Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Biomarkers of Fibrosis and Fibrosis Progression in Chronic Hepatitis C

  • Global Perspectives: Australia (W Sievert, Section Editor)
  • Published:
Current Hepatitis Reports Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The majority of patients exposed to the hepatitis C virus develop chronic infection. The morbidity and mortality associated with chronic hepatitis C (CHC) is a consequence of progressive liver fibrosis, leading to cirrhosis, decompensated liver disease and hepatocellular carcinoma. As fibrosis is the key determinant of prognosis and influences treatment decisions and enrolment in surveillance programs, accurate assessment of fibrosis is crucial in the management of CHC. Currently liver biopsy is the “gold standard” for fibrosis assessment, but has a number of limitations including morbidity and mortality, sampling error and inter/intra-observer variability. The identification of non-invasive biomarkers of fibrosis has expanded rapidly over the last 10 years, providing an attractive alternative to liver biopsy. This article will review non-invasive biomarkers (serum biochemistry, imaging-based and genetic) for the assessment of fibrosis and fibrosis progression in CHC.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

Papers of particular interest, published recently, have been highlighted as: • Of importance •• Of major importance

  1. Shepard CW, Finelli L, Alter MJ. Global epidemiology of hepatitis C virus infection. Lancet Infect Dis. 2005;5:558–67.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Micallef JM, Kaldor JM, Dore GJ. Spontaneous viral clearance following acute hepatitis C infection: a systematic review of longitudinal studies. J Viral Hepat. 2006;13:34–41.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. National Institutes of Health Consensus Development Conference Statement. Management of hepatitis C 2002 (June 10–12, 2002). Gastroenterology. 2002;123:2082–99.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. • Poynard T, Bedossa P, Opolon P. Natural history of liver fibrosis progression in patients with chronic hepatitis C. The OBSVIRC, METAVIR, CLINIVIR, and DOSVIRC groups. Lancet. 1997;349:825–32. This study details the natural history of fibrosis progression and factors assocaited with fibrosis progression in a large cohort of patients with chronic hepatitis C.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Rodger AJ, Roberts S, Lanigan A, Bowden S, Brown T, Crofts N. Assessment of long-term outcomes of community-acquired hepatitis C infection in a cohort with sera stored from 1971 to 1975. Hepatology. 2000;32:582–7.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Thomas DL, Astemborski J, Rai RM, Anania FA, Schaeffer M, Galai N, et al. The natural history of hepatitis C virus infection: host, viral, and environmental factors. JAMA. 2000;284:450–6.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Ratziu V, Munteanu M, Charlotte F, Bonyhay L, Poynard T. Fibrogenic impact of high serum glucose in chronic hepatitis C. J Hepatol. 2003;39:1049–55.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Missiha SB, Ostrowski M, Heathcote EJ. Disease progression in chronic hepatitis C: modifiable and nonmodifiable factors. Gastroenterology. 2008;134:1699–714.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Alberti A, Chemello L, Benvegnu L. Natural history of hepatitis C. J Hepatol. 1999;31 Suppl 1:17–24.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Hutchinson SJ, Bird SM, Goldberg DJ. Influence of alcohol on the progression of hepatitis C virus infection: a meta-analysis. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2005;3:1150–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Zarski JP, Bohn B, Bastie A, Pawlotsky JM, Baud M, Bost-Bezeaux F, et al. Characteristics of patients with dual infection by hepatitis B and C viruses. J Hepatol. 1998;28:27–33.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Wright M, Goldin R, Fabre A, Lloyd J, Thomas H, Trepo C, et al. Measurement and determinants of the natural history of liver fibrosis in hepatitis C virus infection: a cross sectional and longitudinal study. Gut. 2003;52:574–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Hui JM, Sud A, Farrell GC, Bandara P, Byth K, Kench JG, et al. Insulin resistance is associated with chronic hepatitis C virus infection and fibrosis progression [corrected]. Gastroenterology. 2003;125:1695–704.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. McCaughan GW, George J. Fibrosis progression in chronic hepatitis C virus infection. Gut. 2004;53:318–21.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Rockey DC. Hepatic fibrogenesis and hepatitis C. Semin Gastrointest Dis. 2000;11:69–83.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. • Gabele E, Brenner DA, Rippe RA. Liver fibrosis: signals leading to the amplification of the fibrogenic hepatic stellate cell. Front Biosci. 2003;8:d69–77. This article outlines the pathogenesis of liver fibrosis.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Bedossa P, Poynard T. An algorithm for the grading of activity in chronic hepatitis C. The METAVIR Cooperative Study Group. Hepatology. 1996;24:289–93.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Ishak K, Baptista A, Bianchi L, Callea F, De Groote J, Gudat F, et al. Histological grading and staging of chronic hepatitis. J Hepatol. 1995;22:696–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. •• Adams LA. Biomarkers of liver fibrosis. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2011;26:802–9. This review article summarises the serum biomarkers associated with fibrosis.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Piccinino F, Sagnelli E, Pasquale G, Giusti G. Complications following percutaneous liver biopsy. A multicentre retrospective study on 68,276 biopsies. J Hepatol. 1986;2:165–73.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Colloredo G, Guido M, Sonzogni A, Leandro G. Impact of liver biopsy size on histological evaluation of chronic viral hepatitis: the smaller the sample, the milder the disease. J Hepatol. 2003;39:239–44.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Bedossa P, Dargere D, Paradis V. Sampling variability of liver fibrosis in chronic hepatitis C. Hepatology. 2003;38:1449–57.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. •• Wai CT, Greenson JK, Fontana RJ, Kalbfleisch JD, Marrero JA, Conjeevaram HS, Lok AS. A simple noninvasive index can predict both significant fibrosis and cirrhosis in patients with chronic hepatitis C. Hepatology. 2003;38:518–26. This study identified APRI as a non-invasive serum marker of significant fibrosis. APRI is now one of the most widely validated biomarkers of firbrosis in chronic hepatitis C.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. • Rosenberg WM, Voelker M, Thiel R, Becka M, Burt A, Schuppan D, et al. Serum markers detect the presence of liver fibrosis: a cohort study. Gastroenterology. 2004;127:1704–13. This study identified the ELF test as a non-invasive serum marker of significant fibrosis.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Vallet-Pichard A, Mallet V, Nalpas B, Verkarre V, Nalpas A, Dhalluin-Venier V, et al. FIB-4: an inexpensive and accurate marker of fibrosis in HCV infection. comparison with liver biopsy and fibrotest. Hepatology. 2007;46:32–6.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Koda M, Matunaga Y, Kawakami M, Kishimoto Y, Suou T, Murawaki Y. FibroIndex, a practical index for predicting significant fibrosis in patients with chronic hepatitis C. Hepatology. 2007;45:297–306.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Cales P, Oberti F, Michalak S, Hubert-Fouchard I, Rousselet MC, Konate A, et al. A novel panel of blood markers to assess the degree of liver fibrosis. Hepatology. 2005;42:1373–81.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Sud A, Hui JM, Farrell GC, Bandara P, Kench JG, Fung C, et al. Improved prediction of fibrosis in chronic hepatitis C using measures of insulin resistance in a probability index. Hepatology. 2004;39:1239–47.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Patel K, Gordon SC, Jacobson I, Hezode C, Oh E, Smith KM, et al. Evaluation of a panel of non-invasive serum markers to differentiate mild from moderate-to-advanced liver fibrosis in chronic hepatitis C patients. J Hepatol. 2004;41:935–42.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. •• Imbert-Bismut F, Ratziu V, Pieroni L, Charlotte F, Benhamou Y, Poynard T. Biochemical markers of liver fibrosis in patients with hepatitis C virus infection: a prospective study. Lancet. 2001;357:1069–75. This study identified FibroTest as a non-invasive serum marker of significant fibrosis. FibroTest is now one of the most widely validated biomarkers of firbrosis in chronic hepatitis C, and is currently used in clinical practice in Europe.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Forns X, Ampurdanes S, Llovet JM, Aponte J, Quinto L, Martinez-Bauer E, et al. Identification of chronic hepatitis C patients without hepatic fibrosis by a simple predictive model. Hepatology. 2002;36:986–92.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Islam S, Antonsson L, Westin J, Lagging M. Cirrhosis in hepatitis C virus-infected patients can be excluded using an index of standard biochemical serum markers. Scand J Gastroenterol. 2005;40:867–72.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Fontana RJ, Goodman ZD, Dienstag JL, Bonkovsky HL, Naishadham D, Sterling RK, et al. Relationship of serum fibrosis markers with liver fibrosis stage and collagen content in patients with advanced chronic hepatitis C. Hepatology. 2008;47:789–98.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. • Adams LA, Bulsara M, Rossi E, DeBoer B, Speers D, George J, et al. Hepascore: an accurate validated predictor of liver fibrosis in chronic hepatitis C infection. Clin Chem. 2005;51:1867–73. This study identified HepaScore as a non-invasive serum marker of significant fibrosis. HepaScore is now one of the most widely validated biomarkers of firbrosis in chronic hepatitis C.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Lok AS, Ghany MG, Goodman ZD, Wright EC, Everson GT, Sterling RK, et al. Predicting cirrhosis in patients with hepatitis C based on standard laboratory tests: results of the HALT-C cohort. Hepatology. 2005;42:282–92.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Leroy V, Monier F, Bottari S, Trocme C, Sturm N, Hilleret MN, et al. Circulating matrix metalloproteinases 1, 2, 9 and their inhibitors TIMP-1 and TIMP-2 as serum markers of liver fibrosis in patients with chronic hepatitis C: comparison with PIIINP and hyaluronic acid. Am J Gastroenterol. 2004;99:271–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Fontana RJ, Kleiner DE, Bilonick R, Terrault N, Afdhal N, Belle SH, et al. Modeling hepatic fibrosis in African American and Caucasian American patients with chronic hepatitis C virus infection. Hepatology. 2006;44:925–35.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Bedossa P, Carrat F. Liver biopsy: the best, not the gold standard. J Hepatol. 2009;50:1–3.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Mehta SH, Lau B, Afdhal NH, Thomas DL. Exceeding the limits of liver histology markers. J Hepatol. 2009;50:36–41.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. •• Poynard T, Morra R, Halfon P, Castera L, Ratziu V, Imbert-Bismut F, et al. Meta-analyses of FibroTest diagnostic value in chronic liver disease. BMC Gastroenterol. 2007;7:40. This meta-analysis demonstrated the use of FibroTest in determining fibrosis in chronic hepatitis C patients.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Bourliere M, Penaranda G, Ouzan D, Renou C, Botta-Fridlund D, Tran A, et al. Optimized stepwise combination algorithms of non-invasive liver fibrosis scores including Hepascore in hepatitis C virus patients. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2008;28:458–67.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. Boursier J, Bacq Y, Halfon P, Leroy V, de Ledinghen V, de Muret A, et al. Improved diagnostic accuracy of blood tests for severe fibrosis and cirrhosis in chronic hepatitis C. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2009;21:28–38.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Sebastiani G, Vario A, Guido M, Noventa F, Plebani M, Pistis R, et al. Stepwise combination algorithms of non-invasive markers to diagnose significant fibrosis in chronic hepatitis C. J Hepatol. 2006;44:686–93.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. •• Sebastiani G, Halfon P, Castera L, Pol S, Thomas DL, Mangia A, et al. SAFE biopsy: a validated method for large-scale staging of liver fibrosis in chronic hepatitis C. Hepatology. 2009;49:1821–7. This study combined several validated biomarkers if fibrosis assessments to determine if their combination was superior in the diagnosis of fibrosis.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. •• Castera L, Sebastiani G, Le Bail B, de Ledinghen V, Couzigou P, Alberti A. Prospective comparison of two algorithms combining non-invasive methods for staging liver fibrosis in chronic hepatitis C. J Hepatol. 2010;52:191–8. This study combined several validated biomarkers if fibrosis assessments to determine if their combination was superior in the diagnosis of fibrosis.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Martinez SM, Fernandez-Varo G, Gonzalez P, Sampson E, Bruguera M, Navasa M, et al. Assessment of liver fibrosis before and after antiviral therapy by different serum marker panels in patients with chronic hepatitis C. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2010;33:138–48.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Halfon P, Carrat F, Bedossa P, Lambert J, Penaranda G, Perronne C, et al. Effect of antiviral treatment on serum markers of liver fibrosis in HIV-hepatitis C virus-coinfected patients: the Fibrovic 2 Study - ANRS HC02. Antivir Ther. 2009;14:211–9.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  48. •• Mummadi RR, Petersen JR, Xiao SY, Snyder N. Role of simple biomarkers in predicting fibrosis progression in HCV infection. World J Gastroenterol. 2010;16:5710–5. This study demonstrates the role of serum biomarkers of fibrosis in predicting fibrosis progression.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. •• Poynard T, McHutchison J, Manns M, Myers RP, Albrecht J. Biochemical surrogate markers of liver fibrosis and activity in a randomized trial of peginterferon alfa-2b and ribavirin. Hepatology. 2003;38:481–92. This study demonstrates the dynamic nature of serum biomarkers of fibrosis, and hence a role in predicting fibrosis progression.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  50. Cholongitas E, Tsochatzis E, Goulis J, Burroughs AK. Noninvasive tests for evaluation of fibrosis in HCV recurrence after liver transplantation: a systematic review. Transpl Int. 2010;23:861–70.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. •• Ngo Y, Munteanu M, Messous D, Charlotte F, Imbert-Bismut F, Thabut D, et al. A prospective analysis of the prognostic value of biomarkers (FibroTest) in patients with chronic hepatitis C. Clin Chem. 2006;52:1887–96. This study demonstrates the role of serum biomarkers of fibrosis in determining the prognosis, defined as liver-related morbidity and mortality.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  52. Nunes D, Fleming C, Offner G, Craven D, Fix O, Heeren T, et al. Noninvasive markers of liver fibrosis are highly predictive of liver-related death in a cohort of HCV-infected individuals with and without HIV infection. Am J Gastroenterol. 2010;105:1346–53.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Parkes J, Roderick P, Harris S, Day C, Mutimer D, Collier J, et al. Enhanced liver fibrosis test can predict clinical outcomes in patients with chronic liver disease. Gut. 2010;59:1245–51.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  54. •• Poynard T, Ngo Y, Perazzo H, Munteanu M, Lebray P, Moussalli J, et al. Prognostic value of liver fibrosis biomarkers: a meta-analysis. Gastroenterol Hepatol (N Y). 2011;7:445–54. This meta-analysis demonstrates the role of serum biomarkers of fibrosis in determining the prognosis, defined as liver-related morbidity and mortality.

    Google Scholar 

  55. Kuroda H, Kakisaka K, Tatemichi Y, Sawara K, Miyamoto Y, Oikawa K, et al. Non-invasive evaluation of liver fibrosis using acoustic radiation force impulse imaging in chronic hepatitis patients with hepatitis C virus infection. Hepatogastroenterology. 2010;57:1203–7.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. Friedrich-Rust M, Nierhoff J, Lupsor M, Sporea I, Fierbinteanu-Braticevici C, Strobel D, et al. Performance of Acoustic Radiation Force Impulse imaging for the staging of liver fibrosis: a pooled meta-analysis. J Viral Hepat. 2012;19:e212–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  57. Huwart L, Sempoux C, Vicaut E, Salameh N, Annet L, Danse E, et al. Magnetic resonance elastography for the noninvasive staging of liver fibrosis. Gastroenterology. 2008;135:32–40.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  58. Roulot D, Czernichow S, Le Clesiau H, Costes JL, Vergnaud AC, Beaugrand M. Liver stiffness values in apparently healthy subjects: influence of gender and metabolic syndrome. J Hepatol. 2008;48:606–13.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  59. Fraquelli M, Rigamonti C, Casazza G, Conte D, Donato MF, Ronchi G, Colombo M. Reproducibility of transient elastography in the evaluation of liver fibrosis in patients with chronic liver disease. Gut. 2007;56:968–73.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  60. Arena U, Vizzutti F, Corti G, Ambu S, Stasi C, Bresci S, et al. Acute viral hepatitis increases liver stiffness values measured by transient elastography. Hepatology. 2008;47:380–4.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  61. Arena U, Vizzutti F, Abraldes JG, Corti G, Stasi C, Moscarella S, et al. Reliability of transient elastography for the diagnosis of advanced fibrosis in chronic hepatitis C. Gut. 2008;57:1288–93.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  62. Millonig G, Reimann FM, Friedrich S, Fonouni H, Mehrabi A, Buchler MW, et al. Extrahepatic cholestasis increases liver stiffness (FibroScan) irrespective of fibrosis. Hepatology. 2008;48:1718–23.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  63. Vispo E, Barreiro P, Del Valle J, Maida I, de Ledinghen V, Quereda C, et al. Overestimation of liver fibrosis staging using transient elastography in patients with chronic hepatitis C and significant liver inflammation. Antivir Ther. 2009;14:187–93.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  64. • Ziol M, Handra-Luca A, Kettaneh A, Christidis C, Mal F, Kazemi F, et al. Noninvasive assessment of liver fibrosis by measurement of stiffness in patients with chronic hepatitis C. Hepatology. 2005;41:48–54. This study demonstrates the role of transient elastography in the diagnosis of signficant liver fibrosis.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  65. •• Castera L, Vergniol J, Foucher J, Le Bail B, Chanteloup E, Haaser M, et al. Prospective comparison of transient elastography, Fibrotest, APRI, and liver biopsy for the assessment of fibrosis in chronic hepatitis C. Gastroenterology. 2005;128:343–50. This study compares the accuracy of transient elastography and serum biomarker panels for the diagnosis of signficant liver fibrosis.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  66. Degos F, Perez P, Roche B, Mahmoudi A, Asselineau J, Voitot H, Bedossa P. Diagnostic accuracy of FibroScan and comparison to liver fibrosis biomarkers in chronic viral hepatitis: a multicenter prospective study (the FIBROSTIC study). J Hepatol. 2010;53:1013–21.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  67. Zarski JP, Sturm N, Guechot J, Paris A, Zafrani ES, Asselah T, et al. Comparison of nine blood tests and transient elastography for liver fibrosis in chronic hepatitis C: the ANRS HCEP-23 study. J Hepatol. 2012;56:55–62.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  68. •• Huang H, Shiffman ML, Friedman S, Venkatesh R, Bzowej N, Abar OT, et al. A 7 gene signature identifies the risk of developing cirrhosis in patients with chronic hepatitis C. Hepatology. 2007;46:297–306. This study identified seven polymorphisms (cirrhosis risk score) that strongly predicted for significant fibrosis.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  69. Ge D, Fellay J, Thompson AJ, Simon JS, Shianna KV, Urban TJ, et al. Genetic variation in IL28B predicts hepatitis C treatment-induced viral clearance. Nature. 2009;461:399–401.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  70. Suppiah V, Moldovan M, Ahlenstiel G, Berg T, Weltman M, Abate ML, et al. IL28B is associated with response to chronic hepatitis C interferon-alpha and ribavirin therapy. Nat Genet. 2009;41:1100–4.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  71. Tanaka Y, Nishida N, Sugiyama M, Kurosaki M, Matsuura K, Sakamoto N, et al. Genome-wide association of IL28B with response to pegylated interferon-alpha and ribavirin therapy for chronic hepatitis C. Nat Genet. 2009;41:1105–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  72. Thomas DL, Thio CL, Martin MP, Qi Y, Ge D, O’Huigin C, et al. Genetic variation in IL28B and spontaneous clearance of hepatitis C virus. Nature. 2009;461:798–801.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  73. Fabris C, Falleti E, Cussigh A, Bitetto D, Fontanini E, Bignulin S, et al. IL-28B rs12979860 C/T allele distribution in patients with liver cirrhosis: role in the course of chronic viral hepatitis and the development of HCC. J Hepatol. 2011;54:716–22.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  74. Bochud PY, Bibert S, Kutalik Z, Patin E, Guergnon J, Nalpas B, et al. IL28B alleles associated with poor hepatitis C virus (HCV) clearance protect against inflammation and fibrosis in patients infected with non-1 HCV genotypes. Hepatology. 2011;55:384–94.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  75. Huang H, Shiffman ML, Cheung RC, Layden TJ, Friedman S, Abar OT, et al. Identification of two gene variants associated with risk of advanced fibrosis in patients with chronic hepatitis C. Gastroenterology. 2006;130:1679–87.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  76. Yee LJ, Tang J, Herrera J, Kaslow RA, van Leeuwen DJ. Tumor necrosis factor gene polymorphisms in patients with cirrhosis from chronic hepatitis C virus infection. Genes Immunol. 2000;1:386–90.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  77. Dai CY, Chuang WL, Lee LP, Chen SC, Hou NJ, Lin ZY, et al. Associations of tumour necrosis factor alpha promoter polymorphisms at position −308 and −238 with clinical characteristics of chronic hepatitis C. J Viral Hepat. 2006;13:770–4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  78. Sasaki K, Tsutsumi A, Wakamiya N, Ohtani K, Suzuki Y, Watanabe Y, et al. Mannose-binding lectin polymorphisms in patients with hepatitis C virus infection. Scand J Gastroenterol. 2000;35:960–5.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  79. Okamoto K, Mimura K, Murawaki Y, Yuasa I. Association of functional gene polymorphisms of matrix metalloproteinase (MMP)-1, MMP-3 and MMP-9 with the progression of chronic liver disease. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2005;20:1102–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  80. Sonzogni L, Silvestri L, De Silvestri A, Gritti C, Foti L, Zavaglia C, et al. Polymorphisms of microsomal epoxide hydrolase gene and severity of HCV-related liver disease. Hepatology. 2002;36:195–201.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  81. Kuzushita N, Hayashi N, Moribe T, Katayama K, Kanto T, Nakatani S, et al. Influence of HLA haplotypes on the clinical courses of individuals infected with hepatitis C virus. Hepatology. 1998;27:240–4.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  82. Aikawa T, Kojima M, Onishi H, Tamura R, Fukuda S, Suzuki T, et al. HLA DRB1 and DQB1 alleles and haplotypes influencing the progression of hepatitis C. J Med Virol. 1996;49:274–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  83. •• Powell EE, Edwards-Smith CJ, Hay JL, Clouston AD, Crawford DH, Shorthouse C, et al. Host genetic factors influence disease progression in chronic hepatitis C. Hepatology. 2000;31:828–33. This article summarises the genetic factors previously identified to be associated with fibrosis.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  84. Souza RM, Freitas LA, Lyra AC, Moraes CF, Braga EL, Lyra LG. Effect of iron overload on the severity of liver histologic alterations and on the response to interferon and ribavirin therapy of patients with hepatitis C infection. Braz J Med Biol Res. 2006;39:79–83.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  85. Smith BC, Gorve J, Guzail MA, Day CP, Daly AK, Burt AD, Bassendine MF. Heterozygosity for hereditary hemochromatosis is associated with more fibrosis in chronic hepatitis C. Hepatology. 1998;27:1695–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  86. Thorburn D, Curry G, Spooner R, Spence E, Oien K, Halls D, et al. The role of iron and haemochromatosis gene mutations in the progression of liver disease in chronic hepatitis C. Gut. 2002;50:248–52.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  87. Piperno A, Vergani A, Malosio I, Parma L, Fossati L, Ricci A, et al. Hepatic iron overload in patients with chronic viral hepatitis: role of HFE gene mutations. Hepatology. 1998;28:1105–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  88. Hezode C, Cazeneuve C, Coue O, Roudot-Thoraval F, Lonjon I, Bastie A, et al. Liver iron accumulation in patients with chronic active hepatitis C: prevalence and role of hemochromatosis gene mutations and relationship with hepatic histological lesions. J Hepatol. 1999;31:979–84.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  89. Martinelli AL, Franco RF, Villanova MG, Figueiredo JF, Secaf M, Tavella MH, et al. Are haemochromatosis mutations related to the severity of liver disease in hepatitis C virus infection? Acta Haematol. 2000;102:152–6.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  90. Marcolongo M, Young B, Dal Pero F, Fattovich G, Peraro L, Guido M, et al. A seven-gene signature (cirrhosis risk score) predicts liver fibrosis progression in patients with initially mild chronic hepatitis C. Hepatology. 2009;50:1038–44.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  91. • Trepo E, Potthoff A, Pradat P, Bakshi R, Young B, Lagier R, et al. Role of a cirrhosis risk score for the early prediction of fibrosis progression in hepatitis C patients with minimal liver disease. J Hepatol. 2011;55:38–44. This article demonstrated that the cirrhosis risk score was able to predict fibrosis progression in patients with chronic hepatitis C.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  92. Patin E, Kutalik Z, Guergnon J, Bibert S, Nalpas B, Jouanguy E, et al. Genome-wide association study identified variants associated with liver fibrosis progression in HCV-infected patients. J Hepatol. 2012;56:S551.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  93. Richardson MM, Powell EE, Barrie HD, Clouston AD, Purdie DM, Jonsson JR. A combination of genetic polymorphisms increases the risk of progressive disease in chronic hepatitis C. J Med Genet. 2005;42:e45.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  94. Bataller R, North KE, Brenner DA. Genetic polymorphisms and the progression of liver fibrosis: a critical appraisal. Hepatology. 2003;37:493–503.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  95. Marabita F, Aghemo A, De Nicola S, Rumi MG, Cheroni C, Scavelli R, et al. Genetic variation in the interleukin-28B gene is not associated with fibrosis progression in patients with chronic hepatitis C and known date of infection. Hepatology. 2011;54:1127–34.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Disclosure

JA Holmes: none; AJ Thompson: co-inventor of a patent related to the IL28B discovery; has worked as a consultant for Merck, Roche, and Janssen, has received grant support from Merck, Gilead Sciences, and Roche, as well as honoraria from Gilead Sciences, Roche, BMS, Merck, and Janssen. LA Adams: co-applicant on patents for Hepascore and is employed by the University of Western Australia, which has a licensing agreement with Quest Diagnostics Inc. regarding the commercialization of Hepascore; consultant for Merck, Roche, and Janssen, receives honoraria from Gilead Sciences, Roche, BMS, Merck, and Janssen.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Jacinta A. Holmes or Leon A. Adams.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Holmes, J.A., Thompson, A.J. & Adams, L.A. Biomarkers of Fibrosis and Fibrosis Progression in Chronic Hepatitis C. Curr Hepatitis Rep 11, 231–242 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11901-012-0148-0

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11901-012-0148-0

Keywords

Navigation