Abstract
Introduction
Surgery is the mainstay of treatment of anal fistulas. Low fistulas are often laid open, but higher fistulas present a more difficult problem. Patient choice centres on a compromise between risk of recurrence and risk of impairment of continence. We aimed to determine the efficacy and safety of fistulotomy at a tertiary referral centre, in particular the additional risk of impairment of continence following fistulotomy of the often recurrent, multiply-operated patients seen.
Methods
Patients undergoing surgery under the senior author (RKSP) for an anal fistula during the study period (2005–2006) were identified, and a thorough review of the patients' clinical records was undertaken. Demographic, fistula anatomy, treatment and follow-up data were obtained.
Results
Eighty-four patients underwent either fistulotomy (50), insertion of permanent loose (drainage) seton (28) or EUA with or without drainage of abscess. Mean length of follow up was 11 months (SD 14.22). In the fistulotomy group, we found an overall success rate of 93 %. Secondary extensions were associated with failure to achieve cure (P = 0.008). Nine patients (20 %) suffered deterioration in continence after surgery. A longer time to referral was associated with impaired final continence. In the group referred from a surgeon in secondary care, 91 % of patients were cured, and continence impairment (mostly minor) rose from 32 % at referral to 40 % after surgery.
Conclusions
We have shown that it is safe and reasonable to offer fistulotomy to appropriate patients despite previous surgery and within the tertiary setting. By so doing, a very high rate of healing can be achieved in patients who have previously failed. The additional risk of impairment of continence is around one in five, and in the majority will represent only minor incontinence.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Parks AG. Pathogenesis and treatment of fistuila-in-ano. Br Med J 1961 Feb 18;1(5224):463–9.
Rojanasakul A. LIFT procedure: a simplified technique for fistula-in-ano. Tech Coloproctol 2009 Sep;13(3):237–40.
Shanwani A, Nor AM, Amri N. Ligation of the intersphincteric fistula tract (LIFT): a sphincter-saving technique for fistula-in-ano. Dis Colon Rectum 2010 Jan;53(1):39–42.
Ortiz H, Marzo J, Ciga MA, Oteiza F, Armendariz P, de M. Randomized clinical trial of anal fistula plug versus endorectal advancement flap for the treatment of high cryptoglandular fistula in ano. Br J Surg 2009 Jun;96(6):608–12.
Perez F, Arroyo A, Serrano P, Sanchez A, Candela F, Perez MT, et al. Randomized clinical and manometric study of advancement flap versus fistulotomy with sphincter reconstruction in the management of complex fistula-in-ano. Am J Surg 2006 Jul;192(1):34–40.
Yeung JM, Simpson JA, Tang SW, Armitage NC, Maxwell-Armstrong C. Fibrin glue for the treatment of fistulae in ano–a method worth sticking to? Colorectal Dis 2010 Apr;12(4):363–6.
Christoforidis D. Who benefits from the anal fistula plug? Dis Colon Rectum 2010 Aug;53(8):1105–6.
Vial M, Pares D, Pera M, Grande L. Faecal incontinence after seton treatment for anal fistulae with and without surgical division of internal anal sphincter: a systematic review. Colorectal Dis 2010 Mar;12(3):172–8.
Atkin GK, Martins J, Tozer P, Ranchod P, Phillips RK. For many high anal fistulas, lay open is still a good option. Tech Coloproctol 2011 Jun;15(2):143–50.
Lunniss PJ, Kamm MA, Phillips RK. Factors affecting continence after surgery for anal fistula. Br J Surg 1994 Sep;81(9):1382–5.
Ommer A, Wenger FA, Rolfs T, Walz MK. Continence disorders after anal surgery–a relevant problem? Int J Colorectal Dis 2008 Nov;23(11):1023–31.
Bennet RC, Goligher JC. Results of internal sphincterotomy for anal fissure. Br Med J 1962 Dec 8;2(5318):1500–3.
Vaizey CJ, Carapeti E, Cahill JA, Kamm MA. Prospective comparison of faecal incontinence grading systems. Gut 1999 Jan;44(1):77–80.
Jorge JM, Wexner SD. Etiology and management of fecal incontinence. Dis Colon Rectum 1993 Jan;36(1):77–97.
Bleier JI, Moloo H, Goldberg SM. Ligation of the intersphincteric fistula tract: an effective new technique for complex fistulas. Dis Colon Rectum 2010 Jan;53(1):43–6.
Acknowledgments
P Tozer would like to acknowledge the support of Core, the Ileostomy Association, forCrohn's and the St Mark's Foundation who have funded elements of his fistula work.
Conflict of interests
None
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Tozer, P., Sala, S., Cianci, V. et al. Fistulotomy in the Tertiary Setting can Achieve High Rates of Fistula Cure with an Acceptable Risk of Deterioration in Continence. J Gastrointest Surg 17, 1960–1965 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11605-013-2198-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11605-013-2198-1