Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Families of Youth Who Have Sexually Offended: Understanding Shared Experiences and Moving Towards a Typology

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Journal of Child and Family Studies Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Theoretical frameworks like Family Systems and Ecological Theories that postulate youth development is shaped by interconnected and interdependent systems begets further inquiry into classifications of such systems. Developing family typologies of youth who commit sexual crimes may inform etiology, service approaches, and judicial responses. In collaboration with a state Sex Offender Management Board, this study analyzed the perspectives of treatment providers (N = 19) on families of youth who have committed sexual crimes. Using deductive coding strategies including hypothesis and elaborative coding; observer triangulation and inter-subjective agreement; constant comparison analyses; and other rigorous qualitative techniques, findings confirmed and expanded upon extant literature. Results revealed a spectrum of open and closed family systems and common experiences including distorted perceptions of sexuality, protection of the family system, and other contextual influences. Findings are integrated with the theoretical frameworks and recommendations are offered to improve practices and typological research.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adler, N. A., & Schutz, J. (1995). Sibling incest offenders. Child Abuse and Neglect, 19(7), 811–819.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • ATLAS.ti Version 7.0. (2012). Berlin, Scientific Software Development.

  • Baker, A. J. L., Tabacoff, R., Tornusciolo, G., & Eisenstadt, M. (2003). Family secrecy: A comparative study of juvenile sex offenders and youth with conduct disorders. Family Process, 42(1), 105–116.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bischof, G. P., Stith, S. M., & Wilson, S. M. (1992). A comparison of the family systems of adolescent sexual offenders and nonsexual offending delinquents. Family Relations, 41(3), 318–323.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boeije, H. (2002). A purposeful approach to the constant comparative method in the analysis of qualitative interviews. Quality and Quantity, 36(4), 391–409.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bowen, M. (1976). Theory in the practice of psychotherapy. In P. J. Guerin (Ed.), Family therapy (pp. 42–90). New York: Gardner.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowen, M. (1978). Family therapy in clinical practice. New York: Aronson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Broderick, C. B. (1993). Understanding family process: Basics of family systems theory. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bronfenbrenner, U. (1979). The ecology of human development: Experiments by nature and design. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carter, B., & McGoldrick, M. (1989). The changing family life cycle: A framework for family therapy. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chaffin, M., Berliner, L., Block, R., Johnson, T. C., Friedrich, W. N., Lyon, T. D., et al. (2006). Report of the ATSA task force on children with sexual behavior problems. Beaverton, OR: Association for the Treatment of Sexual Abusers.

    Google Scholar 

  • DeFrain, J., & Asay, S. M. (2007). Strong families around the world: An introduction to the family strengths perspective. Marriage and Family Review, 41(1/2), 1–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Duane, Y., Carr, A., Cherry, J., McGrath, K., & O’Shea, D. (2002). Experiences of parents attending a program for families of adolescent child sexual abuse perpetrators in Ireland. Child Care in Practice, 8(1), 46–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Duane, Y., & Morrison, T. (2004). Families of young people who sexually abuse: Characteristics, context, and considerations. In G. O’Reilly, A. Carr, & W. L. Marshall (Eds.), The handbook of clinical intervention with young people who sexually abuse (pp. 103–128). New York, NY: Brunner Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Etgar, T., & Shulstain-Elrom, H. (2009). A combined therapy model (individual and family) for children with sexual behavior problems. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 53(5), 574–595.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Felizzi, M. C. (2015). Family or caregiver instability, parental attachment, and the relationship to juvenile sex offending. Journal of Child Sexual Abuse, 24(6), 641–658.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hunter, J. A. (2006). Understanding diversity in juvenile sexual offenders: Implications for assessment, treatment, and legal management. In R. E. Longo & D. S. Prescott (Eds.), Current perspectives: Working with sexually aggressive youth and youth with sexual behavior problems (pp. 63–77). Holyoke, MA: NEARI Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hunter, J., & Longo, R. E. (2004). Relapse prevention with juvenile sexual abusers: A holistic and integrated approach. In G. Reilly, W. L. Marshall, A. Carr, & R. C. Beckett (Eds.), The handbook of clinical intervention with young people who sexually abuse. Brunner-Routledge: Hove and New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaplan, M. S., Becker, J. V., & Martinez, D. F. (1990). A comparison of mothers of adolescent incest vs. non-incest perpetrators. Journal of Family Violence, 5(3), 209–214.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lankester, D., & Meyer, B. (1986). The relationship of family structure to sex offense behavior. In Paper presented at the first national conference on juvenile sex offending, Minneapolis, MN.

  • Letourneau, E. J., & Borduin, C. M. (2008). The effective treatment of juveniles who sexually offend: An ethical imperative. Ethics and Behavior, 18(2/3), 286–306.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Letourneau, E. J., Henggeler, S. W., Borduin, C. M., Schewe, P. A., McCart, M. R., Chapman, J. E., & Saldana, L. (2009). Multisystemic therapy for juvenile sexual offenders: 1-year results from a randomized effectiveness trial. Journal of Family Psychology, 23(1), 89–102.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Longo, R. E. (2005). An integrated experiential approach to treating young people who sexually abuse. Journal of Child Sexual Abuse, 13(3–4), 193–213.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miner, M. H., Romine, R., Robinson, B. E., Berg, D., & Knight, R. A. (2014). Anxious attachment, social isolation, and indicators of sex drive and compulsivity: Predictors of sexual abuse perpetration in adolescent males. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 1–22. doi:10.1177/1079063214547585.

  • Nahum, D., & Brewer, M. M. (2004). Multi-family group therapy for sexually abusive youth. Journal of Child Sexual Abuse, 13(3/4), 215–243.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • O’Brien, M. J. (1991). Taking sibling incest seriously. In M. Patton (Ed.), Family sexual abuse: Frontline research and evaluation (pp. 75–92). Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Olson, D. H., Sprenkle, D. H., & Russell, C. S. (1979). Circumplex model of marital and family systems: I. Cohesion and adaptability dimensions, family types, and clinical applications. Family Process, 18(1), 3–28.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Padget, D. K. & Henwood, B. F. (2012). Qualitative and mixed methods: Current approaches. School of social work, University of Denver, May 9, 2012. Presentation.

  • Padgett, D. K. (2008). Qualitative methods in social work research (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Papero, D. V. (1990). Bowen family systems theory. Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rich, P. (2011). Juvenile sexual offenders: understanding, assessing, and rehabilitating (2nd ed.). New Jersey: Wiley.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Righthand, S., & Welch, C. (2004). Characteristics of youth who sexually offend. Journal of Child Sexual Abuse, 13(3), 15–32.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ryan, G. (2010a). Sexually abusive youth: Defining the problem and the population. In G. Ryan, T. Leversee, & S. Lane (Eds.), Juvenile sexual offending: Causes consequences and correction (3rd ed., pp. 3–12). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ryan, G. (2010b). The families of sexually abusive youth. In G. Ryan, T. Leversee, & S. Lane (Eds.), Juvenile sexual offending: Causes consequences and correction (3rd ed., pp. 147–164). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saldana, J. (2009). The coding manual for qualitative researchers. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sefarbi, R. (1990). Admitters and deniers among adolescent sex offenders and their families: A preliminary study. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 60(3), 460–465.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Seto, M. S., & Lalumiere, M. L. (2010). What is so special about male adolescent sexual offending? A review and test of explanations through meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 136(4), 526–575.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Smallbone, S. W., & Dadds, M. R. (2000). Attachment and coercive sexual behavior. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 12(1), 3–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, W. R., & Monastersky, C. (1987). Strategies for studying the role of the family in the commission of sexual offenses by adolescents. Unpublished manuscript.

  • Spice, A., Viljoen, J., Latzman, N., Scalora, M., & Ullman, D. (2012). Risk and protective factors for recidivism among juveniles who have offended sexually. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 25(4), 347–369.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stevenson, H. C., Castillo, E., & Sefarbi, R. (1990). Treatment of denial in adolescent sex offenders and their families. Journal of Offender Counseling Services Rehabilitation, 14(1), 37–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thomas, J. (2004). Family intervention with young people with sexually abusive behavior. In G. O’Reilly, A. Carr, & W. L. Marshall (Eds.), The handbook of clinical intervention with young people who sexually abuse (pp. 315–342). New York: Brunner Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomas, J. (2010). Family therapy: A critical component in treatment of sexually abusive youth. In G. Ryan, T. Leversee, & S. Lane (Eds.), Juvenile sexual offending: Causes consequences and correction (3rd ed., pp. 357–379). New Jersey: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomas, V., & Olson, D. H. (2007). Problem families and the circumplex model: Observational assessment using the clinical rating scale. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 19(2), 159–175.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van Wijk, A., Vermeiren, R., Loeber, R., Hart-Kerkhoffs, L., Doreleijers, T., & Bullens, R. (2006). Juvenile sex offenders compared to non-sex offenders: A review of the literature 1995–2005. Trauma, Violence, and Abuse, 7(4), 227–243.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wanklyn, S. G., Ward, A. K., Cormier, N. S., Day, D. M., & Newman, J. E. (2012). Can we distinguish juvenile violent sex offenders, violent non-sex offenders, and versatile violent sex offenders based on childhood risk factors? Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 27(11), 2128–2143.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ward, T., & Brown, M. (2004). The good lives model and conceptual issues in offender rehabilitation. Psychology, Crime and Law, 10(3), 243–257.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ward, T., & Gannon, T. A. (2006). Rehabilitation, etiology, and self-regulation: The comprehensive good lives model of treatment for sexual offenders. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 11(1), 77–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Worley, K. B., Church, J. K., & Clemmons, J. C. (2011). Parents of adolescents who have committed sexual offenses: Characteristics, challenges and interventions. Clinical Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 17(3), 433–448.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Yoder, J. R., & Brown, S. (2015). Challenges facing families of sexually abusive youth: What prevents service engagement? Victims and Offenders, 10(1), 29–50. doi:10.1080/15564886.2013.875969.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yoder, J., Hansen, J., Lobanov-Rostovsky, C., & Ruch, D. (2015). The impact of family service involvement on treatment completion and general recidivism among male youthful sexual offenders. Journal of Offender Rehabilitation, 54(4), 256–277.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yoder, J., & Ruch, D. (2015). Youth who have sexually offended: Using strengths and rapport to engage families in treatment. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 24(9), 1–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zankman, S., & Bonomo, J. (2004). Working with parents to reduce juvenile sex offender recidivism. Journal of Child Sexual Abuse, 13(3/4), 139–156.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. College of Social Work, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, 43210, USA

    Jamie Rae Yoder, Donna Ruch & Ashleigh Hodge

Authors
  1. Jamie Rae Yoder
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Donna Ruch
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Ashleigh Hodge
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jamie Rae Yoder.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Yoder, J.R., Ruch, D. & Hodge, A. Families of Youth Who Have Sexually Offended: Understanding Shared Experiences and Moving Towards a Typology. J Child Fam Stud 25, 1581–1593 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10826-015-0339-8

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10826-015-0339-8

Keywords

Search

Navigation