Abstract
Purpose. We undertook a natural history investigation of a broad selection of prognostic factors in a cohort of women with node-negative breast cancer.
Patients and methods. The cohort consisted of 415 consecutive histologic node-negative (T1-3, M0) patients, operated on for primary breast cancer at Women’s College Hospital, Toronto, Canada, between 1977 and 1986. Only 7% of these patients were given adjuvant systemic therapy; further, for the 48% of women who underwent lumpectomy, only 29% received adjuvant radiotherapy to the breast. Paraffin-embedded tumour tissue was available for the majority of patients. The following factors were examined for their univariate and multivariate effects on time to recurrence outside the breast (DFI) and survival from breast cancer (DSS): age, weight, tumour size, estrogen receptor, progesterone receptor, histologic type, tumour grade, nuclear grade, lymphovascular invasion, overexpression of neu oncoprotein, DNA ploidy, % cells in S-phase, and adjuvant therapy. Multivariate analyses utilized a Cox model with a step-wise factor selection for the 260 patients with complete information.
Results. A worse prognosis was indicated when there was lymphovascular invasion (for DFI, p<0.001; for DSS, p=0.0046), high %S-phase (for DFI, p=0.08; for DSS, p=0.02), high tumour grade (for DFI, p=0.02; for DSS, p=0.03), and overexpression of neu oncoprotein (for DSS, p=0.07).
Conclusions. In our natural history investigation, two factors, lymphovascular invasion and tumour grade, are of particular interest since they may be readily incorporated into clinical practice. Overexpression of neu oncoprotein may also play a role in determining prognosis for women administered adjuvant systemic therapy.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Piccart MJ, Davidson NE, Pritchard KI: ASCO: Controversies in Adjuvant Systemic Therapy of Breast Cancer, ASCO Educational Book, pp 137–173, 2002
InstitutionalAuthorNameEarly Breast Cancer Trialists’ Collaborative Group (1998) ArticleTitleTamoxifen for early breast cancer: an overview of the randomised trials Lancet 351 1451–1467
InstitutionalAuthorNameEarly Breast Cancer Trialists’ Collaborative Group (1996) ArticleTitleOvarian ablation in early breast cancer: overview of the randomized trials Lancet 348 1189–1196
InstitutionalAuthorNameEarly Breast Cancer Trialists’ Collaborative Group (1998) ArticleTitlePolychemotherapy for early breast cancer: an overview of the randomised trials Lancet 352 930–942
A Goldhirsch JH Glick RD Gelber AS Coates HJ Senn (2001) ArticleTitleMeeting highlights: International Consensus Panel on the Treatment of Primary Breast Cancer–Seventh International Conference on Adjuvant Therapy of Primary Breast Cancer J Clin Oncol 19 3817–3827
Bowersox JA: National Institutes of Health Consensus Development Conference Statement: Adjuvant Therapy for Breast Cancer, November 1–3, 2000. J Natl Cancer Inst Monographs, No. 30, 5–15, 2001
Steering Committee on Clinical Practice Guidelines for the Care and Treatment of Breast Cancer. Clinical practice guidelines for the care and treatment of breast cancer: 7. Adjuvant systemic therapy for women with node-negative breast cancer. CMAJ 158 (suppl 3): S43–51, 1998
Levine M: For the Steering Committee on Clinical Practice Guidelines for the Care and Treatment of Breast Cancer: Clinical Practice Guidelines for the care and Treatment of Breast Cancer: 7. Adjuvant systemic therapy for women with node-negative breast (2001 update) Can Med Assoc J 164(2): 213, 2001
The NCCN Breast Cancer Clinical Pratice Guidelines in Oncology. JNCCN 1: 148–188, 2003.
DC Allred JM Harvey M Berardo GM Clark (1998) ArticleTitlePrognostic and predictive factors in breast cancer by immunohistochemical analysis Mod Pathol 11 155–168
IC Henderson AJ Patek (1998) ArticleTitleThe relationship between prognostic and predictive factors in the management of breast cancer Breast Cancer Res Treat 52 261–268
K Keyomarsi SL Tucker TA Buccholz M Callister Y Ding GN Hortobagyi I Bedrosian C Knickerbocker W Toyofuku M Lowe TW Herliczek SS Bacus (2002) ArticleTitleCyclin E and survival in patients with breast cancer. New Eng J Med 347 IssueID20 1566–1575
F Janicke A Prechtl C Thomssen N Harbeck C Meisner M Untch FCGJ Sweep HK Selbmann H Graeff M Schmitt (2001) ArticleTitleFor the German Chemo N0 Study Group: randomized adjuvant therapy trial in high-risk lymph node-negative breast cancer patients identified by urokinase-type plasminogen activator and plasminogen activator inhibitor type I J Natl Cancer Inst 93 913–920
MP Look WLJ Putten Particlevan N Harbeck JI Christensen C Thomssen R Kates F Spyratos M Ferno S Eppenberger-Castori FCGF Sweep K Ulm JP Peyrat PM Martin H Magdelenat N Brünner C Duggan BW Lisboa PO Bendahl V Quillien A Daver G Ricolleau ME Meijer-van Gelder P Manders WE Fiets MA Blankenstein P Broët S Romain G Daxenbichler G Windbichler T Cufer S Borstnar W Borstnar W Kueng LVAM Beex JGM Klijn N O’Higgins U Eppenberger F Jänicke M Schmitt JA Foekens (2002) ArticleTitlePooled analysis of prognostic impact of uPA and PAI-1 in 8, 377 breast cancer patients J Natl Cancer Inst 94 116–128
DG Altman B Lausen W Sauerbrei M Schumacher (1994) ArticleTitleDangers of using optimal cutpoints in the evaluation of prognostic factors J Natl Cancer Inst 86 829–835
JW Chapman D Murray DR McCready W Hanna HJ Kahn HLA Lickley ME Trudeau BG Mobbs CA Sawka EB Fish KI Pritchard (1996) ArticleTitleAn improved statistical approach: can it clarify the role of new prognostic factors for breast cancer Eur J Cancer 11 1949–1956
IL Andrulis SB Bull ME Blackstein D utherland C Mak S Sidlofsky KPH Pritzker RW Hartwick W Hanna L Lickley R Wilkinson A Qizilbash U Ambus M Lipa H Weizel A Katz M Baida S Mariz G Stoik P Dacamara D Strongitharm W Geddie D McCready (1998) ArticleTitleFor the Toronto Breast Cancer Study Group: neu/erbB-2 amplification identifies a poor-prognosis group of women with node-negative breast cancer J Clin Oncol 16 1340–1349
I Zemzoum RE Kates JS Ross P Dettmar M Dutta C Henrichs S Yurdseven H Hofler M Kiechle M Schmitt N Harbeck (2003) ArticleTitleInvasion factors uPA/PAI-1 and HER2 status provide independent and complementary information on patient outcome in node-negative breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 21 IssueID6 1022–1028
MJ Vijver ParticleVan de D Yudong LJ Van T Veer H Dai AAM Hart DW Voskuil GJ Schreiber JL Peterse C Roberts MJ Marton M Parrish D Parrish A Witteveen A Glas L Delahaye T Velde Particlevan der H Bartelink S Rodenhuis ET Rutgers SH Friend R Bernards (2002) ArticleTitleA gene-expression signature as a predictor of survival in breast cancer. N Engl J Med 347 IssueID25 1999–2009 Occurrence Handle10.1056/NEJMoa021967 Occurrence Handle12490681
AE Ring PA Ellis (2002) ArticleTitlePredictors of response to systemic therapy in breast cancer. Forum (Genova) 12 IssueID1 19–32
CA Sawka KI Pritchard HLA Lickley GA Oldfield JW Chapman G Allen BG Mobbs WM Hanna H Kahn ME Trudeau DR McCready (1995) ArticleTitleThe Henrietta Banting Breast Centre Database: a model for clinical research utilizing a hospital-based inception cohort J Clin Epidemiol 48 779–786
EB Fish JW Chapman MA Link (1998) ArticleTitleCompeting causes of death for primary breast cancer Annal Surg Oncol 5 368–375
JW Meakin JL Hayward HJ Stewart (1978) ArticleTitleAssessment of response and recurrence in breast cancer Seminars in Oncology 5 445–449
BG Mobbs IE Johnson (1978) ArticleTitleUse of an enzyme immunoassay (EIA) for quantitation of cytosolic and nuclear estrogen receptor, and correlation with progesterone receptor in human breast cancer J Steroid Biochem 28 653–662
ED Ryan AF Clark BG Mobbs TC Ooi DJA Sutherland ER Tustanoff (1985) ArticleTitleInter-laboratory quality control of estrogen and progesterone receptor assays in breast cancer tissue using lyophilized cytosols Clin Biochem 18 20–26
MM Black FD Speer SR Opler (1956) ArticleTitleStructural representations of tumor-host relationships in mammary carcinoma–biologic and prognostic significance Am J Clin Path 26 250–265
WM Hanna HJ Kahn JW Chapman EB Fish HLA Lickley DR McCready (1999) ArticleTitlePathological characteristics of breast cancer that predict for local recurrence after lumpectomy alone The Breast Journal 5 105–111
DW Hedley GM Clark CJ Cornelisse D Killander T Kute D Merkel (1993) ArticleTitleConsensus review of the utility of DNA cytometry in carcinoma of the breast Cytometry 14 482–485
JW Chapman E Wolman SR Wolman Y Remvikos S Shackney DE Axelrod H Baisch IJ Christensen RA White LS Liebovitch DH Moore FM Waldman CJ Cornilesse TV Shankey (1998) ArticleTitleAssessing genetic markers of tumour progression in the context of intra-tumor heterogeneity Cytometry 31 67–73
BMDP Statistical Software, PC Dynamic 7.0. Statistical Solutions Ltd, Saugua, MA, 1993.
RL Prentice P Marek (1979) ArticleTitleA qualitative discrepancy between censored data rank tests Biometrics 35 861–867
D Coradini MG Daidone P Boracchi E Biganzol S Oriana G Bresciani C Pellizzaro G Tomasic G DiFronzo E Marubini (2000) ArticleTitleTime-dependent relevance of steroid receptors in breast cancer. JCO 18 IssueID14 2702–2709
PM Ravdin LA Siminoff GJ Davis MB Mercer J Hewlett N Gerson HL Parker (2001) ArticleTitleComputer program to assist in making decisions about adjuvant therapy for women with early breast cancer J Clin Oncol 19 980–991
TE Moon SE Jones G Bonadonna P Valagussa T Powles A Buzdar E Montague (1987) ArticleTitleDevelopment and use of a natural history data base of breast cancer studies Am J Clin Oncol 10 396–403
CA Quiet DJ Ferguson RR Weichselbaum S Hellman (1995) ArticleTitleNatural history of node-negative breast cancer: a study of 826 patients with long-term follow-up J Clin Oncol 13 1144–1151
PP Rosen S Groshen PE Saigo DW Kinne S Hellman (1989) ArticleTitleA long-term follow-up study of survival in stage I (T1N0M0) and Stage II (T1N1M0) breast carcinoma J Clin Oncol 7 355–366
H Joensuu S Toikkanen (1995) ArticleTitleCured of breast cancer J Clin Oncol 13 62–69
DR McCready JW Chapman WM Hanna HJ Kahn D Murray EB Fish ME Trudeau IL Andrulis HLA Lickley (2000) ArticleTitleFactors affecting distant disease-free survival for primary invasive breast cancer: use of a log-normal survival model Annal Surg Oncol 7 416–426
SE Pinder IO Ellis M Galea S O’Rouke RW Blamey CW Elston (1994) ArticleTitlePathological prognostic factors in breast cancer III Vascular invasion: relationship with recurrence and survival in a large study with long-term follow-up. Histopathol 24 41–47 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:ByuC1MzhsFU%3D Occurrence Handle8144141
SB Bull H Ozcelik D Pinnaduwage ME Blackstein D Sutherland KI Pritchard A Tzontcheva S Sidlofsky W Hanna MD Qizilbash M Tweeddale S Fine D McCready IL Andrulis (2004) ArticleTitleThe combination of p53 Mutation and neu/erbB-2 amplification is associated with increased risk of recurrence in node-negative breast cancer J Clin Oncol 22 86–96
AP Locker JO Ellis DAL Morgan CW Elston A Mitchell RW Blamey (1989) ArticleTitleFactors influencing local recurrence after excision and radiotherapy for primary breast cancer Br J Surg 76 890–94
IA Olivotto CD Bajdik IH Plenderleith CM Coppin KA Gelmon SM Jackson J Ragaz KS Wilson A Worth (1994) ArticleTitleAdjuvant systemic therapy and survival after breast cancer N Engl J Med 330 805–810
DF Hayes RC Bast CE Desch H Fritsche SuffixJr NE Kemeny JM Jessup GY Locker JS Macdonald RG Mennel L Norton P Ravdin S Taube RJ Winn (1996) ArticleTitleTumor marker utility grading system: a framework to evaluate clinical utility of tumor markers J Natl Cancer Inst 88 1456–1466
BA Gusterson (1995) The change in the role of the pathologist in the prediction of tumor behaviour and response to treatment RB Dickson HE Lippman (Eds) DoctorsDrugs and Hormonal Resistance in Breast Cancer Ellis Harwood New York 39–53
S Toikkanan H Joensuu P Klemi (1989) ArticleTitleThe prognostic significance of nuclear DNA content in invasive breast cancer–a study with long-term follow-up Br J Cancer 60 693–700
J Sun J Chapman R Gordon R Sivaramakrishna M Link E Fish (2002) ArticleTitleSurvival from primary breast cancer after routine clinical use of mammography Br J 8 199–208
DE Merkel WL McGuire (1990) ArticleTitlePloidy, proliferative activity and prognosis DNA flow cytometry of solid tumors. Cancer 65 1194–1205
B Fisher N Gunduz J Costantino ER Fisher C Redmond EP Mamounas R Siderits (1991) ArticleTitleDNA flow cytometric analysis of primary operable breast cancer Cancer 68 1465–1475
HB Muss AD Thor DA Berry T Kute ET Liu F Koerner CT Cirrincione DR Budman (1994) ArticleTitlec-erbB-2 expression and response to adjuvant therapy in women with node-positive early breast cancer. N Engl J Med 330 IssueID18 12606–1266
Pritchard KI, O’Malley FA, Andrulis I, Shephard L, Tu D, Levine MN, Bramwell V: Prognostic and predictive value of HER 2/neu in a randomized trial comparing CMF to CEF in premenopausal women with axillary node positive breast cancer (NCIC CTG MA.5). Proc Amer Soc Clin Oncol 21: 42a (Abstract #165), 2002.
LJ van’t Veer H Dai MJ Vijver Particlevan de YD He AA Hart M Mao HL Peterse K Kooy Particlevan der MJ Marton AT Witteveen GJ Schreiber RM Kerkhoven C Roberts PS Linsley R Bernards SH Friend (2002) ArticleTitleGene expression profiling predicts clinical outcome of breast cancer Nature 415 530–536 Occurrence Handle10.1038/415530a Occurrence Handle11823860
Sotiriou C, Neo SY, McShane LM, Korn EL, Long PM, Jazaeri A, Martiat P, Fox SB, Harris AL, Liu ET: Breast cancer classification and prognosis based on gene expression profiles from a population-based study. PNAS 100(18): 10393–10398, xxxx.
TR Hughes M Mao AR Jones J Burchard MJ Marton KW Shannon SM Lefkowitz M Ziman JM Schelter MR Meyer S Kobayashi C Davis H Dai YD He SB Stephaniants G Cavet WL Walker A West E Coffey DD Shoemaker R Stoughton AP Blanchard SH Friend PS Linsley (2001) ArticleTitleExpression profiling using microarrays fabricated by an ink-jet oligonucleotide synthesizer Nature Biotechnology 19 342–347
M West C Blanchette H Dressman E Huang S Ishida R Spang H Zuzan JA Olson SuffixJr JR Marks JR v (2001) ArticleTitlePredicting the clinical status of human breast cancer by using gene expression profiles PNAS 98 11462–11467
YD He SH Friend (2001) ArticleTitleMicroarrays–the 21st century divining rod Nat Med 7 658–659
S Ramaswamy P Tamayo R Rifkin S Mukherjee CH Yeang M Angelo C Ladd M Reich E Latulippe JP Mesirov T Poggio W Gerald M Loda ES Lander TR Golub (2001) ArticleTitleMulticlass cancer diagnosis using tumor gene expression signatures PNAS 98 15149–15154
C Caldas SAJ Aparicio (2002) ArticleTitleCancer: The molecular outlook Nature 415 484–485
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Trudeau, M.E., Pritchard, K.I., Chapman, JA.W. et al. Prognostic factors affecting the natural history of node-negative breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat 89, 35–45 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10549-004-1368-y
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10549-004-1368-y