Abstract
This article presents pupils’ awareness of writing as elicited through a metawriting task, in other words a task in which pupils from the third, fourth and sixth forms (grades) were required to write about writing. The analysis of the texts revealed the pupils’ increasing ability to write texts focusing on writing and on the subject’s relationship to writing. There are significant differences concerning the number of processes mobilised by the pupils to describe the writing process and the operations that take place within it. The increase in awareness is particularly salient in the case of planning during pre-writing. The pupils from the sixth form also mobilise a significantly higher number of processes concerned with the components of textualising (translating) and revising. The results for awareness of text and of reader do not present significant differences or any gradual increase. On the textual dimension, attention is given predominantly to the formal aspects of the texts, especially in the lower forms, while the emergence of other factors, such as genre, is still limited. As for the reader, this aspect of awareness receives the lowest number of associated processes when pupils write about their writing. The results revealed the dimensions and factors to which pupils in different school forms have conscious access when reflecting on their writing. The outcomes support the strategy of using metawriting as consciousness raising tool to increase pupils’ writing skills.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Baggetun, R., & Wasson, B. (2006). Self-regulated learning and open writing. European Journal of Education, 41, 453–472.
Barbeiro, L. (1999). Os alunos e a expressão escrita: Consciência metalinguística e expressão escrita [Students and writing: Metalinguistc consciousness and writing]. Lisbon, Portugal: Fundação Calouste Gulbenkian.
Barbeiro, L. (2003). Escrita: Construir a aprendizagem [Writing: Learning construction]. Braga, Portugal: Instituto de Educação e Psicologia–Universidade do Minho.
Barré-de-Miniac, C. (2000). Le rapport à l’écriture: Aspects théoriques et didactiques [The relationship with writing: Theoretical and didactic aspects]. Paris, Villeneuve d’Ascq (Nord). France: Presses Universitaires du Septentrion.
Beal, C. R. (1996). The role of comprehension monitoring in children’s revision. Educational Psychology Review, 8, 219–238.
Beers, S. F., & Nagy, W. E. (2009). Syntactic complexity as a predictor of adolescent writing quality: Which measures? Which genre? Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 22, 185–200.
Britton, J. (1978). The composing processes and punctions of writing. In C. R. Cooper & L. Odell (Eds.), Research on composing: Points of departure (pp. 13–28). Urbana, IL: National Council of Teachers of English.
Brown, A. L., Armbruster, B. B., & Baker, L. (1986). The role of metacognition in reading and studying. In J. Orasanu (Ed.), Reading comprehension: From research to practice (pp. 49–76). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers.
Camps, A., Guasch, O., Milian, M., & Ribas, T. (2000). Metalinguistic activity: The link between writing and learning to write. In A. Camps & M. Milian (Eds.), Metalinguistic activity in learning to write (pp. 103–124). Amsterdam, Holland: Amsterdam University Press.
Cardoso, I. (2009). A relação com a escrita extra-escolar e escolar: Um estudo no ensino básico [The relationship with writing: A case study in Portugues basic schools]. (Doctoral Thesis, University of Aveiro, Aveiro, Portugal).
Cho, K., Schunn, C. D., & Charney, D. (2006). Commenting on writing: Typology and perceived helpfulness of comments from novice peer reviewers and subject matter experts. Written Communication, 23, 260–294.
Dinsmore, D., Alexander, P. A., & Loughlin, S. M. (2008). Focusing the conceptual lens on metacognition, self-regulation, and self-regulated learning. Educational Psychology Review, 20, 477–484.
Dray, A. J., Selman, R. L., & Schultz, L. H. (2009). Communicating with intent: A study of social awareness and children’s writing. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 30, 116–128.
Ewert, D. E. (2009). L2 writing conferences: Investigating teacher talk. Journal of Second Language Writing, 18, 251–269.
Flavell, J. H. (1976). Metacognitive aspects of problem solving. In L. B. Resnick (Ed.), The nature of intelligence (pp. 231–235). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Flavell, J. H. (1979). Metacognition and cognitive monitoring: A new area of cognitve-developmental inquiry. American Psychologist, 34, 906–911.
Gombert, J.-É. (1993). Metacognition, metalanguage and metapragmatics. International Journal of Psychology, 28, 571–580.
Graham, S., Berninger, V., & Fan, W. (2007). The structural relationship between writing attitude and writing achievement in first and third grade students. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 32, 516–536.
Graves, D. (1983). Writing: Teachers and children at work. Exeter, NH: Heinemann.
Graves, D. (1984). A researcher learns to write: Selected articles and monographs. Exeter, NH: Heinemann.
Hunt, K. W. (1965). Grammatical structures written and three grade levels (Research Report No. 3). Champaign, IL: National Council of Teachers of English.
Hunt, K. W. (1970). Syntactic maturity in school children and adults. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 35, 1–67.
Hyland, K. (2002). Teaching and researching writing. Essex, NH: Pearson Education.
Jones, I. (2003). Collaborative writing and children’s use of literate language: A sequential analysis of social interaction. Journal of Early Childhood Literacy, 3, 165–178.
Joyce, D. J. (2002). On the use of metawriting to learn grammar and mechanics. The Quarterly, 24(4), 24–27. (36).
Kaplan, A. (2008). Clarifying metacognition, self-regulation, and self-regulated learning: What’s the purpose? Educational Psychology Review, 20, 477–484.
Kellog, R. T. (2008). Training writing skills: A cognitive developmental perspective. Journal of Writing Research, 1, 1–26.
Kostouli, T. (2005). Co-constructing writing contexts in classrooms: Scaffolding, collaboration, and asymmetries of knowledge. In T. Kostouli (Ed.), Writing in context(s): Textual practices and learning processes in sociocultural settings (pp. 93–116). Boston: Springer.
Kulikowich, J. M., Mason, L., & Brown, S. W. (2008). Evaluating fifth- and sixth-grade students’ expository writing: Task development, scoring, and psychometric issues. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 21, 153–175.
Lacon de De Lucia, N., & Ortega de Hocevar, S. (2008). Cognition, metacognition, and writing. Revista Signos, 41(67), 231–255.
Lowry, P. B., Curtis, A., & Lowry, M. R. (2004). Building a taxonomy and nomenclature of collaborative writing to improve interdisciplinary research and practice. Journal of Business Communication, 41, 66–99.
Madigan, T. P. (2007). Thinking, writing, talking: A discourse analysis of writing instruction for boys with dyslexia. Reading and Writing Quarterly, 23, 359–416.
Mason, L., & Schriner, J. (2008). Self-regulated strategy development instruction for writing an opinion essay: Effects for six students with emotional/behavior disorders. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 21, 71–93.
Mayer, C. (1999). Shapping at the point of the utterance: An investigation of the composing processes of the deaf student writer. Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education, 4, 37–49.
McCarthey, S., & García, G. E. (2005). English language learners’ writing practices and attitudes. Written Communication, 22, 36–75.
Milian, M. (2005). Reformulation: A means of constructing knowledge in shared writing. L1—Educational Studies in Language and Literature, 5, 335–351.
Morin, M.-F. (2005). Declared knowledge of beginning writers. L1—Educational Studies in Language and Literature, 5, 385–401.
Peterson, S. (2003). Peer response and students’ revisions of their narrative writing. L1—Educational Studies in Language and Literature, 3, 239–272.
Romeo, L. (2008). Informal writing assessment linked to instruction: A continuous process for teachers, students, and parents. Reading and Writing Quarterly, 24, 25–51.
Ruttle, K. (2004). What goes on inside my head when I’m writing? A case study of 8–9-year-old boys. Literacy, 38, 71–77.
Schunk, D. H., & Zimmerman, B. (2007). Influencing children’s self-efficacy and self-regulation of reading and writing through modeling. Reading and Writing Quarterly, 23, 7–25.
Sperling, M. (1994). Discourse analysis of teacher-student writing conferences: Finding the message in the medium. In P. Smagorinsky (Ed.), Speaking about writing: Reflections on research methodology (pp. 205–224). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
Storch, N. (2005). Collaborative writing, product, process, and student’s reflections. Journal of Second Language Writing, 14, 153–173.
Thompson, I. (2009). Scaffolding in the writing center: A microanalysis of an experienced tutor’s verbal and nonverbal tutoring strategies. Written Communication, 26, 417–453.
Vass, E., Littleton, K., Miell, D., & Jones, A. (2008). The discourse of collaborative creative writing: Peer collaboration as a context for mutual inspiration. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 3, 192–202.
Wolfe, J. (2005). Gesture and collaborative planning: A case study of a student writing group. Written Communication, 22, 298–332.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Barbeiro, L.F. What happens when I write? Pupils’ writing about writing. Read Writ 24, 813–834 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-010-9226-2
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-010-9226-2