Skip to main content
Log in

The Elastic Modulus Variation During the Shotcrete Curing Jointly Investigated by the Convergence-Confinement and the Hyperstatic Reaction Methods

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Geotechnical and Geological Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Induced stresses in sprayed concrete (or shotcrete) are quite complex to evaluate and depend on many factors such as the size and depth of the tunnel, the geomechanical characteristics of the surrounding ground in which the tunnel is excavated, the type of shotcrete, the evolution of its mechanical parameters over time and the excavation face advance rate. In particular, the evolution of the mechanical properties of the shotcrete is crucial regarding the interaction with the tunnel wall and the development of the bending moments and the normal forces which occur along the circumference of the lining. In this research, a new calculation procedure based on the combined use of two calculation methods, the convergence confinement and the hyperstatic reaction methods, is presented. Thanks to this procedure, it is possible to progressively apply the load acting on the lining as the curing phase of the concrete progresses and therefore with the evolution of its mechanical parameters. This procedure has been applied to several examples of calculation, obtaining useful considerations regarding the mechanical behavior of the shotcrete lining when some fundamental parameters of the calculation change. It is possible to achieve bending moments and forces in the lining with the progress of the load steps. It is also possible to determine the trend of the lining safety factor over time and at the end of the loading phase, allowing a proper design of the support, with particular attention to the type of shotcrete and the thickness of the lining.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

(picture courtesy Roland Mayr, BASF)

Fig. 2

(modified after Oreste 2009)

Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

A :

Area of the lining section

\(E_{rm}\) :

Elastic modulus of the rock mass

\(E_{,mean }\) :

Mean value of the elastic modulus of shotcrete

\(E_{, t}\) :

Elastic modulus of shotcrete at the time \(t\)

\(E_{, 0}\) :

Value of the asymptotic elastic modulus of the shotcrete, for \(t = \infty\)

\(\left\{ F \right\}\) :

Nodal forces applied to the numerical model

\(J_{z}\) :

Moment of inertia of the lining section

\(K\) :

Global stiffness matrix

\(k_{i }\) :

Local stiffness matrix of the element i

\(K_{n}\) :

Normal stiffness of the interaction spring in the node of the model

\(K_{0}\) :

Lateral earth pressure

\(K_{s}\) :

Shear stiffness of the interaction spring in the node of the model

l :

Length of the one-dimensional element

M :

Bending moment

N :

Normal force

\(p\) :

Internal tunnel pressure

\(p_{cr}\) :

Critical pressure at the limit between the elastic and the plastic behavior

\(p_{fict}\) :

Fictitious internal tunnel pressure

\(p_{0}\) :

Lithostatic pressure

\(R\) :

Tunnel radius

\(r\) :

Generic radial coordinate

\(\left\{ S \right\}\) :

Vector of nodal displacements

T :

Shear force

\(t_{0}\) :

Final installation time of the support

\(u\) :

Tunnel wall radial displacement

v :

Poisson’s ratio

\(\alpha\) :

Time constants \((t^{ - 1} )\) of the curing equation for the elastic modulus

\(\alpha_{i}\) :

Angle of inclination of the element ith with respect to the horizontal

\(\phi\) :

Rotation of the element in correspondence to the nodes

\(\delta\) :

Advance step

\(\delta n\) :

Nodal normal displacement between the structure and the rock mass

\(\delta s\) :

Shear displacement between the structure and the rock mass

\(\sigma_{c,t}\) :

Unconfined compressive strength for the shotcrete at the time t

References

  • Chang Y, Stille H (1993) Influence of early age properties of shotcrete on tunnel construction sequences. In: Wood DF, Morgan DR (eds) Shotcrete for underground support VI. American Society of Civil Engineers, Reston, pp 110–117

    Google Scholar 

  • Clements M (2004) Comparison of methods for early age strength testing of sprayed fibre reinforced concrete. In: Bernard ES (ed) Proceedings of the 2nd international conference on engineering developments in sprayed fibre reinforced concrete, Cairns, Queensland, Australia. Taylor and Francis Group, London, pp 81–87

    Google Scholar 

  • Concrete Institute of Australia (2010) Shotcrete in Australia. Concrete Institute of Australia, Rhodes

    Google Scholar 

  • DIN EN 12504-1 (2009) Prüfung von Beton in Bauwerken—Teil 1: Bohrkernproben—Herstellung, Untersuchung und Prüfung der Druckfestigkeit. Deutsches Institut fur Normung, e.V

  • DIN EN 14487-1 (2006) Spritzbeton—Teil 1: Begriffe, Festlegungen und Konformität. Deutsches Institut fur Normung, e.V

  • DIN EN 14488-2 (2006) Prüfung von Spritzbeton—Teil 2: Druckfestigkeit von jungem Spritzbeton. Deutsches Institut fur Normung, e.V

  • DIN 18551 (1992) Spritzbeton—Nationale Anwendungsregeln zur Reihe DIN EN 14487 und Regeln für die Bemessung von Spritzbetonkonstruktionen. Deutsches Institut fur Normung, e.V

  • Do NA, Dias D, Oreste P, Djeran-Maigre I (2014a) The behavior of the segmental tunnel lining studied by the hyperstatic reaction method. Eur J Environ Civ Eng 18(4):489–510

    Google Scholar 

  • Do NA, Dias D, Oreste P, Djeran-Maigre I (2014b) A new numerical approach to the hyperstatic reaction method for segmental tunnel linings. Int J Numer Anal Methods Geomech 38:1617–1632

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Franzen T, Garshol KF, Tomisawa N (2001) Sprayed concrete for final lining: ITA working group report. Tunn Undergr Space Technol 16:295–309

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hemphill GB (2013) Practical tunnel construction. Wiley, Hoboken

    Google Scholar 

  • Iwaki K, Hirama A, Mitani K, Kaise S, Nakagawa K (2001) A quality control method for shotcrete strength by pneumatic pin penetration test. NDT E Int 34(6):395–402

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jolin M, Beaupré D (2003) Understanding wet-mix shotcrete: mix design, specifications, and placement. Shotcrete magazine, pp 6–12

  • Melbye T (1994) Sprayed concrete for rock support. MBT International Underground Construction Group, Zürich

    Google Scholar 

  • Mohajerani A, Rodrigues D, Ricciuti C, Wilson C (2015) Early-age strength measurement of shotcrete. J Mater. https://doi.org/10.1155/2015/470160

    Google Scholar 

  • Oreste P (2003) Procedure for determining the reaction curve of shotcrete lining considering transient conditions. Rock Mech Rock Eng 36(3):209–236. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00603-002-0043-z

    Google Scholar 

  • Oreste P (2007) A numerical approach to the hyperstatic reaction method for the dimensioning of tunnel supports. Tunn Undergr Space Technol 22:185–205

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oreste P (2009) The convergence-confinement method: roles and limits in modern geomechanical tunnel design. Am J Appl Sci 6(4):757–771

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oreste P (2014) The determination of the tunnel structure loads through the analysis of the interaction between the void and the support using the convergence-confinement method. Am J Appl Sci 11(11):1945–1954

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oreste P, Spagnoli G, Luna Ramos CA, Sebille L (2018) The hyperstatic reaction method for the analysis of the sprayed concrete linings behavior in tunneling. Geotech Geol Eng 36(4):2143–2169. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10706-018-0454-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ÖVBB (2006) Guideline sprayed concrete. Österreichische Bautechnik Vereinigung, Vienna

    Google Scholar 

  • Panet M, Guenot A (1982) Analysis of convergence behind the face of a tunnel. In: Proceedings of the tunnelling, vol 82, Brighton, pp 197–204

  • Pottler R (1990) Time-dependent rock-shotcrete interaction. A numerical shortcut. Comput Geotech 9:149–169

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Prudencio LR (1998) Accelerating admixtures for shotcrete. Cement Concr Compos 20:213–219

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rispin M, Howard D, Kleven OB, Garshol K, Gelson J (2009) Safer, deeper, faster: sprayed concrete—an integral component of development mining. Australian Centre for Geomechanics, Perth

    Google Scholar 

  • Spagnoli G, Oreste P, Lo Bianco L (2017) Estimation of shaft radial displacement beyond the excavation bottom before installation of permanent lining in nondilatant weak rocks with a novel formulation. Int J Geomech 17:04017051. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GM.1943-5622.0000949

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thomas A (2009) Sprayed concrete lined tunnel. Taylor & Francis, Oxon

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang J, Niu D, Zhang Y (2015) Mechanical properties, permeability and durability of accelerated shotcrete. Constr Build Mater 95:312–328

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Giovanni Spagnoli.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Oreste, P., Spagnoli, G. & Luna Ramos, C.A. The Elastic Modulus Variation During the Shotcrete Curing Jointly Investigated by the Convergence-Confinement and the Hyperstatic Reaction Methods. Geotech Geol Eng 37, 1435–1452 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10706-018-0698-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10706-018-0698-1

Keywords

Navigation