Skip to main content
Log in

From preschool teachers’ professional development to children’s knowledge: comparing sets

  • Published:
Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Recently, there have been increased calls for enhancing preschool children’s mathematics knowledge along with increasing calls for preparing preschool teachers to meet the demands of new preschool mathematics curricula. This article describes the professional development program Starting Right: Mathematics in Preschools. Focusing on four episodes that revolve around the topic of equivalent sets, it demonstrates how engaging preschool teachers with challenging tasks may promote their subject matter knowledge as well as their pedagogical content knowledge, leading to an interweaving of knowledge and practice. Assessment of the program included assessing the children’s knowledge. Results indicated that students of participating teachers learned to be more flexible and to give more possible answers than students of non-participating teachers.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. In Israel, preschool children 4–6 years of age often learn together and are taught by the same preschool teacher.

References

  • Borasi, R. (1996). Reconceiving mathematics instruction: A focus on errors. Issues in curriculum theory, policy, and research series. Norwood, NJ: Ablex Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chapman, O. (2008). Narratives in mathematics teacher education. In D. Tirosh & T. Wood (Eds.), The international handbook of mathematics teacher education (Vol. 2, pp. 15–38). Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clarke, D. (1994). Ten key principles from research for the professional development of mathematics teachers. In D. B. Aichele & A. F. Coxford (Eds.), Professional development for teachers of mathematics, NCTM 1994 yearbook (pp. 37–48). Reston, VA: NCTM INC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clements, D. H., Sarama, J., & DiBiase, A. M. (2002). Preschool and kindergarten mathematics: A national conference. Teaching Children Mathematics, 8(9), 510–514.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferrini-Mundy, J., & Schram, T. (Eds.). (1997). The recognizing and recoding reform in mathematics education projects: Insights, issues, and implications (Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, Monograph #8). Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.

  • Fischbein, E., & Baltsan, M. (1999). The mathematical concept of set and the ‘collection’ model. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 37, 1–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ginsburg, H. P., Lee, J. S., & Boyd, J. S. (2008). Mathematics education for young children: What it is and how to promote it. Social Policy Report, 22(1), 1–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Graven, M. (2004). Investigating mathematics teacher learning within an in-service community of practice: The centrality of confidence. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 57, 177–211.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Israel National Mathematics Preschool Curriculum (INMPC). (2008). Retrieved April 7, 2010, from http://www.meyda.education.gov.il/files/Tochniyot_Limudim/KdamYesodi/Math1.pdf.

  • Linchevsky, L., & Vinner, S. (1988). The naive concept of sets in elementary teachers’. In A. Borbás (Ed.), Proceedings of the 12th conference of the international group for the psychology of mathematics education (Vol. 2, pp. 471–478). Veszprém, Hungary: PME.

    Google Scholar 

  • Markovitz, Z., & Smith, M. (2008). Cases as tools in mathematics teacher education. In D. Tirosh & T. Wood (Eds.), The international handbook of mathematics teacher education (Vol. 2, pp. 39–64). Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Association for the Education of Young Children & National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (2002). Position statement. Early childhood mathematics: Promoting good beginnings. Available www.naeyc.org/resources/position_statements/psmath.htm.

  • National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (2000). Principles and standards for school mathematics. Reston, VA: NCTM.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (2006). Curriculum focal points for kindergarten through grade 8 mathematics. Reston, VA: NCTM.

    Google Scholar 

  • Practice Guidance for the Early Years Foundation Stage. (2008). Retrieved April 9, 2009, from www.standards.dfes.gov.uk/eyfs/resources/downloads/practice-guidance.pdf.

  • Schoenfeld, A. H., & Kilpatrick, J. (2008). Toward a theory of proficiency in teaching mathematics. In D. Tirosh & T. Wood (Eds.), The international handbook of mathematics teacher education (Vol. 2, pp. 321–354). Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwan Smith, M. (2001). Practice-based professional development for teachers of mathematics. Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shulman, L. (1986). Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching. Educational Researcher, 15(2), 4–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sullivan, P. (2006). Not only what and why, but also how: Thinking about strategies for mathematics teacher education. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 8, 437–440.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sullivan, P., & Mousley, J. (2001). Thinking teaching: Seeing mathematics teachers as active decision makers. In F.-L. Lin & T. J. Cooney (Eds.), Making sense of mathematics teacher education (pp. 147–163). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tirosh, D., & Graeber, A. (2003). Challenging and changing mathematics teaching classroom practices. In A. J. Bishop, M. A. Clements, C. Keitel, J. Kilpatrick, & F. K. S. Leung (Eds.), Second international handbook of mathematics education (pp. 643–687). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tsamir, P. (1999). The transition from comparison of finite to the comparison of infinite sets: Teaching prospective teachers. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 38, 209–234.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tsamir, P. (2008). Using theories as tools in mathematics teacher education. In D. Tirosh & T. Wood (Eds.), The international handbook of mathematics teacher education (Vol. 2, pp. 211–234). Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tsamir, P., Tirosh, D., Tabach, M., & Levenson, E. (2010). Multiple solution methods and multiple outcomes—Is it a task for kindergarten children? Educational Studies in Mathematics, 73(3), 217–231.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Watson, A., & Sullivan, P. (2008). Teachers learning about tasks and lessons. In D. Tirosh & T. Wood (Eds.), The international handbook of mathematics teacher education (Vol. 2, pp. 109–134). Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zaslavsky, O. (2005). Seizing the opportunity to create uncertainty in learning mathematics. Educations Studies in Mathematics, 60(3), 297–321.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zaslavsky, O. (2007). Mathematics-related tasks, teacher education, and teacher educators: The dynamics associated with tasks in mathematics teacher education. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 10(6), 433–440.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The project reported on here was conducted in collaboration with the Rashi Foundation.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Esther Levenson.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Tirosh, D., Tsamir, P., Levenson, E. et al. From preschool teachers’ professional development to children’s knowledge: comparing sets. J Math Teacher Educ 14, 113–131 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10857-011-9172-1

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10857-011-9172-1

Keywords

Navigation