Abstract
Hemispherotomy is an established surgical technique to cure or palliate selected, mostly young patients suffering from refractory epilepsy. However, a few patients continue to have seizures despite the surgical hemispherical disconnection. We present a case series of patients who underwent redo hemispherotomy after a first unsuccessful hemispherical disconnection and provide a roadmap for subsequent workup and treatment. The institutional database of epilepsy surgery was reviewed. Twenty-four patients who underwent hemispherotomies for refractory epilepsy were identified between 2007 and 2016. Patients’ notes were checked for demographics, history, clinical presentation, preoperative workup, medical treatment, age at first hemispherotomy, and surgical technique. Complications, histopathology, postoperative antiepileptic drug, and postoperative neurological follow-up were documented. Engel class was used to determine the outcome after surgery. Three patients (one hemimegalencephaly, one perinatal stroke, and one Rasmussen’s disease) underwent redo hemispherotomy after electroencephalography and MRI studies with particular importance given to diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) to demonstrate residual connection between hemispheres. In one case, redo disconnection followed by a frontal lobectomy rendered the patient seizure-free (Engel class I). In one case, the seizure frequency remained the same but generalized seizures disappeared (Engel class III), and in one case, seizure frequency was considerably reduced after the redo disconnection (Engel class II), with a minimum follow-up of 2 years. Surgical aspects, possible reasons of failure of first hemispherotomy, and rationale that led to second-look surgery are presented. Reasons for failure can be related to patient’s selection and/or surgical aspects. Hemispherotomy is a technically demanding procedure and requires accurate preoperative workup. Redo hemispherotomy is a valid option on the basis of further epileptological and radiological workup to demonstrate residual interhemispheric connections and/or rule out bi-hemispheric epileptic activity.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Asarnow RF, LoPresti C, Guthrie D, Elliott T, Cynn V, Shields WD, Shewmon DA, Sankar R, Peacock WJ (1997) Developmental outcomes in children receiving resection surgery for medically intractable infantile spasms. Dev Med Child Neurol 39:430–440
Bahuleyan B, Robinson S, Nair AR, Sivanandapanicker JL, Cohen AR (2013) Anatomic hemispherectomy: historical perspective. World neurosurg 80:396–398. doi:10.1016/j.wneu.2012.03.020
Basheer SN, Connolly MB, Lautzenhiser A, Sherman EM, Hendson G, Steinbok P (2007) Hemispheric surgery in children with refractory epilepsy: seizure outcome, complications, and adaptive function. Epilepsia 48:133–140. doi:10.1111/j.1528-1167.2006.00909.x
Beier AD, Rutka JT (2013) Hemispherectomy: historical review and recent technical advances. Neurosurg Focus 34:E11. doi:10.3171/2013.3.focus1341
Binder DK, Schramm J (2006) Transsylvian functional hemispherectomy. Childs Nerv Syst 22:960–966. doi:10.1007/s00381-006-0131-6
Cats EA, Kho KH, Van Nieuwenhuizen O, Van Veelen CW, Gosselaar PH, Van Rijen PC (2007) Seizure freedom after functional hemispherectomy and a possible role for the insular cortex: the Dutch experience. J Neurosurg 107:275–280. doi:10.3171/ped-07/10/275
Chandra PS, Padma VM, Shailesh G, Chandreshekar B, Sarkar C, Tripathi M (2008) Hemispherotomy for intractable epilepsy. Neurol India 56:127–132
Cook SW, Nguyen ST, Hu B, Yudovin S, Shields WD, Vinters HV, Van de Wiele BM, Harrison RE, Mathern GW (2004) Cerebral hemispherectomy in pediatric patients with epilepsy: comparison of three techniques by pathological substrate in 115 patients. J Neurosurg 100:125–141. doi:10.3171/ped.2004.100.2.0125
De Ribaupierre S, Delalande O (2008) Hemispherotomy and other disconnective techniques. Neurosurg Focus 25:E14. doi:10.3171/foc/2008/25/9/e14
Delalande O, Bulteau C, Dellatolas G, Fohlen M, Jalin C, Buret V, Viguier D, Dorfmuller G, Jambaque I (2007) Vertical parasagittal hemispherotomy: surgical procedures and clinical long-term outcomes in a population of 83 children. Neurosurgery 60:ONS19–ONS32; Discussion ONS32. doi:10.1227/01.neu.0000249246.48299.12
Devlin AM, Cross JH, Harkness W, Chong WK, Harding B, Vargha-Khadem F, Neville BG (2003) Clinical outcomes of hemispherectomy for epilepsy in childhood and adolescence. Brain J Neurol 126:556–566
Dunkley C, Kung J, Scott RC, Nicolaides P, Neville B, Aylett SE, Harkness W, Cross JH (2011) Epilepsy surgery in children under 3 years. Epilepsy Res 93:96–106. doi:10.1016/j.eplepsyres.2010.11.002
Engel J Jr (2001) Intractable epilepsy: definition and neurobiology. Epilepsia 42(Suppl 6):3
Gonzalez-Martinez JA, Gupta A, Kotagal P, Lachhwani D, Wyllie E, Luders HO, Bingaman WE (2005) Hemispherectomy for catastrophic epilepsy in infants. Epilepsia 46:1518–1525. doi:10.1111/j.1528-1167.2005.53704.x
Gowda S, Salazar F, Bingaman WE, Kotagal P, Lachhwani DL, Gupta A, Davis S, Niezgoda J, Wyllie E (2010) Surgery for catastrophic epilepsy in infants 6 months of age and younger. J Neurosurg Pediatr 5:603–607. doi:10.3171/2010.1.peds08301
Kiehna EN, Widjaja E, Holowka S, Carter Snead O 3rd, Drake J, Weiss SK, Ochi A, Thompson EM, Go C, Otsubo H, Donner EJ, Rutka JT (2016) Utility of diffusion tensor imaging studies linked to neuronavigation and other modalities in repeat hemispherotomy for intractable epilepsy. J Neurosurg Pediatr 17:483–490. doi:10.3171/2015.7.peds15101
Kim DL, Osburn LL, Cohen-Gadol AA (2010) A novel method for confirmation of hemispheric disconnection during hemispherotomy surgery. Pediatr Neurosurg 46:71–75. doi:10.1159/000315321
Kossoff EH, Vining EP, Pillas DJ, Pyzik PL, Avellino AM, Carson BS, Freeman JM (2003) Hemispherectomy for intractable unihemispheric epilepsy etiology vs outcome. Neurology 61:887–890
Kwan A, Ng WH, Otsubo H, Ochi A, Snead OC 3rd, Tamber MS, Rutka JT (2010) Hemispherectomy for the control of intractable epilepsy in childhood: comparison of 2 surgical techniques in a single institution. Neurosurgery 67:429–436. doi:10.1227/NEU.0b013e3181f743dc
Kwan P, Brodie MJ (2000) Early identification of refractory epilepsy. N Engl J Med 342:314–319. doi:10.1056/nejm200002033420503
Limbrick DD, Narayan P, Powers AK, Ojemann JG, Park TS, Bertrand M, Smyth MD (2009) Hemispherotomy: efficacy and analysis of seizure recurrence. J Neurosurg Pediatr 4:323–332. doi:10.3171/2009.5.peds0942
Maehara T, Shimizu H, Kawai K, Shigetomo R, Tamagawa K, Yamada T, Inoue M (2002) Postoperative development of children after hemispherotomy. Brain Dev 24:155–160
Marras CE, Granata T, Franzini A, Freri E, Villani F, Casazza M, De Curtis M, Ragona F, Ferroli P, D’Incerti L, Pincherle A, Spreafico R, Broggi G (2010) Hemispherotomy and functional hemispherectomy: indications and outcome. Epilepsy Res 89:104–112. doi:10.1016/j.eplepsyres.2009.09.006
Mittal S, Farmer JP, Rosenblatt B, Andermann F, Montes JL, Villemure JG (2001) Intractable epilepsy after a functional hemispherectomy: important lessons from an unusual case. Case report. J Neurosurg 94:510–514. doi:10.3171/jns.2001.94.3.0510
Morino M, Shimizu H, Ohata K, Tanaka K, Hara M (2002) Anatomical analysis of different hemispherotomy procedures based on dissection of cadaveric brains. J Neurosurg 97:423–431. doi:10.3171/jns.2002.97.2.0423
Peacock WJ, Wehby-Grant MC, Shields WD, Shewmon DA, Chugani HT, Sankar R, Vinters HV (1996) Hemispherectomy for intractable seizures in children: a report of 58 cases. Childs Nerv Syst 12:376–384
Pearl M, Gregg L, Gandhi D (2011) Cerebral venous development in relation to developmental venous anomalies and vein of Galen aneurysmal malformations. Semin Ultrasound CT MR 32:252–263. doi:10.1053/j.sult.2011.02.001
Penfield W, Jasper HH (1954) Epilepsy and the functional anatomy of the human brain. Little Brown, Boston
Pinto AL, Lohani S, Bergin AM, Bourgeois BF, Black PM, Prabhu SP, Madsen JR, Takeoka M, Poduri A (2014) Surgery for intractable epilepsy due to unilateral brain disease: a retrospective study comparing hemispherectomy techniques. Pediatr Neurol 51:336–343. doi:10.1016/j.pediatrneurol.2014.05.018
Pollo C, Debatisse D, Pralong E, Levivier M (2008) Periinsular hemispherotomy: surgical technique, intraoperative EEG monitoring and results on seizure outcome. Neuro-Chirurgie 54:303–310. doi:10.1016/j.neuchi.2008.03.001
Schramm J, Kuczaty S, Sassen R, Elger CE, von Lehe M (2012) Pediatric functional hemispherectomy: outcome in 92 patients. Acta Neurochir 154:2017–2028. doi:10.1007/s00701-012-1481-3
Schwartz TH, Spencer DD (2001) Strategies for reoperation after comprehensive epilepsy surgery. J Neurosurg 95:615–623. doi:10.3171/jns.2001.95.4.0615
Shimizu H, Maehara T (2000) Modification of peri-insular hemispherotomy and surgical results. Neurosurgery 47:367–372 Discussion 372-363
Tyrand R, Momjian S, Pollo C, Lysakowski C, Lascano AM, Vulliemoz S, Schaller K, Boex C (2016) Continuous intraoperative monitoring of temporal lobe epilepsy surgery. Stereotact Funct Neurosurg 94:404–412. doi:10.1159/000452842
Vadera S, Moosa AN, Jehi L, Gupta A, Kotagal P, Lachhwani D, Wyllie E, Bingaman W (2012) Reoperative hemispherectomy for intractable epilepsy: a report of 36 patients. Neurosurgery 71:388–392; discussion 392-383. doi:10.1227/NEU.0b013e31825979bb
Vigliano P, Margary G, Bagnasco I, Jarre L (2010) Cognitive evolution of a girl submitted to right hemispherotomy when five years old. Brain Dev 32:579–582. doi:10.1016/j.braindev.2009.07.010
Wyllie E (2000) Surgical treatment of epilepsy in pediatric patients. Can J Neurol Sci Le Journal Canadien des Sciences Neurologiques 27:106–110
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Ethical approval was obtained from our institutional Ethical Committee (study 2017-00308).
Conflict of interest
There are neither conflicts of interest nor funding sources to disclose.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Bartoli, A., El Hassani, Y., Jenny, B. et al. What to do in failed hemispherotomy? Our clinical series and review of the literature. Neurosurg Rev 41, 125–132 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10143-017-0888-y
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10143-017-0888-y