Abstract
Building rapport with families (parents and children) is recognized as an important feature of effective intervention. In telepractice service delivery, activities and practices that shape speech language pathologists’ (SLPs) rapport with children and families can take different forms of engagement and interaction. Identifying which SLP practices facilitate the establishment and nurturing of rapport is important and may provide keys to successful service delivery via telepractice. In this article, we present results from a qualitative study exploring SLPs’ perceptions of building rapport with the children and families they serve via telepractice and the strategies they use to establish and maintain rapport with them.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
American Speech-Language-Hearing Association. (2005). Speech-language pathologists providing clinical services via telepractice: Technical report [technical report]. https://doi.org/10.1044/policy.TR2005-00152. Retrieved from American Speech-Language-Hearing Association website: http://www.asha.org/policy/TR2005-00152.htm.
Anderson, K., Balandin, S., Stancliffe, R. J., & Layfield, C. (2014). Parents' perspectives on tele-AAC support for families with a new speech generating device: Results from an Australian pilot study. Perspectives on telepractice, 4(2), 39–70.
Ashforth, B. E., & Humphrey, R. H. (1993). Emotional labor in service roles: The influence of identity. Academy of Management Review, 18(1), 88–115.
Brantlinger, E., Jimenez, R., Klingner, J., Pugach, M., & Richardson, V. (2005). Qualitative studies in special education. Exceptional Children, 71, 195–207.
Cherney, L. R., Kaye, R. C., & Hitch, R. S. (2011). The best of both worlds: Combining synchronous and asynchronous telepractice in the treatment of aphasia. Perspectives on Neurophysiology and Neurogenic Speech and Language Disorders, 21, 83–93.
Corbin, J., & Strauss, A. (2015). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory (4th ed.). Los Angeles, CA: Sage Publications.
Curtiss, S., Pearson, J., Akamoglu, Y., Fisher, K. W., Meyer, L., Snodgrass, M., et al. (2016). Bringing instructional strategies home: Reaching families online. Teaching Exceptional Children, 48, 159–167.
Day, S. X., & Schneider, P. L. (2002). Psychotherapy using distance technology: A comparison of face-to-face, video, and audio treatment. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 49(4), 499–503.
Dobransky, N. D., & Frymier, A. B. (2004). Developing teacher children relationships through out of class communication. Communication Quarterly, 52, 211–223.
Freckmann, A., Hines, M., & Lincoln, M. (2017). Clinicians’ perspectives of therapeutic alliance in face-to-face and telepractice speech–language pathology sessions. International Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 19(3), 287–296.
Grogan-Johnson, S., Schmidt, A., Schenker, J., Alvares, R., Rowan, L., & Taylor, J. (2013). A comparison of speech sound intervention delivered by telepractice and side-by-side service delivery models. Communication Disorders Quarterly, 34, 210–220.
Hill, A., Theodoros, D., Russell, T., & Ward, E. (2009). Using telerehabilitation to assess apraxia of speech in adults. International Journal of Language and Communication Disorders, 44, 731–747.
Hines, M., Lincoln, M., Ramsden, R., Martinovich, J., & Fairweather, M. (2015). Speech pathologists’ perspectives on transitioning to telepractice: What factors promote acceptance? Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare, 21, 469–473.
Mazer, J. P., Murphy, R. E., & Simonds, C. J. (2007). I'll see you on “Facebook”: The effects of computer-mediated teacher self-disclosure on children motivation, affective learning, and classroom climate. Communication Education, 56(1), 1–17.
Mazer, J. P., Murphy, R. E., & Simonds, C. J. (2009). The effects of teacher self-disclosure via Facebook on teacher credibility. Learning, Media and Technology, 34(2), 175–183.
Murphy, E., & Rodriguez-Manzanares, M. A. (2008). Contradictions between the virtual and physical high school classroom: A third generation activity theory perspective. British Journal of Educational Technology, 39, 1061–1072.
Murphy, E., & Rodriguez-Manzanares, M. A. (2012). Rapport in distance education. The International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 13, 167–190.
Nguyen, H. (2007). Rapport building in language instruction: A microanalysis of the multiple resources in teacher talk. Language and Education, 21, 284–303.
Parette, H. P., Meadan, H., Doubet, S., & Hess, J. (2010). Supporting families of young children with disabilities using technology. Education and Training in Autism and Developmental Disabilities, 45, 552–565.
Snodgrass, M. R., Chung, M. Y., Biller, M. F., Appel, K. E., Meadan, H., & Halle, J. W. (2017). Telepractice in speech–language therapy: The use of online technologies for parent training and coaching. Communication Disorders Quarterly, 38(4), 242–254.
Sucala, M., Schnur, J. B., Brackman, E. H., Constantino, M. J., & Montgomery, G. H. (2013). Clinicians’ attitudes toward therapeutic alliance in e-therapy. Journal of General Psychology, 140(4), 282–293.
Tickle-Degnen, L., & Rosenthal, R. (1990). The nature of rapport and its nonverbal correlates. Psychological Inquiry, 7, 285–293.
Tucker, J. K. (2012). Perspectives of speech-language pathologists on the use of telepractice in schools: Quantitative survey results. International Journal of Telerehabilitation, 4, 61–72.
Acknowledgements
We would like to acknowledge the contributions and mentorship of Dr. James Halle at the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.
Funding
This study was partially funded by the Department of Special Education at the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Ethical Approval
All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.
Informed Consent
Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.
Conflict of Interest
We declare no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.
Appendix
Appendix
Service Provider Questionnaire
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Akamoglu, Y., Meadan, H., Pearson, J.N. et al. Getting Connected: Speech and Language Pathologists’ Perceptions of Building Rapport via Telepractice. J Dev Phys Disabil 30, 569–585 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10882-018-9603-3
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10882-018-9603-3