Skip to main content
Log in

Upgrading of pyrolysis bio-oil using WO3/ZrO2 and Amberlyst catalysts: Evaluation of acid number and viscosity

  • Catalysis, Reaction Engineering
  • Published:
Korean Journal of Chemical Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Tungstated zirconia (WO3/ZrO2 with WO3 loadings of 9.9 (WZ9.9), 15.5 (WZ15.5), and 15.7 wt% (WZ15.7)) and Amberlyst (15, 35, 36, 39 and 45) catalysts were employed to upgrade pyrolysis bio-oil of acacia sawdust through an esterification reaction using methanol at atmospheric pressure and room temperature or 80 °C. The upgrading efficiency was evaluated by measuring the total acid number (TAN) and viscosity. The viscosity and TAN of the resulting upgraded bio-oil were found to be dependent on the calcination temperature of the WO3/ZrO2 catalysts. At room temperature, the largest decrease in viscosity and TAN of the bio-oil and methanol mixture was obtained using WZ9.9 tungstated zirconia calcined at 900 °C. An increase in reaction temperature to 80 °C improved the flowability and TAN of the methanol-added bio-oil using WZ9.9 activated at 900 °C. The product distribution of the bio-oil upgraded using methanol revealed esterification to be the dominant reaction pathway under the reaction conditions of this study. When the ether extracted bio-oil was upgraded at 80 °C using methanol over catalysts, the Amberlyst catalysts were found more effective than tungstated zirconia catalysts in enhancing the esterification reaction and reducing TAN.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. H. B. Kim and J. H. Park, Int. J. Urban Sci., 18, 373 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. D. Park, N. S. Kim, H. Park and K. Kim, Int. J. Urban Sci., 16, 85 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. S. S. Kim, H.V. Ly, B.H. Chun, J. H. Ko and J. Kim, Korean J. Chem. Eng., 33, 3128 (2016).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Y.M. Kim, B.S. Kim, K.S. Chea, T.S. Jo, S. Kim and Y.K. Park, Appl. Chem. Eng., 27, 407 (2016).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. N. Lohitharn and B.H. Shanks, Catal. Commun., 11, 96 (2009).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. X. Li, R. Gunawan, C. Lievens, Y. Wang, D. Mourant, S. Wang, H. Wu, M. Garcia-Perez and C. Z. Li, Fuel, 90, 2530 (2011).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. S. H. Park, H. J. Cho, C. Ryu and Y. K. Park, J. Ind. Eng. Chem., 36, 314 (2016).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Y. Wei, H. Lei, L. Wang, L. Zhu, X. Zhang, Y. Liu, S. Chen and B. Ahring, Energy Fuels, 28, 1207 (2014).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. H. Lee, Y. M. Kim, I. G. Lee, J. K. Jeon, S. C. Jung, J.D. Chung, W. G. Choi and Y. K. Park, Korean J. Chem. Eng., 33, 3299 (2016).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. E.H. Lee, R. S. Park, H. Kim, S. H. Park, S. C. Jung, J. K. Jeon, S. C. Kim and Y.K. Park, J. Ind. Eng. Chem., 37, 18 (2016).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Z. Yang, A. Kumar and R. L. Huhnke, Renew. Sust. Energy Rev., 50, 859 (2015).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. J. H. Choi, S. S. Kim, D. J. Suh, E. J. Jang, K. I. Min and H.C. Woo, Korean J. Chem. Eng., 33, 2691 (2016).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. H.C. Park, H.S. Choi and J.E. Lee, Korean J. Chem. Eng., 33, 1159 (2016).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. D. Mohan, C.U. Pittman, Jr. and P. H. Steele, Energy Fuels, 20, 848 (2006).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. G.W. Huber, S. Iborra and A. Corma, Chem. Rev., 106, 4044 (2006).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. S. Xiu and A. Shahbazi, Renew. Sust. Energy Rev., 16, 4406 (2012).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Z. Zhang, S. Sui, F. Wang, Q. Wang and C.U. Pittman, Jr., Energies, 6, 4531 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. X. Jiang, Z. Zhong, N. Ellis and Q. Wang, Chem. Eng. Technol., 34, 727 (2011).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. D. Chen, J. Zhou, Q. Zhang and X. Zhu, Renew. Sust. Energy Rev., 40, 69 (2014).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. F. Wenting, L. Ronghou, Z. Weiqi, M. Yuanfei and Y. Renzhan, Int. J. Agric. Biol. Eng., 7, 83 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  21. L. Ciddor, J. A. Bennett, J. A. Hunns, K. Wilson and A. F. Lee, J. Chem. Technol. Biotechol., 90, 780 (2015).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. X. Zhang, Q. Zhang, T. Wang, B. Li, Y. Xu and L. Ma, Fuel, 179, 312 (2016).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. O. Ilgen, Fuel Process. Technol., 124, 134 (2014).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. P. Weerachanchai, C. Tangsathitkulchai and M. Tangsathitkulchai, Korean J. Chem. Eng., 29, 182 (2012).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. M.M.R. Talukder, J. C. Wu, S. K. Lau, L. C. Cui, G. Shimin and A. Lim, Energy Fuels, 23, 1 (2009).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Young-Kwon Park.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Lee, Y., Shafaghat, H., Kim, Jk. et al. Upgrading of pyrolysis bio-oil using WO3/ZrO2 and Amberlyst catalysts: Evaluation of acid number and viscosity. Korean J. Chem. Eng. 34, 2180–2187 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11814-017-0126-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11814-017-0126-x

Keywords

Navigation