Skip to main content
Log in

Effect of Dietary Supplementation with Copper Sulfate or Tribasic Copper Chloride on the Growth Performance, Liver Copper Concentrations of Broilers Fed in Floor Pens, and Stabilities of Vitamin E and Phytase in Feeds

  • Published:
Biological Trace Element Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

An experiment was conducted using a total of 840, 1-day-old, Arbor Acres commercial male broilers to compare copper (Cu) sulfate and tribasic Cu chloride (TBCC, Cu2(OH)3Cl) as sources of supplemental Cu for broilers fed in floor pens. Chicks were randomly allotted to one of seven treatments for six replicate pens of 20 birds each, and were fed a basal corn–soybean meal diet (10.20 mg/kg Cu) supplemented with 0, 100, 150, or 200 mg/kg Cu from either Cu sulfate or TBCC for 21 days. Chicks fed 200 mg/kg Cu as TBCC had a higher (P < 0.05) average daily gain (ADG) than those consuming other diets. Liver Cu contents of broilers fed diets supplemented with TBCC were numerically lower (P > 0.05) than those of broilers fed diets supplemented with Cu sulfate. The vitamin E contents and the phytase activities in the feed fortified with TBCC were higher (P < 0.01) and numerically higher (P > 0.05) compared with those in the feeds fortified with Cu sulfate stored at room temperature, respectively. The vitamin E contents in liver and plasma of broilers fed diets supplemented with TBCC were higher (P < 0.05) than those of birds fed diets supplemented with Cu sulfate. This result indicates that TBCC is more effective than Cu sulfate in improving the growth of broilers fed in floor pens, and it is chemically less active than Cu sulfate in promoting the undesirable oxidation of vitamin E in feeds.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Davis GK, Mertz W (1987) Copper. In: Mertz W (ed) Trace elements in human and animal nutrition, Vol. I. Academic, New York, pp 301–364

    Google Scholar 

  2. Miles RD, O’Keefe SF, Henry PR, Ammerman CB, Luo XG (1998) The effect of dietary supplementation with copper sulfate or tribasic copper chloride on broiler performance, relative copper bioavailability and dietary prooxidant activity. Poult Sci 77:416–425

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Spears JW, Kegley EB, Mullis LA, Wise TA (1997) Bioavailability of copper chloride in cattle. J Anim Sci 75(Suppl 1):265, Abstr

    Google Scholar 

  4. Liu Z, Bryant MM, Roland DA Sr (2005) Layer performance and phytase retention as influenced by copper sulfate pentahydrate and tribasic copper chloride. J Appl Poult Res 14:499–505

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Cromwell GL, Lindemann MD, Monegue HJ, Hall DD, Orr DE Jr (1998) Tribasic copper chloride and copper sulfate as copper sources for weanling pigs. J Anim Sci 76:118–123

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. PARC Institute (1997) Evaluation of TBCC and copper sulfate in diets upon the performance of commercial chicken broilers. PARC Institute, Easton

    Google Scholar 

  7. PARC Institute (1999) Study of effect of copper source on vitamin stability. PARC Institute, Easton

    Google Scholar 

  8. PARC Institute (1997) Evaluation of TBCC impact on vitamin loss during pelleting. PARC Institute, Easton

    Google Scholar 

  9. Micronutrients (2003) TBCC Notes: technical information for users of micronutrients TBCC: vitamin stability. www.micronutrients.net/Animal/vitamin.htm. Accessed 29 June 2005

  10. Luo XG, Ji F, Lin YX, Steward F, Lu L, Liu B, Yu SX (2005) Effects of dietary supplementation with copper sulfate or tribasic copper chloride on broiler performance, relative copper bioavailability and oxidation stability of vitamin E in feed. Poult Sci 84:888–893

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. PARC Institute (1999) Study of effects of copper source on crop mycosis and performance with coccidia and candida albican challenge. PARC Institute, Easton

    Google Scholar 

  12. PARC Institute (1998) In vitro antimicrobial screening vs. E. Coli, Salmonella and Camplobacter: TBCC appeared significantly more discouraging to microbial growth than copper sulfate. PARC Institute, Easton

    Google Scholar 

  13. National Research Council (1994) Nutrient requirements of poultry, 9th edn. National Academic Press, Washington DC

    Google Scholar 

  14. Engelen AJ, Van der Heeft FC, Randsdorp PHG, Smit ELC (1994) Simple and rapid determination of phytase activity. J AOAC Int 77:760–764

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. SAS (2002) User’s guide: statistics. Version, 9th edn. SAS Inst., Cary

    Google Scholar 

  16. Braude R (1945) Some observations on the need for copper in the diet of fattening pigs. J Agric Sci 35:163

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Hooge DM, Steward FA, McNaughton JL (2000) Improved stabilities of vitamin A, D3, E and riboflavin with tribasic copper chloride (TBCC) compared to copper sulfate pentahydrate in crumbled broiler starter feed. Poult Sci 79(suppl 1):43–44

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This study was supported by the earmarked fund for Modern Agro-industry Technology Research System (No. nycytx-42-G2-04), the special research fund for public benefit industries from Ministry of Agriculture of the People’s Republic of China (No. 200903006), and Micronutrients, Div. of Heritage Technologies, LLC, Indianapolis, IN.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Xugang Luo.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lu, L., Wang, R.L., Zhang, Z.J. et al. Effect of Dietary Supplementation with Copper Sulfate or Tribasic Copper Chloride on the Growth Performance, Liver Copper Concentrations of Broilers Fed in Floor Pens, and Stabilities of Vitamin E and Phytase in Feeds. Biol Trace Elem Res 138, 181–189 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12011-010-8623-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12011-010-8623-3

Keywords

Navigation