Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Long-term follow-up of nipple-sparing mastectomy without radiotherapy: a single center study at a Japanese institution

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Medical Oncology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Recent reports have suggested that nipple-sparing mastectomy (NSM) is a potential alternative to mastectomy (MT). The aim of our study was to investigate the oncological and technical outcomes of NSM compared with MT using long-term follow-up data. A total of 932 patients between April 1985 and March 2004 were enrolled in our study. Among them, 788 patients received NSM, whereas 144 patients received the routine mastectomy. The median follow-up time was 78 months. No significant difference in the probability of local recurrence between the NSM cohort and the MT cohort was found (8.2 vs. 7.6 %, p = 0.81). The rate of nipple-areola complex (NAC) relapse was low (3.7 %), and all of the nipple and/or areola recurrence cases were treated with NAC removal. Furthermore, nipple and/or areola recurrence was associated with a significantly better prognosis than that of skin flap recurrences and local lymph node recurrences. For the 21-year disease-free survival and the 21-year overall survival, no significant difference between the NSM and MT cohorts was observed. There was no occurrence of nipple necrosis in our trial. This was the first study to investigate the long-term follow-up of NSM in a large Japanese population. We reported the NSM could be performed without nipple necrosis and is oncologically as safe as mastectomy without radiotherapy. Therefore, we suggest that NSM without radiotherapy is a potential alternative to mastectomy for breast cancer patients for both outcome and aesthetic benefits.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Balch CM, Singletary SE, Bland KI. Clinical decision-making in early breast cancer. Ann Surg. 1993;217:207–25.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Handley RS. The early spread of breast carcinoma and its bearing on operative treatment. Br J Surg. 1964;51:206–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Afifi RY, El-Hindawy A. Analysis of nipple-areolar complex involvement with mastectomy: can the nipple be preserved in Egyptian patients receiving skin-sparing mastectomy? Breast J. 2004;10:543–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Fregnani JHTG, Macéa JR. Lymphatic drainage of the breast: from theory to surgical practice. Int J Morphol. 2009;27:873–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Gerber B, Krause A, Reimer T, et al. Skin-sparing mastectomy with conservation of the nipple-areola complex and autologous reconstruction is an oncologically safe procedure. Ann Surg. 2003;238:120–7.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Caruso F, Ferrara M, Castiglione G, et al. Nipple sparing subcutaneous mastectomy: sixty-six months follow-up. Eur J Surg Oncol (EJSO). 2006;32:937–40.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Sacchini V, Pinotti JA, Barros AC, et al. Nipple-sparing mastectomy for breast cancer and risk reduction: oncologic or technical problem? J Am Coll Surg. 2006;203:704–14.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Petit JY, Veronesi U, Orecchia R, et al. Nipple-sparing mastectomy in association with intra operative radiotherapy (ELIOT): a new type of mastectomy for breast cancer treatment. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2005;96:47–51.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Benediktsson KP, Perbeck L. Survival in breast cancer after nipple-sparing subcutaneous mastectomy and immediate reconstruction with implants: a prospective trial with 13 years median follow-up in 216 patients. Eur J Surg Oncol (EJSO). 2008;34:143–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Paepke S, Schmid R, Fleckner S, et al. Subcutaneous mastectomy with conservation of the nipple-areola skin. Ann Surg. 2009;250:288–92.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Yoshimura G, Sakurai T, Oura S, et al. Clinical outcome of immediate breast reconstruction using a silicone gel-filled implant after nipple-preserving mastectomy. Breast Cancer. 1996;3:47–52.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Crowe JP Jr, Kim JA, Yetman R, et al. Nipple-sparing mastectomy: technique and results of 54 procedures. Arch Surg. 2004;139:148–50.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Psaila A, Pozzi M, Barone Adesi L, et al. Nipple sparing mastectomy with immediate breast reconstruction: a short term analysis of our experience. J Exp Clin Cancer Res. 2006;25:309–12.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Komorowski AL, Zanini V, Regolo L, et al. Necrotic complications after nipple- and areola-sparing mastectomy. World J Surg. 2006;30:1410–3.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Bistoni G, Rulli A, Izzo L, et al. Nipple-sparing mastectomy. Preliminary results. J Exp Clin Cancer Res. 2006;25:495–7.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Brachtel EF, Rusby JE, Michaelson JS, et al. Occult nipple involvement in breast cancer: clinicopathologic findings in 316 consecutive mastectomy specimens. J Clin Oncol. 2009;27:4948–54.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Chung AP, Sacchini V. Nipple-sparing mastectomy: where are we now? Surg Oncol. 2008;17:261–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Rusby JE, Smith BL, Gui GPH. Nipple-sparing mastectomy. Br J Surg. 2010;97:305–16.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Rusby JE, Smith BL. Unanswered questions in nipple-sparing mastectomy. Surg Oncol. 2008;17:259–60.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Laronga C, Kemp B, Johnston D, et al. The incidence of occult nipple-areola complex involvement in breast cancer patients receiving a skin-sparing mastectomy. Ann Surg Oncol. 1999;6:609–13.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Simmons RM, Brennan M, Christos P, et al. Analysis of nipple/areolar involvement with mastectomy: can the areola be preserved? Ann Surg Oncol. 2002;9:165–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Vlajcic Z, Zic R, Stanec S, et al. Nipple-areola complex preservation: predictive factors of neoplastic nipple-areola complex invasion. Ann Plast Surg. 2005;55:240–4.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Schecter AK, Freeman MB, Giri D, et al. Applicability of the nipple-areola complex-sparing mastectomy: a prediction model using mammography to estimate risk of nipple-areola complex involvement in breast cancer patients. Ann Plast Surg. 2006;56:498–504. Discussion 504.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Petit JY, Veronesi U, Rey P, et al. Nipple-sparing mastectomy: risk of nipple-areolar recurrences in a series of 579 cases. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2008;114:97–101.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Petit JY, Veronesi U, Orecchia R, et al. Nipple sparing mastectomy with nipple areola intraoperative radiotherapy: one thousand and one cases of a five years experience at the European institute of oncology of Milan (EIO). Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2009;117:333–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Gerber B, Krause A, Dieterich M, et al. The oncological safety of skin sparing mastectomy with conservation of the nipple-areola complex and autologous reconstruction: an extended follow-up study. Ann Surg. 2009;249:461–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Crowe JP, Kim JA, Yetman R. Nipple-sparing mastectomy. Arch Surg 2004;139.

  28. Margulies AG, Hochberg J, Kepple J, et al. Total skin-sparing mastectomy without preservation of the nipple-areola complex. Am J Surg. 2005;190:920–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Voltura AM, Tsangaris TN, Rosson GD, et al. Nipple-sparing mastectomy: critical assessment of 51 procedures and implications for selection criteria. Ann Surg Oncol. 2008;15:3396–401.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Sakamoto N, Fukuma E, Higa K, et al. Early results of an endoscopic nipple-sparing mastectomy for breast cancer. Ann Surg Oncol. 2009;16:3406–13.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Jensen JA, Orringer JS, Giuliano AE. Nipple-sparing mastectomy in 99 patients with a mean follow-up of 5 years. Ann Surg Oncol. 2010;18:1665–70.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This project is supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 81072150; No. 81172529; No. 81272903).

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Qifeng Yang.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Sakurai, T., Zhang, N., Suzuma, T. et al. Long-term follow-up of nipple-sparing mastectomy without radiotherapy: a single center study at a Japanese institution. Med Oncol 30, 481 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12032-013-0481-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12032-013-0481-3

Keywords

Navigation