Skip to main content
Log in

Effect of combined low-frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation and virtual reality training on upper limb function in subacute stroke: a double-blind randomized controlled trail

  • Published:
Journal of Huazhong University of Science and Technology [Medical Sciences] Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

The effect of combined low-frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (LF rTMS) and virtual reality (VR) training in patients after stroke was assessed. In a double-blind randomized controlled trial, 112 patients with hemiplegia after stroke were randomly divided into two groups: experimental and control. In experimental group, the patients received LF rTMS and VR training treatment, and those in control group received sham rTMS and VR training treatment. Participants in both groups received therapy of 6 days per week for 4 weeks. The primary endpoint including the upper limb motor function test of Fugl-meyer assessment (U-FMA) and wolf motor function test (WMFT), and the secondary endpoint including modified Barthel index (MBI) and 36-item Short Form Health Survey Questionnaire (SF-36) were assessed before and 4 weeks after treatment. Totally, 108 subjects completed the study (55 in experimental group and 53 in control group respectively). After 4-week treatment, the U-FMA scores [mean difference of 13.2, 95% confidence interval (CI) 3.6 to 22.7, P<0.01], WMFT scores (mean difference of 2.9, 95% CI 2.7 to 12.3, P<0.01), and MBI scores (mean difference 16.1, 95% CI 3.8 to 9.4, P<0.05) were significantly increased in the experimental group as compared with the control group. The results suggested the combined use of LF rTMS with VR training could effectively improve the upper limb function, the living activity, and the quality of life in patients with hemiplegia following subacute stroke, which may provide a better rehabilitation treatment for subacute stroke.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Nichols-Larsen DS, Clark PC, Zeringue A, et al. Factors influencing stroke survivors’ quality of life during subacute recovery. Stroke, 2005,36(7):1480–1484

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Brunner IC, Skouen JS, Strand LI. Recovery of upper extremity motor function post stroke with regard to eligibility for constraint-induced movement therapy. Top Stroke Rehabil, 2011,18(3):248–257

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Kwakkel G, Kollen B. Predicting improvement in the upper paretic limb after stroke: a longitudinal prospective study. Restor Neurol Neurosci, 2007,25(5–6):453–460

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Paquette C, Thiel A. Rehabilitation interventions for chronic motor deficits with repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation. J Neurosurg Sci, 2012,56(4):299–306

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Masiero S, Celia A, Rosati G, et al. Robotic-assisted rehabilitation of the upper limb after acute stroke. Arch Phys Med Rehabil, 2007,88(2):142–149

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Chen JC, Shaw FZ. Progress in sensorimotor rehabilitative physical therapy programs for stroke patients. World J Clin Cases, 2014,2(8):316–326

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Doğan-Aslan M, Nakipoğlu-Yüzer GF, Doğan A, et al. The effect of electromyographic biofeedback treatment in improving upper extremity functioning of patients with hemiplegic stroke. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis, 2012,21(3):187–192

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Kapadia NM, Nagai MK, Zivanovic V, et al. Functional electrical stimulation therapy for recovery of reaching and grasping in severe chronic pediatric stroke patients. J Child Neurol, 2014,29(4):493–499

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. McIntyre A, Viana R, Janzen S, et al. Systematic review and meta-analysis of constraint-induced movement therapy in the hemiparetic upper extremity more than six months post stroke. Top Stroke Rehabil, 2012,19(6):499–513

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Kwon JS, Park MJ, Yoon IJ, et al. Effects of virtual reality on upper extremity function and activities of daily living performance in acute stroke: a double-blind randomized clinical trial. NeuroRehabilitation, 2012,31(4):379–385

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Jang SH. Motor function-related maladaptive plasticity in stroke: a review. NeuroRehabilitation, 2013,32(2):311–316

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Kakuda W, Abo M, Shimizu M, et al. A multi-center study on low-frequency rTMS combined with intensive occup ational therapy for upper limbhemiparesis in post-stroke patients. J Neuroeng Rehabil, 2012,9(1):4

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Simonetta-Moreau M. Non-invasive brain stimulation (NIBS) and motor recovery after stroke. Ann Phys Rehabil Med, 2014,57(8):530–542

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Málly J. Non-invasive brain stimulation (rTMS and tDCS) in patients with aphasia: mode of action at the cellular level. Brain Res Bull, 2013,98(9):30–35

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Edwardson MA, Lucas TH, Carey JR, et al. New modalities of brain stimulation for stroke rehabilitation. Exp Brain Res, 2013,224(3):335–358

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Hsu WY, Cheng CH, Liao KK, et al. Effects of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation on motor functions in patients with stroke: a meta-analysis. Stroke, 2012,43(7): 1849–1857

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Kakuda W, Abo M, Kobayashi K, et al. Application of combined 6-Hz primed low-frequency rTMS and intensive occupational therapy for upper limb hemiparesis after stroke. NeuroRehabilitation, 2011,29(4):365–371

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Brunner I, Skouen JS, Hofstad H, et al. Virtual reality training for upper extremity in subacute stroke (VIRTUES): study protocol for a randomized controlled multicenter trial. BMC Neurol, 2014,14(1):186

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Henderson A, Korner-Bitensky N, Levin M. Virtual reality in stroke rehabilitation: a systematic review of its effectiveness for upper limb motor recovery. Top Stroke Rehabil, 2007,14(2):52–61

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Fernandes AB, Passos JO, Brito DP, et al. Comparison of the immediate effect of the training with a virtual reality game in stroke patients according side brain injury. NeuroRehabilitation, 2014,35(1):39–45

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Saposnik G, Teasell R, Mamdani M, et al. Effectiveness of virtual reality using Wii gaming technology in stroke rehabilitation: a pilot randomized clinical trial and proof of principle. Stroke, 2010,41(7):1477–1484

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Wade E, Winstein CJ. Virtual reality and robotics for stroke rehabilitation: where do we go from here? Top Stroke Rehabil, 2011,18(6):685–700

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Prochnow D, Bermúdez i Badia S, Schmidt J, et al. A functional magnetic resonance imaging study of visuomotor processing in a virtual reality-based paradigm: Rehabilitation Gaming System. Eur J Neurosci, 2013,37(9):1441–1447

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Sharma N, Simmons LH, Jones PS, et al. Motor imagery after subcortical stroke: a functional magnetic resonance imaging study. Stroke, 2009,40(4):1315–1324

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Seniów J, Bilik M, Leśniak M, et al. Transcranial magnetic stimulation combined with physiotherapy in rehabilitation of poststroke hemiparesis: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. Neurorehabil Neural Repair, 2012,26(9):1072–1079

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. da Silva Cameirão M, Bermúdez I Badia S, Duarte E, et al. Virtual reality based rehabilitation speeds up functional recovery of the upper extremities afterstroke: a randomized controlled pilot study in the acute phase of stroke using the rehabilitation gaming system. Restor Neurol Neurosci, 2011,29(5):287–298

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Fugl-Meyer AR, Jaasko L, Leyman I, et al. The post-stroke hemiplegic patient. 1. A method for evaluation of physical performance. Scand J Rehab Med, 1975,7(1):13–31

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Morris DM, Uswatte G, Grago JE, et al. The reliability of the wolf motor function test for assessing upper extremity function after stroke. Arch Phys Med Rehabil, 2001,82(6): 750–755

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Shah S, Vanclay F, Cooper B. Improving the sensitivity of the Barthel Index for stroke rehabilitation. J Clin Epidemiol, 1989,42(8):703–709

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Bergfeldt U, Sköld C, Julin P. Short Form 36 assessed health-related quality of life after focal spasticity therapy. J Rehabil Med, 2009,41(4):279–281

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Benninger DH, Lomarev M, Wassermann EM, et al. Safety study of 50 Hz repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation in patients with Parkinson’s disease. Clin Neurophysiol, 2009,120(4):809–815

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Lomarev MP, Kim DY, Richardson SP, et al. Safety study of high-frequency transcranial magnetic stimulation in patients with chronic stroke. Clin Neurophysiol, 2007,118(9): 2072–2075

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Etoh S1, Noma T, Ikeda K, et al. Effects of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation on repetitive facilitation exercises of the hemiplegic hand in chronic stroke patients. J Rehabil Med, 2013,45(9):843–847

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Sasaki N, Mizutani S, Kakuda W, et al. Comparison of the effects of high- and low-frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation on upper limb hemiparesis in the early phase of stroke. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis, 2013,22(4):413–418

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Avenanti A, Coccia M, Ladavas E, et al. Low-frequency rTMS promotes use-dependent motor plasticity in chronic stroke: a randomized trial. Neurology, 2012,78(4): 256–264

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Gillick BT, Krach LE, Feyma T, et al. Primed low-frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation and constraint-induced movement therapy in pediatric hemiparesis: a randomized controlled trial. Dev Med Child Neurol, 2014,56(1):44–52

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Tretriluxana J, Kantak S, Tretriluxana S, et al. Low frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation to the non-lesioned hemisphere improves paretic arm reach-to-grasp performance after chronic stroke. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol, 2013,8(2):121–124

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Koyama S, Tanabe S, Warashina H, et al. NMES with rTMS for moderate to severe dysfunction after stroke. NeuroRehabilitation, 2014,35(3):363–368

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Vongvaivanichakul P, Tretriluxana J, Bovonsunthonchai S, et al. Reach-to-grasp training in individuals with chronic stroke augmented by low-frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation. J Med Assoc Thai, 2014,97(Suppl 7):S45–S49

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Motamed Vaziri P, Bahrpeyma F, Firoozabadi M, et al. Low frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation to improve motor function and grip force of upper limbs of patients with hemiplegia. Iran Red Crescent Med J, 2014,16(8):e13579

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Wei-jing Liao  (廖维靖).

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zheng, Cj., Liao, Wj. & Xia, Wg. Effect of combined low-frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation and virtual reality training on upper limb function in subacute stroke: a double-blind randomized controlled trail. J. Huazhong Univ. Sci. Technol. [Med. Sci.] 35, 248–254 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11596-015-1419-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11596-015-1419-0

Key words

Navigation