Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Phase II trial with letrozole to maximum response as primary systemic therapy in postmenopausal patients with ER/PgR[+] operable breast cancer

  • Research Articles
  • Published:
Clinical and Translational Oncology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

Letrozole is superior to tamoxifen in terms of response and breast preservation rates as primary systemic therapy (PST) in postmenopausal women with ER-positive early breast cancer. However, the optimum duration of endocrine PST remains uncertain.

Methods

A phase 2 multicentre, open-label trial was conducted to evaluate the efficacy of letrozole over a preoperative period of 4 months to 1 year. Seventy postmenopausal patients (over 65 years) were recruited in four centers. The primary endpoint was to establish the optimal duration of treatment defined as the time required to attain the maximum response by clinical palpation.

Results

The median age of the group was 79 years (66–91) and the median tumour size 35 mm (range 25–100 mm). No severe adverse events were reported. Fifty-six patients were evaluable for the primary objective. A total of 43 patients (76.8%) achieved an objective response; 29 (51.8%) being partial and 14 (25.0%) complete. The median time to objective response was 3.9 months (95% CI, 3.3–4.5) and the median time to maximum response was 4.2 months (95% CI, 4.0–4.5), although 20 (37.1%) patients achieved the maximal response within 6–12 months.

Conclusions

Letrozole shows a high activity and excellent tolerability as neoadjuvant therapy in elderly patients with endocrine-dependent breast cancer. Four to six months of letrozole as PST is an optimum duration with modest benefits thereafter.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Mouridsen H, Gershanovich M, Sun Y et al (2001) Superior efficacy of letrozole versus tamoxifen as first-line therapy for postmenopausal women with advanced breast cancer: results of a phase III study of the International Letrozole Breast Cancer Group. J Clin Oncol 19:2596–2606; erratum in: J Clin Oncol 19:3302

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Mouridsen H, Gershanovich M, Sun Y et al (2003) Phase III study of letrozole versus tamoxifen as first-line therapy of advanced breast cancer in postmenopausal women: analysis of survival and update of efficacy from the International Letrozole Breast Cancer Group. J Clin Oncol 21:2101–2109

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Ellis M, Ma C (2007). Letrozole in the neoadjuvant setting: the P024 trial. Breast Cancer Res Treat 105:33–43

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Dixon JM, Love CD, Bellamy CO et al (2001) Letrozole as primary medical therapy for locally advanced and large operable breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat 66:191–199

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Eiermann W, Paepke S, Appfelstaedt J et al (2001) Preoperative treatment of postmenopausal breast cancer patients with letrozole: a randomized double-blind multicenter study. Ann Oncol 12:1527–1532

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Mahillo Ramos E, Llombart Cussac A, Ruiz Simón A et al (2005) Estudio epidemiológico del grupo GEICAM sobre el cáncer de mama en España (1994–1997): Proyecto “El Álamo II” [Epidemiological study of the GEICAM group on breast cancer in Spain (1994–1997): “El Álamo II” Project]. Investigación Clínica y Farmacéutica 2:1697–2554

    Google Scholar 

  7. Ellis MJ, Buzdar G, Unzeitig GW et al (2010) ACOSOG Z1031: a randomized phase II trial comparing exemestane, letrozole, and anastrozole in postmenopausal women with clinical stage II/III estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 28[18s]:abstr LBA513)

  8. Ellis MJ, Miller WR, Tao Y et al (2009) Aromatase expression and outcomes in P024 neoadjuvant endocrine therapy trial. Breast Cancer Res Treat 116:371–378

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Mustacchi G, Ceccherini R, Milani S et al; Italian Cooperative Group GRETA (2003) Tamoxifen alone versus adjuvant tamoxifen for operable breast cancer of the elderly: long-term results of the phase III randomized controlled multicenter GRETA trial. Ann Oncol 14:414–420

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Fennesy M, Bates T, Mc Rae et al (2004) Late follow-up of a randomized trial of surgery plus tamoxifen versus tamoxifen alone in women aged over 70 years with operable breast cancer. Br J Surg 91:699–704

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Chia YH, Ellis MJ, Ma C (2010) Neoadjuvant endocrine therapy in primary breast cancer: indications and use as a research tool. Br J Cancer 103: 759–764

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Smith IE, Dowsett M, Ebbs SR et al (2005) Neoadjuvant treatment of postmenopausal breast cancer with anastrozole, tamoxifen, or both in combination: the Immediate Preoperative Anastrozole, Tamoxifen, or Combined With Tamoxifen (IMPACT) Multicenter double-blind randomized trial. J Clin Oncol 23:5108–5116

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Cataliotti L, Buzdar AU, Noguchi S et al (2006) Comparison of anastrozole versus tamoxifen as preoperative therapy in postmenopausal women with hormone receptor-positive breast cancer: the Pre-Operative “Arimidex” Compared to Tamoxifen (PROACT) trial. Cancer 15:2095–2103

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Semiglazov V, Kletsel A, Semiglazov V et al (2005) Exemestane (E) vs tamoxifen (T) as neoadjuvant endocrine therapy for postmenopausal women with ER+ breast cancer (T2N1-2, T3N0-1, T4N0M0). J Clin Oncol 23[(16S):11S]:Abstract 530

  15. Gil y Gil MJ, Moreno A, Perez X et al (2002) Prognostic factors of tumor response and progression free survival in patients with localized breast cancer treated with toremifene as primary therapy. Proc Am Soc Clin Oncol 21[Suppl]:2979

    Google Scholar 

  16. Barnadas A, Gil M, Gonzalez S et al (2009) Exemestane as primary treatment of estrogen receptor positive breast cancer in post menopausal women: a phase II trial. Br J Cancer 100:442–449

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Goldhirsch A, Ingle JN, Gelber RD et al (2009) Thresholds for therapies: highlights of the St Gallen International Expert Consensus on the primary therapy of early breast cancer. Ann Oncol 8:1319–1329

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Bates T, Riley DL, Houghton J et al (1991) Breast cancer in elderly women: a Cancer Research Campaign trial comparing treatment with tamoxifen and optimal surgery with tamoxifen alone. The Elderly Breast Cancer Working Party. Br J Surg 78:591–594

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Robertson JF, Ellis IO, Elston CW et al (1992) Mastectomy or tamoxifen as initial therapy for operable breast cancer in elderly patients: 5-year follow-up. Eur J Cancer 28A:908–910

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Gazet JC, Ford HT, Coombes RC et al (1994) Prospective randomized trial of tamoxifen vs surgery in elderly patients with breast cancer. Eur J Surg Oncol 20:207–214

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Alba E, Calvo L, Albanell J et al; on behalf of GEICAM (2010) Chemotherapy (CT) versus hormone therapy (HT) as neoadjuvant treatment in luminal breast cancer: a multicenter, randomized phase II study (GEICAM/2006-03). J Clin Oncol 28[Suppl 7]:abstract 500

  22. Semiglazov VF, Semiglazov VV, Dashyan GA et al (2007) Phase 2 randomized trial of primary endocrine therapy versus chemotherapy in postmenopausal patients with estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer. Cancer 110:244–254

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Hind D, Wyld L, Beverley CB et al (2006) Surgery versus primary endocrine therapy for operable primary breast cancer in elderly women (70 years plus). Cochrane Database Syst Rev 1:CD004272

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Fisher B, Bryant J, Wolmark N et al (1998) Effect of preoperative chemotherapy on the outcome of women with operable breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 16:2672–2685

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Bear HD, Anderson S, Smith RE et al (2006) Sequential preoperative or postoperative docetaxel added to preoperative doxorubicin plus cyclophosphamide for operable breast cancer: National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project Protocol B-27. J Clin Oncol 24:2019–2027

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Mauriac L, Durand M, Avril A et al (1991) Effects of primary chemotherapy in conservative treatment of breast cancer patients with operable tumors larger than 3 cm. Results of a randomized trial in a single centre. Ann Oncol 2: 347–354

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Chen AM, Meric-Bernstam F, Hunt KK et al (2004) Breast conservation after neoadjuvant chemotherapy: the MD Anderson Cancer Center experience. J Clin Oncol 22:2303–2312

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Boughey JC, Peintinger F, Meric-Bernstam F et al (2006) Impact of preoperative versus postoperative chemotherapy on the extent and number of surgical procedures in patients treated in randomized clinical trials for breast cancer. Ann Surg 244:464–470

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Krainick-Strobel UE, Lichtenegger W, Wallwiener W et al (2008) Neoadjuvant letrozole in postmenopausal estrogen and/or progesterone receptor positive breast cancer: a phase IIb/III trial to investigate optimal duration of preoperative endocrine therapy. BMC Cancer 8:62

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Instituto Valenciano de Oncología, Valencia, Spain

    Antonio Llombart-Cussac, Ángel Guerrero, Amparo Ruiz & Vicente Guillem Porta

  2. Hospital de Sagunto, Sagunto, Valencia, Spain

    Antonio Galán & Elvira Buch

  3. Medical Oncology Department, Hospital Arnau de Vilanova, C/San Clemente, 12, ES-46015, Valencia, Spain

    Antonio Llombart-Cussac & Vicente Carañana

  4. Hospital Universitario de Elche, Elche, Alicante, Spain

    Álvaro Rodríguez-Lescure

  5. Hospital General de Valencia, Valencia, Spain

    Carlos Fuster Diana

Authors
  1. Antonio Llombart-Cussac
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Ángel Guerrero
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Antonio Galán
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Vicente Carañana
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Elvira Buch
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Álvaro Rodríguez-Lescure
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Amparo Ruiz
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Carlos Fuster Diana
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Vicente Guillem Porta
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Antonio Llombart-Cussac.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Llombart-Cussac, A., Guerrero, Á., Galán, A. et al. Phase II trial with letrozole to maximum response as primary systemic therapy in postmenopausal patients with ER/PgR[+] operable breast cancer. Clin Transl Oncol 14, 125–131 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12094-012-0771-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12094-012-0771-9

Keywords

Search

Navigation