Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

The Esophageal Anastomosis: Traditional Methods to Prevent Leak

  • SSAT/SAGES Joint Symposium
  • Published:
Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery Aims and scope

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Chang AC, Ji H, Birkmeyer NJ, Orringer MB, Birkmeyer JD. Outcomes after transhiatal and transthoracic esophagectomy for cancer. Ann Thorac Surg. 2008;85(2):424–429. doi:10.1016/j.athoracsur.2007.10.007.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Connors RC, Reuben BC, Neumayer LA, Bull DA. Comparing outcomes after transthoracic and transhiatal esophagectomy: A 5-year prospective cohort of 17,395 patients. J Am Coll Surg. 2007;205(6):735–740. doi:10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2007.07.001.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Briel JW, Tamhankar AP, Hagen JA, DeMeester SR, Johansson J, Choustoulakis E, et al. Prevalence and risk factors for ischemia, leak, and stricture of esophageal anastomosis: Gastric pull-up versus colon interposition. J Am Coll Surg. 2004;198(4):536–541. Apr; discussion 541–2.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Rizk NP, Bach PB, Schrag D, Bains MS, Turnbull AD, Karpeh M, et al. The impact of complications on outcomes after resection for esophageal and gastroesophageal junction carcinoma. J Am Coll Surg. 2004;198(1):42–50. doi:10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2003.08.007.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Rutegard M, Lagergren J, Rouvelas I, Lindblad M, Blazeby JM, Lagergren P. Population-based study of surgical factors in relation to health-related quality of life after oesophageal cancer resection. Br J Surg. 2008;95(5):592–601. doi:10.1002/bjs.6021.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Boyle NH, Pearce A, Hunter D, Owen WJ, Mason RC. Intraoperative scanning laser doppler flowmetry in the assessment of gastric tube perfusion during esophageal resection. J Am Coll Surg. 1999;188(5):498–502. doi:10.1016/S1072-7515(99)00016-2.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Beitler AL, Urschel JD. Comparison of stapled and hand-sewn esophagogastric anastomoses. Am J Surg. 1998;175(4):337–340. doi:10.1016/S0002-9610(98)00002-6.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Collard JM, Romagnoli R, Goncette L, Otte JB, Kestens PJ. Terminalized semimechanical side-to-side suture technique for cervical esophagogastrostomy. Ann Thorac Surg. 1998;65(3):814–817. doi:10.1016/S0003-4975(97)01384-2.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Orringer MB, Marshall B, Iannettoni MD. Eliminating the cervical esophagogastric anastomotic leak with a side-to-side stapled anastomosis. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2000;119(2):277–288. doi:10.1016/S0022-5223(00)70183-8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Ercan S, Rice TW, Murthy SC, Rybicki LA, Blackstone EH. Does esophagogastric anastomotic technique influence the outcome of patients with esophageal cancer? J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2005;129(3):623–631. doi:10.1016/j.jtcvs.2004.08.024.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Urschel JD, Urschel DM, Miller JD, Bennett WF, Young JE. A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials of route of reconstruction after esophagectomy for cancer. Am J Surg. 2001;182(5):470–475. doi:10.1016/S0002-9610(01)00763-2.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Orringer MB, Marshall B, Chang AC, Lee J, Pickens A, Lau CL. Two thousand transhiatal esophagectomies: Changing trends, lessons learned. Ann Surg. 2007;246(3):363–372. Sep; discussion 372–4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Collard JM, Tinton N, Malaise J, Romagnoli R, Otte JB, Kestens PJ. Esophageal replacement: Gastric tube or whole stomach? Ann Thorac Surg. 1995;60(2):261–266. Aug; discussion 267.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Ngan SY, Wong J. Lengths of different routes for esophageal replacement. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1986;91(5):790–792.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Yildirim S, Koksal H, Celayir F, Erdem L, Oner M, Baykan A. Colonic interposition vs. gastric pull-up after total esophagectomy. J Gastrointest Surg. 2004;8(6):675–678. doi:10.1016/j.gassur.2004.03.007.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Davis PA, Law S, Wong J. Colonic interposition after esophagectomy for cancer. Arch Surg. 2003;138(3):303–308. doi:10.1001/archsurg.138.3.303.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Mitchell JD. Anastomotic leak after esophagectomy. Thorac Surg Clin. 2006;16(1):1–9. doi:10.1016/j.thorsurg.2006.01.011.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Crestanello JA, Deschamps C, Cassivi SD, Nichols FC, Allen MS, Schleck C, et al. Selective management of intrathoracic anastomotic leak after esophagectomy. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2005;129(2):254–260. doi:10.1016/j.jtcvs.2004.10.024.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Martin LW, Hofstetter W, Swisher SG, Roth JA. Management of intrathoracic leaks following esophagectomy. Adv Surg. 2006;40:173–190. doi:10.1016/j.yasu.2006.05.010.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Sarela AI, Tolan DJ, Harris K, Dexter SP, Sue-Ling HM. Anastomotic leakage after esophagectomy for cancer: A mortality-free experience. J Am Coll Surg. 2008;206(3):516–523. doi:10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2007.09.016.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Division of Thoracic and Foregut Surgery, University of Rochester Medical Center, 601 Elmwood Ave; Box SURG, Rochester, NY, 14642, USA

    Daniel P. Raymond

Authors
  1. Daniel P. Raymond
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Daniel P. Raymond.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Raymond, D.P. The Esophageal Anastomosis: Traditional Methods to Prevent Leak. J Gastrointest Surg 13, 1555–1557 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11605-009-0907-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11605-009-0907-6

Keywords

Search

Navigation