Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Should a Colonoscopy be Recommended for Healthy Individuals with Increased Carcinoembryonic Antigen Levels? A Case–Control Study

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Digestive Diseases and Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background and Aim

Despite the limitations of screening or early diagnosis of colorectal cancers (CRC), carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) is frequently measured in practice and during health promotion programs. The aim of this study was to evaluate the role of colonoscopy in healthy individuals with elevated CEA levels.

Methods

From January 2003 to November 2008, 117,731 healthy persons underwent an opportunistic screening program in two health promotion centers; 1,497 subjects (1.3%) showed an elevated CEA level (>5 ng/ml). Among them, 174 patients were recruited to undergo a colonoscopy to determine if colorectal malignancies were present. A total of 372 age- and sex-matched persons were selected as controls from among the healthy subjects who had a normal level of CEA and had received surveillance colonoscopy. The primary outcome was the incidences of CRC in elevated CEA and normal CEA groups. The secondary outcome was the predictive factors of CRC in the elevated CEA group.

Results

The incidence of CRC was higher in the group with higher CEA-levels than in the group with normal CEA levels (4.6 vs. 1.3%; P = 0.031). In the CEA-elevated group, patients with CRCs were diagnosed at more advanced stages than were those in the CEA-normal group. The incidence of colorectal polyps was not different between the two groups. In the CEA-elevated group, anemia was an independent predictive factor of CRCs by multivariate analysis (P = 0.002).

Conclusion

Anemia itself is not a predictive factor of CRC in the entire population, but is an independent predictive factor of CRC in healthy individuals with an elevated level of CEA. Therefore, colonoscopy should be recommended for healthy subjects with an elevated level of CEA accompanied with anemia in the absence of other adenocarcinomas to evaluate the presence of colorectal malignancy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Boulware LE, Marinopoulos S, Phillips KA, et al. Systematic review: the value of the periodic health evaluation. Ann Intern Med. 2007;146:289–300.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Han PK. Historical changes in the objectives of the periodic health examination. Ann Intern Med. 1997;127:910–917.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Fenton JJ, Cai Y, Weiss NS, et al. Delivery of cancer screening: how important is the preventive health examination? Arch Intern Med. 2007;167:580–585.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Lee TW, Lee CY, Kim HS, et al. Health promotion health center project. Public Health Nurs. 2007;24:529–537.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Kim HR, Lee CH, Kim YW, et al. Increased CA 19–9 level in patients without malignant disease. Clin Chem Lab Med. 2009;47:750–754.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Kim JE, Lee KT, Lee JK, et al. Clinical usefulness of carbohydrate antigen 19–9 as a screening test for pancreatic cancer in an asymptomatic population. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2004;19:182–186.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Lim YK, Kam MH, Eu KW. Carcinoembryonic antigen screening: how far should we go? Singapore Med J. 2009;50:862–865.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Sturgeon C. Practice guidelines for tumor marker use in the clinic. Clin Chem. 2002;48:1151–1159.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Bast RC Jr, Ravdin P, Hayes DF, et al. 2000 update of recommendations for the use of tumor markers in breast and colorectal cancer: clinical practice guidelines of the American Society of Clinical Oncology. J Clin Oncol. 2001;19:1865–1878.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Duffy MJ. Carcinoembryonic antigen as a marker for colorectal cancer: is it clinically useful? Clin Chem. 2001;47:624–630.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Burt RW. Colon cancer screening. Gastroenterology. 2000;119:837–853.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Rubio CA, Nesi G, Messerini L, et al. The Vienna classification applied to colorectal adenomas. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2006;21:1697–1703.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Schlemper RJ, Riddell RH, Kato Y, et al. The Vienna classification of gastrointestinal epithelial neoplasia. Gut. 2000;47:251–255.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Winawer SJ, Zauber AG, O’Brien MJ, et al. Randomized comparison of surveillance intervals after colonoscopic removal of newly diagnosed adenomatous polyps. The National Polyp Study Workgroup. N Engl J Med. 1993;328:901–906.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Compton C, Fenoglio-Preiser CM, Pettigrew N, et al. American Joint Committee on Cancer Prognostic Factors Consensus Conference: Colorectal Working Group. Cancer. 2000;88:1739–1757.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Wei EK, Giovannucci E, Wu K, et al. Comparison of risk factors for colon and rectal cancer. Int J Cancer. 2004;108:433–442.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Imperiale TF, Glowinski EA, Juliar BE, et al. Variation in polyp detection rates at screening colonoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc. 2009;69:1288–1295.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Gold P, Freedman SO. Demonstration of tumor-specific antigens in human colonic carcinomata by immunological tolerance and absorption techniques. J Exp Med. 1965;121:439–462.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Chevinsky AH. CEA in tumors of other than colorectal origin. Semin Surg Oncol. 1991;7:162–166.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Stevens DP, Mackay IR, Cullen KJ. Carcinoembryonic antigen in an unselected elderly population: a four year follow up. Br J Cancer. 1975;32:147–151.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Cullen KJ, Stevens DP, Frost MA, et al. Carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA), smoking, and cancer in a longitudinal population study. Aust N Z J Med. 1976;6:279–283.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Goldstein MJ, Mitchell EP. Carcinoembryonic antigen in the staging and follow-up of patients with colorectal cancer. Cancer Invest. 2005;23:338–351.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Eom BW, Lee HJ, Yoo MW, et al. Synchronous and metachronous cancers in patients with gastric cancer. J Surg Oncol. 2008;98:106–110.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Lim SB, Jeong SY, Choi HS, et al. Synchronous gastric cancer in primary sporadic colorectal cancer patients in Korea. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2008;23:61–65.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Tomoda H, Taketomi A, Baba H, et al. Multiple primary colorectal and gastric carcinoma in Japan. Oncol Rep. 1998;5:147–149.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Begent RH. The value of carcinoembryonic antigen measurement in clinical practice. Ann Clin Biochem. 1984;21:231–238.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Thomas P, Toth CA, Saini KS, et al. The structure, metabolism and function of the carcinoembryonic antigen gene family. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1990;1032:177–189.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Doos WG, Wolff WI, Shinya H, et al. CEA levels in patients with colorectal polyps. Cancer. 1975;36:1996–2003.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Fischbach W, Mossner J. Do size, histology, or cytology of colorectal adenomas and their removal influence serum CEA? Dis Colon Rectum. 1987;30:595–599.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Slattery ML, Boucher KM, Caan BJ, et al. Eating patterns and risk of colon cancer. Am J Epidemiol. 1998;148:4–16.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Center MM, Jemal A, Ward E. International trends in colorectal cancer incidence rates. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2009;18:1688–1694.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors thank Soung Min Jeon, Chang Mo Moon and Jae Jun Park for their assistence throughout this study.

Conflict of interests

The authors have no commercial associations that might represent a conflict of interest in relation to this manuscript.

Ethics approval

This study was approved by the Human Research Review Committees of Severance Hospital, Yonsei University and Sanggye Paik Hospital, Inje University, Korea.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sung Pil Hong.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lee, J.H., Hong, S.P., Jeon, T.J. et al. Should a Colonoscopy be Recommended for Healthy Individuals with Increased Carcinoembryonic Antigen Levels? A Case–Control Study. Dig Dis Sci 56, 2396–2403 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10620-011-1606-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10620-011-1606-1

Keywords

Navigation