Skip to main content
Log in

Characteristics of papers published in journals: an analysis of open access journals, country of publication, and languages used

  • Published:
Scientometrics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study explores how the citation of open access (OA) journal articles occurs by analyzing the impact of certain journal characteristics, namely, whether the journal is OA and whether its country of publication is the same as the affiliation of a paper’s author. As the language of a paper is an important factor contributing to paper citations, this study uses papers in English. This analysis included publications from 77 countries from 2010 to 2012. This analysis included 19,530 journals and 3,215,742 papers without duplication. The results showed that papers published in OA and international journals were cited in more countries than non-OA and domestic journals, and a higher percentage of these were being cited by foreign countries. From these findings, it was determined that the more widely accessible OA journals were effectively being accessed by researchers from multiple countries. However, of the top 10% most cited papers in international journals, a higher percentage of these came from non-OA compared to OA journals. Among domestic journals, no such difference was found. Papers published in non-OA international journals were most cited in foreign countries with a large number of published papers. Hence, the effect of OA’s expanded accessibility, while having an apparent effect on heightening the interest of foreign readership, has a limited impact in terms of increasing citations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. https://doaj.org/.

  2. http://road.issn.org/en.

  3. Although the USA and the UK are excluded from the discussion, articles published in journals for which the USA or the UK is the country of publication are subject to analysis. In addition, the USA and the UK are included in the analysis in terms extracting articles in the top 10% and identifying countries from which citations originate.

  4. Country identification is based on the country in which the institution that the author is affiliated with is located.

References

  • Björk, B.-C., & Solomon, D. (2012). Open access versus subscription journals: A comparison of scientific impact. BMC Medicine, 10, 73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bohannon, J. (2013). Who’s afraid of peer review? Science, 342(6154), 60–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Budapest Open Access Initiative. (2002). Read the Budapest open access initiative. http://www.budapestopenaccessinitiative.org/read. Accessed March 27, 2017.

  • Budapest Open Access Initiative. (2012). Ten years on from the Budapest open access initiative: Setting the default to open. http://www.budapestopenaccessinitiative.org/boai-10-recommendations. Accessed March 27, 2017.

  • Davis, P. M. (2009). Author-choice open-access publishing in the biological and medical literature: A citation analysis. Journal of American Society for Information Science and Technology, 60(1), 3–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davis, P. M., Lewenstein, B. V., Simon, D. H., Booth, J. G., & Connolly, M. J. L. (2008). Open access publishing, article downloads, and citations: Randomised controlled trail. BMJ, 377, 568.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gamba, E., Packer, A., & Meneghini, R. (2015). Pathways to internationalize Brazilian journals of psychology. Psicologia: Reflexao e Critica, 28(1), 66–71.

    Google Scholar 

  • James, E., & Reimer, J. (2009). Open access and global participation in science. Science, 323(5917), 1025.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lawrence, S. (2001). Free online availability substantially increases a paper’s impact. Nature, 411, 521.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meneghini, R. (1992). Brazilian production in biochemistry international versus domestic publication. Scientometrics, 23(1), 21–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meneghini, R., & Packer, A. (2007). Is there science beyond English? Initiatives to increase the quality and visibility of non-English publications might help to break down language barriers in scientific communication. EMBO Reports, 8(2), 112–116.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meneghini, R., Mugnaini, R., & Packer, A. (2006). International versus national oriented Brazilian scientific journals. A scientometric analysis based on SciELO and JCR-ISI database. Scientometrics, 69(3), 529–538.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miguel, S., Chinchilla-Rodríguez, Z., & Moya-Anegón, F. (2011). Open access and scopus: A new approach to scientific visibility from the standpoint of access. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 62(6), 1130–1145.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • OECD. (2015). Making open science a reality. OECD Science, Technology and Industry Policy Papers, No. 25. Paris: OECD. https://www.fct.pt/dsi/docs/Making_Open_Science_a_Reality.pdf.

  • Salager-Meyer, F. (2014). Writing and publishing in peripheral scholarly journals: How to enhance the global influence of multilingual scholars? Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 13, 78–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Solomon, D., Laakso, M., & Bjōrk, B.-C. (2013). A longitudinal comparison of citation rates and growth among open access journals. Journal of Informetrics, 7(3), 642–650.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sotudeh, H., Ghasempour, Z., & Yaghtin, M. (2015). The citation advantage of author-pays model: the case of Springer and Elsevier OA journals. Scientometrics, 104(2), 581–608.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, L., Liu, X., & Fang, H. (2015a). Investigation of the degree to which articles supported by research grants are published in open access health and life sciences journals. Scientometrics, 104(2), 511–528.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, X., Liu, C., Mao, W., & Fang, Z. (2015b). The open access advantage considering citation, article usage and social media attention. Scientometrics, 103(2), 555–564.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xia, J., Myer, T. L., & Wilhoit, S. K. (2011). Multiple open access availability and citation impact. Journal of Information Science, 37(1), 19–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The author would like to convey her sincerest appreciation to Dr. Masatsura Igami of the National Institute of Science and Technology Policy, Professor Terutaka Kuwahara of the National Graduate Institute for Policy Studies and Sotaro Shibayama of the University of Tokyo for their exceptional suggestions and guidance. This study also benefited greatly from researchers and the author’s colleagues at the National Institute of Science and Technology who provided valuable advice.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Naomi Fukuzawa.

Appendix

Appendix

See Tables 8 and 9.

Table 8 The top 20 list of percentage of journals’ countries of publication in Scopus
Table 9 Number of papers and ratio of foreign non-OA, domestic non-OA, foreign OA and domestic OA in each journal category for the 77 countries (average values for 2010–2012)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Fukuzawa, N. Characteristics of papers published in journals: an analysis of open access journals, country of publication, and languages used. Scientometrics 112, 1007–1023 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-017-2414-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-017-2414-y

Keywords

Navigation