Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Ultrasound optic nerve sheath diameter evaluation in patients undergoing robot-assisted laparoscopic pelvic surgery

  • Letter to the Editor
  • Published:
Journal of Robotic Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Following the interesting reading of the article “A randomised trial to compare the increase in intracranial pressure as correlated with the optic nerve sheath diameter during propofol versus sevoflurane-maintained anesthesia in robot-assisted laparoscopic pelvic surgery”, the authors comment some aspects about ocular ultrasonography to measure optic nerve sheath diameter as a tool to detect potential intracranial hypertension, pointing out the utility of Standardized A Scan technique for this purpose.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Sujata N, Tobin R, Tamhankar A, Gautam G, Yatoo AH (2019) A randomised trial to compare the increase in intracranial pressure as correlated with the optic nerve sheath diameter during propofol versus sevoflurane-maintained anesthesia in robot-assisted laparoscopic pelvic surgery. J Robot Surg 13:267–273

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. De Bernardo M, Rosa N (2018) Transbulbar B-mode sonography in multiple sclerosis: clinical and biological relevance. Ultrasound Med Biol 44:508

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. De Bernardo M, Rosa N (2017) Clarification on using ultrasonography to detect intracranial pressure. JAMA Ophthalmol 135:1004–1005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. De Bernardo M, Marotta G, Rosa N (2018) Sonography of the optic nerve sheath diameter. J Ultrasound Med 37:1845

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. De Bernardo M, Rosa N (2018) Transorbital sonography to evaluate optic nerve in hypertensive encephalopathy. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis 27:1124

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Rosa N, De Bernardo M (2017) Measurement of the optic nerve in a resource-limited setting. J Neurosci Rural Pract 8:310–311

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Tenuta M, De Bernardo M, Rosa N (2017) Comments on “Neuromuscular ultrasonography of cranial nerves”. J Clin Neurol 13:212–213

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. De Bernardo M, Vitiello L, Rosa N (2019) Optic nerve ultrasonography to predict increased intracranial pressure in idiopathic intracranial hypertension. Neuroradiol J. https://doi.org/10.1177/1971400919832001

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. De Bernardo M, Vitiello L, Rosa N (2019) Optic nerve ultrasound measurement in multiple sclerosis. Acta Neurol Scand 139:399–400

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Rosa N, Lanza M, Borrelli M, De Bernardo M, Palladino A, Di Gregorio MG, Pascotto F, Politano L (2011) Low intraocular pressure resulting from ciliary body detachment in patients with myotonic dystrophy. Ophthalmology 118:260–264

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. De Bernardo M, Salerno G, Cornetta P, Rosa N (2018) Axial length shortening after cataract surgery: new approach to solve the question. Transl Vis Sci Technol 7:34

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. De Bernardo M, Vitiello L, Rosa N (2019) Comment on “Effectiveness and safety of accelerated (9 mW/cm(2)) corneal collagen cross-linking for progressive keratoconus: a 24-month follow-up”. Eye (Lond). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41433-019-0370-x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Rosa N, De Bernardo M (2017) Ultrasound assessment of optic nerve sheath diameter in healthy volunteers. J Crit Care 40:279

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. De Bernardo M, Rosa N (2018) Measuring optic nerve sheath diameter as a proxy for intracranial pressure. JAMA Ophthalmol 136:1309–1310

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. De Bernardo M, Rosa N (2018) Optic nerve sheath diameter measurement in patients with idiopathic normal-pressure hydrocephalus. Eur J Neurol 25:e24

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. De Bernardo M, Rosa N (2018) Comment on ‘Invasive and noninvasive means of measuring intracranial pressure: a review’. Physiol Meas 39:058001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. De Bernardo M, Rosa N (2018) Comment on “optic nerve sheath diameter ultrasound evaluation in intensive care unit: possible role and clinical aspects in neurological critical patients’ daily monitoring”. Biomed Res Int 2018:6154357

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Iaconetta G, De Bernardo M, Rosa N (2017) Coronal axis measurement of the optic nerve sheath diameter. J Ultrasound Med 36:1073

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. De Bernardo M, Vitiello L, Rosa N (2019) Intracranial pressure evaluation in acute liver failure. Neurocrit Care 30:495–496

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. De Bernardo M, Vitiello L, Rosa N (2019) Ocular ultrasound assessment to estimate the risk of increased intracranial pressure after traumatic brain injury in prehospital setting. Prehosp Emerg Care 11:1–2

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

None.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Maddalena De Bernardo.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

Maddalena De Bernardo, Livio Vitiello and Nicola Rosa declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Research involving human participants and/or animals

This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.

Informed consent

Not applicable.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

De Bernardo, M., Vitiello, L. & Rosa, N. Ultrasound optic nerve sheath diameter evaluation in patients undergoing robot-assisted laparoscopic pelvic surgery. J Robotic Surg 13, 709–710 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11701-019-00966-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11701-019-00966-7

Keywords

Navigation