Abstract
The rbcL gene of Ulva pertusa, Enteromorpha prolifera and Monostroma grevillei was amplified, sequenced and analyzed. By comparing the rbcL sequences with seven other Ulvales species retrieved from GenBank, the sequence divergences and the phyletic evolution were analyzed and the phylogenetic tree was constructed. From the phylogenetic tree, it can be found that U. pertusa, E. prolifera and U. californica group in one branch, while E. compressa, U. rigida and U. fenestrata cluster in another clade. Obviously, unlike the Enteomorpha species, the Ulva species do not gather in one branch. Therefore Ulva and Enteomorpha might be affiliates of one genus. E. compressa and E. intestinalis gathered together, which coincided with the morphological characters. However, the thallus of U. pertusa is thick and with many holes, which is different from E. prolifera in morphology. They cluster together in the phylogenetic tree with a genetic distance of 0.005. The results indicate that Ulva and Enteromorpha are not distinguished strictly.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Agardh, J. G., 1883. Till algernes systematik. Nya bidrag. Naturvetensk, 19: 1–177.
Freshwater, D. W., and Rueness, J., 1994. Phylogenetic relationships of some European Gelidium (Gelidiales, Rhodphyta) species, based on rbcL nucleotide sequence analysis. Phycologia, 33: 187–194.
Freshwater, D. W., Fredericq, S., and Hommersand, M. H., 1995. A molecular phylogeny of the Gelidiales (Rhodophyta) based on analysis of plastid rbcL nucleotide sequences. J. Phycol., 31: 616–632.
Hall, T. A., 1999. BioEdit: a user friendly biological sequence alignment editor and analysis program for Windows 95/ 98/ NT. Nucleic Acids Symposium Series, 41: 95–98.
Hayden, H. S., and Waaland, J. R., 2002. Phylogenetic systematics of the Ulvaceae (Ulvales, Ulvophyceae) using chloroplast and nuclear DNA sequences. J. Phycol., 38: 1200–1212.
Hayden, H. S., Blomster, J., and Maggs, C. A., 2003. Linnaeus was right all along: Ulva and Enteromorpha are not distinct genera. Eur. J. Phycol., 38: 277–294.
Hayden, H. S., and Waaland, J. R., 2004. A molecular systematic study of Ulva (Ulvaceae, Ulvales) from the northeast Pacific. Phycologia, 43: 364–382.
Hommersand, M. H., Fredericq, S., and Freshwater, D. W., 1999. Recent developments in the systematics of the Gigartinaceae (Gigartinales, Rhodophyta) based on rbcL sequence analysis and morphological evidence. Phycol. Res., 47: 139–151.
Kumar, S., Tamura, K., and Jakobsen, I. B., 2001. MEGA 2: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis software. Bioinformation, 17: 1244–1245.
Linnaeus, C., 1753. Species planarum. Salvii, Stockholm. 1: 1–30.
Shen, S. D., 2005. Marine chlorophyta genetics. In: The Genetics of Marine Algae. Zhang, X. C., et al., eds., Chinese Agriculture Press, Beijing, 108–124.
Tseng, C. K., 1983. Common Seaweeds of China. Science Press, Beijing, 316pp.
van Oppen, M. J. H., Draisma, S. G. A., and Olsen, J. L., 1995. Multiple transarctic passages in the red alga Phycodrys rubens: evidence from nuclear rDNA ITS sequences. Mar. Biol., 123(1): 179–188.
Wang, J. W., Lin, A. P., and Li, Y. Y., 2006. Microscopic observation on the development of Enteromorpha prolifera (Chlorophyta). Ecol. Sci., 25(5): 400–404.
Yang, J., Wang, Q., Liu, M. H., and An, L. J., 1999. A simple method for extracting total DNA of seaweeds. Biotechnology, 9(4): 39–42.
Yoshida, T., 1998. Marine Algae of Japan. Uchida Rokakuho Publishing, Tokyo, 25–122.
Zeng, C. K., Zhang, D. R., and Zhang, J. F., 1962. Chinese Economic Seaweed. Science Press, Beijing, 42pp.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Shen, S., Li, Y., Wu, X. et al. Sequences and phylogeny analysis of rbcL gene in marine chlorophyta. J. Ocean Univ. China 9, 145–150 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11802-010-0145-2
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11802-010-0145-2