Abstract
Artefacts are often regarded as being mere things that possess only instrumental value. In contrast, living entities (or some subset of them) are often regarded as possessing some form of intrinsic (or non-instrumental) value. Moreover, in some cases they are thought to possess such value precisely because they are natural (i.e., non-artefactual). However, living artefacts are certainly possible, and they may soon be actual. It is therefore necessary to consider whether such entities should be regarded as mere things (like most non-living artefacts) or as possessing intrinsic value (like many, if not all) living entities. That is, it is necessary to determine whether artefactualness is a value-relevant property with respect to the intrinsic value of living things.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS). (2005). Assembling life from scratch. Accessed 18 February, 2010, from http://www.aaas.org/news/releases/2005/1208protocell.shtml.
Baxter W. (1974) People or penguins: The case for optimum pollution. Columbia University Press, New York
Cahen H. (1988) Against the moral considerability of ecosystems. Environmental Ethics 10: 196–216
Callicott B. (1989) In defense of the land ethic: Essays in environmental philosophy. State University of New York Press, Albany
Callicott, B. (2005). Intrinsic value in nature: A metaethical analysis. Electronic Journal of Analytical Philosophy, 3. Accessed 5 May, 2010, from http://ejap.louiiana.edu/EJAP/1995.spring/callicott.1995.spring.html.
Callicott B. (2006) Explicit and implicit values. In: Scott J., Goble D., Davis F. (eds) The endangered species act at thirty: Conserving biodiversity in human-dominated landscapes. Island Press, Washington, DC, pp 36–48
Elliot R. (1992) Intrinsic value, environmental obligation and naturalness. Monist 75: 138–160
Fukuyama F. (2002) Our posthuman future: Consequences of the biotechnology revolution. Picador, New York
Gibson D., Benders G., Andrews-Pfannkoch C., Denisova E., Baden-Tillson H., Zaveri J., Stockwell T., Brownley A., Thomas D., Algire M., Merryman C., Young L., Noskov V., Glass J., Venter J. C., Hutchison C. III, Smith H. (2008) Complete chemical synthesis assembly and cloning of a Mycoplasma genitalium genome. Science 319: 1215–1220
Hart Research Associates. (2008). Awareness of and attitudes toward nanotechnology and synthetic biology. Washington, DC: Woodrow Wilson Center, Project on Emerging Nanotechnologies. Retrieved February 18, 2010, from http://www.nanotechproject.org/process/assets/files/7040/final-synbioreport.pdf.
International Genetically Engineered Machines Competition (iGEM). (2009). Main page. Accessed 18 February, 2010, from http://2010.igem.org/About.
Jamieson D. (1998) Animal liberation is an environmental ethics. Environmental Values 7: 41–57
Johnson L. (1991) A morally deep world. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK
Kant, I. (1998). Groundwork of the metaphysics of morals. M. Gregor (Ed., Trans.). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Kass L. (2003) Ageless bodies, happy souls. The New Atlantis 1: 9–28
Katz E. (1992) The call of the wild. Environmental Ethics 14: 265–273
Kulinowski K. (2004) Nanotechnology: From wow to yuk. Bulletin of Science, Technology & Society 24: 13–20
Kurzweil R. (2005) The singularity is near: When humans transcend biology. Viking, New York
Lartigue C., Vashee S., Algire M., Chuang R., Benders G., MaL., Noskov V., Denisovam E., Gibson D., Assad-Garcia N., Alperovich N., Thomas D., Merryman C., Hutchison C. III, Smith H., Venter J. C., Glass J. (2009) Creating bacterial strains from genomes that have been cloned and engineered in yeast. Science 325: 1693–1696
Mansy S., Schrum P., Krishnamurthy M., Tobé S., Treco D., Szostak J. (2008) Template-directed synthesis of a genetic polymer in a model protocell. Nature 454: 122–125
McKibben B. (2003) Enough: Staying human in an engineered age. Times Books, New York
McShane K. (2004) Ecosystem health. Environmental Ethics 26: 227–245
Mill J. S. (2001) Utilitarianism. Hackett, Indianapolis, IN
Naam R. (2005) More than human: Embracing the promise of biological enhancement. Broadway Books, New York
Nolt J. (2009) The move from is to good in environmental ethics. Environmental Ethics 31: 135–154
Nussbaum M. (2000) Women and human development: The capabilities approach. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK
Nussbaum M. (2006) Frontiers of justice: Disability, nationality, species membership. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA
O’Neill J. (1993) Ecology, policy and politics: Human well-being and the natural world. Routledge, New York
Pinchot G. (1914) The training of a forester. J.B. Lippincott Company, Philadelphia, PA
Preston C. (2008) Synthetic biology: Drawing a line in Darwin’s sand. Environmental Values 17: 23–39
Rasmussen, S., Bedau, M. A., Chen, L., Deamer, D., Krakauer, D. C., Packaerd, N. H., & Stadler, P. F. (Eds.) (2009) Protocells: Bridging nonliving and living matter. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Regan T. (1983) The case for animal rights. University of California Press, Berkeley, CA
Registry of Standard Biological Parts. (2009). Main page. Accessed 18 February, 2010, from http://partsregistry.org/Main_Page.
Ro D., Paradise E., Ouellet M., Fisher K., Newman K., Ndungu J., Ho K., Eachus R., Ham T., Kirby J., Chang M., Withers S., Shiba Y., Sarpong R., Keasling J. (2006) Production of the antimalarial drug precursor artemisinic acid in engineered yeast. Nature 440: 940–943
Rolston H. III (1986) Can we and ought we to follow nature?. In: Rolston H. (eds) Philosophy gone wild. Prometheus, Buffalo, NY, pp 30–52
Royal Academy of Engineering (RAE). (2009). Synthetic biology: Public dialogue on synthetic biology. Accessed 5 May, 2010, from http://www.raeng.org.uk/news/publications/list/reports/Syn_bio_dialogue_report.pdf.
Sandler R. (2007) Character and environment: A virtue-oriented approach to environmental ethics. Columbia University Press, New York
Sandler R., Crane J. (2006) On the moral considerability of Homo sapiens and other species. Environmental Values 15: 69–84
Sandler, R., & Simon, L. (in press). The value of artefactual organisms. Environmental Values.
Singer P. (1975) Animal liberation. The New York Review, New York
Soule M. (1985) What is conservation biology?. Bioscience 35: 727–734
Sterba J. (1995) A biocentrist fights back. Environmental Ethics 17: 361–376
Sterba J. (2001) Three challenges to ethics: Environmentalism, feminism, and multiculturalism. Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK
Stock G. (2002) Redesigning humans: Our inevitable genetic future. Houghton Mifflin, Boston, MA
Suthers, P. F., Dasika, M. S., Kumar, V. S., Denisov, G., Glass, J. I., & Maranas, C. (2009). A genome-scale metabolic reconstruction of Mycoplasma genitalium, i PS189. PLoS Computational Biology, 5, e1000285. Accessed 5 May, 2010, from http://www.ploscompbiol.org/article/info:doi%2F10.1371%2Fjournal.pcbi.1000285.
Szostak Lab. (2009). Home page. Accessed 18 February, 2010, from http://genetics.mgh.harvard.edu/szostakweb/index.html.
Taylor P. (1986) Respect for nature: A theory of environmental ethics. Princeton University Press, Princeton, MJ
Thompson P. (2007) Food biotechnology in ethical perspective. (2nd ed.). Springer, Dordrecht, The Netherlands
Whitesides, G. (2001). The once and future nanomachine. Scientific American. Accessed 5 May, 2010, from http://www.ruf.rice.edu/~rau/phys600/whitesides.htm.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Sandler, R. Is artefactualness a value-relevant property of living things?. Synthese 185, 89–102 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-011-9877-9
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-011-9877-9