Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Visualizing the knowledge domain of sustainable development research between 1987 and 2015: a bibliometric analysis

  • Published:
Scientometrics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Sustainable development (SD) was posited almost three decades ago by the World Commission on Environment and Development (WCED) as an integrated approach for addressing concerns regarding a number of environmental and socio-economic issues. To represent the knowledge structure and evolution of SD in the post-WCED era, this paper resorted to CiteSpace to identify and visualize cited references and keyword networks, the distribution of categories and countries, and highly cited references relating to SD research. Two indicators embedded in CiteSpace were introduced to investigate intellectual turning points and pivotal points to outline the emerging trends, and furthermore, a new indicator (BC × CB) was developed and applied for keyword analysis. Our findings were as follows. First, the United States and UK occupy dominant positions in relation to SD studies in general and meanwhile China records the highest publication counts. Second, the concept of nature capital has contributed significantly to interpretations of SD and the detected promising disciplinary frontiers are materials category and social sciences. Lastly, keyword analysis shows the valuable keywords under the measure of BC × CB and furthermore citation maps and visible hot research areas are revealed as well.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bettencourt, L. M., & Kaur, J. (2011). Evolution and structure of sustainability science. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 108(49), 19540–19545.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Biermann, F., Betsill, M. M., Gupta, J., Kanie, N., Lebel, L., Liverman, D., et al. (2010). Earth system governance: A research framework. International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics, 10(4), 277–298.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, B. J., Hanson, M. E., Liverman, D. M., & Merideth, R. W., Jr. (1987). Global sustainability: Toward definition. Environmental Management, 11(6), 713–719.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buter, R. K., & Van Raan, A. F. J. (2013). Identification and analysis of the highly cited knowledge base of sustainability science. Sustainability Science, 8(2), 253–267.

    Google Scholar 

  • Callicott, J. B., & Mumford, K. (1997). Ecological sustainability as a conservation concept. Conservation Biology, 11(1), 32–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, C. (2005). The centrality of pivotal points in the evolution of scientific networks. In Proceedings of the 10th international conference on intelligent user interfaces. Association for Computing Machinery (ACM) (pp. 98–105).

  • Chen, C. (2006). CiteSpace II: Detecting and visualizing emerging trends and transient patterns in scientific literature. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 57(3), 359–377.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, C., Hu, Z., Liu, S., & Tseng, H. (2012). Emerging trends in regenerative medicine: A scientometric analysis in CiteSpace. Expert Opinion on Biological Therapy, 12(5), 593–608.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Costanza, R., d’Arge, R., de Groot, R., Farberk, S., Grasso, M., Hannon, B., et al. (1997). The value of the world’s ecosystem services and natural capital. Nature, 387, 253.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Costanza, R., & Daly, H. E. (1992). Natural capital and sustainable development. Conservation Biology, 6(1), 37–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Costanza, R., Stern, D., Fisher, B., He, L., & Ma, C. (2004). Influential publications in ecological economics: A citation analysis. Ecological Economics, 50(3), 261–292.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Daly, H. E. (1990). Toward some operational principles of sustainable development. Ecological Economics, 2(1), 1–6.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Denters, E. (2001). A. Boyle; D. Freestone, eds., International law and sustainable development: Past achievements and future challenges, Oxford University Press, Oxford 1999, xxx + 377 pp. ISBN 0-19-829807-2. Netherlands International Law Review, 48(01), 101–103.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dovers, S. R., & Handmer, J. W. (1993). Contradictions in sustainability. Environmental Conservation, 20(03), 217–222.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Egghe, L. (2006). Theory and practise of the g-index. Scientometrics, 69(1), 131–152.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Freeman, L. (1977). A set of measures of centrality based on betweenness. Sociometry, 40(1), 35–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goodland, R. (1995). The concept of environmental sustainability. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics, 26, 1–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hassan, S. U., Haddawy, P., & Zhu, J. (2014). A bibliometric study of the world’s research activity in sustainable development and its sub-areas using scientific literature. Scientometrics, 99(2), 549–579.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • He, Q. (1999). Knowledge discovery through co-word analysis. Library Trends, 48(1), 133.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hopwood, B., Mellor, M., & O’Brien, G. (2005). Sustainable development: Mapping different approaches. Sustainable Development, 13(1), 38–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kajikawa, Y. (2008). Research core and framework of sustainability science. Sustainability Science, 3(2), 215–239.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Kajikawa, Y., Ohno, J., Takeda, Y., Matsushima, K., & Komiyama, H. (2007). Creating an academic landscape of sustainability science: An analysis of the citation network. Sustainability Science, 2(2), 221–231.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kates, R., Clark, W. C., Hall, J. M., Jaeger, C., Lowe, I., McCarthy, J. J., et al. (2001). Sustainability science. Science, 292(5517), 641–642.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kates, R. W., Parris, T. M., & Leiserowitz, A. A. (2005). What is sustainable development? Goals, indicators, values, and practice. Environment (Washington DC), 47(3), 8–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kleinberg, J. (2003). Bursty and hierarchical structure in streams. Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery, 7(4), 373–397.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Knowles, B., Blair, L., Hazas, M., & Walker, S. (2013, September). Exploring sustainability research in computing: where we are and where we go next. In Proceedings of the 2013 ACM international joint conference on Pervasive and ubiquitous computing (pp. 305–314). ACM.

  • Korten, D. C. (2015). When corporations rule the world. San Francisco: Berrett-Koehler Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leemans, R. (1999). Modelling for species and habitats: New opportunities for problem solving. Science of the Total Environment, 240(1), 51–73.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Leydesdorff, L., & Opthof, T. (2010). Normalization at the field level: Fractional counting of citations. arXiv preprint arXiv:1006.2896.

  • Linnenluecke, M. K., & Griffiths, A. (2013). Firms and sustainability: Mapping the intellectual origins and structure of the corporate sustainability field. Global Environmental Change, 23(1), 382–391.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lovins, A. B., Lovins, L. H., & Hawken, P. (1999). A road map for natural capitalism. Harvard Business Review, 77(3), 145–158.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ma, C., & Stern, D. I. (2006). Environmental and ecological economics: A citation analysis. Ecological Economics, 58(3), 491–506.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Manning, E. W. (1990). Presidential address: Sustainable development, the challenge. The Canadian Geographer, 34(4), 290–302.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Markard, J., Raven, R., & Truffer, B. (2012). Sustainability transitions: An emerging field of research and its prospects. Research Policy, 41(6), 955–967.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Monbiot, G. (2013). Captive state: The corporate takeover of Britain. Hants: Pan Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pearce, D. W., Markandya, A., & Barbier, E. (1989). Blueprint for a green economy. London: Earthscan Publications Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pudovkin, A. I., & Garfield, E. (2004). Rank-normalized impact factor: A way to compare journal performance across subject categories. Proceedings of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 41(1), 507–515.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Quental, N., & Lourenço, J. M. (2012). References, authors, journals and scientific disciplines underlying the sustainable development literature: A citation analysis. Scientometrics, 90(2), 361–381.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rafols, I., & Meyer, M. (2010). Diversity and network coherence as indicators of interdisciplinarity: case studies in bionanoscience. Scientometrics, 82(2), 263–287.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Redclift, M. (1987). The production of nature and the reproduction of the species. Antipode, 19(2), 222–230.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Redclift, M. (1992). The meaning of sustainable development. Geoforum, 23(3), 395–403.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Revkin, A. C. (2002, August 20). Forget nature. Even Eden is engineered. The New York Times. Retrieved from http://www.nytimes.com/2002/08/20/science/earth/20MANA.html. Accessed 26 May 2016.

  • Rockström, J., Steffen, W., Noone, K., Persson, Å., Chapin, F. S., Lambin, E. F., et al. (2009). A safe operating space for humanity. Nature, 461(7263), 472–475.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rosvall, M., & Bergstrom, C. T. (2008). Maps of random walks on complex networks reveal community structure. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 105(4), 1118–1123.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rousseeuw, P. J. (1987). Silhouettes: A graphical aid to the interpretation and validation of cluster analysis. Journal of Computational and Applied Mathematics, 20, 53–65.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Schoolman, E. D., Guest, J. S., Bush, K. F., & Bell, A. R. (2012). How interdisciplinary is sustainability research? Analyzing the structure of an emerging scientific field. Sustainability Science, 7(1), 67–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Searchinger, T., Heimlich, R., Houghton, R. A., Dong, F., Elobeid, A., Fabiosa, J., et al. (2008). Use of US croplands for biofuels increases greenhouse gases through emissions from land-use change. Science, 319(5867), 1238–1240.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seuring, S., & Müller, M. (2008). From a literature review to a conceptual framework for sustainable supply chain management. Journal of Cleaner Production, 16(15), 1699–1710.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shearman, R. (1990). The meaning and ethics of sustainability. Environmental Management, 14(1), 1–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Small, H. (1973). Co-citation in the scientific literature: A new measure of the relationship between two documents. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 24(4), 265–269.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Solomon, S. (Ed.). (2007). Climate change 2007—the physical science basis: Working group I contribution to the fourth assessment report of the IPCC (Vol. 4). New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stern, N. (2007). The economics of climate change: The Stern review. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Thelwall, M., Vann, K., & Fairclough, R. (2006). Web issue analysis: An integrated water resource management case study. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 57(10), 1303–1314.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wackernagel, M., & Rees, W. (1998). Our ecological footprint: Reducing human impact on the earth (No. 9). Gabriola Island: New Society Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Woods, D. (2002). Sustainable development: A contested paradigm. Birmingham. Cologny, UK: Economics Forum of the Foundation for Water Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • World Commission on Environment and Development (WCED). (1987). Our common future. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Xu, L., & Marinova, D. (2013). Resilience thinking: A bibliometric analysis of socio-ecological research. Scientometrics, 96(3), 911–927.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yang, L., Chen, Z., Liu, T., Gong, Z., Yu, Y., & Wang, J. (2013). Global trends of solid waste research from 1997 to 2011 by using bibliometric analysis. Scientometrics, 96(1), 133–146.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yarime, M., Takeda, Y., & Kajikawa, Y. (2010). Towards institutional analysis of sustainability science: A quantitative examination of the patterns of research collaboration. Sustainability Science, 5(1), 115–125.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors sincerely treasured the comments and suggestions from reviewers. This work was supported by National Social Science Foundation of China (15ZDC031).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Research Team on Sustainable Development, Wuhan University, Wuhan, 430072, Hubei Province, China

    Jie Zhu & Weijian Hua

Authors
  1. Jie Zhu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Weijian Hua
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jie Zhu.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zhu, J., Hua, W. Visualizing the knowledge domain of sustainable development research between 1987 and 2015: a bibliometric analysis. Scientometrics 110, 893–914 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-016-2187-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-016-2187-8

Keywords

Search

Navigation