Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

The effects of psychosocial interventions on the mental health, pregnancy rates, and marital function of infertile couples undergoing in vitro fertilization: a systematic review

  • Assisted Reproduction Technologies
  • Published:
Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

The purpose of this study was to examine the effects of psychosocial interventions on the mental health, pregnancy rates, and marital function of infertile couples undergoing in vitro fertilization (IVF), as determined through RCT studies.

Methods

Using the electronic databases PubMed, EMBase, Cochrane Library, CINAHL, PsycInfo, and CAJ, a systematic literature search was conducted in July 2015. MeSH terms, key words, and free words such as “infertility,” “fertilization in vitro,” “psychotherapy,” “intervention,” “anxiety,” “depression,” and “marital satisfaction” were used to identify all potential studies. The quality of the studies that were included was assessed using the risk of bias assessment tool developed by the Cochrane Back Review Group. Descriptive analysis was adopted to synthesize the results.

Results

A total of 20 randomized controlled trials were included in this review. There were reports of positive effects on the anxiety levels, pregnancy rates, or marital function of infertile couples in six studies that adopted different psychosocial approaches, including mind body intervention (Eastern body-mind-spirit, Integrative body-mind-spirit, and Mind/body intervention), cognitive behavioral therapy, group psychotherapy, and harp therapy. However, there were methodological or practical issues related to measurement points and attrition rates in these studies. None of these interventions were found to be efficacious in relieving the depression or stress of individuals or couples undergoing IVF treatment. None of the included studies tackled or measured the mental health status of the couples during the most stressful time of waiting for the pregnancy results of their treatment.

Conclusions

A complex intervention, based on sound evidence, should be developed targeting both females and males of infertile couples undergoing IVF treatment, particularly during the stressful period of waiting for the results of the pregnancy test result and after failed cycles.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Ying LY, Wu LH, Loke AY. Gender differences in experiences with and adjustments to infertility: a literature review. Int J Nurs Stud. 2015;52(10):1640–52.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Pasch LA, Christensen AL. Couples facing fertility problems. In: Schmaling KB, Sher TG, editors. The psychology of couples and illness: theory, research, & practice. Washington DC: American Psychological Association; 2000. p. 241–67.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  3. Ishihara O, Adamson GD, Dyer S, de Mouzon J, Nygren KG, Sullivan EA, et al. International committee for monitoring assisted reproductive technologies: world report on assisted reproductive technologies, 2007. Fertil Steril. 2015;103(2):402–13. e11.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Verhaak CM, Smeenk JM, Evers AW, Kremer JA, Kraaimaat FW, Braat DD. Women’s emotional adjustment to IVF: a systematic review of 25 years of research. Hum Reprod Update. 2007;13(1):27–36.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Wang K, Li J, Zhang JX, Zhang L, Yu J, Jiang P. Psychological characteristics and marital quality of infertile women registered for in vitro fertilization-intracytoplasmic sperm injection in China. Fertil Steril. 2007;87(4):792–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Yong P, Martin C, Thong J. A comparison of psychological functioning in women at different stages of in vitro fertilization treatment using the mean affect adjective check list. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2000;17(10):553–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Dong YZ, Yang XX, Sun YP. Correlative analysis of social support with anxiety and depression in men undergoing in vitro fertilization embryo transfer for the first time. J Int Med Res. 2013;41(4):1258–65.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Ismail W, Menezes M, Martin C, Thong K. A comparison of psychological functioning in couples undergoing frozen–thawed embryo replacement in various stages of treatment using the Mean Affect Adjective Check List (MAACL). J Assist Reprod Genet. 2004;21(9):323–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Yassini M, Khalili MA, Hashemian Z. The level of anxiety and depression among Iranian infertile couples undergoing in vitro fertilization or intra cytoplasmic sperm injection cycles. J Res Med Sci. 2005;10(6):358–62.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Wichman CL, Ehlers SL, Wichman SE, Weaver AL, Coddington C. Comparison of multiple psychological distress measures between men and women preparing for in vitro fertilization. Fertil Steril. 2011;95(2):717–21.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Volgsten H, Svanberg AS, Ekselius L, Lundkvist Ö, Poromaa IS. Prevalence of psychiatric disorders in infertile women and men undergoing in vitro fertilization treatment. Hum Reprod. 2008;23(9):2056–63.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Matthiesen S, Frederiksen Y, Ingerslev HJ, Zachariae R. Stress, distress and outcome of assisted reproductive technology (ART): a meta-analysis. Hum Reprod. 2011:der246.

  13. Boivin J, Griffiths E, Venetis CA. Emotional distress in infertile women and failure of assisted reproductive technologies: meta-analysis of prospective psychosocial studies. BMJ. 2011;342(7795).

  14. Sultan S, Tahir A. Psychological consequences of infertility. Hellenic J Psychol. 2011;8:229–4.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Onat G, Beji N. Marital relationship and quality of life among couples with infertility. Sex Disabil. 2012;30(1):39–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Gerrity DA. Five medical treatment stages of infertility: implications for counselors. The Family J. 2001;9(2):140–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Boivin J. A review of psychosocial interventions in infertility. Soc Sci Med. 2003;57(12):2325–41.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. De Liz T, Strauss B. Differential efficacy of group and individual/couple psychotherapy with infertile patients. Hum Reprod. 2005;20(5):1324–32.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Hammerli K, Znoj H, Barth J. The efficacy of psychological interventions for infertile patients: a meta-analysis examining mental health and pregnancy rate. Hum Reprod Update. 2009;15(3):279–95.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Frederiksen Y, Farver-Vestergaard I, Skovgård NG, Ingerslev HJ, Zachariae R. Efficacy of psychosocial interventions for psychological and pregnancy outcomes in infertile women and men: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ open. 2015;5(1):e006592.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Hoffmann TC, Glasziou PP, Boutron I, Milne R, Perera R, Moher D, et al. Better reporting of interventions: template for intervention description and replication (TIDieR) checklist and guide. BMJ (Clinical research ed). 2014;348:g1687.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Ruddy R. House A. The Cochrane Library: Psychosocial interventions for conversion disorder; 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Furlan AD, Pennick V, Bombardier C, van Tulder M. 2009 updated method guidelines for systematic reviews in the Cochrane Back Review Group. Spine. 2009;34(18):1929–41.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Gorayeb R, Borsari AC, Rosa-e-Silva AC, Ferriani RA. Brief cognitive behavioral intervention in groups in a Brazilian assisted reproduction program. Behav Med. 2012;38(2):29–35.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Mosalanejad L, Koolaee AK, Jamali S. Effect of cognitive behavioral therapy in mental health and hardiness of infertile women receiving assisted reproductive therapy (ART). Iran J Reprod Med. 2012;10(5):483–8.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Tarabusi M, Volpe A, Facchinetti F. Psychological group support attenuates distress of waiting in couples scheduled for assisted reproduction. J Psychosom Obstet Gynaecol. 2004;25(3–4):273–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Chan CHY, Ng EHY, Chan CLW. Ho, Chan THY. Effectiveness of psychosocial group intervention for reducing anxiety in women undergoing in vitro fertilization: a randomized controlled study. Fertil Steril. 2006;85(2):339–46.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Chan CH, Chan CL, Ng EH, Ho PC, Chan TH, Lee GL, et al. Incorporating spirituality in psychosocial group intervention for women undergoing in vitro fertilization: a prospective randomized controlled study. Psychol Psychother Theory Res. 2012;85(4):356–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Domar AD, Rooney KL, Wiegand B, Orav EJ, Alper MM, Berger BM, et al. Impact of a group mind/body intervention on pregnancy rates in IVF patients. Fertil Steril. 2011;95(7):2269–73.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Connolly KJ, Edelmann RJ, Bartlett H, Cooke ID, Lenton E, Pike S. An evaluation of counselling for couples undergoing treatment for in-vitro fertilization. Hum Reprod. 1993;8(8):1332–8.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. de Klerk C, Hunfeld JAM, Duivenvoorden HJ, den Outer MA, Fauser BCJM, Passchier J, et al. Effectiveness of a psychosocial counselling intervention for first-time IVF couples: a randomized controlled trial. Hum Reprod. 2005;20(5):1333–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Emery M, Béran MD, Darwiche J, Oppizzi L, Joris V, Capel R, et al. Results from a prospective, randomized, controlled study evaluating the acceptability and effects of routine pre-IVF counselling. Hum Reprod. 2003;18(12):2647–53.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Zyl C, Dyk AC, Niemandt C. The embryologist as counsellor during assisted reproduction procedures. Reprod Biomed Online. 2005;11(5):545–51.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Lancastle D, Boivin J. A feasibility study of a brief coping intervention (PRCI) for the waiting period before a pregnancy test during fertility treatment. Hum Reprod. 2008;23(10):2299–307.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Ockhuijsen H, Hoogen A, Eijkemans M, Macklon N, Boivin J. The impact of a self-administered coping intervention on emotional well-being in women awaiting the outcome of IVF treatment: a randomized controlled trial. Hum Reprod. 2014;29(7):1459–70.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Catoire P, Delaunay L, Dannappel T, Baracchini D, Marcadet-Fredet S, Moreau O, et al. Hypnosis versus diazepam for embryo transfer: a randomized controlled study. Am J Clin Hypn. 2013;55(4):378–86.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Tuil WS, Verhaak CM, Braat DD, de Vries Robbé PF, Kremer JA. Empowering patients undergoing in vitro fertilization by providing Internet access to medical data. Fertil Steril. 2007;88(2):361–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Lee S. Effects of using a nursing crisis intervention program on psychosocial responses and coping strategies of infertile women during in vitro fertilization. J Nurs Res. 2003;11(3):197–207.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Matthiesen S, Klonoff-Cohen H, Zachariae R, Jensen-Johansen MB, Nielsen BK, Frederiksen Y, et al. The effect of an expressive writing intervention (EWI) on stress in infertile couples undergoing assisted reproductive technology (ART) treatment: a randomized controlled pilot study. Brit J Health Psychol. 2012;17(2):362–78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Murphy EM, Nichols J, Somkuti SG, Sobel M, Braverman A, Barmat LI. Randomized trial of harp therapy during in vitro fertilization–embryo transfer. Evid-based Complement Alternat. 2014;19(2):93–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Panagopoulou E, Montgomery A, Tarlatzis B. Experimental emotional disclosure in women undergoing infertility treatment: are drop outs better off? Soc Sci Med. 2009;69(5):678–81.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Skiadas CC, Terry K, Pari M, Geoghegan A, Lubetsky L, Levy S, et al. Does emotional support during the luteal phase decrease the stress of in vitro fertilization? Fertil Steril. 2011;96(6):1467–72.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Zhu H-B, Hu P-C, Qiao J. Effects of group psychotherapy on mood in patients undergoing in vitro fertilization and embryo transfer. Chin Ment Health J. 2010;24(12):912–6.

    Google Scholar 

  44. Sandi C, Richter-Levin G. From high anxiety trait to depression: a neurocognitive hypothesis. Trends Neurosci. 2009;32(6):312–20.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Ying L, Wu LH, Loke AY. Gender differences in emotional reactions to in vitro fertilization treatment: a systematic review. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2016;33(2):167–79.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Quant HS, Zapantis A, Nihsen M, Bevilacqua K, Jindal S, Pal L. Reproductive implications of psychological distress for couples undergoing IVF. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2013;30(11):1451–8.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  47. Ying LY, Wu LH, Loke AY. The experience of Chinese couples undergoing in vitro fertilization treatment: perception of the treatment process and partner support. PLoS One. 2015;10(10):e0139691.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  48. Beckmann C. Infertility. Obstetrics and gynecology. Philadelphia: Wolters Kluwer Health/Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2014. p. 371–80

  49. Ying LY, Loke AY. An analysis of the concept of partnership in the couples undergoing infertility treatment. J Sex Marital Ther. 2015(ahead-of-print):1–14.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Alice Yuen Loke.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Capsule

A complex intervention, based on sound evidence, should be developed targeting both females and males of infertile couples undergoing IVF treatment, particularly during the stressful period of waiting for the results of the pregnancy test result and after failed cycles.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Table S1

(DOCX 31 kb)

Table S2

(DOCX 20 kb)

Table S3

(DOC 64 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ying, L., Wu, L.H. & Loke, A.Y. The effects of psychosocial interventions on the mental health, pregnancy rates, and marital function of infertile couples undergoing in vitro fertilization: a systematic review. J Assist Reprod Genet 33, 689–701 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10815-016-0690-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10815-016-0690-8

Keywords

Navigation