Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Effects of dietary restriction followed by high dietary energy or protein on compensatory growth of Ashanti Black × Large White crossbred weaner pigs

  • Regular Articles
  • Published:
Tropical Animal Health and Production Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The study determined the effect of re-alimenting dietary protein or energy on compensatory growth. Eighteen Ashanti Black × Large White crossbred weaner pigs (7.5 ± 0.30 kg) were randomly assigned to one of three dietary treatments in a completely randomized design resulting in three replicate pens per treatment (n = 3) and two pigs per pen. In the first treatment, pigs were fed ad libitum a diet containing 12.0 MJ/kg of metabolizable energy (ME) and 14.4 % crude protein (CP) (maintenance diet) for 56 days. In the second and third dietary treatments, pigs were fed the maintenance diet for the initial 28 days and then switched to a high protein (17.4 % dry matter (DM) CP; protein) or high (14.0 MJ/kg DM; energy) diet for the rest of the 28-day period. Dry matter intake and growth performance were similar (P ≥ 0.52) among treatments during the first 28 days of restrictive feeding, but pigs re-alimented with the protein diet achieved superior (P = 0.004) DM intake, average daily gain (ADG), and feed efficiency than those fed the maintenance diet or re-alimented with the energy diet in the re-alimentation period. At the end of the entire 56-day period, pigs re-alimented with the protein diet had higher (P ≥ 0.01) live weight gains and ADG compared with those fed the maintenance diet or re-alimented with the energy diet, but DM intake was similar (P = 0.66) among treatments. It was concluded that re-alimentation with protein rather than energy can improve compensatory growth of Ashanti Black × Large White crossbred weaner pigs.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • AOAC, 2005. Official methods of analysis of Association of Analytical Chemists. 18th edition. AOAC International, Gaithersburg, MD.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baffour-Awuah, O., Kewuribi, C.S. and Etse, D. B., 2005. The performance of Ashanti Black pigs under an intensive management system, Ghanaian Journal of Animal Science 1: 7–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barnes, A.R. and Fleischer J.E., 1998. Growth rate and carcass characteristics of indigenous (Ashanti Dwarf) pig, Ghana Journal Agricultural Science, 31, 217–221.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chaosap, C., Parr, T. and Wiseman, J., 2011. Effect of compensatory growth on performance, carcass composition and plasma IGF-1 in grower finisher pigs, Animal, 5, 749–756.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Crampton, E.W. and Harris, L.E., 1969. The use of feed stuff in the formation of livestock rations. In: Applied Animal Nutrition. 2nd edition. W. H. Freeman and Co., San Francisco, California, USA. p. 36.

  • Critser DJ, Miller PS, Lewis AJ., 1995. The effects of dietary protein concentration on compensatory growth in barrows and gilts, Journal of Animal Science, 73, 3376–83.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Danfaer, A. and Strathe, A. B. 2012. Quantitative and physiological aspects of pig growth. In: Nutritional physiology of the pig. 26 pp.

  • Edmonds, M.S. and Baker, D.H., 2010. Effect of dietary protein and lysine fluctuations in the absence and presence of ractopamine on performance and carcass quality of late-finishing pigs, Journal of Animal Science, 88, 604–611

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Fischer, R.L., Miller, P.S. and Lewis, A.J., 2001. The effect of compensatory growth on organ weights and carcass composition in growing gilts, Nebraska Swine Reports. pp. 29–32.

  • Heyer, A. and Lebret, B., 2007. Compensatory growth response in pigs: effects on growth performance, composition of weight gain at carcass and muscle levels, and meat quality, Journal of Animal Science, 285, 769–778.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hornick, J.L., Van Eenaeme, C., Gérard O., Dufrasne, I., 2000. Mechanisms of reduced and compensatory growth, Domestic animal endocrinology, 19, 121–-132.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kristensen, L., Therkildsen, M., Riis, B. and Sorensen, M.T., 2002. Dietary-induced changes of muscle growth rate in pigs: effects on in vivo and postmortem muscle proteolysis and meat quality, Journal of Animal Science, 80, 2862–2871.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Noblet, J., Fortune, H., Shi, X.S. and Dubois, S., 1994. Prediction of net energy value of feeds for growing pigs, Journal of Animal Science, 72, 344–354.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • NRC, 1998. Nutrient requirements of swine. National Research Council. National Academy Press, Rev. 10th revised edition. NRC, Washington, DC.

  • Rantzer, D., Svendsen, J. and Weström, B., 1996. Effects of a strategic feed restriction on pig performance and health during the post-weaning period, Acta Agriculturae Scandinavica, Section A – Animal Science, 46, 219–226.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ryan, W.J., Williams, I.H. and Moir, R.J., 1993. Compensatory growth in sheep and cattle. II. Changes in body composition and tissue weights, Australian Journal of Agricultural Research, 44, 1623–1633.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • SAS 1991. Statistical Analysis System Institute Inc. SAS/Stat user's guide. SAS Institute, Cary, NC.

  • Tengan, D.K., Karbo, N. and Avornyo, F., 2015. Introducing intensive smallholder pig farming in the Lawra and Nandom districts in the Upper East region of Ghana: a preliminary study. Proceedings of the 19th Biennial conference of the Ghana Society of Animal Production. University of Cape Coast. August 5-8th 2015.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Weseh Addah.

Ethics declarations

Ethical standards and considerations

The experimental animals were cared for and managed in accordance with the ethical considerations for handling animals within the laws of Ghana and were critiqued by the staff of the Department for Animal Science, University for Development, Ghana, prior to commencement of the experiment.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Addah, W., Dzewu, R.R.K. & Alenyorege, B. Effects of dietary restriction followed by high dietary energy or protein on compensatory growth of Ashanti Black × Large White crossbred weaner pigs. Trop Anim Health Prod 48, 145–150 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11250-015-0936-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11250-015-0936-y

Keywords

Navigation