Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Design and development of a virtual anatomic atlas of the human skull for automatic segmentation in computer-assisted surgery, preoperative planning, and navigation

  • Original Article
  • Published:
International Journal of Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose Manual segmentation of CT datasets for preoperative planning and intraoperative navigation is a time-consuming procedure. The purpose of this study was to develop an automated segmentation procedure for the facial skeleton based on a virtual anatomic atlas of the skull, to test its practicability, and to evaluate the accuracy of the segmented objects.

Materials and methods The atlas skull was created by manually segmenting an unaffected skull CT dataset. For automated segmentation of cases via IPlan cranial (BrainLAB, Germany), the atlas skull underwent projection, controlled deformation, and a facultative threshold segmentation within the individual datasets, of which 16 routine CT (13 pathologies, 3 without) were processed. The variations of the no-threshold versus threshold segmentation results compared to the original were determined. The clinical usability of the results was assessed in a multicentre evaluation.

Results Compared to the original dataset, the mean accuracy was \(\le 0.6\) mm for the threshold segmentation and 0.6–1.4 mm for the no-threshold segmentation. Comparing both methods together, the deviation was \(\le 0.2\) mm. An isolated no-threshold segmentation of the orbital cavity alone resulted in a mean accuracy of \(\le 0.6\) mm. With regard to clinical usability, the no-threshold method was clearly preferred, reaching modal scores of “good” to “moderate” in most areas. Limitations were seen in segmenting the TMJ, mandibular fractures, and thin bone in general.

Conclusion The feasibility of automated skull segmentation was demonstrated. The virtual anatomic atlas can improve the preprocessing of skull CT scans for computer assisted craniomaxillofacial surgery planning.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Metzger MC, Schon R, Weyer N et al (2006) Computer-assisted extracorporeal orbital reconstruction after optic nerve decompression by removal of sphenoid bone. Ann Plast Surg 57:223–227

    Google Scholar 

  2. Zhou Z, Chen S, Tao D et al (2005) Medical image automatic adjusting window and segmentation. Sheng Wu Yi Xue Gong Cheng Xue Za Zhi. 22:331–334

    Google Scholar 

  3. Metzger MC, Hohlweg-Majert B, Schon R et al (2007) Verification of clinical precision after computer-aided reconstruction in craniomaxillofacial surgery. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 104:1–10

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Rohlfing T, Brandt R, Menzel R et al (2004) Evaluation of atlas selection strategies for atlas-based image segmentation with application to confocal microscopy images of bee brains. Neuroimage 21:1428–1442

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Schipper J, Klenzner T, Berlis A et al (2006) Objectivity of therapeutic results following skull base surgery using virtual model analysis. HNO 54:677–683

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Pernozzoli A, Burghart C, Brief J et al (2000) Clinical evaluation of a highly accurate algorithm for CT bone contour segmentation. Stud Health Technol Inform 70:246–252

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Miller RJ, Bier J (2006) Surgical navigation in oral implantology. Implant Dent 15:41–47

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Cuadra MB, Pollo C, Bardera A et al (2004) Atlas-based segmentation of pathological MR brain images using a model of lesion growth. IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 23:1301–1314

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Zachow S, Zilske M, Hege H-C (2012) 3D reconstruction of individual anatomy from medical image data: Segmentation and geometry processing. In: Konrad-Zuse-Zentrum für Informationstechnik Berlin (ZIB), eds. ZIB-Report 07–08. ZIB, Berlin, 2007: 7–41. Available at: http://vs24.kobv.de/opus4-zib/frontdoor/index/index/docId/1044. Accessed 7 Feb 2012

  10. Wong RC, Tideman H, Merkx MA et al (2011) Review of biomechanical models used in studying the biomechanics of reconstructed mandibles. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 40:393–400

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Heermann R, Schwab B, Issing PR et al (2001) Image-guided surgery of the anterior skull base. Acta Otolaryngol 121:973–978

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Ganz SD (2008) Defining new paradigms for assessment of implant receptor sites. The use of CT/CBCT and interactive virtual treatment planning for congenitally missing lateral incisors. Compend Contin Educ Dent. 29:256–258 (260–252, 264–257; quiz 268, 278)

  13. Plooij JM, Maal TJ, Haers P et al (2011) Digital three-dimensional image fusion processes for planning and evaluating orthodontics and orthognathic surgery. A systematic review. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 40:341–352

    Google Scholar 

  14. Eufinger H (1994) Individual augmentation of the atrophic mandible based on CAD/CAM-manipulated computed tomography data-in vitro results. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 23:399–402

    Google Scholar 

  15. Eufinger H, Pack M, Terheyden H et al (1999) Experimental computer-assisted alloplastic sandwich augmentation of the atrophic mandible. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 57:1436–1440 (discussion 1440–1431)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Zizelmann C, Schramm A, Schon R et al (2005) Computer assisted methods in reconstructive and function-preserving orbital surgery. New capabilities of computer assisted preoperative surgical planning (CAPP) and computer assisted surgery (CAS). HNO 53:428–438

    Google Scholar 

  17. Nowinski WL (2001) Modified Talairach landmarks. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 143:1045–1057

    Google Scholar 

  18. Liu J, Huang S, Wojciech A et al (2010) Automatic model-guided segmentation of the human brain ventricular system from CT images. Acad Radiol 17:718–726

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Deuflhard P (2008) Mehr Mathematik wagen in der Medizin. ZIB, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  20. Flores RL, Deluccia N, Grayson BH et al (2010) Creating a virtual surgical atlas of craniofacial procedures: part I. Three-dimensional digital models of craniofacial deformities. Plast Reconstr Surg 126:2084–2092

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Flores RL, Deluccia N, Oliker A et al (2010) Creating a virtual surgical atlas of craniofacial procedures: Part II. Surgical animations. Plast Reconstr Surg 126:2093–2101

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of interest

None.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to M. C. Metzger.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Metzger, M.C., Bittermann, G., Dannenberg, L. et al. Design and development of a virtual anatomic atlas of the human skull for automatic segmentation in computer-assisted surgery, preoperative planning, and navigation. Int J CARS 8, 691–702 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11548-013-0818-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11548-013-0818-6

Keywords

Navigation