Skip to main content
Log in

A Review of the Personal Health Records in Selected Countries and Iran

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Journal of Medical Systems Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Personal Health Record (PHR) enables patients to access their health information and improves care quality by supporting self-care. The purpose of this study is to provide a comparative analysis of the concept of PHRs in selected countries and Iran in order to investigate the gaps between Iran and more advanced countries in terms of PHRs. The study was carried out in 2008-2009 using a descriptive—comparative method in Australia, the United States, England and Iran. Data was gathered from articles, books, journals and reputed websites in English and Persian published between 1995 and September 2009. After collecting the data, both advantages and disadvantages of each of concepts were analyzed. In the three countries considered in the present study the concepts of PHR, extracted from the literature, are that; a)patient/person be recognized as the owner of PHR; b)information be disclosed only to those authorized by the patient; c) and that PHR is created upon request and consent of the individual involved. Before PHRs can be profitably used in the health administration of a (developing) country, the necessary knowledge, infrastructures, and rules need to be developed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Institute of Medicine, Crossing the quality chasm: a new health system for the twenty-first century. National Academy, Washington, 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Borowitz, S. M., and Wyatt, J. C., The Origin, content and workload of e-mail consultations. JAMA 280:13211–1324, 1998.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Markle Foundation Connecting for Health (2003). A public-private collaborative, the personal health working group, final report. .www. Connecting for health.org/resources/final_phwg_report1.pdf. Accessed Jul 2009

  4. American Health Information Management Association, And the American Medical informatics Association. A Joint Position Statement for Consumers of Health Care. The Value of Personal Health Records, February 2007, 78.4 available on www.ahima.org Accessed 2009.

  5. Vincelet, C., et al., How are personal child health records completed? A multicentric evaluation study. Archives de pédiatrie 10:403–409, 2003.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Wuerdeman, L., Volk, L., Pizziferri, L., Tsurikova, R,. Harris, C., Feygin, R., etal. How Accurate is Information That Patient Contribute to their Electronic Health Record? .AMIA Symposium Proceeding. 834, 2005.

  7. Tobacmana, J., Kissinger, P., Wells, M., Prokuski, J., Hoyer, M., McPherson, P., et al., Implementation of personal health records by case managers in a VAMC general medicine clinic. Patient Educ Counsel 54:27–33, 2004.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Tang, P. C., Ash, J. S., Bates, D. W., Overhage, M., and Sands, D. Z., Personal health records: Definitions, benefits, and strategies for overcoming barriers to adoption. J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc. 13:121–126, 2006.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Sun, K., Development of a model and comparison of personal health record and related health sites, 2001, available at http://www.informatics-review.com/thoughts/ksun.html. Accessed 2009

  10. Klein-Fedyshin, M. S., Consumer health informatics—integrating patients. Providers and Professionals Online. Med. Ref. Serv. Q. 21:35–50, 2002.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Sittig, D. F., Personal Health Records on the Internet: a Snapshot of the Pioneers at the end of the 20th Century. Int. J. Med. Inform. 65:1–6, 2002.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. AHIMA, Defining the personal health record. J AHIMA 76:24–25, 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Lee, M., Delaney, C., and Moorhead, S., Building a personal health record from a nursing perspective. Int. J. Med. Inform 76:S308–S316, 2007.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Kupchunas, W.R., Personal health record: new opportunity for patient education. Orthop Nurs. 26(3):185–91, 2007. quiz 192-3 (ISSN: 0744-6020). Available on: http://www.medscape.com/medline/publication/123?pmid=17538475 Accessed 2009.

  15. Pyper, C., Amery, J., Watson, M., and Crook, C., Patients’ experiences when accessing their online electronic patient records in primary care. Br J Gen Pract 54(498):38–43, 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Ward, I., and Innes, M., Electronic medical summaries in general practice—considering the patient’s contribution. Br J Gen Pract 53(489):293–7, 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Winkelman, W. J., Leonard, K. J., and Rossos, P. G., Patient perceived usefulness of on-line electronic medical records: employing grounded theory in the development of information and communication technologies by patients living with chronic illnesses. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 12(3):306–14, 2005.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Ertmer, A., and Uckert, F., User acceptance of and satisfaction with a personal electronic health record. Stud Health Technol Inform. 116:861–6, 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Honeyman, A., Cox, B., and Fisher, B., Potential impacts of patients' access to their electronic records. Informat Prim Care 13:55–60, 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Masys, D., Baker, D., Butros, A., and Cowles, K. E., Giving patient's access to their medical records via the internet: the PCASSO experience. J Am Med Inform Assoc 9(2):181–91, 2002.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Tang, C. P., and Lansky, D., The missing link: bridging the patient—provider health information gap. Health Aff 24(5):1290–1295, 2005.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. de Mul, M., and Berg, M., Completeness of medical records in emergency trauma care and an IT-based strategy for improvement. Inform Health Soc Care 32(2):157–167, 2007.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Garrido, T., Jamieson, L., Zhou, Y., Wiesenthal, A., and Liang, L., Effect of electronic health records in ambulatory care: retrospective, serial, cross sectional study. BMJ; 330(7491):581, 2005.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Boulay, F., Chevallier, T., Gendreike, Y., Joliot, Y., and Sambuc, R., A method for auditing medical records quality: audit of 467 medical records within the framework of the medical information system project quality control. Sante Publique 10:1–5, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Ashkenazi, A., Cooper, M., Chemke, J., Simon, D., Cohen, C., Mass, N., and Schattner, A., The quality assurance committee in a general hospital: its use in improvement of the medical record. Isr J Med Sci 28:10–714, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Cardo, S., Agabiti, N., Picconi, O., Scarinci, M., Papini, P., Guasticchi, G., et al., The quality of medical records: a retrospective study in Lazio region, Italy. Ann Ig 15(5):433–442, 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Patel, A. G., Mould, T., and Webb, P. J., Inadequacies of hospital medical records. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 75:1–7, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Khajouei, R., A study on the performance of medical record departments of teaching hospitals affiliated with kerman university of medical sciences. Thesis of Master’s Degree of Medical Records Education. Iran University of Medical Sciences. School of Management and Medical Information Sciences, 2000.

  29. Salahi, M., Survey of condition of retention and retrieval of medical records in teaching hospitals affiliated with Iran University of medical sciences and comparing with the national standards and standards of AMRA. Thesis of Master’s Degree of Medical Records Education. Iran University of Medical Sciences. School of Management and Medical Information Sciences, 2000.

  30. Ebrahimi, P., Study of the rate of commitment to the standards in medical record department of social security hospitals located in Tehran”. Thesis of master’s degree of medical records education. Iran University of Medical Sciences. School of Management and Medical Information Sciences, 1997

  31. Goldstein, D., Groen, P. J., Ponkshe, S., and Wine, M., Medical informatics 20/20: quality and electronic health records through collaboration, open solutions, and innovation. Jones & Bartlett, Boston, 2007.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Kim, E. H., Stolyar, A., Lober, W. B., Herbaugh, A. L., Shinstrom, S. E., Zierler, B. K., Soh, C. B., and Kim, Y., Challenges to using an electronic personal health record by a low-income elderly population. J Med Internet Res 11(4):e44, 2009.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Farzandipour, M., Sadoughi, F., Ahmadi, M., Karimi, I., Security Requirements and Solutions in Electronic Health Records: Records: Lessons Learned from a Comparative Study. J Med Syst. 2009 April. www.springerlink.com/content/ct7363q930202377/. DOI 10.1007/s10916-009-9276-7.

  34. Kimiafar, K. H., Study of user's viewpoint about hospital information system quality in the teaching hospitals of Mashhad Medical Sciences University. Iran University of Medical sciences, School of Medical information Management, Tehran, 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Mann, R., Williams, J., Standards in Medical Record Keeping. J R Coll Physicians; 3(4): 329–332(4) 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Detmer, D., Steen. M.A., Learning from abroad: lessons and questions on personal health records for national policy. Washington American Association for Retired Persons (AARP) Public Policy Institute, 2006.URL: http://www.esi-bethesda.com/ncrrworkshops/clinicalResearch/pdf/2006_10_phr_abroad_DED_AARP.pdf. Accessed 2007.

  37. Pagliari, C., Detmer, D., Singleton, P., Electronic personal health records emergence and implications for the UK a report to the Nuffield Trust available at: www.nuffieldtrust.org.uk/ecomm/.../ElecPersonalRecordsII.pdf. Accessed 2009.

  38. Riazi, H., Fathi Roodsari, B., and Bitaraf, E., Electronic health record, concepts, standards and development approaches. Version 1.1. Ministry of Health, Treatment and Medical Training, Tehran, 2007.

    Google Scholar 

  39. Commonwealth Department of Health and Aged Care. The benefits and difficulties of introducing a national approach to electronic health records in Australia. Available from URL:http://www.health.gov.au. Accessed 2007.

  40. Commonwealth of Australia, International Approaches to the Electronic Health Record. In: policy coordination and research section. Background Documents. [Online].Commonwealth of Australia; 2003.p.1–48. Available At: http://www.healthconnect.gov.au. Accessed 2007.

  41. National Committee on Vital and Health Statistics. Information for health. [Cited 2001 Nov]. Available from URL: http://www.ncvhs.hhs.gov/nhiilayo.pdf.

  42. The no-computer-virus, The Economist. Retrieved December 2, 2005, http://www.economist.com , 2005.

  43. Brennan, S., NHS IT project: the biggest computer programme in the world. .. ever! Radcliff Medical, Oxford, 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  44. NHS Scotland. National eHealth/IM&T strategy 2004–2008, 2004. Accessed February 6, 2008, from www.show.scot.nhs.uk/ehealth/index.htm

  45. Personal health records for Gypsies-Travellers, Scottish Executive. 2005. Available At: http://www.scotland.gov.uk/News/Releases/2005/10/12125440. Accessed December 7, 2008.

  46. Eklund, B., and Joustra-Enquist, I., SUSTAINS—direct access for the patients to the medical record over the Internet. In: Iakovidis, I., Wilson, P., and Healy, J. C. (Eds.), E-Health: current situation and examples of implemented and beneficial e-Health applications. IOS, Amsterdam, 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  47. AARP: Policy and Research Information for Professionals in Aging Global Focus On Personal Health Records, Available At: http://www.aarpinternational.org/gra_sub/gra_sub_show.htm?doc_id=541055. Accessed May 2008.

  48. Request for Proposals: Testing of Personal Health Record Data Exchanges: The use of medicare claims data to populate a personal health record. RFP. Baltimore, MD: Department of Health and Human Services: Center for Medicare & Medicaid Services; 2006 March 1. Report No.: RFP-CMS-2006-0003.

  49. ASTM International, E2211-02 Standard specification for relationship between a person (Consumer) and a supplier of an electronic personal (Consumer) health record, available at: www.astm.org. Accessed Jan 2008.

  50. National E-Health Transition Authority. (2005). Welcome to NEHTA and major initiatives 2005–2006. Accessed September 2007, from www.nehta.gov.au.

  51. National Health Service Connecting for Health. HealthSpace. 2008. Available at: www.connectingforhealth.nhs.uk/systemsandservices/nhscrs/scr/healthspace. Accessed March 2009.

  52. National Committee on Vital and Health Statistics, Information for Health: A strategy for building the national health information infrastructure, Washington, D.C., 2001.

  53. E Health Record. Shaping the future of healthcare individual electronic health records. Available at: http://www.nehta.gov.au. Accessed May 2009.

  54. Parham Medical Organization, Available at: http://www.Parhammedical.or/farsi/e_general.asp. Accessed April 2009.

  55. Department of Health and Human Services. National Committee on Vital and Health Statistics. Personal health records and personal health record systems: a report and recommendations. Washington, 2006. www.ncvhs.hhs.gov/0602nhiirpt.pdf.

  56. NAHTA. ehealth record individual electronic health record consultation report July 2008. Available at:http://www.nehta.gov.au and http://www.nehta.gov.au/coordinated-care/benefits-of-an-iehr. Accessed May 2008.

  57. BMA. Inquiry into the electronic patient record and its use—response from the British Medical Association.2007. Available at: http://www.bma.org.uk/ap.nsf/content/HSCresponseEPR?OpenDocument&Hightlight=2.patient,record.2007. Accessed December 2008.

  58. Harris Interactive. Two in five adults keep personal or family health records and almost everybody thinks this is a good idea. Available at: http://www.harrisinteractive.com/news/newsletters/healthnews/HI_HealthCareNews2004Vol4_Iss13.pdf. Accessed March 30, 2006.

  59. Australian Institute of Health and welfare. Australian's Health, 2008. Available at: http://www.healthconnect.gov.au/Australians. March 2008. Accessed May 2009.

  60. Clarke, J. L., Meiris, D. C., and Nash, D. B., Electronic personal health records come of age. Am J Med Qual 21(suppl 3):5–15S, 2006.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  61. National Health Services, Available at: http://www.nhs.uk/chq/pages/1309.aspx?CategoryID=68&SubCategoryID=160&r=1&rtitle=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.nhs.uk%2Fchq+-+1309%3FCategoryID%3D68%26SubCategoryID%3D160, Accessed 12May 2008.

  62. Bitaraf, E., Riazi, H., Fathi Roodsari, B., Comparative study on eHealth on World. Version 2.2. Ministry of Health, Treatment and Medical Training, Tehran, 2007. Available at: www.Takfab.hbi.ir. Accessed April 2009.

  63. Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center. Operates PatientSite. Available at: (www.patientsite.org).Accessed April 2009.

  64. Commonwealth of Australia. 2005a. Health connect implementation strategy, Version 2.0. Available at: www.healthconnect.gov.au/pdf/HealthConnect_implementation_Jun05.pdf. Accessed July 2008.

  65. SMS News, Now doctors offer health help by text. Available at: http://sms-news.tm4b.com/email-446.php . Accessed 2008.

  66. Markle Foundation, Connecting for Health. Connecting Americans to their healthcare. Final report of the working group on policies for electronic information sharing between doctors and patients. Available at: http://www.connectingforhealth.org/resources/final_phwg_report1.pdf . Accessed April 2008

  67. Lohr, S., Microsoft rolls our personal health records. New York Times. 2007 October 4.

  68. Steinbrook, R., Personally controlled online health data—the next big thing in medical care? N. Engl. J. Med; 358:1653–6, 2008.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  69. Leavitt, M., Dissenting statement on PHR certification process. Available at: http://www.providersedge.com/ehdocs/ehr_presentations/AHIC_Meeting_Materials_2007-04-24.pdf. Accessed May2009.

  70. Mayer, M., Google health, a first look. 2008. Available at: http://googleblog.blogspot.com/2008/02/google-health-first-look.html. Accessed April 2009

  71. Markle Foundation, Attitudes of Americans regarding personal health records and national electronic health information exchange. October 2005. Available at. www.connectingforhealth.org/resources/101105_survey_summary.pdf. Accessed November 2008.

  72. Tang, P.C., Black, W., Buchanan, J., Young, C.Y., Hooper, D., Lane, S.R., etal. PAMF online: integrating ehealth with an electronic medical record system. AMIA Annu Symp Proc, 649–53, 2003.

  73. Canada Health infoway, Infoway Pan-Canadian EHR survey phase I results and analysis. Available at: http://www.canadahealthinfoway.ca. Accessed December 2008.

  74. Zahedifar, R., An investigation over the observance of patients’ rights in medical record department in hospitals sponsored by Isfahan University of Medical Sciences. [MSc Thesis in Persian]. Tehran: School of Medical Information Management, Iran University of Medical Sciences; 2001.

  75. Hospitals and Health Networks. Most wired survey and benchmarking study. 2002, Available at: www.hhn-mostwired.com. Accessed October 2008.

  76. Iakovidis, I., Towards personal health record: current situation, obstacles and trends in implementation of electronic healthcare record in Europe. Int J Med Informat 52:105–115, 1998.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  77. HIMSS; Himss National health information infrastructure survey, 2004. Available at: http://www.himss.org/content/files/2004HealthInfoInfrastructureSurvey.pdf. Accessed January 2008.

  78. Advisory Council on Health infostructure. Canada Health infoway, [cited 1999 Feb]. Available from URL: http://www.hc-sc.gc.ca. Accessed December 2008.

  79. Behnam, S., A comparative study of accessibility levels confidentiality of medical records in selected countries. School of Medical Information Management, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, 2005 [MSc Thesis in Persian].

    Google Scholar 

  80. Cayton, H., Introduction to better information, better choices, better health: putting information at the centre of health. 2004. London: Department of Health http://www.dh.gov.uk/en/Publicationsandstatistics/Publications/PublicationsPolicyAndGuidance/DH_4098576. Accessed 2008.

  81. Cimino, J. J., Patel, V. L., and Kushniruk, A. W., What do patients do with access to their medical records. Medinfo 10:1440–1444, 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  82. Cimino, J. J., Patel, V. L., and Kushniruk, A. W., The patient clinical information system (PatCIS):technical solutions for and experiences with giving patients access to their electronic medical records. Int J Med Informat 68(1–3):113–27, 2002.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  83. Tuil, W. S., Hoopen, A. J., Braat, D., Vries Robbe, P. F., and Kremer, A. J., Patient—centered care: using online personal medical records in IVF practice. Hum Reprod 21(11):2955–2959, 2006.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  84. Earnest, M., Ross, S., Wittevrongel, L., Moore, L., and Lin, C., Use of a patient-accessible electronic medical record in a practice for congestive heart failure: patient and physician experiences. J Am Med Inform Assoc 11:410–417, 2004.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  85. Gaster, B., Knight, C., Dewitt, D., Sheffield, V. L. J., Asseffi, P. N., and Buchwald, D., Physician's use of and attitudes toward electronic mail for patient communication. J. GEN. INTERN. MED. 18:385–389, 2003.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  86. Sands, D.Z., Sharing electronic medical record information with patient via the internet. Available at: http://www.informatics-review.com/talks/TEPR-2003/share.pdf. Accessed March 2008.

  87. Alarcon, O., Baudet, J. S., Sanchez Del Rio, A., Dorta, M. C., De La Torre, M., Socas, M. R., and Blasco, P., Internet use to obtain health information among patients attending a digestive disease office. Gastroenterol Hepatol 29(5):286–90, 2006.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  88. Iverson, S. A., Howard, K. B., and Penney, B. K., Impact of internet use on health–related behaviors and the patient-physician relationship: a survey-based study and review. JAOA 108(12):699–711, 2008.

    Google Scholar 

  89. Sands, Z.D., Building the health informatics chunnel. Available at: http://mit-docs.sbu.ac.ir/2-MIT/Dr.%20L.Nazarimanesh/Lecture%20Notes/03-01.pdf. Accessed May 2008.

  90. Torabi, M., and Ramezanghorbani, N., The role of information and communication technology on health knowledge of high school students. Journal of Zanjan Uniersity of Medial Siences 15(58):49–56, 2007.

    Google Scholar 

  91. Katz, S. J., and Moyer, C. A., The emerging role of online communication between patients and their providers. J. GEN. INTERN. MED. 19:978–983, 2004.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  92. Pelletier, A.L., Sutton, G.R., Walker, R.R., Are your patients ready for electronic communication. Available at: www.aafp.org/fpm. Accessed 2008.

  93. Ludwick, D. A., and Doucette, J., Adopting electronic medical records in primary care: lessons learned from health information systems implementation experience in seven countries. Int J Med Inform. 78(1):22–31, 2009.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  94. Hajavi, A., Azar, F. E., and Meidani, Z., Medical records standards in selected countries and Iran: a comparative study. New J (Inst Health Rec Inf Manag) 46(1):4–6, 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  95. Meidani, Z., and Safdari, R., Telemedicolegal aspects of telemedicine. New J (Inst Health Rec Inf Manag) 46(3):4–6–8, 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  96. Lober, W.B., Zierler, B., Herbaugh, A., Shinstrom, S.E., Stolyar, A., Kim, E.H., Kim, Y., Barriers to the use of a personal health record by an elderly population. AMIA Annu Symp Proc: 514–8. 2006. www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Farahnaz Sadoughi.

Additional information

This research is resulted from PhD thesis.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ahmadi, M., Jeddi, F.R., Gohari, M.R. et al. A Review of the Personal Health Records in Selected Countries and Iran. J Med Syst 36, 371–382 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10916-010-9482-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10916-010-9482-3

Keywords

Navigation