Skip to main content
Log in

Molecular identification of sex in Hippophae rhamnoides L. using isozyme and RAPD markers

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Forestry Studies in China

Abstract

In many dioecious plants, gender affects economic value, breeding schemes and opportunities for commercial harvests. Hippophae rhamnoides L. is a dioecious plant species in which female genotypes are commercially preferred over male genotypes. Its berries have rich medicinal, nutritional and pharmaceutical properties because of their large amounts of vitamins, essential oils, proteins, fatty acids, free amino acids and flavanoids. Primary limitation for breeding H. rhamnoides L. is its dioecious nature, since gender cannot be identified by traditional methods. Therefore, some reliable and quick methods need to be developed. This communication deals with the development of isozyme and RAPD markers for early sex identification in this dioecious tree. The isozyme analysis was conducted with four enzyme systems, viz. peroxidase, esterase, malate dehydrogenase and catalase. The peroxidase enzyme system produced a female specific sex marker, which successfully differentiated between the staminate and pistillate genotypes of H. rhamnoides L. Thirty five random decamer primers were used in our study and one male sex linked marker was identified. OPD-20 (5′-ACTTCGCCAC-3′) displayed a band at 911 bp that expressed polymorphism between male and female genotypes. The staminate and pistillate genotypes could be distinguished using RAPD marker OPD-20911. These results revealed the immense potential of peroxidase isozyme patterns and RAPD as genetic markers for sex identification in H. rhamnoides L.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aggarwal V, Sharma K, Gupta S, Kumar R, Parsed M. 2007. Identification of sex chromosome in Simmondsia chinensis (Jojoba) using RAPD markers. Plant Biotechnol Rep, 1: 207–210

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alstrom R C, Lascoux M, Wang Y C, Roberts G, Tiskan G A. 1998. Identification of a RAPD marker linked to sex determination in the basket willow (Salix viminalis L.). J Hered, 89: 44–49

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Banerjee N S, Manoj P, Das M R. 1999. Male sex associated marker in Piper longum L. Curr Sci, 77: 692–695

    Google Scholar 

  • Buhatel T, Vesa S, Morar R. 1991. Data on the action of seabuckthorn oil extract in cicatrization of wounds in animals. Buletinulinstituhii Agronomic Chij Napoea Seria Zootohnic Si Medicina Veterinaria, 45: 129–133

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen J H. 1991. Effect of the immuno modulating agents (BCG) and the juice of HRL in the activity of splenic NK cells and LAK cells from tumour bearing mice. Chin J Microbiol Immunol, 11: 105–108

    Google Scholar 

  • Conkle M T. 1981. Isozyme variation and linkage in some conifer species. In: Conkle M T (ed). Proceeding Symposium of Isozymes: North America Forest Trees and Forest Insects. Berkly. California: Gen Tech Rep, PSW-48

    Google Scholar 

  • Davies J. 1964. Disc electrophoresis II. Methods and application of human serum proteins. Ann New York Acad Sci, 121: 404–427

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Doyle J J, Doyle J. 1987. A rapid DNA isolation procedure from small quantities of fresh leaf tissue. Phytochem Bull, 19: 11–15

    Google Scholar 

  • Ganeshaiah K N, Ravishankar K V, Anand L, Shibhu M P, Shaanker U. 2002. Identification of sex specific DNA markers in the dioecious tree, nutmeg (Myristica fragrans Houtt.). PGR News Letter, 121: 59–61

    Google Scholar 

  • Georg J, Karun A, Manimekali R, Rajesh M K, Remya P. 2007. Identification of RAPD marker linked to sex determination in palmyrah (Borassus flabellifer L.). Curr Sci, 93: 1075–1077

    Google Scholar 

  • Hirsch A M, Fortune D, Chalak L, Lagave J M, Chat J, Monet R. 1997. Peroxidase test: A test for sex screening in kiwifruit seedlings. Acta Horticult, 444: 89–95

    Google Scholar 

  • Hormaza J L, Dollo, Polito V S. 1994. Identification of RAPD marker linked to sex determination on Pistachoio vera using bulk segregant analysis. Theor App Genet, 89: 9–13

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Jeppsson N. 1999. Genetic variation and fruit quality in Seabuckthorn and black chokeberry. Doctoral Thesis. Kristianstad, Sweden: Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences

    Google Scholar 

  • Kahlem G. 1976. Isolation and localization of histoimmunology of isoperoxidase specific for male flowers of dioecious species Mercurialis annua. Dev Biol, 50: 58–67

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lbeda A. 2003. Danube Seabuckthorn populations, valuable for selections. In: Singh V, Khosla P K (eds). Proceedings of International Workshop on Seabuckthorn. New Delhi, 8–21

  • Lee T T. 1973. Extraction and quantification of plant peroxidase isoenzymes. Physiol Plants, 29: 198–203

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Legrnand B, Bouazza A. 1991. Changes in peroxidase and IAA-oxidase activities during adventitious bud formation from small root explants of Cichorium intybus L.: Influence of glucose. J Plant Phys, 138: 102–106

    Google Scholar 

  • Ornstein L. 1964. Disc electrophoresis I. background and theory. Ann New York Acad Sci, 121: 321–349

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Persson H A, Nybom H. 1998. Genetic sex determination and RAPD marker segregation in the dioecious species, seabuckthorn (Hippophae rhamnoides L.). Hered Land, 129: 45–51

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ruan C J, Li D Q. 2000. Function and benefits of seabuckthorn improving eco environment of loess plateaus. Environ Prot, 5: 30–31

    Google Scholar 

  • Ruan C J, Xie Q L. 2001. Preliminary report on seabuckthorn variety introduction at beach in Vancheng City. Hippophae, 14: 15–19

    Google Scholar 

  • Scandalios J G. 1969. Genetic control of multiple molecular forms of enzymes in plants: a review. Biochem Genet, 3: 37–79

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Shaw C R, Prasad R. 1970. Starch gel electrophoresis of enzymes: a compilation of recipes. Biochem Genet, 4: 297–320

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Shirkot P. 2000. Studies on sex and cultivar identification of Actinidia deliciosa through molecular markers. Doctoral Thesis. Solan, H. P., India: Dr. Y.S. Parmar University of Horticulture and Forestry

    Google Scholar 

  • Shirkot P, Sharma D R, Mohapatra T. 2002. Molecular identification of sex in Actinidia deliciosa var. deliciosa by RAPD markers. Sci Hort, 94: 33–39

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Singh M, Kumar S, Singh A K, Kalloo G. 2002. Female sex associated marker in pointed ground (Trichosanthes dioica Roxb.). Curr Sci, 82: 131–132

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Singh V. 1998. Seabuckthorn: a wonder plant of dry temperate Himalayas. Indian Horticult, 6–9

  • Synge P M. 1974. Dictionary of Gardening: A Practical and Scientific Encyclopaepedia of Horticulture. 2nd ed. Oxford: Clarendon Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Walf D, Wegart F. 1993. Experience gained in the harvesting and utilization of seabuckthorn. In: Cultivation and Utilization of Wild Fruit Crops. Germany: Ernhard Thalacker veriage Gmbh & Co., 22–29

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams J G K, Kubelik A R, Livak K J, Rafalski J A, Tingsey S V. 1990. DNA polymorphism amplified by arbitrary primers are useful as genetic markers. Nucl Acid Res, 18: 6531–6535

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Poonam Shirko.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Sharma, A., Zinta, G., Rana, S. et al. Molecular identification of sex in Hippophae rhamnoides L. using isozyme and RAPD markers. For. Stud. China 12, 62–66 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11632-010-0012-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11632-010-0012-7

Key words

Navigation