Skip to main content
Log in

Utilitarian epistemology

  • Published:
Synthese Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Standard epistemology takes it for granted that there is a special kind of value: epistemic value. This claim does not seem to sit well with act utilitarianism, however, since it holds that only welfare is of real value. I first develop a particularly utilitarian sense of “epistemic value”, according to which it is closely analogous to the nature of financial value. I then demonstrate the promise this approach has for two current puzzles in the intersection of epistemology and value theory: first, the problem of why knowledge is better than mere true belief, and second, the relation between epistemic justification and responsibility.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alston W. P. (1988) The deontological conception of epistemic justification. Philosophical Perspectives 2: 257–299

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Balaguer M. (2004) A coherent, naturalistic and plausible formulation of libertarian free will. Noûs 38(3): 379–406

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chisholm R. (1977) Theory of knowledge (2nd ed.). Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ

    Google Scholar 

  • Dennett D. C. (1991) Real patterns. The Journal of Philosophy 88(1): 27–51

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frankfurt H. G. (1971) Freedom of the will and the concept of a person. Journal of Philosophy 68(1): 5–20

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gettier E. (1963) Is justified true belief knowledge?. Analysis 23: 121–123

    Google Scholar 

  • Ginet, C. (1975). The general conditions of knowledge: Justification. In L. M. Alcoff (Ed.), Epistemology: The big questions, 2004 edition (pp. 79–89). Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing.

  • Goldman A. I. (2000) Epistemic folkways and scientific epistemology. In: Sosa E., Kim J. (eds) Epistemology: An anthology. Blackwell Publishing, Malden, MA, pp 438–444

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldman A.I., Olsson E.J. (2009) Reliabilism and the value of knowledge. In: Haddock A., Millar A., Pritchard D. (eds) Epistemic value. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 19–41

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Greco J. (2003) Knowledge as credit for true belief. In: DePaul M., Zagzebski L. (eds) Intellectual virtue: Perspectives from ethics and epistemology. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 111–134

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Harman G. (1977) The nature of morality. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Kvanvig J. L. (2003) The value of knowledge and the pursuit of understanding. Cambridge university press, Cambridge, MA

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Plato (ca. 380 BCE), Meno. In G. R. Crane (Ed.), The Perseus digital library project. Somerville, MA: Tufts University. Retrieved April 5, 2010 from http://www.perseus.tufts.edu/.

  • Pritchard D. (2005) Epistemic luck. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Pritchard D. (2007) Anti-luck epistemology. Synthese 158(3): 277–297

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pritchard D. (2011) What is the swamping problem?. In: Reisner A., Steglich-Petersen A. (eds) Reasons for belief. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, MA

    Google Scholar 

  • Riggs W. D. (2002) Reliability and the value of knowledge. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 64(1): 79–96

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Riggs, W. D. (2009). Luck, knowledge, and control. In A. Haddock, A. Millar, & D. Pritchard (Eds.), Epistemic value (pp. 204–221).

  • Sosa E. (1997) Reflective knowledge in the best circles. Journal of Philosophy 94(8): 410–430

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sosa, E. (2003). The place of truth in epistemology. In M. DePaul, & L. Zagzebski (Eds.), Intellectual virtue: Perspectives from ethics and epistemology (pp. 155–179).

  • Sosa, E. (2007). A virtue epistemology: Apt belief and reflective knowledge (Vol. 1). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

  • Steup, M. (Ed.) (2001) Knowledge, truth, and duty: Essays on epistemic justification, responsibility, and virtue. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Steup, M. (2006). The analysis of knowledge. In E. N. Zalta (Ed.), The Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy. Stanford, CA: The Metaphysics Research Lab. Retrieved July 3, 2008 from http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/knowledge-analysis/.

  • Stich S. (1990) The fragmentation of reason. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA

    Google Scholar 

  • Strawson G. (1994) The impossibility of moral responsibility. In: Watson G. (Ed.) Free will (2nd ed.). Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 212–228

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams M. (1991) Unnatural doubts. Blackwell, Cambridge, MA

    Google Scholar 

  • Williamson, T. (2000). Knowledge and its limits, 2002 edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

  • Zagzebski L. (2003) The search for the source of epistemic good. Metaphilosophy 34(1/2): 12–28

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Steve Petersen.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Petersen, S. Utilitarian epistemology. Synthese 190, 1173–1184 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-011-9887-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-011-9887-7

Keywords

Navigation