Skip to main content
Log in

Towards a Semantics Based on the Notion of Justification

  • Published:
Synthese Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Suppose we want to take seriously the neoverificationist idea that an intuitionistic theory of meaning can be generalized in such a way as to be applicable not only to mathematical but also to empirical sentences. The paper explores some consequences of this attitude and takes some steps towards the realization of this program. The general idea is to develop a meaning theory, and consequently a formal semantics, based on the idea that knowing the meaning of a sentence is tantamount to having a criterion for establishing what is a justification for it. Section 1 motivates a requirement of epistemic transparency imposed onto justifications conceived as mental states. In Section 2, the formal notion of justification for an atomic formula is defined, in terms of the notion of cognitive state. In Section 3, the definition is extended to logically complex formulas. In Section 4, the notion of truth-ground is introduced and is used to give a definition of logical validity.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • N. Chomsky (1980) Rules and Representations Columbia University Press New York

    Google Scholar 

  • M. Dummett (1973) Frege Philosophy of Language. Duckworth London

    Google Scholar 

  • Dummett, M.: 1975, ‘The Philosophical Basis of Intuitionistic Logic’, in H. E. Rose and J. C. Sheperdson (eds.), Logic Colloquium ’73, North Holland, Amsterdam, pp. 5–40.

  • M. Dummett (1977) Elements of Intuitionism Clarendon Press Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • D. Marr (1982) Vision W. H. Freeman and Company New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Musatti, C.: 1926, ‘Analisi del Concetto di Realtà Empirica’, now in C. Musatti, Condizioni dell’esperienza e Fondazione Della Psicologia, Giunti-Barbera, Firenze, 1964, pp. 13–175.

  • D. Nelson (1949) ArticleTitle‘Constructible Falsity’ The Journal of Symbolic Logic. 14 16–26 Occurrence Handle10.2307/2268973

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nelson, D.: 1959, ‘Negation and Separation of Concepts in Constructive Systems’, in A. Heyting (ed.), Constructivity in Mathematics, North-Holland, Amsterdam, pp. 208–225.

  • D. Prawitz (1977) ArticleTitle‘Meaning and Proofs: On the Conflict Between Classical and Intuitionistic Logic’ Theoria. 43 2–40 Occurrence Handle10.1111/j.1755-2567.1977.tb00776.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • D. Prawitz (1987) ‘Dummett on a Theory of Meaning and Its Impact on Logic’ B. Taylor (Eds) Michael Dummett: Contributions to Philosophy. The Hague Nijhoff 117–165

    Google Scholar 

  • G. Usberti (1995) Significto e Conoscenza Guerini e Associati Milano

    Google Scholar 

  • G. Usberti (2002) ArticleTitle‘Names: Sense, Epistemic Content, and Denotation’ Topoi. 21 99–112 Occurrence Handle10.1023/A:1014848802670

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Gabriele Usberti.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Usberti, G. Towards a Semantics Based on the Notion of Justification. Synthese 148, 675–699 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-004-6272-9

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-004-6272-9

Keywords

Navigation