Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Traditions of the diagram, tradition of the text: A case study

  • Published:
Synthese Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

After explaining general characteristics such as overspecification, found in the diagrams of Greek manuscripts of Euclid’s Elements, diagrams in some propositions of Book III are examined in detail. Codex P (Vat. gr. 190) and b (Bologna) are common in avoiding overspecification in a couple of propositions. However, further examination of diagrams of Book III in other manuscripts including those in the Arabic tradition, and collation of the text suggest that the common feature in the diagrams of codex P and b is rather due either to independent efforts to avoid overspecification or to contamination of traditions. It is codex F (Florence, Laurenziana 28.3) that most often coincides with codex P in Book III.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • DeYoung G. (2009) Diagrams in ancient Egyptian geometry: Survey and assessment. Historia Mathematica 36: 321–373

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heiberg-Stamatis (1969–1977). Euclidis Elementa, 5 vols. post I. L. Heiberg edidit E. S. Stamatis. Leipzig. (Heiberg’s edition was published in 1883–1888).

  • Knorr W. R. (1996) The wrong text of Euclid: On Heiberg’s text and its alternatives. Centaurus 36: 208–276

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Menge, H. (1896). Euclidis Opera omnia, ediderunt I. L. Heiberg et H. Menge. Vol. VI: Data, cum commentario Marini et scholiis antiquis, edidit H. Menge. Leipzig.

  • Saito, K. (2006). A preliminary study in the critical assessment of diagrams in Greek mathematical works. SCIAMVS, 7, (pp. 81–144). (Errata in SCIAMVS, 9(2008), 257.) For update of this article, visit http://www.greekmath.org/diagrams/

  • Saito, K. (2009). Reading ancient Greek mathematics. In E. Robson & J. Stedall (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of the history of mathematics (pp. 801–826). Oxford.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Osaka Prefecture University, Osaka, Japan

    Ken Saito

Authors
  1. Ken Saito
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ken Saito.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Saito, K. Traditions of the diagram, tradition of the text: A case study. Synthese 186, 7–20 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-012-0073-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-012-0073-3

Keywords

Search

Navigation