Zusammenfassung
GRUNDLAGEN: Die Wirkung der Strahlentherapie beruht auf DNA-Schädigung, wobei das p53 Gen eine wichtige Rolle bei der Induktion des Zelltodes spielt. p53 ist in Tumoren häufig inaktiviert, was eine DNA-Schaden-Induzierte Apoptose verhindert. METHODIK: In der vorliegenden Arbeit werden Aspekte zur Durchführung einer prädiktiven Markerstudie erörtert. Diese Studie ist zur klinischen Umsetzung einer auf p53 als prädiktivem Marker basierenden, individualisierten Krebstherapie erforderlich. ERGEBNISSE: PART 1 ist eine akademische, prospektiv randomisierte klinische Studie, welche sich erstmals mit markeradaptierter Strahlentherapie befasst. Patienten mit Rektumkarzinom Stadium T2/T3, welche für eine präoperative Strahlentherapie geeignet sind, werden in die Studie eingebracht. Das Studiendesign erlaubt die Untersuchung, ob der p53-Genotyp ein valider Marker zur Therapiewahl ist. Eine verlängerte Wartezeit zwischen Bestrahlung und Operation soll die Strahlenwirkung auf den Tumor sichtbar machen. SCHLUSSFOLGERUNGEN: Die Markerstudie ist ausgelegt um auf hohem Evidenzniveau (Level 1) zu zeigen, dass der p53 Genotyp und der Zeitpunkt der Operation prognostische Faktoren sind. Weiters soll der prädiktive Wert des p53 Genotyps als Selektionsmarker für Patienten zur Strahlentherapie evaluiert werden.
Summary
BACKGROUND: Cell killing by ionizing radiation is triggered by DNA-damage involving the p53 gene as major player in cell death induction. p53 is frequently inactivated in cancer which prevents apoptosis after extensive DNA-damage. METHOD: We summarize considerations to conduct a predictive marker trial mandatory before clinical application of p53 for individualized therapy. RESULTS: PART 1 is an academic driven prospective randomized trial addressing individualized, marker adapted radiation therapy for the first time. Patients suffering from T2/T3 rectal cancer appropriate for preoperative radiation will be included. The design qualifies the trial to determine the relevance of p53 gene mutation as a marker guiding the choice of therapy. A delay of surgery after radiation is implemented to improve detection of the radiation effect on the tumor. CONCLUSIONS: This predictive marker trial intends to provide the level of evidence I that the p53 genotype and time of surgery are prognostic markers. Furthermore should the predictive value of p53 genotype be evaluated as marker to select patients for preoperative radiation therapy.
References
Ferlay J, Autier P, Boniol M, et al. Estimates of the cancer incidence and mortality in Europe in 2006. Ann Oncol 2007;18:581–92
Jemal A, Siegel R, Ward E, et al. Cancer statistics, 2008. CA Cancer J Clin 2008;58:71–96
Verdecchia A, Francisci S, Brenner H, et al. Recent cancer survival in Europe: a 2000–02 period analysis of EUROCARE-4 data. Lancet Oncol 2007;8:784–96
Quirke P, Steele R, Monson J, et al. Effect of the plane of surgery achieved on local recurrence in patients with operable rectal cancer: a prospective study using data from the MRC CR07 and NCIC-CTG CO16 randomised clinical trial. Lancet 2009;373:821–8
Birgisson H, Pahlman L, Gunnarsson U, et al. Adverse effects of preoperative radiation therapy for rectal cancer: long-term follow-up of the Swedish Rectal Cancer Trial. J Clin Oncol 2005;23:8697–705
Marijnen CA, van de Velde CJ, Putter H, et al. Impact of short-term preoperative radiotherapy on health-related quality of life and sexual functioning in primary rectal cancer: report of a multicenter randomized trial. J Clin Oncol 2005;23:1847–58
Peeters KC, van de Velde CJ, Leer JW, et al. Late side effects of short-course preoperative radiotherapy combined with total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer: increased bowel dysfunction in irradiated patients – a Dutch colorectal cancer group study. J Clin Oncol 2005;23:6199–206
Bates S, Vousden KH. Mechanisms of p53-mediated apoptosis. Cell Mol Life Sci 1999;55:28–37
Cai Z, Capoulade C, Moyret-Lalle C, et al. Resistance of MCF7 human breast carcinoma cells to TNF-induced cell death is associated with loss of p53 function. Oncogene 1997;15:2817–26
Clarke AR, Purdie CA, Harrison DJ, et al. Thymocyte apoptosis induced by p53-dependent and independent pathways. Nature 1993;362:849–52
Hermeking H, Eick D. Mediation of c-Myc-induced apoptosis by p53. Science 1994;265:2091–3
Shaw P, Bovey R, Tardy S, et al. Induction of apoptosis by wild-type p53 in a human colon tumor-derived cell line. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1992;89:4495–9
Wallace-Brodeur RR, Lowe SW. Clinical implications of p53 mutations. Cell Mol Life Sci 1999;55:64–75
Ahmed IA, Kelly SB, Anderson JJ, et al. The predictive value of p53 and p33(ING1b) in patients with Dukes'C colorectal cancer. Colorectal Dis 2008;10:344–51
Bossi G, Sacchi A. Restoration of wild-type p53 function in human cancer: Relevance for tumor therapy. Head Neck 2007;29:272–84
Ince WL, Jubb AM, Holden SN, et al. Association of k-ras, b-raf, and p53 status with the treatment effect of bevacizumab. J Natl Cancer Inst 2005;97:981–9
Lopez-Crapez E, Bibeau F, Thezenas S, et al. p53 status and response to radiotherapy in rectal cancer: a prospective multilevel analysis. Br J Cancer 2005;92:2114–21
Negri FV, Campanini N, Camisa R, et al. Biological predictive factors in rectal cancer treated with preoperative radiotherapy or radiochemotherapy. Br J Cancer 2008;98:143–7
Kandioler D, Zwrtek R, Ludwig C, et al. TP53 genotype but not p53 immunohistochemical result predicts response to preoperative short-term radiotherapy in rectal cancer. Ann Surg 2002;235:493–8
Graf W, Dahlberg M, Osman MM, et al. Short-term preoperative radiotherapy results in down-staging of rectal cancer: a study of 1316 patients. Radiother Oncol 1997;43:133–7
Kapiteijn E, Marijnen CA, Nagtegaal ID, et al. Preoperative radiotherapy combined with total mesorectal excision for resectable rectal cancer. N Engl J Med 2001;345:638–46
Marijnen CA, Nagtegaal ID, Klein Kranenbarg E, et al. No downstaging after short-term preoperative radiotherapy in rectal cancer patients. J Clin Oncol 2001;19:1976–84
Improved survival with preoperative radiotherapy in resectable rectal cancer. Swedish Rectal Cancer Trial. N Engl J Med 1997;336:980–7
Sargent DJ, Conley BA, Allegra C, et al. Clinical trial designs for predictive marker validation in cancer treatment trials. J Clin Oncol 2005;23:2020–7
Eisenhauer EA, Therasse P, Bogaerts J, et al. New response evaluation criteria in solid tumours: revised RECIST guideline (version 1.1). Eur J Cancer 2009;45:228–47
Therasse P, Arbuck SG, Eisenhauer EA, et al. New guidelines to evaluate the response to treatment in solid tumors. European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer, National Cancer Institute of the United States, National Cancer Institute of Canada. J Natl Cancer Inst 2000;92:205–16
Bogaerts J, Ford R, Sargent D, et al. Individual patient data analysis to assess modifications to the RECIST criteria. Eur J Cancer 2009;45:248–60
Koscielny S. Critical review of microarray-based prognostic tests and trials in breast cancer. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol 2008;20:47–50
Simon RM. Guidelines for the design of clinical studies for the development and validation of therapeutically relevant biomarkers and biomerker-based classification systems. In: Hayes F, Gasparini G, editors. Biomarkers in breast cancer. Totowa: Humana Press Inc.; 2006. pp. 3–15
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Wolf, B., Kührer, I., Akan, B. et al. PART 1 – p53 adapted preoperative radiotherapy for T2 and T3 rectal cancer. A study of the p53 research group. Eur Surg 42, 18–23 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10353-010-0514-5
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10353-010-0514-5