Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Measuring learners’ perceptions of a team-taught learning environment: development and validation of the Learners’ Team Teaching Perceptions Questionnaire (LTTPQ)

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Learning Environments Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Team teaching is a teaching model in which teachers work collaboratively in the preparation, teaching and evaluation of a course. Literature suggests that team teaching potentially provides rich and varied lessons, increased support and learning gains. However, team teaching possibly also could cause some confusion. To support the implementation of team teaching, stakeholders (teachers and policy makers) require an instrument that offers insights to support their decision making. The present study describes the development and validation of an easy-to-use questionnaire to explore learners’ perceptions of team teaching. The questionnaire was developed and validated in four stages: an extensive literature review (1) resulted in a preliminary version of the questionnaire (2) containing advantages and disadvantages for learners of team teaching. Next, a pilot study (3) was conducted, followed by a validation study (4) based on confirmatory factor analysis in two different learning environments of secondary education (Belgium, n = 229 pupils) and higher education (South Africa, n = 350 students). The final questionnaire comprises 16 items and four factors and appears to be valid, internally consistent and reliable.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Akerson, A., & Montgomery, M. S. (2017). Peer-to-peer co-teaching: Idea to implementation. SRATE Journal,26(2), 1–8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Austin, V. L. (2001). Teachers’ beliefs about co-teaching. Remedial and Special Education,22(4), 2045–2255.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Badiali, B., & Titus, N. (2010). Co-teaching: Enhancing students learning through mentor-intern partnerships. School–University Partnerships,4(2), 74–80.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baeten, M., & Simons, M. (2014). Student teachers’ team teaching: Models, effects and conditions for implementation. Teaching and Teacher Education,41, 92–110.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baeten, M., & Simons, M. (2016). Student teachers’ team teaching : How do learners in the classroom experience team-taught lessons by student teachers? Journal of Education for Teaching,42(1), 93–105.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Birrell, J., & Bullough, R. (2005). Teaching with a peer: A follow-up study of the first year of teaching. Action in Teacher Education,27(1), 72–81. https://doi.org/10.1080/01626620.2005.10463375.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bollen, K. (1989). Structural equations with latent variables. New York: Wiley.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Bronson, C. E., & Dentith, A. M. (2014). Partner teaching: A promising model. Education,134(4), 504–520.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bullough, R., Young, J., Birrell, J., Clark, D., Egan, M., Erickson, L., et al. (2003). Teaching with a peer: A comparison of two models of student teaching. Teaching and Teacher Education,19, 57–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bullough, R. V., Young, J., Erickson, L., Birrell, J. R., Clark, D. C., Egan, M. W., et al. (2002). Rethinking field experiences: Partnership teaching vs. single-placement teaching. The Journal of Teacher Education,53(1), 68–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carless, D. (2016). Collaborative EFL teaching in primary schools. ELT Journal,60(4), 328–335.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carpenter, D., Crawford, L., & Walden, R. (2007). Testing the efficacy of team teaching. Learning Environments Research,10, 53–65. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10984-007-9019-y.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chanmugan, A., & Gerlach, B. (2013). A co-teaching model for developing future educators’ teaching effectiveness. International Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education,25(1), 110–117.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cook, L., & Friend, M. (1995). Co-teaching: Guidelines for creating effective practices. Focus on Exceptional Children,28(3), 1–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dee, A. (2012). Collaborative clinical practice: An alternate field experience. Issues in Teacher Education,21(2), 147–163.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deneire, A., Gijbels, D., Vanhoof, J., & Van Petegem, P. (2012). (Wanneer) draagt het beoordelen van leerkrachten bij tot jobtevredenheid? Lessen uit het TALIS-onderzoek. Leerrijk.be, 1–13.

  • Deneire, A., Vanhoof, J., Faddar, J., & Van Petegem, P. (2013). Denken, handelen en professionele ontwikkeling van Vlaamse leraren en schoolleiders. Eerste resultaten van de Teaching and Learning International Survey (TALIS). Vlaamse Overheid.

  • Dugan, K., & Letterman, M. (2008). Student appraisals of collaborative teaching. College Teaching,56(1), 11–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Entwistle, N. J. (1991). Approaches to learning and perceptions of the learning environment. Introduction to the special issue. Higher Education,22, 201–204.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Field, A. (2013). Discovering statistics using IBM SPSS statistics (4th ed.). London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gardiner, W. (2010). Mentoring two student teachers: Mentors’ perceptions of peer placements. Teaching Education,21(3), 233–246. https://doi.org/10.1080/10476210903342102.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gardiner, W., & Robinson, K. (2011). Peer field placements with preservice teachers: Negotiating the challenges of professional collaboration. The Professional Educator,35(2).

  • George, D., & Mallery, P. (2003). SPSS for Windows step by step: A simple guide and reference (4th ed.). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodnough, K., Osmond, P., Dibbon, D., Glassman, M., & Stevens, K. (2009). Exploring a triad model of student teaching: Pre-service teacher and cooperating teacher perceptions. Teaching and Teacher Education,25, 285–296.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Graue, E., Hatch, K., Rao, K., & Oen, D. (2007). The wisdom of class-size reduction. American Educational Research Journal,44(3), 670–700.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Graziano, K., & Navarette, L. (2012). Co-teaching in a teacher education classroom: Collaboration, comprise, and creativity. Issues in Teacher Education,21(1), 109–126.

    Google Scholar 

  • Helms, M., Alvis, J., & Willis, M. (2005). Planning and implementing shared teaching: An MBA team-teaching case study. Journal of Education for Business,8, 29–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hooper, D., Coughlan, J., & Mullen, M. (2008). Structural equation modelling: Guidelines for determining model fit. Electronic Journal of Business Research Methods,6(1), 53–60.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kamens, M. (2007). Learning about co-teaching: A collaborative student teaching experience for preservice teachers. Teacher Education and Special Education,30(3), 155–166. https://doi.org/10.1177/088840640703000304.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keefe, E. B., Moore, V., & Duff, F. (2004). The four “knows” of collaborative teaching. Teaching Exceptional Children,36(5), 36–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mastropieri, M. A., & Scruggs, T. E. (2014). The inclusive classroom: Strategies for effective instruction (5th ed.). Cranbury, NJ: Pearson Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Millis, B. J. (2012). Why faculty should adopt cooperative learning approaches. In B. Millis (Ed.), Cooperative learning in higher education: Across the disciplines, across the academy. Sterling, VA: Stylus Publishing LLC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murata, R. (2002). What does team teaching mean? A case study of interdisciplinary teaming. The Journal of Educational Research,96(2), 67–77.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Musanti, S., & Pence, L. (2010). Collaboration and teacher development: Unpacking resistance, constructing knowledge and navigating identities. Teacher Education Quarterly,37(1), 73–89.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nevin, A., Thousand, J., & Villa, R. (2009). Collaborative teaching for teacher educators: What does the research say? Teaching and Teacher Education,25, 569–574. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2009.02.009.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nokes, J., Bullough, R., Egan, W., Birrell, J., & Hansen, J. (2008). The paired-placement of student teachers: An alternative to traditional placements in secondary schools. Teaching and Teacher Education,24, 2168–2177. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2008.05.001.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pajares, F. (1992). Teachers’ beliefs and educational research: Cleaning up a messy construct. Review of Educational Research,62, 307–332.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, J. (2002). The development of tandem teaching placements. Mentoring and Tutoring: Partnership in Learning,10(3), 253–274. https://doi.org/10.1080/1361126022000022507.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, J. (2004). Developing paired teaching placements. Educational Action Research,12(1), 99–125.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Solis, M., Vaughn, S., Swanson, E., & Mcculley, L. (2012). Collaborative models of instruction: The empirical foundations of inclusion and co-teaching. Psychology in the Schools,49(5), 498–510.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sorensen, P. (2004). Learning to teach collaboratively: The use of subject pairs in the school practicum. Canadian Journal of Educational Administration and Policy. Available at: http://www.umanitoba.ca/publications/cjeap/pdf%20files/sorensen.pdf.

  • Struyf, E., Adriaensens, S., & Verschueren, K. (2012). De meerwaarde van zorgverantwoordelijken in het schoolteam. Leerrijk.be. 1–8.

  • Thousand, J., Villa, N., & Nevin, A. (2006). The many faces of collaborative planning and teaching. Theory into Practice,45(3), 239–248.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tobin, K., Roth, W., & Zimmermann, A. (2001). Learning to teach science in urban schools. Journal of Research in Science Teaching,38(8), 941–964.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Topping, K. J. (2005). Trends in peer learning. Educational Psychology,25(6), 631–645.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vanblaere, B., & Devos, G. (2016). Exploring the link between experienced teachers’ learning outcomes and individual and professional learning community characteristics. School Effectiveness and School Improvement,27(2), 205–227.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Welch, M. (2002). Descriptive analysis of team teaching in two elementary classrooms: A formative experimental approach. Remedial and Special Education,21(6), 366–376. https://doi.org/10.1177/074193250002100606.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zeegers, P. (2001). Approaches to learning in science: A longitudinal study. British Journal of Educational Psychology,71, 115–132.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mathea Simons.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Simons, M., Coetzee, S., Baeten, M. et al. Measuring learners’ perceptions of a team-taught learning environment: development and validation of the Learners’ Team Teaching Perceptions Questionnaire (LTTPQ). Learning Environ Res 23, 45–58 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10984-019-09290-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10984-019-09290-1

Keywords

Navigation