Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Adaptation readiness and adaptive capacity of transboundary river basins

  • Published:
Climatic Change Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Transboundary river basins face significant threats from climate change, with the need for adaptation widely noted. In this paper we develop a theoretically-rooted indicator-based evaluation framework to identify transboundary river basins where the need for adaptation support is pronounced and prioritize where attention is best placed. The framework combines indicators which capture the broad level potential to adapt (adaptive capacity) and the actual preparedness for adaptation (adaptation readiness) at the level of transboundary institutions. Adaptive capacity and adaptation readiness have not previously been evaluated and compared within a single framework, and by combining them we gain a more comprehensive and nuanced basis for characterising and evaluating the adaptation landscape and diagnosing opportunities and constraints for adaptation. We apply the framework to 42 transboundary basins in Mediterranean Europe, the Middle East, North Africa and sub-Saharan Africa, which account for 15 % of global transboundary river basins, are home to over 550 million people, and cover 8 % of Earth’s total land area. We find: 1) There is widespread need for improving national and transboundary institutional support for adaptation spanning basins of various economic, physical, and demographic characteristics; 2) Many transboundary basins in Africa have low adaptive capacity, but were found to have high readiness to begin adapting if resources were available; and 3) Improved coverage of River Basin Organisations and treaties with mandates to recognise and respond actively to climate change would underpin adaptation efforts across basins.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adger WN, Agrawala S, Mirza M et al (2007) Assessment of adaptation practices, options, constraints and capacity. In: Parry M et al (eds) Climate change 2007: impacts. Adaptation and vulnerability. Contribution of working group II to the fourth assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 717–743

  • Bauer A, Feichtinger J, Steurer R (2012) The governance of climate change adaptation in 10 OECD countries: challenges and approaches. J Environ Policy Plan 14:279–304. doi:10.1080/1523908X.2012.707406

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berrang-Ford L, Pearce T, Ford JD (2015) Systematic review approaches for climate change adaptation research. Reg Environ Chang 15:755–769. doi:10.1007/s10113-014-0708-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Biesbroek GR, Swart RJ, Carter TR et al (2010) Europe adapts to climate change: comparing national adaptation strategies. Glob Environ Chang 20:440–450. doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2010.03.005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Biesbroek R, Dupuis J, Jordan A et al (2015) Opening up the black box of adaptation decision-making. Nat Clim Chang 5:493–494. doi:10.1038/nclimate2615

  • Brooks N, Neil Adger W, Mick Kelly P (2005) The determinants of vulnerability and adaptive capacity at the national level and the implications for adaptation. Glob Environ Chang 15:151–163. doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2004.12.006

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cooley H, Gleick PH (2011) Climate-proofing transboundary water agreements. Hydrol Sci J 56:711–718. doi:10.1080/02626667.2011.576651

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Drieschova A, Giordano M, Fischhendler I (2009) Climate change, international cooperation and adaptation in transboundary water management. In: Adger WN, Lorenzoni I, O’Brien K (eds) Adapting to climate change: thresholds, values and governance. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Dupuis J, Biesbroek R (2013) Comparing apples and oranges: the dependent variable problem in comparing and evaluating climate change adaptation policies. Glob Environ Chang 23:1476–1487. doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2013.07.022

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eisenack K, Pechan A, Moser S et al (2014) Explaining and overcoming barriers to climate change adaptation. Nat Clim Chang 4:867–872. doi:10.1038/nclimate2350

  • Engle NL (2011) Adaptive capacity and its assessment. Glob Environ Chang 21:647–656. doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2011.01.019

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eriksen S, Brooks, N, Bentham G et al (2004) New indicators of vulnerability and adaptive capacity. Tyndall Centre, United Kingdom

  • Ford JD, Berrang-Ford L (2015) The 4Cs of adaptation tracking: consistency, comparability, comprehensiveness, coherency. Mitig Adapt Strateg Glob Chang 1–21. doi:10.1007/s11027-014-9627-7

  • Ford JD, King D (2015) A framework for examining adaptation readiness. Mitig Adapt Strateg Glob Change 20:505–526

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ford JD, Berrang-Ford L, Lesnikowski A et al (2013) How to track adaptation to climate change: a typology of approaches for national-level application. Ecol Soc. doi:10.5751/ES-05732-180340

  • Ford JD, Berrang-Ford L, Araos M et al (2015) Adaptation tracking for a post-2015 climate agreement. Nat Clim Chang 5:967–969. doi:10.1038/nclimate2744

  • Gagnon-Lebrun F, Agrawala S (2007) Implementing adaptation in developed countries: an analysis of progress and trends. Clim Pol 7:392–408. doi:10.1080/14693062.2007.9685664

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gerlak AK, Grant KA (2009) The correlates of cooperative institutions for international rivers. In: Thomas V, Zlatko Š, Petra R, Andrea G (eds) Mapping the new world order. Wiley-Blackwell, Chichester, p 114–147

  • Goulden M, Conway D, Persechino A (2009) Adaptation to climate change in international river basins in Africa: a review / Adaptation au changement climatique dans les bassins fluviaux internationaux en Afrique: une revue. Hydrol Sci J 54:805–828. doi:10.1623/hysj.54.5.805

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gupta J, Termeer C, Klostermann J et al (2010) The adaptive capacity wheel: a method to assess the inherent characteristics of institutions to enable the adaptive capacity of society. Environ Sci Pol 13:459–471. doi:10.1016/j.envsci.2010.05.006

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hardee K, Mutunga C (2009) Strengthening the link between climate change adaptation and national development plans: lessons from the case of population in National Adaptation Programmes of Action (NAPAs). Mitig Adapt Strateg Glob Chang 15:113–126. doi:10.1007/s11027-009-9208-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hooper B, Lloyd G (2011) Report on IWRM in transboundary basins. UNDP-DHI centre for water and environment. Hørsholm, Denmark

    Google Scholar 

  • Jiménez Cisneros BE, Oki T, Arnell N et al (2014) Freshwater resources. In: Field CB et al (eds) Climate change 2014: impacts, adaptation, and vulnerability. Part a: global and sectoral aspects. Contribution of working group II to the fifth assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 229–269

  • Khan A, Amelie V (2015) Assessing climate change readiness in Seychelles: implications for ecosystem-based adaptation mainstreaming and marine spatial planning. Reg Environ Chang 15:721–733. doi:10.1007/s10113-014-0662-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kranz N, Menniken T, Hinkel J (2010) Climate change adaptation strategies in the Mekong and Orange-Senqu basins: What determines the state-of-play? Environ Sci Pol 13:648–659. doi:10.1016/j.envsci.2010.09.003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lesnikowski A, Ford JD, Biesbroek R et al (2016) National-level progress on adaptation. Nat Clim Chang. doi:10.1038/nclimate2863

  • Lwasa S (2015) A systematic review of research on climate change adaptation policy and practice in Africa and South Asia deltas. Reg Environ Chang 15:815–824. doi:10.1007/s10113-014-0715-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Magnan AK (2016) Climate change: metrics needed to track adaptation. Nature 530:160. doi:10.1038/530160d

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marty F (2001) Managing international rivers. European Academic Publishers, Bern

    Google Scholar 

  • Mekong River Commission (MRC) (2014) International experiences on the formulation and implementation of transboundary climate change adaptation strategies. Mekong River Commission (MRC), Vientane

    Google Scholar 

  • Milman A, Bunclark L, Conway D, Adger WN (2013) Assessment of institutional capacity to adapt to climate change in transboundary river basins. Clim Change 121:755–770. doi:10.1007/s10584-013-0917-y

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mimura N, Pulwarty R, Elshinnawy I et al (2014) Adaptation planning and implementation. In: Field CB et al (eds) Climate change 2014: impacts, adaptation, and vulnerability. Part a: global and sectoral aspects. Contribution of working group II to the fifth assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 869–898

  • Moser SC, Ekstrom JA (2010) A framework to diagnose barriers to climate change adaptation. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 107:22026–22031. doi:10.1073/pnas.1007887107

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Noble IR, Huq S, Anokhin Y et al (2014) Adaptation needs and options. In: Field CB et al (eds) Climate change 2014: impacts, adaptation, and vulnerability. Part a: global and sectoral aspects. Contribution of working group II to the fifth assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 833–868

  • O’Brien K, Eriksen S, Sygna L, Naess LO (2006) Questioning complacency: climate change impacts, vulnerability, and adaptation in Norway. Ambio 35:50–56

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schneiderbauer S, Pedoth L, Zhang D, Zebisch M (2011) Assessing adaptive capacity within regional climate change vulnerability studies—an Alpine example. Nat Hazards 67:1059–1073. doi:10.1007/s11069-011-9919-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith JB, Vogel JM, Iii JEC (2009) An architecture for government action on adaptation to climate change. An editorial comment. Clim Change 95:53–61. doi:10.1007/s10584-009-9623-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stefano LD, Duncan J, Dinar S et al (2012) Climate change and the institutional resilience of international river basins. J Peace Res 49:193–209. doi:10.1177/0022343311427416

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stucki V, Smith M (2011) Integrated approaches to natural resources management in practice: the catalyzing role of national adaptation programmes for action. Ambio 40:351–360

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sud R, Mishra A, Varma N, Bhadwal S (2015) Adaptation policy and practice in densely populated glacier-fed river basins of South Asia: a systematic review. Reg Environ Chang 1–12. doi:10.1007/s10113-014-0711-z

  • Swart R, Biesbroek R, Lourenço TC (2014) Science of adaptation to climate change and science for adaptation. of 2:29. doi:10.3389/fenvs.2014.00029

  • Timmerman JG, Koeppel S, Bernardini F, Buntsma JJ (2011) Adaptation to climate change: challenges for transboundary water management. In: Filho WL (ed) The economic, social and political elements of climate change. Springer, Berlin, pp 523–541

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • UNECE, INBO (2015) Water and climate change adaptation in transboundary basins: lessons learned and good practices. United Nations, Geneva

    Google Scholar 

  • Vincent K (2007) Uncertainty in adaptive capacity and the importance of scale. Glob Environ Chang 17:12–24. doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2006.11.009

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wolf AT, Natharius J, Danielson J et al (1999) International river basins of the world. Int J Water Resour Dev 15:387–427. doi:10.1080/07900629948682

  • Zeitoun M, Goulden M, Tickner D (2013) Current and future challenges facing transboundary river basin management. WIREs Clim Change 4:331–349. doi:10.1002/wcc.228

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Geography, McGill University, Montreal, Canada

    Simon Tilleard & James Ford

Authors
  1. Simon Tilleard
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. James Ford
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Simon Tilleard.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

ESM 1

(DOCX 403 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Tilleard, S., Ford, J. Adaptation readiness and adaptive capacity of transboundary river basins. Climatic Change 137, 575–591 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-016-1699-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-016-1699-9

Keywords

Search

Navigation