Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

The prognostic value of HER2 status and efficacy of anti-HER2 therapy in patients with HR-positive mucinous breast cancer: a nationwide study from the Korean Breast Cancer Society

  • Epidemiology
  • Published:
Breast Cancer Research and Treatment Aims and scope Submit manuscript

A Letter to the Editor to this article was published on 11 March 2020

Abstract

Purpose

The effect of human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) status on mucinous carcinoma (MC) of the breast is unknown due to the rarity of HER2-positive cases. We evaluated the prognostic value of HER2 status and the efficacy of anti-HER2 therapy in patients with hormone receptor (HR)-positive MC.

Methods

From the data of 154,661 patients recorded in the Korean Breast Cancer Registry between January 1990 and August 2016, 3076 (2.0%) were diagnosed with MC. Overall survival (OS) according to HER2 status and anti-HER2 therapy was analyzed using Kaplan–Meier estimates. Multivariate analysis was performed using the Cox proportional hazards model to estimate the adjusted hazards ratio (HR) for clinicopathologic factors.

Results

A total of 2716 HR-positive MC patients were enrolled and followed up for a median 100.1 months. Of these, 2094 (77.1%) were HER2-negative and 228 (8.4%) were HER2-positive. HR-positive, HER2-positive MC patients had more advanced pathologic tumor stages (T3 or T4) (p = 0.001), more axillary lymph node involvement (p < 0.001), higher nuclear grade (p < 0.001), and more lymphovascular invasion (p = 0.012) than HER2-negative patients. Subgroup analysis of HR-positive, node-positive MC showed that HER2-positive MC was an independent prognostic factor for OS (HR = 2.657; 95% CI, 1.665–4.241; p < 0.001). HR-positive, node-positive, and HER2-negative MC had significantly longer OS than HER2-positive MBC (p = 0.017). The node-positive subgroup that received anti-HER2 therapy had increased OS, although not significantly (p = 0.224).

Conclusion

Our nationwide database study revealed that HER2-positive status was associated with worse prognosis in HR-positive and node-positive MC. Anti-HER2 therapy might be beneficial in HR-positive, node-positive, and HER2-positive MC.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

CI:

Confidence interval

ER:

Estrogen receptor

HER2:

Human epidermal growth factor receptor 2

HR:

Hormone receptor

IDC:

Invasive duct carcinoma

KBCR:

Korean Breast Cancer Registry

MC:

Mucinous carcinoma

OS:

Overall survival

PR:

Progesterone receptor

References

  1. Azzopardi JG, Ahmed A, Millis RR (1979) Problems in breast pathology. Major Probl Pathol 11(i-xvi):1–466

    Google Scholar 

  2. Fentiman IS, Millis RR, Smith P, Ellul JP, Lampejo O (1997) Mucoid breast carcinomas: histology and prognosis. Br J Cancer 75(7):1061–1065

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Komaki K, Sakamoto G, Sugano H, Morimoto T, Monden Y (1988) Mucinous carcinoma of the breast in Japan: a prognostic analysis based on morphologic features. Cancer 61(5):989–996

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Gallager HS (1984) Pathologic types of breast-cancer—their prognoses. Cancer 53(3):623–629. https://doi.org/10.1002/1097-0142(19840201)53:3+%3c623:Aid-Cncr2820531307%3e3.0.Co;2-Z

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Lacroix-Triki M, Suarez PH, MacKay A, Lambros MB, Natrajan R, Savage K, Geyer FC, Weigelt B, Ashworth A, Reis-Filho JS (2010) Mucinous carcinoma of the breast is genomically distinct from invasive ductal carcinomas of no special type. J Pathol 222(3):282–298. https://doi.org/10.1002/path.2763

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Bae SY, Choi MY, Cho DH, Lee JE, Nam SJ, Yang JH (2011) Mucinous carcinoma of the breast in comparison with invasive ductal carcinoma: clinicopathologic characteristics and prognosis. J Breast Cancer 14(4):308–313. https://doi.org/10.4048/jbc.2011.14.4.308

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Rasmussen BB, Rose C, Christensen IB (1987) Prognostic factors in primary mucinous breast carcinoma. Am J Clin Pathol 87(2):155–160

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Avisar E, Khan MA, Axelrod D, Oza K (1998) Pure mucinous carcinoma of the breast: a clinicopathologic correlation study. Ann Surg Oncol 5(5):447–451

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Ranade A, Batra R, Sandhu G, Chitale RA, Balderacchi J (2010) Clinicopathological evaluation of 100 cases of mucinous carcinoma of breast with emphasis on axillary staging and special reference to a micropapillary pattern. J Clin Pathol 63(12):1043–1047. https://doi.org/10.1136/jcp.2010.082495

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Cao AY, He M, Liu ZB, Di GH, Wu J, Lu JS, Liu GY, Shen ZZ, Shao ZM (2012) Outcome of pure mucinous breast carcinoma compared to infiltrating ductal carcinoma: a population-based study from China. Ann Surg Oncol 19(9):3019–3027. https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-012-2322-6

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Di Saverio S, Gutierrez J, Avisar E (2008) A retrospective review with long term follow up of 11,400 cases of pure mucinous breast carcinoma. Breast Cancer Res Treat 111(3):541–547. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10549-007-9809-z

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Goetz MP, Gradishar WJ, Anderson BO, Abraham J, Aft R, Allison KH, Blair SL, Burstein HJ, Dang C, Elias AD, Farrar WB, Giordano SH, Goldstein LJ, Isakoff SJ, Lyons J, Marcom PK, Mayer IA, Moran MS, Mortimer J, O'Regan RM, Patel SA, Pierce LJ, Reed EC, Rugo HS, Sitapati A, Smith KL, Smith ML, Soliman H, Telli ML, Ward JH, Young JS, Shead DA, Kumar R (2019) NCCN guidelines insights: breast cancer, version 3.2018. J Natl Compr Canc Netw 17(2):118–126. https://doi.org/10.6004/jnccn.2019.0009

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Fu J, Wu L, Jiang M, Li D, Jiang T, Hong Z, Wang F, Li S (2016) Clinical nomogram for predicting survival outcomes in early mucinous breast cancer. PLoS ONE 11(10):e016492. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0164921

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Slamon DJ, Clark GM, Wong SG, Levin WJ, Ullrich A, Mcguire WL (1987) Human-breast cancer—correlation of relapse and survival with amplification of the Her-2 neu oncogene. Science 235(4785):177–182. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.3798106

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Gonzalez-Angulo AM, Litton JK, Broglio KR, Meric-Bernstam F, Rakkhit R, Cardoso F, Peintinger F, Hanrahan EO, Sahin A, Guray M, Larsimont D, Feoli F, Stranzl H, Buchholz TA, Valero V, Theriault R, Piccart-Gebhart M, Ravdin PM, Berry DA, Hortobagyi GN (2009) High risk of recurrence for patients with breast cancer who have human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-positive, node-negative tumors 1 cm or smaller. J Clin Oncol 27(34):5700–5706. https://doi.org/10.1200/Jco.2009.23.2025

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Elston CW, Ellis IO (2002) Pathological prognostic factors in breast cancer. I: the value of histological grade in breast cancer: experience from a large study with long-term follow-up. Histopathology 41(3A):154–161

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Park EH, Min SY, Kim Z, Yoon CS, Jung KW, Nam SJ, Oh SJ, Lee S, Park BW, Lim W, Hur MH, Korean Korean Breast Cancer S (2017) Basic facts of breast cancer in Korea in 2014: the 10-year overall survival progress. J Breast Cancer 20(1):1–11. https://doi.org/10.4048/jbc.2017.20.1.1

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Kang SY, Kim YS, Kim Z, Kim HY, Lee SK, Jung KW, Youn HJ, Soc KBC (2018) Basic findings regarding breast cancer in Korea in 2015: data from a breast cancer registry. J Breast Cancer 21(1):1–10. https://doi.org/10.4048/jbc.2018.21.1.1

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Hammond MEH, Hayes DF, Dowsett M, Allred DC, Hagerty KL, Badve S, Fitzgibbons PL, Francis G, Goldstein NS, Hayes M, Hicks DG, Lester S, Love R, Mangu PB, McShane L, Miller K, Osborne CK, Paik S, Perlmutter J, Rhodes A, Sasano H, Schwartz JN, Sweep FCG, Taube S, Torlakovic EE, Valenstein P, Viale G, Visscher D, Wheeler T, Williams RB, Wittliff JL, Wolff AC (2010) American society of clinical oncology/college of American pathologists guideline recommendations for immunohistochemical testing of estrogen and progesterone receptors in breast cancer. Arch Pathol Lab Med 134(6):907–922

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Diab SG, Clark GM, Osborne CK, Libby A, Allred DC, Elledge RM (1999) Tumor characteristics and clinical outcome of tubular and mucinous breast carcinomas. J Clin Oncol 17(5):1442–1448. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.1999.17.5.1442

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Northridge ME, Rhoads GG, Wartenberg D, Koffman D (1997) The importance of histologic type on breast cancer survival. J Clin Epidemiol 50(3):283–290

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Lei L, Yu X, Chen B, Chen Z, Wang X (2016) Clinicopathological characteristics of mucinous breast cancer: a retrospective analysis of a 10-year study. PLoS ONE 11(5):e0155132. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0155132

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Wei YN, Liu S, Zhang ML, Ke XX, Chen M, Wei B (2019) Clinicopathologic characteristics of HER2-positive pure mucinous breast carcinoma: a systematic investigation into an unusual tumor. Int J Clin Exp Patho 12(5):1666–1677

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Rasmussen BB (1985) Human mucinous breast carcinomas and their lymph-node metastases—a histological review of 247 cases. Pathol Res Pract 180(4):377–382

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Baretta Z, Guindalini RS, Khramtsova G, Olopade OI (2013) Resistance to trastuzumab in HER2-positive mucinous invasive ductal breast carcinoma. Clin Breast Cancer 13(2):156–158. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clbc.2012.11.007

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Hernandez IG, Marcos MC, Montemayor MG, Sotomayor DL, Ochoa DP, Macias GSG (2018) Her-2 positive mucinous carcinoma breast cancer, case report. Int J Surg Case Rep 42:242–246. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijscr.2017.12.025

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Jang Y, Cho EY, Cho SY (2019) Human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-positive mucinous carcinoma with signet ring cell differentiation, which showed complete response after neoadjuvant chemotherapy. J Breast Cancer 22(2):336–340. https://doi.org/10.4048/jbc.2019.22.e17

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported the Basic Science Research Program of the National Research Foundation funded by the Ministry of Education (2017R1D1A1B03033486).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Byung Joo Chae.

Ethics declarations

Conflicts of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Ethical approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki Declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed consent

For this type of study, formal consent is not required.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (DOCX 15 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kim, H.S., Yoo, T.K., Park, W.C. et al. The prognostic value of HER2 status and efficacy of anti-HER2 therapy in patients with HR-positive mucinous breast cancer: a nationwide study from the Korean Breast Cancer Society. Breast Cancer Res Treat 180, 461–470 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10549-020-05550-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10549-020-05550-4

Keywords

Navigation