Skip to main content
Log in

A Longitudinal Study of Adenoma Detection Rate in Gastroenterology Fellowship Training

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Digestive Diseases and Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Current guidelines suggest that a gastroenterology fellow in training needs to perform 140 colonoscopies to achieve competency. Data are limited regarding adenoma detection rate (ADR) in fellowship.

Aims

To assess how fellow ADR correlates with number of colonoscopies performed.

Methods

We performed a retrospective study examining consecutive colonoscopies performed by gastroenterology fellows. Fellow ADR before and after the 140 procedure benchmark was compared to colonoscopies performed by attending only with whom these fellows trained. A threshold for ideal procedure count was performed using ROC analysis.

Results

We analyzed 2021 average-risk colonoscopies performed by 10 gastroenterology fellows under the supervision of an attending physician. When fellows had performed <140 colonoscopies, the ADR was 27 % compared with an ADR of 36 % when fellows had performed >140 colonoscopies under attending supervision (p = 0.02). The ADR of fellows who had performed >140 colonoscopies under attending supervision was greater than that of attending-only colonoscopies (36 vs. 25 %, p < 0.0001). A threshold of >325 (male patients) and 539 (female patients) colonoscopies was determined to be ideal for achieving adequate ADR based on ROC analysis.

Conclusions

Our data suggest that ADR increases after fellows perform >140 colonoscopies under attending supervision, and thereafter surpasses the ADR of attending-only colonoscopies. Some of the differences may be driven by detection of small adenomas. The findings of this study suggest that a higher threshold for number of colonoscopies performed under attending supervision may be needed to achieve adequate ADR during fellowship prior to independent practice.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Siegel RL, Miller KD, Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2015. CA Cancer J Clin. 2015;65:5–29.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Kahi CJ, Imperiale TF, Juliar BE, Rex DK. Effect of screening colonoscopy on colorectal cancer incidence and mortality. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2009;7:770–775.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Kahi CJ, Myers LJ, Slaven JE, et al. Lower endoscopy reduces colorectal cancer incidence in older individuals. Gastroenterology. 2014;146:718-e3–725-e3.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Nishihara R, Wu K, Lochhead P, et al. Long-term colorectal-cancer incidence and mortality after lower endoscopy. N Engl J Med. 2013;369:1095–1105.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Rex DK, Schoenfeld PS, Cohen J, et al. Quality indicators for colonoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc. 2015;81:31–53.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Do A, Weinberg J, Kakkar A, et al. Reliability of adenoma detection rate is based on procedural volume. Gastrointest Endosc. 2013;77:376–380.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Spier BJ, Benson M, Pfau PR, et al. Colonoscopy training in gastroenterology fellowships: determining competence. Gastrointest Endosc. 2009;30:1–6.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Patwardhan VR, Feuerstein JD, Sengupta N, et al. Fellowship colonoscopy training and preparedness for independent gastroenterology practice. J Clin Gastroenterol; 2015.

  9. Rogart JN, Siddiqui UD, Jamidar PA, et al. Fellow involvement may increase adenoma detection rates during colonoscopy. Am J Gastroenterol. 2008;103:2841–2846.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Buchner AM, Shahid MW, Heckman MG, et al. Trainee participation is associated with increased small adenoma detection. Gastrointest Endosc. 2011;73:1223–1231.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Peters SL, Hasan AG, Jacobson NB, Austin GL. Level of fellowship training increases adenoma detection rates. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2010;8:439–442.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Munroe CA, Lee P, Coplant A, et al. A tandem colonoscopy study of adenoma miss rates during endoscopic training: a venture into uncharted territory. Gastrointest Endosc. 2012;75:561–567.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Butterly LF, Chase MP, Pohl H, Fiarman GS. Prevalence of clinically important histology in small adenomas. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2006;4:343–348.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Barclay RL, Vicari JJ, Greenlaw RL. Effect of a time-dependent colonoscopic withdrawal protocol on adenoma detection during screening colonoscopy. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2008;10:1091–1098.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

There was no grant support for this manuscript.

Author’s contribution

Gianotti and Shah involved in writing. Tapper, Gianotti, Kothari, and Sheth involved in critical revision. Gianotti, Kothari, and Shah involved in data acquisition. Tapper involved in analysis. Shah and Sheth involved in supervision/concept. All authors approved manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Robert J. Gianotti.

Ethics declarations

Conflicts of interest

None.

Additional information

Robert J. Gianotti and Sveta Shah Oza have contributed equally to this manuscript.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 13 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Gianotti, R.J., Oza, S.S., Tapper, E.B. et al. A Longitudinal Study of Adenoma Detection Rate in Gastroenterology Fellowship Training. Dig Dis Sci 61, 2831–2837 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10620-016-4228-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10620-016-4228-9

Keywords

Navigation