Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Randomized controlled clinical trials of psychological interventions to improve glycemic control in pediatric and adult patients with T1DM

  • Clinical Trials Report
  • Published:
Current Diabetes Reports Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  1. American Diabetes Association: Standards of medical care in diabetes—2006. Diabetes Care 2006, 29(suppl 1):S4–S42.

    Google Scholar 

  2. American Diabetes Association: Care of children and adolescents with type 1 diabetes. Diabetes Care 2005, 28:186–212.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. The effect of intensive treatment of diabetes on the development and progression of long-term complications in insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus. Diabetes Control and Complications Trial (DCCT) Research Group [no authors listed]. N Engl J Med 1993, 329:977–986.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Beneficial effect of intensive therapy of diabetes during adolescence; Outcomes after the conclusion of the Diabetes Control and Complications Trial (DCCT). Epidemiology of Diabetes Interventions and Complications (EDIC) Research Group [no authors listed]. J Pediatr 2001, 139:804–812.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Lorenzi G: Post-study access to health care has influenced glycemic control in the DCCT Cohort: EDIC follow-up study [abstract]. Diabetes 1996, 45(Suppl 2):7A.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Weinger K, Jacobson AM: Psychosocial and quality of life correlates of glycemic control during intensive treatment of type 1 diabetes. Patient Educ Couns 2001, 42:123–131.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Peyrot M, Rubin RR, Lauritzen T, et al.: Psychosocial problems and barriers to improved diabetes management: results of the Cross-national Diabetes Attitudes, Wishes and Needs (DAWN) Study. Diabet Med 2005, 22:1379–1385.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Cochran W: The comparison of percentages in matched samples Biometrika 1950, 37:256–266.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Schulz K, Chalmers I, Hayes R, Altman D: Empirical evidence for bias: dimensions of methodological quality associated with estimates of treatment effects in controlled trials. JAMA 1995, 273:408–412.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Jadad A, Moore R, Carroll D, et al.: Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: is blinding necessary?. Control Clin Trials 1996, 17:1–12.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Moher D, Schulz K, Altman D: The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel-group randomised trials. Lancet 2001, 357:1191–1194.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Funnell MM, Anderson RM: Patient empowerment: a look back, a look ahead. Diabetes Educ 2003, 29:454–458, 460.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Anderson BJ, Brackett J, Ho J, et al.: An office-based intervention to maintain parent-adolescent teamwork in diabetes management. Impact on parent involvement, family conflict, and subsequent glycemic control. Diabetes Care 1999, 22:713–721.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Svoren B, Butler D, Levine B, et al.: Reducing acute adverse outcomes in youths with type 1 diabetes: a randomized, controlled trial. Pediatrics 2003, 112:914–922.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Anderson, B.J. Randomized controlled clinical trials of psychological interventions to improve glycemic control in pediatric and adult patients with T1DM. Curr Diab Rep 7, 101–103 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11892-007-0018-2

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11892-007-0018-2

Keywords

Navigation