–7.
Rao A, Parker S, Ratzer E, Stephens J, Fenoglio M. Atypical ductal hyperplasia of the breast diagnosed by 11-gauge directional vacuum-assisted biopsy. Am J Surg. 2002;184:534–7.
Winchester DJ, Bernstein JR, Jeske JM, Nicholson MH, Hahn EA, Goldschmidt RA, et al. Upstaging of atypical ductal hyperplasia after vacuum-assisted 11-gauge stereotactic core needle biopsy. Arch Surg. 2003;138:619–23.
Kettritz U, Rotter K, Schreer I, Murauer M, Schulz-Wendtland R, Peter D, et al. Stereotactic vacuum-assisted breast biopsy in 2874 patients: a multicenter study. Cancer. 2004;100:245–51.
Jackman RJ, Marzoni FA Jr, Rosenberg J. False-negative diagnoses at stereotactic vacuum-assisted needle breast biopsy: long-term follow-up of 1,280 lesions and review of literature. Am J Roentogenol. 2009;192:341–51.
Lai JT, Burrowes P, MacGregor JH. Diagnostic accuracy of a stereotactically guided vacuum-assisted large-core breast biopsy program in Canada. Can Assoc Radiol J. 2001;52:223–7.
Apesteguia L, Mellado M, Saenz J, Cordero JL, Reparaz B, Miguel C. Vacuum-assisted breast biopsy on digital stereotaxic table of nonpalpable lesions non-recognisable by ultrasonography. Eur Radiol. 2002;12:638–45.
Liberman L, Kaplan JB, Morris EA, Abramson AF, Menell JH, Dershaw DD. To excise or to sample the mammographic target: what is the goal of stereotactic 11-gauge vacuum-assisted breast biopsy? Am J Roentogenol. 2002;179:679–83.
Kettritz U. Stereotactic vacuum-assisted breast biopsy in 2874 patients. (reply to letter). Cancer. 2004;101:431.
Wunderbaldinger P, Wolf G, Turetschek K, Helbich TH. Comparison of sitting versus prone position for stereotactic large-core breast biopsy in surgically proven lesions. Am J Roentogenol. 2002;178:1221–5.
Conflict of interest
None.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
About this article
Cite this article
Ohsumi, S., Taira, N., Takabatake, D. et al. Breast biopsy for mammographically detected nonpalpable lesions using a vacuum-assisted biopsy device (Mammotome) and upright-type stereotactic mammography unit without a digital imaging system: experience of 500 biopsies. Breast Cancer 21, 123–127 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12282-012-0360-3
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12282-012-0360-3