Skip to main content
Log in

Intellectual Property Issues in Archaeological Publication: Some Questions to Consider

  • Forum
  • Published:
Archaeologies Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

For the past 4 years, in concert with a growing number of colleagues, we have been examining intellectual property issues within archaeology and the larger realm of cultural heritage. This topic is garnering increased attention as archaeologists, descendent communities, and other stakeholders grapple with difficult questions about the uses and abuses of cultural knowledge and research data. Our work seeks to identify the issues, examine the circumstances under which they arise, and disseminate policies and practices that lead to a better understanding of what is at stake and how to approach a resolution. Here we are commenting on what questions might be considered in a situation in which photographs portraying tribal members or cultural sites taken during the course of a project conducted on tribal land in the United States are to be printed as part of a public site report or other publication. Thinking through these issues beforehand can result in positive resolution and also promote increased awareness of and sensitivity to actual or potential intellectual property issues related to archaeological practice.

Résumé

Ces quatre dernières années, de concert avec un nombre toujours plus important de collègues, nous avons examiné les problèmes liés à la propriété intellectuelle dans le cadre de l’archéologie et du domaine de l'héritage culturel. Ce sujet recueille une attention soutenue, car les archéologues, et d’autres parties prenantes, luttent contre les difficiles questions relatives à l’utilisation et l’abus de la connaissance culturelle et des données de recherche. Notre travail consiste à identifier les problèmes, examiner les circonstances dans lesquelles elles se posent et disséminer les politiques et les pratiques qui amènent une meilleure compréhension de ce qui est en jeu, et en dernier lieu comment élaborer une résolution. Nous commentons ici les questions qui doivent être considérées au sujet des photographies de membres tribaux ou de sites culturels prises à l'occasion d'un projet archéologique; si elles doivent ou non être imprimées en tant que rapport public ou dans le cadre d’autres publications. Réfléchir à ces problèmes à l’avance peut résulter en une résolution positive et également promouvoir une prise de conscience plus aiguë d’un domaine important des problèmes de propriété intellectuelle liés à la pratique archéologique.

Resúmen

En los últimos cuatro años, hemos estudiado, en colaboración con un grupo de colegas cada vez más nutrido, algunas cuestiones relacionadas con la propiedad intelectual de la arqueología y con el campo más amplio del patrimonio cultural. Este tema está recibiendo cada vez más atención ahora que los arqueólogos, comunidades descendientes y otros interesados se enfrentan a cuestiones de difícil respuesta sobre los usos y los abusos de los conocimientos culturales y los datos de investigación. Con este trabajo pretendemos identificar los problemas, examinar las circunstancias que los han originado y difundir las políticas y las prácticas que han propiciado un mejor entendimiento de lo que está en juego y cómo adoptar una resolución. En él hablamos sobre las cuestiones que podrían considerarse si se dieran determinadas situaciones, como por ejemplo, en caso de imprimirse fotos de miembros tribales o lugares culturales durante el curso de un proyecto arqueológico para incluirlas en un informe público sobre el sitio o en otra publicación. Recapacitar sobre estas situaciones antes de que ocurran puede ayudar a alcanzar una resolución positiva y fomentar también la concienciación y la sensibilidad en el importante asunto de los derechos de propiedad intelectual relacionados con la arqueología.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References Cited

  • Bendremer, J.C., and K.A. Richman 2006. Human Subjects Review and Archaeology: A View from Indian Country. In: The Ethics of Archaeology: Philosophical Perspectives on Archaeological Practice, edited by C. Scarre and G. Scarre, pp. 97–114. Cambridge University Press.

  • Brown, M. 2003. Who Owns Native Culture. Harvard University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carson, C.A. 1997. Laser Bones: Copyright Issues Raised by the Use of Information Technology in Archaeology. Harvard Journal of Law and Technology 10(2):281–319.

    Google Scholar 

  • McLay, E., K. Bannister, L. Joe, B. Thom, and G. Nicholas 2008. ‘A’lhut Tu Sul’Hweentst [Respecting the Ancestors]: Understanding Hul’qumi’num Heritage Laws and Concerns for the Protection of Archaeological Heritage. In: Our Voices, Our Culture, edited by C. Bell, and V. Napoleon, pp. 150–202. UBC Press, Vancouver (forthcoming).

  • Nicholas, G.P., and K.P. Bannister 2004. ‘Copyrighting the Past?’: Emerging Intellectual Property Rights Issues in Archaeology. Current Anthropology 45(3):327–350.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nicholas, G.P., and J. Hollowell 2006. Intellectual Property Rights in Archaeology. In: Archaeological Ethics, 2nd ed., edited by K. D. Vitelli and C. Colwell-Chanthaphonh, pp. 206–211. AltaMira Press, Lanham, MD.

  • Noble, B. 2007. Justice, Transaction, Translation: Blackfoot Tipi Transfers and WIPO’s Search for the Facts of Traditional Knowledge Exchange. American Anthropologist 109(2):338–349.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • University Press of Florida 2003. Manuscript Preparation Guidelines for Authors. University Press of Florida, Gainesville, http://www.upf.com/submissionguidelines.asp. Accessed 2 July 2008

  • Watkins, J., and T.J. Ferguson 2005. Working with and Working for Indigenous Communities. In: Handbook of Archaeological Methods, Volume 2, edited by H.D.G. Maschner and C. Chippindale, pp. 1372–1406. Walnut Creek, California: AltaMira Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

Portions of this article appeared in The Midden, 39(4): 10–15, the publication of the Archaeological Society of British Columbia, and we thank the editors for supporting the use of the material here. We want to thank all those involved in the case that prompted this inquiry for raising these issues so that we can all learn from them. We also benefited from the review and suggestions of legal scholar Jane Anderson, whose specialties include intellectual property issues relating to Aboriginal peoples, archival policies, and the public domain.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Julie Hollowell.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hollowell, J., Nicholas, G. Intellectual Property Issues in Archaeological Publication: Some Questions to Consider . Arch 4, 208–217 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11759-008-9073-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11759-008-9073-9

Keywords

Navigation