Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Intra- and Inter-personal Barriers to Condom Use Among College Students: A Review of the Literature

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Sexuality & Culture Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Research indicates that a large number of youth participate in risky sexual behaviors, including: having sex with multiple partners, not participating in discussions on safer sex practices, and not using condoms consistently when engaging in sexual activities. These behaviors put college students at an increased risk for human immunodeficiency virus, sexually transmitted infections, and unintended pregnancy. The purpose of this paper is to identify factors that may act as intra- and interpersonal barriers to condom use and to provide recommendations to increase condom use among college students. A review of the literature was performed which resulted in 15 articles identifying and discussing common barriers to condom use. Multiple factors were found to serve as barriers to condom use including (a) relationship dynamics; (b) perception of risk; and (c) gender roles. These barriers are summarized and recommendations are given to improve the rate of condom use among college students.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alvarez, M., & Garcia-Marques, L. (2011). Cognitive and contextual variables in sexual partner and relationship perception. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 40(2), 407–417.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • American College Health Association. (2012). American College Health Association-National College Health Assessment II: Reference Group Executive Summary Spring 2012. Hanover, MD: American College Health Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bailey, J., Haggerty, K., White, H., & Catalano, R. (2011). Associations between changing developmental contexts and risky sexual behavior in the two years following high school. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 40(5), 951–960. doi:10.1007/s10508-010-9633-0.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baldwin, J. A., & Baldwin, J. D. (2000). Heterosexual anal intercourse: An understudied high-risk sexual behavior. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 29, 367–373.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Broaddus, M., Morris, H., & Bryan, A. (2010). ‘It’s Not What You Said, It’s How You Said It’: Perceptions of condom proposers by gender and strategy. Sex Roles, 62(9/10), 603–614. doi:10.1007/s11199-009-9728-z.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carter, J. A., McNair, L. D., Corbin, W. R., & Williams, M. (1999). Gender differences related to heterosexual condom use: The influence of negotiation styles. Journal of Sex and Marital Therapy, 25(3), 217–225.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (2011). HIV among youth. Retrieved from http://www.cdc.gov/hiv/risk/age/youth/index.html.

  • Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (2012). Youth risk behavior surveillance—United States, 2011. Retrieved from http://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/preview/mmwrhtml/ss6104a1.htm?s_cid=ss6104a1_w.

  • Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (2013). Condoms and STDs: Fact sheet for public health personnel. Retrieved from http://www.cdc.gov/condomeffectiveness/latex.htm.

  • Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (2014). Male latex condoms and sexually transmitted diseases. Retrieved from http://www.cdc.gov/condomeffectiveness/latex.htm.

  • Civic, D. (2000). College students’ reasons for nonuse of condoms within dating relationships. Journal of Sex and Marital Therapy, 26(1), 95–105.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Flannery, D., Ellingson, L., Votaw, K., & Schaefer, E. (2003). Anal intercourse and sexual risk factors among college women, 1993–2000. American Journal of Health Behavior, 27, 228–234.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frankel, A., & Curtis, D. (2008). What’s in a purse? Maybe a Woman’s Reputation. Sex Roles, 59(9/10), 615–622. doi:10.1007/s11199-008-9463-x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gullette, D. L., & Lyons, A. (2006). Sensation seeking, self-esteem, and unprotected sex in college students. Journal of the Association of Nurses in AIDS Care, 17(5), 23–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lehmiller, J. J., VanderDrift, L. E., & Kelly, J. R. (2014). Sexual communication, satisfaction, and condom use behavior in friends with benefits and romantic partners. Journal of Sex Research, 51(1), 74–85. doi:10.1080/00224499.2012.719167.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, J. E., Malow, R. M., & Ireland, S. J. (1997). HIV/AIDS in heterosexual college students: A review of a decade of literature. Journal of American College Health, 45, 147–158.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mikulincer, M., & Shaver, P. R. (2007). Attachment in adulthood—Structure, dynamics, and change. New York: Guilford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Milhausen, R. R., McKay, A., Graham, C. A., Crosby, R. A., Yarber, W. L., & Sanders, S. A. (2013). Prevalence and predictors of condom use in a national sample of Canadian university students. Canadian Journal of Human Sexuality, 22(3), 142–151. doi:10.3138/cjhs.2316.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Patel, V. L., Yoskowitz, N. A., & Kaufman, D. R. (2007). Comprehension of sexual situations and its relationship to risky decisions by young adults. AIDS Care, 19(7), 916–922.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schachner, D. A., & Shaver, P. R. (2004). Attachment dimensions and sexual motives. Personal Relationships, 11, 179–195.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shearer, C., Hosterman, S., Gillen, M., & Lefkowitz, E. (2005). Are traditional gender role attitudes associated with risky sexual behavior and condom-related beliefs? Sex Roles, 52(5/6), 311–324. doi:10.1007/s11199-005-2675-4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Strachman, A., & Impett, E. A. (2009). Attachment orientations and daily condom use in dating relationships. Journal of Sex Research, 46(4), 319–329.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Umphrey, L., & Sherblom, J. (2007). Relational commitment and threats to relationship maintenance goals: Influences on condom use. Journal of American College Health, 56(1), 61–68.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vail-Smith, K., Whetstone, L., & Knox, D. (2010). The illusion of safety in “monogamous” undergraduate relationships. American Journal of Health Behavior, 34(1), 12–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Woolf, S. E., & Maisto, S. A. (2008). Gender differences in condom use behavior? The role of power and partner-type. Sex Roles, 58(9/10), 689–701.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Young, M., Penhollow, T. M., & Bailey, W. C. (2010). Hooking-up and condom provision: Is there a double standard? American Journal of Health Studies, 25(3), 156–164.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Health Promotion and Education Program, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH, 45221-0068, USA

    Sara K. Fehr, Rebecca A. Vidourek & Keith A. King

Authors
  1. Sara K. Fehr
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Rebecca A. Vidourek
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Keith A. King
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sara K. Fehr.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Fehr, S.K., Vidourek, R.A. & King, K.A. Intra- and Inter-personal Barriers to Condom Use Among College Students: A Review of the Literature. Sexuality & Culture 19, 103–121 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12119-014-9249-y

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12119-014-9249-y

Keywords

Search

Navigation