Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Rights and the City: An Exploration of the Interaction Between Socio-economic Rights and the City

  • Published:
Urban Forum Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In a rapidly urbanising society and against a background of rural underdevelopment, cities are increasingly the locations for access to basic socio-economic amenities and essential services. Access to the city and everything that it offers therefore impacts profoundly on the manner and extent to which poor and marginalised persons access the objects of their constitutionally ensconced socio-economic rights. Conversely, the content of the ‘right to the city’ is impacted by legal understandings of the ambit, scope and enforceability of socio-economic rights. Either way, the South African Constitution’s entrenchment of rights to access water, housing, health care services and education, alongside its guarantee of a substantive right to equality, mean that urban design, policy making and regeneration processes have become increasingly legalized and will increasingly be tested for constitutional compliance, especially in instances where they have the effect of excluding poor and marginalised persons from the city. This article begins to unpack the interrelationship between constitutional rights and the right to the city, focusing specifically on the impact of rights-based litigation and judgements on urban policy making, design and regeneration in South Africa.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Albertyn, C. (2007). Substantive equality and transformation in South Africa. South African Journal on Human Rights, 23, 253–277.

    Google Scholar 

  • Albertyn, C., & Goldblatt, B. (1998). Facing the challenge of transformation: difficulties in the development of an indigenous jurisprudence of equality. South African Journal on Human Rights, 14, 248–276.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bilchitz, D. (2007). Poverty and fundamental rights: the justification and enforcement of socio-economic rights. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Centre on Housing Rights and Evictions (COHRE). (2005). Any room for the poor? Forced evictions in Johannesburg, South Africa. Report available through www.cohre.org.

  • City of Johannesburg v. Rand Properties. (2007). Judgment by the South African Supreme Court of Appeal, reported as 2007 (6) SA 417 (SCA).

  • Constitution of the Republic of South Africa. (1996). South African Parliament, Act 108 of 1996.

  • Currie, I. (1999). Judicious avoidance. South African Journal on Human Rights, 15, 138–165.

    Google Scholar 

  • Democratic Alliance v. Masondo. (2003). Judgment by the Constitutional Court of South Africa, reported as 2003 (2) SA 413 (CC).

  • Dirsuweit, T. (2002). Johannesburg: fearful City? Urban Forum, 13(3), 3–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dirsuweit, T. (2006). Security, citizenship and governance: an introduction. Urban Forum, 17(4), 295–300.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dugard, J. (2008). Rights, regulation and resistance: the Phiri water campaign. South African Journal on Human Rights, 24, 593–611.

    Google Scholar 

  • Enslin, P. (2003). Citizenship education in post-Apartheid South Africa. Cambridge Journal of Education, 33, 73–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fernandes, E. (2007). Constructing the ‘right to the city’ in Brazil. Social & Legal Studies, 16(2), 201–219.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frug, J. (1996). The geography of community. Stanford Law Review, 48(5), 1047–1108.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gibson, J. L., & Caldeira, G. A. (2003). Defenders of democracy? Legitimacy, popular acceptance, and the South African Constitutional Court. Journal of Politics, 65(1), 1–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Government of the RSA v. Grootboom. (2001). Judgment by the Constitutional Court of South Africa, reported as 2001 (1) SA 46 (CC).

  • Hammett, D. (2008). The challenge of a perception of ‘un-entitlement’ to citizenship in post-Apartheid South Africa. Political Geography, 27, 652–668.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harvey, D. (2008). The right to the city. New Left Review, 53, 23–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huchzermeyer, M. (2009). Does recent litigation bring us any closer to a right to the city? - paper delivered at workshop on ‘Intellectuals, ideology, protests and civil society’ held at the University of Johannesburg on 30 October 2009 - available through www.abahlali.org.

  • Jacobs, J. (1961; 3rd edn 1993). The Death and Life of Great American Cities. New York: The Modern Library

  • Joseph v. City of Johannesburg. (2010). Judgment by the Constitutional Court of South Africa, reported as 2010 (3) BCLR 212 (CC).

  • Kirby, A. (2008). The production of private space and its implications for urban social relations. Political Geography, 27, 74–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klare, K. E. (1998). Legal culture and transformative constitutionalism. South African Journal on Human Rights, 14, 146–188.

    Google Scholar 

  • Layard, A. (2010). Shopping in the public realm: a law of place. Journal of Law and Society, 37(3), 412–441.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Le Roux, W. (2006). Planning law, crime control and the spatial dynamics of post-apartheid street democracy. SA Public Law, 21, 25–50.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lefebvre, H. (1996). In E. Kofman & E. Lebas (Eds.), Writings on cities. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lemanski, C. (2004). A new apartheid? The spatial implications of fear of crime in Cape Town, South Africa. Environment and Urbanization, 16, 101–111.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lemanski, C. (2006). Residential responses to fear (of crime plus) in two Cape Town suburbs: implications for the post-apartheid city. Journal of International Development, 18, 787–802.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lemanski, C., Landman, K., & Durington, M. (2008). Divergent and similar experiences of ‘gating’ in South Africa: Johannesburg, Durban and cape Town’. Urban Forum, 19, 133–158.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liebenberg, S. (2006). Needs, rights and transformation: adjudicating social rights. Stellenbosch Law Review, 17, 5–36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liebenberg, S. (2010). Socio-economic rights: adjudication under a transformative constitution. Cape Town: Juta & Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liebenberg, S., & Goldblatt, B. (2007). The interrelationship between equality and socio-economic rights under South Africa’s transformative Constitution. South African Journal on Human Rights, 23, 335–361.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marcuse, P. (2009). From critical urban theory to the right to the city. City, 13(2–3), 185–197.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mazibuko v. City of Johannesburg. (2010). Judgment by the Constitutional Court of South Africa, reported as 2010 (3) BCLR 239 (CC).

  • Miraftab, F. (2007). Governing post apartheid spatiality: implementing city improvement districts in Cape Town. Antipode, 39(4), 602–626.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell, D. (1997). The annihilation of space by law: the roots and implications of anti-homeless laws in the United States. Antipode, 29(3), 303–335.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell, D. (2003). The right to the city. New York: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mkontwana v. Nelson Mandela Metropolitan Municipality. (2005). Judgment by the Constitutional Court of South Africa, reported as 2005 (1) SA 530 (CC).

  • Murray, M. J. (2008). Taming the disorderly city: the spatial landscape of Johannesburg after Apartheid. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Narsiah, S. (2011). Urban pulse—the struggle for water, life, and dignity in South African cities: the case of Johannesburg. Urban Geography, 32, 149–155.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Occupiers of 51 Olivia Road, Berea Township v. City of Johannesburg. (2008). Judgment by the Constitutional Court of South Africa, reported as 2008 (5) BCLR 475 (CC).

  • Olga Tellis v. Bombay Municipal Corporation. (1986). Judgment by the Supreme Court of India, reported as 1986 A.I.R. 180.

  • Parnell, S., & Pieterse, E. (2010). The ‘right to the city’: institutional imperatives of a developmental state. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 34(1), 146–162.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pieterse, M. (2005). What do we mean when we talk about transformative constitutionalism? SA Public Law, 20, 155–166.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pieterse, M. (2006). Resuscitating socio-economic rights: constitutional entitlements to health care services. South African Journal on Human Rights, 22, 473–502.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pindell, N. (2006). Finding a right to the city. Exploring property and community in Brazil and in the United States. Vanderbilt Journal of Transnational Law, 39, 435–479.

    Google Scholar 

  • Port Elizabeth Municipality v. Various Occupiers. (2004). Judgment by the Constitutional Court of South Africa, reported as 2005 (1) SA 217 (CC).

  • Pretoria City Council v. Walker. (1998). Judgment by the Constitutional Court of South Africa, reported as 1998 (2) SA 363 (CC).

  • Prevention of Illegal Eviction from and Unlawful Occupation of Land Act. (1998). South African Parliament, Act19 of 1998.

  • Promotion of Equality and Prevention of Unfair Discrimination Act. (2000). South African Parliament, Act 4 of 2000.

  • Purcell, M. (2002). Excavating Lefebvre: the right to the city and its urban politics of the inhabitant. GeoJournal, 58, 99–108.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rail Commuters Action Group v. Transnet t/a Metrorail. (2005). Judgment by the Constitutional Court of South Africa, reported as 2005 (2) SA 359 (CC).

  • Residents of Joe Slovo Community, Western Cape v. Thubelisha Homes. (2009). Judgment by the Constitutional Court of South Africa, reported as 2009 (9) BCLR 847 (CC).

  • Roux, T. (2009). Principle and pragmatism on the Constitutional Court of South Africa. International Journal of Constitutional Law, 7(1), 106–138.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simone, A. (2005). The right to the city. Interventions, 7(3), 321–325.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sinwell, L. (2010). The Wynberg concerned residents’ disempowering court victory. Urban Forum, 21, 153–169.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • South African Human Rights Commission (SAHRC). (2005). Report on the issue of road closures, security booms and related matters. Johannesburg: SAHRC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Staeheli, L. A., & Thompson, A. (1997). Citizenship, community, and struggles for public space. Professional Geographer, 4991), 28–38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Staeheli, L. A., Mitchell, D., & Gibson, K. (2002). Conflicting rights to the city in New York’s community gardens. GeoJournal, 58, 197–205.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Veary, J. (2010). Hidden spaces and urban health: exploring the tactics of rural migrants navigating the city of gold. Urban Forum, 21, 37–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Victoria & Alfred Waterfront v. Police Commissioner, Western Cape. (2004). Judgment by the Cape provincial Division of the High Court of South Africa, reported as 2004 (4) SA 444 (C).

  • Von Schnitzler, A. (2008). Citizenship prepaid: water, calculability and techno-politics in South Africa. Journal of Southern African Studies, 34(4), 899–917.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Waldron, J. (1991). Homelessness and the issue of freedom. UCLA Law Review, 39, 295–324.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weinstein, L., & Ren, X. (2009). The changing right to the city: urban renewal and housing rights in globalizing Shanghai and Mumbai. City & Community, 8(4), 407–432.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, S. (2009). Breaking the tie: evictions from private land, homelessness and a new normality. South African Law Journal, 129, 270–290.

    Google Scholar 

  • Woolman, S. (2007). The amazing, vanishing Bill of Rights. South African Law Journal, 127, 762–794.

    Google Scholar 

  • World Charter on the Right to the City (2005). Available at: <http://www.globalgovernancewatch.org/resources/world-charter-on-the-right-to-the-city>.

  • Young, I. M. (1990). Justice and the politics of difference. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa

    Thomas Coggin & Marius Pieterse

Authors
  1. Thomas Coggin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Marius Pieterse
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Marius Pieterse.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Coggin, T., Pieterse, M. Rights and the City: An Exploration of the Interaction Between Socio-economic Rights and the City. Urban Forum 23, 257–278 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12132-011-9135-8

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12132-011-9135-8

Keywords

Search

Navigation