Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

The Role of Current Audiological Tests in the Early Diagnosis of Hearing Impairment in Infant

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Indian Journal of Otolaryngology and Head & Neck Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study aims to compare the various audiological tests that are currently available as screening tools for infant hearing assessment. In developing countries, which have limited resources, it is imperative to design a screening programme that is easy to perform, gives accurate results, has good patient acceptability and is cost effective. Fifty infants, 3–12 months of age, were subjected to BOT for hearing, transient-evoked oto-acoustic emissions (TEOAEs), automated auditory brainstem response (AABR) test, auditory brainstem evoked response (ABR) testing and auditory steady state response (ASSR). The sensitivity and specificity of the various tests was calculated, with ABR test as the gold standard. We also compared them for average time taken, cost factors, ease of performance, number of repeat tests required and patient acceptability. All the screening tests, TEOAE, AABR and behavioral observation test had reasonably high sensitivity. Specificity was highest for behavioral observation testing (67.7 %) and AABR (64.5 %), but low for OAE test (48.3 %). The cost and time taken for each test was least for the behavioral observation test, which also did not require any repeat testing. TEOAE and AABR incur a recurring cost of approximately one dollar per test. However, in 12 and 28 % of the babies had to be called back for repeat testing, respectively. ASSR, as a diagnostic test, has a 100 % sensitivity and high specificity but scores down on the cost involved, time taken and the number of repeat tests required. Overall parent acceptability was the highest for behavioral observation test, as it was non-invasive and easy to perform. Behavioral observation combined with TEOAE/AABR, can be fairly accurate as screening tests for hearing loss in infants. Considering its ease of performance and low cost, behavioral observation could be used as a screening test for detection of hearing loss in infants, in those countries/places where universal neonatal hearing screening is not yet available.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. American Academy of Pediatrics (1999) Task force on newborn and infant hearing. Newborn and infant hearing loss: detection and intervention. Pediatrics 103(2):527–530

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Early identification of hearing impairment in infants and young children. NIH Consens Statement, 1–3 Mar 1993, vol 11(1), pp 1–24

  3. Primary Ear & Hearing Care Training Resource (2006) Intermediate level trainer’s manual. World Health Organization. http://www.who.int/pbd/deafness/activities/hearing_care/intermediate.pdf

  4. Robertson C, Aldridge S, Jarman F, Saunders K, Poulakis Z, Oberklaih F (1995) Late diagnosis of congenital sensorineural hearing impairment—why are detection methods failing? Arch Dis Child 72:11–15

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Bonfils P, Dumont A, Marie P, Francoise M, Narcy P (1990) Evoked otoacoustic emissions in newborn screening. Laryngoscope 100:186–189

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Luts H, Desloovere C, Kumar A, Vandermeersch E, Wouters J (2004) Objective assessment of frequency-specific hearing thresholds in babies. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol 68(7):915–926

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Schmidt RJ, Sataloff RT, Newman J, Spiegel JR, Myers DL (2001) The sensitivity of auditory brainstem response testing for the diagnosis of acoustic neuromas. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 127(1):19–22

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Johnson JL, White KR, Widen JE, Gravel JS, James M, Kennalley T, Maxon AB, Spivak L, Sullivan-Mahoney M, Vohr BR, Weirather Y, Holstrum J (2005) A multicenter evaluation of how many infants with permanent hearing loss pass a two-stage otoacoustic emissions/automated auditory brainstem response newborn hearing screening protocol. Pediatrics 116:663–672

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Maulana Azad Medical College and Associated Lok Nayak Hospital, New Delhi, India

    Seikholet Kuki, Shelly Chadha, Shruti Dhingra & Achal Gulati

Authors
  1. Seikholet Kuki
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Shelly Chadha
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Shruti Dhingra
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Achal Gulati
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Shruti Dhingra.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kuki, S., Chadha, S., Dhingra, S. et al. The Role of Current Audiological Tests in the Early Diagnosis of Hearing Impairment in Infant. Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 65, 244–250 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12070-012-0558-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12070-012-0558-x

Keywords

Search

Navigation