Skip to main content
Log in

Vagueness, uncertainty and degrees of clarity

  • Published:
Synthese Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this paper we compare different models of vagueness viewed as a specific form of subjective uncertainty in situations of imperfect discrimination. Our focus is on the logic of the operator “clearly” and on the problem of higher-order vagueness. We first examine the consequences of the notion of intransitivity of indiscriminability for higher-order vagueness, and compare several accounts of vagueness as inexact or imprecise knowledge, namely Williamson’s margin for error semantics, Halpern’s two-dimensional semantics, and the system we call Centered semantics. We then propose a semantics of degrees of clarity, inspired from the signal detection theory model, and outline a view of higher-order vagueness in which the notions of subjective clarity and unclarity are handled asymmetrically at higher orders, namely such that the clarity of clarity is compatible with the unclarity of unclarity.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bonnay D., Égré P. (2009) Inexact knowledge with introspection. The Journal of Philosophical Logic 38: 179–227

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bonnay D., Égré P. (2008) Margins for error in context. In: Garcia-Carpintero M., Kölbel M. (eds) Relative truth. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 103–127

    Google Scholar 

  • Fara, D. G. (2001). Phenomenal continua and the sorites. Mind, 110(440), 905–935 (originally published under the name “Delia Graff”).

    Google Scholar 

  • Fara, D. G. (2002). An anti-epistemicist consequence of margin for error semantics for knowledge. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 64, 127–142 (originally published under the name “Delia Graff”).

    Google Scholar 

  • Halpern, J. (2004). Intransitivity and vagueness. In Proceedings of the Ninth International Conference on Principles of Knowledge Representation and Reasoning (KR 2004), pp. 121–129 (Reissued in (2008) as: Review of Symbolic Logic, 1(4):530–547).

  • Horgan, T. (1994). Robust vagueness and the forced-march sorites paradox. Philosophical Perspectives, 8: Logic and Language, 159–188.

  • Kennedy C. (2007) Vagueness and grammar: The semantics of relative and absolute gradable adjectives. Linguistics and Philosophy 30(1): 1–45

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MacFarlane, J. (forthcoming). Fuzzy epistemicism. In R. Dietz & S. Moruzzi (Eds.), Cuts and clouds: Vagueness, its nature and its logic. Oxford University Press.

  • MacMillan N. A., Creelman C. D. (1991) Detection theory: A user’s guide. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • McNicol, D. (2005). A Primer of signal detection theory. London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates (originally published 1972).

  • Rabinowicz W., Segerberg K. (1994) Actual truth, possible knowledge. Topoi 13: 101–115

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Raffman, D. (2000). Is perceptual indiscriminability nontransitive? Philosophical Topics, 28, 1, Vagueness.

  • Schiffer S. (2003) The things we mean. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Smith D., Shields W. E., Washburn D. A. (2003) The comparative psychology of uncertainty monitoring and metacognition. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 26: 317–373

    Google Scholar 

  • Williamson T. (1992) Inexact knowledge. Mind 101: 217–242

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williamson T. (1994) Vagueness. Routledge, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Williamson T. (1999) On the structure of higher-order vagueness. Mind 108: 127–143

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williamson T. (2000) Knowledge and its limits. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Williamson, T. (2007). Improbable knowing, manuscript (online notes, as of 28/06/2007).

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Paul Égré.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Égré, P., Bonnay, D. Vagueness, uncertainty and degrees of clarity. Synthese 174, 47–78 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-009-9684-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-009-9684-8

Keywords

Navigation