Skip to main content
Log in

PART 1 – p53 adapted preoperative radiotherapy for T2 and T3 rectal cancer. A study of the p53 research group

PART 1 – Eine klinische Studie zur p53 adaptierten präoperativen Strahlentherapie beim Rektumkarzinom Stadium T2 und T3

  • Main Topic
  • Published:
European Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Zusammenfassung

GRUNDLAGEN: Die Wirkung der Strahlentherapie beruht auf DNA-Schädigung, wobei das p53 Gen eine wichtige Rolle bei der Induktion des Zelltodes spielt. p53 ist in Tumoren häufig inaktiviert, was eine DNA-Schaden-Induzierte Apoptose verhindert. METHODIK: In der vorliegenden Arbeit werden Aspekte zur Durchführung einer prädiktiven Markerstudie erörtert. Diese Studie ist zur klinischen Umsetzung einer auf p53 als prädiktivem Marker basierenden, individualisierten Krebstherapie erforderlich. ERGEBNISSE: PART 1 ist eine akademische, prospektiv randomisierte klinische Studie, welche sich erstmals mit markeradaptierter Strahlentherapie befasst. Patienten mit Rektumkarzinom Stadium T2/T3, welche für eine präoperative Strahlentherapie geeignet sind, werden in die Studie eingebracht. Das Studiendesign erlaubt die Untersuchung, ob der p53-Genotyp ein valider Marker zur Therapiewahl ist. Eine verlängerte Wartezeit zwischen Bestrahlung und Operation soll die Strahlenwirkung auf den Tumor sichtbar machen. SCHLUSSFOLGERUNGEN: Die Markerstudie ist ausgelegt um auf hohem Evidenzniveau (Level 1) zu zeigen, dass der p53 Genotyp und der Zeitpunkt der Operation prognostische Faktoren sind. Weiters soll der prädiktive Wert des p53 Genotyps als Selektionsmarker für Patienten zur Strahlentherapie evaluiert werden.

Summary

BACKGROUND: Cell killing by ionizing radiation is triggered by DNA-damage involving the p53 gene as major player in cell death induction. p53 is frequently inactivated in cancer which prevents apoptosis after extensive DNA-damage. METHOD: We summarize considerations to conduct a predictive marker trial mandatory before clinical application of p53 for individualized therapy. RESULTS: PART 1 is an academic driven prospective randomized trial addressing individualized, marker adapted radiation therapy for the first time. Patients suffering from T2/T3 rectal cancer appropriate for preoperative radiation will be included. The design qualifies the trial to determine the relevance of p53 gene mutation as a marker guiding the choice of therapy. A delay of surgery after radiation is implemented to improve detection of the radiation effect on the tumor. CONCLUSIONS: This predictive marker trial intends to provide the level of evidence I that the p53 genotype and time of surgery are prognostic markers. Furthermore should the predictive value of p53 genotype be evaluated as marker to select patients for preoperative radiation therapy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  • Ferlay J, Autier P, Boniol M, et al. Estimates of the cancer incidence and mortality in Europe in 2006. Ann Oncol 2007;18:581–92

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Jemal A, Siegel R, Ward E, et al. Cancer statistics, 2008. CA Cancer J Clin 2008;58:71–96

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Verdecchia A, Francisci S, Brenner H, et al. Recent cancer survival in Europe: a 2000–02 period analysis of EUROCARE-4 data. Lancet Oncol 2007;8:784–96

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Quirke P, Steele R, Monson J, et al. Effect of the plane of surgery achieved on local recurrence in patients with operable rectal cancer: a prospective study using data from the MRC CR07 and NCIC-CTG CO16 randomised clinical trial. Lancet 2009;373:821–8

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Birgisson H, Pahlman L, Gunnarsson U, et al. Adverse effects of preoperative radiation therapy for rectal cancer: long-term follow-up of the Swedish Rectal Cancer Trial. J Clin Oncol 2005;23:8697–705

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Marijnen CA, van de Velde CJ, Putter H, et al. Impact of short-term preoperative radiotherapy on health-related quality of life and sexual functioning in primary rectal cancer: report of a multicenter randomized trial. J Clin Oncol 2005;23:1847–58

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Peeters KC, van de Velde CJ, Leer JW, et al. Late side effects of short-course preoperative radiotherapy combined with total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer: increased bowel dysfunction in irradiated patients – a Dutch colorectal cancer group study. J Clin Oncol 2005;23:6199–206

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bates S, Vousden KH. Mechanisms of p53-mediated apoptosis. Cell Mol Life Sci 1999;55:28–37

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cai Z, Capoulade C, Moyret-Lalle C, et al. Resistance of MCF7 human breast carcinoma cells to TNF-induced cell death is associated with loss of p53 function. Oncogene 1997;15:2817–26

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Clarke AR, Purdie CA, Harrison DJ, et al. Thymocyte apoptosis induced by p53-dependent and independent pathways. Nature 1993;362:849–52

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hermeking H, Eick D. Mediation of c-Myc-induced apoptosis by p53. Science 1994;265:2091–3

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Shaw P, Bovey R, Tardy S, et al. Induction of apoptosis by wild-type p53 in a human colon tumor-derived cell line. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1992;89:4495–9

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wallace-Brodeur RR, Lowe SW. Clinical implications of p53 mutations. Cell Mol Life Sci 1999;55:64–75

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ahmed IA, Kelly SB, Anderson JJ, et al. The predictive value of p53 and p33(ING1b) in patients with Dukes'C colorectal cancer. Colorectal Dis 2008;10:344–51

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bossi G, Sacchi A. Restoration of wild-type p53 function in human cancer: Relevance for tumor therapy. Head Neck 2007;29:272–84

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ince WL, Jubb AM, Holden SN, et al. Association of k-ras, b-raf, and p53 status with the treatment effect of bevacizumab. J Natl Cancer Inst 2005;97:981–9

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lopez-Crapez E, Bibeau F, Thezenas S, et al. p53 status and response to radiotherapy in rectal cancer: a prospective multilevel analysis. Br J Cancer 2005;92:2114–21

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Negri FV, Campanini N, Camisa R, et al. Biological predictive factors in rectal cancer treated with preoperative radiotherapy or radiochemotherapy. Br J Cancer 2008;98:143–7

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kandioler D, Zwrtek R, Ludwig C, et al. TP53 genotype but not p53 immunohistochemical result predicts response to preoperative short-term radiotherapy in rectal cancer. Ann Surg 2002;235:493–8

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Graf W, Dahlberg M, Osman MM, et al. Short-term preoperative radiotherapy results in down-staging of rectal cancer: a study of 1316 patients. Radiother Oncol 1997;43:133–7

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kapiteijn E, Marijnen CA, Nagtegaal ID, et al. Preoperative radiotherapy combined with total mesorectal excision for resectable rectal cancer. N Engl J Med 2001;345:638–46

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Marijnen CA, Nagtegaal ID, Klein Kranenbarg E, et al. No downstaging after short-term preoperative radiotherapy in rectal cancer patients. J Clin Oncol 2001;19:1976–84

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Improved survival with preoperative radiotherapy in resectable rectal cancer. Swedish Rectal Cancer Trial. N Engl J Med 1997;336:980–7

  • Sargent DJ, Conley BA, Allegra C, et al. Clinical trial designs for predictive marker validation in cancer treatment trials. J Clin Oncol 2005;23:2020–7

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Eisenhauer EA, Therasse P, Bogaerts J, et al. New response evaluation criteria in solid tumours: revised RECIST guideline (version 1.1). Eur J Cancer 2009;45:228–47

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Therasse P, Arbuck SG, Eisenhauer EA, et al. New guidelines to evaluate the response to treatment in solid tumors. European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer, National Cancer Institute of the United States, National Cancer Institute of Canada. J Natl Cancer Inst 2000;92:205–16

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bogaerts J, Ford R, Sargent D, et al. Individual patient data analysis to assess modifications to the RECIST criteria. Eur J Cancer 2009;45:248–60

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Koscielny S. Critical review of microarray-based prognostic tests and trials in breast cancer. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol 2008;20:47–50

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Simon RM. Guidelines for the design of clinical studies for the development and validation of therapeutically relevant biomarkers and biomerker-based classification systems. In: Hayes F, Gasparini G, editors. Biomarkers in breast cancer. Totowa: Humana Press Inc.; 2006. pp. 3–15

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to D. Kandioler.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Wolf, B., Kührer, I., Akan, B. et al. PART 1 – p53 adapted preoperative radiotherapy for T2 and T3 rectal cancer. A study of the p53 research group. Eur Surg 42, 18–23 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10353-010-0514-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10353-010-0514-5

Schlüsselwörter

Keywords

Navigation