Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Validation of pediatric Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy: patient version 2 of “brain tumor survivor” for grade school patients aged 7–12 years

  • Brief Communication
  • Published:
Quality of Life Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

We evaluated the reliability and validity of the Pediatric Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Childhood Brain Tumor Survivor version 2.0 (pedsFACT-BrS; patient version for grade school children aged 7–12 years).

Methods

After translating and cross-culturally adapting it into Korean, the psychometric properties of the pedsFACT-BrS were evaluated in 148 childhood brain tumor survivors (mean age, 9.67 years). Pre-testing was performed in 25 patients.

Results

The pedsFACT-BrS showed good symptom coverage and overall user comprehension. Internal consistency was acceptable, with Cronbach’s α coefficients ranging from 0.70 to 0.92. The pedsFACT-BrS also demonstrated good convergent and divergent validities when correlated with the Revised Children’s Manifest Anxiety Scale and Kovacs’ Children’s Depression Scale. The pedsFACT-BrS showed good known-group validity and effectively differentiated between clinically distinct patient groups (patient vs. control groups, and among patients having different Karnofsky scores), but offered only partial discrimination of physical well-being (PWB) scores when patients were grouped by treatment type.

Conclusions

Our results indicate that this instrument is reliable and valid and can be used to evaluate the quality of life of Korean childhood brain tumor survivors.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Chien, L. Y., Lo, L. H., Chen, C. J., Chen, Y. C., Chiang, C. C., & Chao, Y. M. Y. (2003). Quality of life among primary caregivers of Taiwanese children with brain tumor. Cancer Nursing, 26, 305–311.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Lai, J. S., Cella, D., Tomita, T., Bode, R. K., Newmark, M., & Goldman, S. (2007). Developing a health-related quality of life instrument for childhood brain tumor survivors. Child Nervous System, 23, 47–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Sloan, J. A., Frost, M. H., Berzon, R., Duck, A., Guyatt, G., Moinpour, C., et al. (2006). The clinical significance of quality of life assessments in oncology: a summary for clinicians. Supportive Care in Cancer, 14, 988–998.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Clarke, S. A., & Eiser, C. (2004). The measurement of health-related quality of life (QOL) in pediatric clinical trials: A systematic review. Health and quality of Life Outcomes, 2, 66.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Palmer, S. N., Meeske, K. A., Katz, E. R., Burwinkle, T. M., & Varni, J. W. (2007). The PedsQL™ brain tumor module: Initial and validity. Pediatric Blood & Cancer, 49, 287–293.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Robitail, S., Simeoni, M. C., Erhart, M., Ravens-Sieberer, U., Bruil, J., Auquier, P., et al. (2006). Validation of the European proxy KIDSCREEN-52 pilot test health-related QOL questionnaire’s first results. Journal of Adolescent Health, 39, 596.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Tao, M. L. (2005). Quality of life assessment in pediatric brain tumor patients and survivors: Lessons learned and challenged to face. Journal of Clinical Oncology, 23, 5424–5426.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Bhat, S. R., Goodwin, T., Burwinkle, T. M., Lansdale, M. F., Dahl, G. V., Huhn, S. L., et al. (2005). Profile of daily life in children with brain tumors: An assessment of health-related quality of life. Journal of Clinical Oncology, 23, 5493–5500.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Gurney, J. G., Smith, M. A., & Bunin, G. R. (1999). CNS and miscellaneous intracranial and intraspinal neoplasms. In L. A. G. Ries, M. A. Smith, J. G. Gurney, et al. (Eds.), Cancer incidence and survival among children and adolescents: United States SEER program 1975–1995 (pp. 51–63). Bethesda, MD: National Institute of Cancer, SEER program.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Korean Central Center Registry. (2003). 2002 Annual report of the Korea central cancer registry (pp. 107–112). Republic of Korea: Ministry of Health and Welfare.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Cella, D. (1997). Manual of the functional assessment of chronic illness therapy (FACIT scales). Evanston, IL: Center on outcomes, research and education (CORE), Evanston Northwestern Healthcare and Northwestern University.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Bonomi, A. E., Cella, D. F., Hahn, E. A., Bjordal, K., Sperner-Unterweger, B., Gangeri, L., et al. (1996). Multilingual translation of the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy (FACT) quality of life measurement system. Quality of Life Research, 5, 309–320.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Reynolds, C. R., & Richmond, B. O. (1978). What I think and feel: A revised measure of children’s manifest anxiety. Journal of Abnormal and Child Psychology, 2, 271–280.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Choi, J. S., & Cho, S. C. (1990). Assessment of anxiety in children reliability and validity of revised children’s manifest anxiety scale. Korean Journal of Neuropsychiatric Association, 29, 691–702.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Kovacs, M. (1983). The children’s depression inventory: A self-rated depression scale for school aged youngsters. Unpublished manuscript. University of Pittsburgh.

  16. Cho, S. C., & Lee, Y. S. (1990). Development of the Korean form of the Kovacs’ children’s depression inventory. Korean Journal of Neuropsychiatric Association, 29, 943–956.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Gartstein, M. A., Short, A. D., Vannatta, K., & Noll, R. B. (1999). Psychosocial adjustment of children with chronic illness: An evaluation of three models. Developmental and Behavioral Pediatrics, 20, 157–163.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Cella, D. F., Bonomi, A. E., Lloyd, S. R., Tulsky, D. S., Kaplan, E., & Bonomi, P. (1995). Reliability and validity of the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Lung (FACT-L) quality of life instrument. Lung Cancer, 12, 199–220.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Cronbach, L. J. (1951). Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrika, 16, 297–334.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Marinozzi, A., Martinelli, N., Panascì, M., Cancilleri, F., Franceschetti, E., Vincenzi, B., et al. (2009). Italian translation of the Manchester-Oxford foot questionnaire, with re-assessment of reliability and validity. Quality of Life Research, 18, 923–927.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Nunally, J. C., & Bernstein, I. R. (1994). Psychometric theory (3rd ed.). New York: MacGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Yeh, C. H., & Hung, L. C. (2003). Construct validity of newly developed QOL assessment instrument for child and adolescent CA patients in Taiwan. Psychooncology, 12, 345–356.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Yeh, C. H., Hung, L. C., & Cha, K. Y. (2004). The quality of life for cancer children (QOLCC) for Taiwanese children with cancer (Part II): Feasibility, cross-informants variance and clinical validity. Psycho-oncology, 13, 171–176.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Russell, K. M. W., Hudson, M., Long, A., & Phipps, S. (2006). Assessment of health-related quality of life in children with cancer. Cancer, 106, 2267–2274.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This study was supported by a grant from the National R&D Program for Cancer Control, Ministry of Health, Welfare and Family Affairs, Republic of Korea (no. 0520300).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Young-Shin Ra.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Yoo, H., Ra, YS., Park, HJ. et al. Validation of pediatric Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy: patient version 2 of “brain tumor survivor” for grade school patients aged 7–12 years. Qual Life Res 20, 529–535 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-010-9786-2

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-010-9786-2

Keywords

Navigation