Abstract
Functional constipation is a very common problem in Western societies. Functional outlet obstruction, part of the spectrum of functional constipation, is suspected when patients present with select symptoms. Diagnosis is commonly made with anorectal manometry, electromyography, and rectal evacuation tests. Abnormal test patterns include poor relaxation and contraction of the anal sphincter in response to attempted defecation and difficult rectal evacuation. Several treatment approaches have been tested in these patients. Biofeedback training is considered the most specific therapeutic modality, and it is particularly attractive because of its safety. This review provides an assessment of the diagnostic tests for functional outlet obstruction and summarizes current options for therapy.
Similar content being viewed by others
References and Recommended Reading
Sonnenberg A, Koch TR: Physician visits in the United States for constipation: 1958–1986. Dig Dis Sci 1989, 34:606–611.
Stewart WF, Liberman JN, Sandler RS, et al.: Epidemiology of constipation (EPOC) study in the United States: relation of clinical subtypes to socioeconomic features. Am J Gastroenterol 1999, 94:3540–3539. A comprehensive study on the epidemiology of constipation.
Thompson WG, Longstreth GF, Drossman DA, et al.: Functional bowel disorders and functional abdominal pain. Gut 1999, 45(suppl II):43–47.
Whitehead WE, Wald A, Diamant NE: Functional disorders of the anus and rectum. Gut 1999, 45(suppl II):55–59.
Rao SSC, Welcher KD, Leistikow JS: Obstructive defecation: failure of rectoanal coordination. Am J Gastroenterol 1998, 93:1042–1050. This study determined different patterns of rectoanal dyssynergia.
Rao SSC, Hatfield R, Soffer E, et al.: Manometric tests of anorectal function in healthy adults. Am J Gastroenterol 1999, 94:773–783.
Savoye G, Leroi AM, Bertot-Sasigneux P, et al.: Does water-perfused catheter overdiagnose anismus compared to balloon probe? Scand J Gastroenterol 2002, 37:1411–1416.
Duthie GS, Bartolo DCC: Anismus: the cause of constipation? Results of investigation and treatment. World J Surg 1992, 16:831–835.
Pinho M, Yoshioka K, Keighley MRB: Long term results of anorectal myectomy for chronic constipation. Br J Surg 1989, 76:1163–1164.
Joo JS, Agachan F, Wolff B, et al.: Initial North American experience with botulinum toxin type A for treatment of anismus. Dis Colon Rectum 1996, 39:1107–1111.
Hallan RI, Williams NS, Melling J, et al.: Treatment of anismus in intractable constipation with botulinum A toxin. Lancet 1988, 2:714–717.
Wald A, Hinds JP, Caruanna BJ: Psychological and physiological characteristics of patients with severe idiopathic constipation. Gastroenterology 1989, 81:879–883.
Nehra V, Bruce BK, Rath-Harvey DM, et al.: Psychological disorders in patients with evacuation disorders and constipation in a tertiary practice. Am J Gastroenterol 2000, 95:1755–1758.
Glia A, Lindberg G: Quality of life in patients with different types of functional constipation. Scan J Gastroenterol 1997, 32:1083–89.
Irvine EJ, Ferrazzi S, Pare P, et al.: Health-related quality of life in functional GI disorders: focus on constipation and resource utilization. Am J Gastroenterol 2002, 97:1986–1993.
Rao SSC, Wellema T, Kempf J, et al.: Symptoms, stool patterns and quality of life in patients with dyssynergic defecation [abstract]. Gastroenterology 2000, 118:A782.
Glia A, Lindberg G, Nilsson LH, et al.: Clinical value of symptom assessment in patients with constipation. Dis Colon Rectum 1999, 42:1401–1410. arge study that examined the correlation between symptoms and abnormalities in physiologic tests in patients with severe constipation. Most patients in this prospective study completed all tests.
Mertz H, Naliboff B, Mayer EA: Symptoms and physiology in severe chronic constipation. Am J Gastroenterol 1999, 94:131–138.
Koch A, Woderholzer WA, Klauser AG, et al.: Symptoms in chronic constipation. Dis Colon Rectum 1997, 40:902–906.
Azpiroz F, Enck P, Whitehead WE: Anorectal functional testing: review of collective experience. Am J Gastroenterol 2002, 97:232–240. This study provides critical assessment of anorectal function tests. The authors review the indications, techniques, and interpretation of various tests in clinical use.
Schouten WR, Briel JW, Auwerda JJA, et al.: Anismus: fact or fiction? Dis Colon Rectum 1997, 40:1033–1041.
Mertz H, Naliboff B, Mayer E: Physiology of refractory chronic constipation. Am J Gastroenterol 1999, 94:609–615.
Glia A, Lindberg G, Nilsson LH, et al.: Constipation assessed on the basis of colorectal physiology. Scand J Gastroenterol 1998, 33:1273–1279.
Rao SSC, Welcher KD, Pelsang RE: Effects of biofeedback therapy on anorectal function in obstructive defecation. Dig Dis Sci 1997, 42:2197–2205.
Emmanuel AB, Kamm MA: Response to a behavioral treatment, biofeedback in constipated patients is associated with improved gut transit and autonomic innervation. Gut 2001, 49:214–219.
Wiesel PH, Cuypers P, Herranz M, et al.: Patient satisfaction after biofeedback for constipation and pelvic floor dyssinergia. Swiss Med Wkly 2001, 131:152–156. Long follow-up of large study in patients undergoing biofeedback therapy. The study highlights the dissociation between symptomatic response and normalization of anorectal function tests.
Van der Plas RN, Benninga MA, Buller HA, et al.: Biofeedback training in treatment of childhood constipation: a randomised controlled study. Lancet 1996, 348:776–780. A controlled study of biofeedback in children. It shows that clinical improvement with conventional therapy for constipation is comparable with conventional therapy plus biofeedback, regardless of the impact on anorectal tests.
Glia A, Gylin M, Gullberg K, et al.: Biofeedback retraining in patients with functional constipation and paradoxical puborectalis contraction: comparison of anal manometry and sphincter electromyography for feedback. Dis Colon Rectum 1997, 40:998–995.
Heymen S, Wexner S, Vickers D, et al.: Prospective, randomized trial comparing four biofeedback techniques for patients with constipation. Dis Colon Rectum 1999, 42:1388–1393.
McKee RF, McEnroe L, Anderson JH, et al.: Identification of patients likely to benefit from biofeedback for outlet obstruction constipation. Br J Surgery 1999, 86:355–359.
Lau CW, Heymen S, Alabaz O, et al.: Prognostic significance of rectocele, intussusception, and abnormal perineal descent in biofeedback treatment for constipated patients with paradoxical puborectalis contraction. Dis Colon Rectum 2000, 43:478–482.
Rhee PL, Choi MS, Jun YH, et al.: An increased rectal maximum tolerable volume and long anal canal are associated with poor short-term response to biofeedback therapy for patients with anismus with decreased bowel frequency and normal colonic transit time. Dis Colon Rectum 2000, 43:1405–1411.
Karlbom U, Hallden M, Eeg-Olofsson KE, et al.: Results of biofeedback in constipated patients: a prospective study. Dis Colon Rectum 1997, 40:1149–1155.
Park UC, Choi SK, Piccirillo MF, et al.: Patterns of anismus and the relation to biofeedback therapy. Dis Colon Rectum 1996, 39:768–773.
Mason HJ, Serrano-Ikkos, Kamm MA: Psychological state and quality of life in patients having behavioral treatment (biofeedback) for intractable constipation. Am J Gastroenterol 2002, 97:3154–3159.
Maria G, Brisinda G, Bentivoglio AR, et al.: Botulinum toxin in the treatment of outlet obstruction constipation caused by puborectalis syndrome. Dis Colon Rectum 2000, 43:376–380.
Ron Y, Avni Y, Lukovetski A, et al.: Botulinum toxin type A in therapy of patients with anismus. Dis Colon Rectum 2001, 44:1821–1826.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Sanmiguel, C.P., Soffer, E.E. Constipation caused by functional outlet obstruction. Curr Gastroenterol Rep 5, 414–418 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11894-003-0055-1
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11894-003-0055-1