Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Validation of the revised International Criteria for Behcet’s Disease (ICBD) in Iran

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Clinical Rheumatology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The first internationally agreed criteria for Behcet’s disease were the International Study Group (ISG) criteria. It had very high specificity, but lacked good sensitivity, missing an important subset of patients. The International Criteria for Behcet’s Disease (ICBD) were created in 2006 to overcome this lack of sensitivity. It was revised in 2010. The objective of this study was to evaluate the performance of the revised International Criteria for Behcet’s Disease (rICBD) in Iran. In this study, the ISG and ICBD were evaluated and compared to the rICBD. All patients from the Behcet’s Disease Registry (7,011) and controls (5,226), up to March 2013, entered the study. The diagnosis was clinical, by expert opinion. Sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy were calculated for ISG, ICBD, and rICBD. A 95% confidence interval (95%CI) was calculated for percentages. For ISG, the sensitivity was 77.5 % (95%CI = 76.5–78.5). It was 98.3 % for ICBD (95%CI = 98.0–98.6) and 96.8 % for rICBD (95%CI = 96.4–97.2). Specificity was 99.2 % (95%CI = 99.0–99.4) for ISG, 96.2 % for ICBD (95%CI = 95.7–96.7), and 97.2 % for rICBD (95%CI = 96.8–97.6). Accuracy was 86.7 % (95%CI = 86.1–87.3) for ISG, 97.4 % for ICBD (95%CI = 97.1–97.7), and 97.0 % for rICBD (95%CI = 96.7–97.3). In Iranian patients, ICBD has 20.8 % and rICBD 19.3 % higher sensitivity than ISG. Although the specificity was lower than ISG by 3 % for ICBD and 2 % for rICBD, the accuracy was higher respectively by 10.7 and 10.3 %. ICBD has by far better performance than ISG. The difference was even more prominent in Iranian patients than for the ICBD cohort of patients and controls.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. International Study Group for Behcet's Disease, Wechsler B, Davatchi F, Mizushima Y et al (1990) Criteria for diagnosis of Behcet’s disease. Lancet 335:1078–1080

    Google Scholar 

  2. Behcet’s Disease Research Committee of Japan (1974) Behcet’s disease guide to diagnosis of Behcet’s disease (1972). Jpn J Ophthalmol 18:291–294

    Google Scholar 

  3. Mizushima Y (1988) Recent research into Behcet’s disease in Japan. Int J Tissue React 10:59–65

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Dilsen N, Konice M, Aral O (1986) Our diagnostic criteria of Behcet’s disease—an overview. In: Lehner T, Barnes CG (eds) Recent advances in Behcet’s disease. London Royal Society of Medicine Services, International Congress and Symposium Series 103, London, pp 177–180

  5. Curth HO (1946) Recurrent genitor–oral aphthosis with hypopion (Behcet’s syndrome). Arch Dermatol 54:179–196

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Hewitt J, Escande JP, Laurent PH, Perlemuter L (1969) Criteres de prevision du syndrome de Behcet. Bull Soc Fr Dermatol Syph 76:565–568

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Hewitt J, Escande JP, Maness S (1971) Revision des criteres diagnostiques du syndrome de Behcet. Presse Med 79:901

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Mason RM, Barnes CG (1969) Behcet’s syndrome with arthritis. Ann Rheum Dis 28:95–103

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Hubault A, Hamza M (1974) La maladie de Behçet en 1974. In: de Seze S et al (eds) L'actualité Rhumatologique 15. Expension Scientifique, Paris, pp 43–55

    Google Scholar 

  10. O'Duffy JD (1974) Critères proposés pour le diagnostique de la maladie de Behçet et notes therapeutiques. Rev Med 36:2371–2379

    Google Scholar 

  11. Cheng SP, Zhang X-Q (1980) Some special clinical manifestations of Behcet’s disease and review of literature. Chin J Int Med 19:15–22 (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Davatchi F, Shahram F, Akbarian M, et al. (1993) Accuracy of existing diagnosis criteria for Behcet’s disease. In: Wechsler B, Godeau P (eds) Behcet’s disease. Excerpta Medica International Congress Series 1037, Amsterdam, pp 225–228

  13. APLAR Subcommittee for Behcet’s Disease (1998) APLAR evaluation of Behcet’s disease diagnosis criteria. APLAR J Rheumatol 1:237–240

    Google Scholar 

  14. Prokaeva T, Alekberova Z, Reshetnjak T et al (2000) Evaluation of Behcet’s disease diagnosis criteria: study from Russia. In: Bang D, Lee E, Lee S (eds) Behcet’s disease. Design Mecca Publishing, Seoul, pp 598–603

    Google Scholar 

  15. Calamia KT, Davatchi F (2000) Sensitivity of diagnosis criteria in United States patients with Behcet’s disease. In: Bang D, Lee E, Lee S (eds) Behcet’s disease. Design Mecca Publishing, Seoul, pp 121–124

    Google Scholar 

  16. Davatchi F, Shahram F, Kumar A, Cheng YK et al (2004) Comparative analysis of Behcet’s disease in the APLAR region. ALPAR J Rheumatol 7:38–43

    Google Scholar 

  17. Davatchi F, Shahram F, Akbarian M et al. (1993) Classification tree for the diagnosis of Behcet’s disease. In: Wechsler B, Godeau P (eds) Behcet’s disease. Excerpta Medica International Congress Series 1037, Amsterdam, pp 245–248

  18. Dilsen N (2000) About diagnostic criteria for Behcet’s disease: our new proposal. In: Bang D, Lee ES, Lee S (eds) Behcet’s disease. Design Mecca Publishing, Seoul, pp 101–104

    Google Scholar 

  19. Chang HK, Kim SY (2003) Survey and validation of the criteria for Behcet’s disease recently used in Korea: a suggestion for modification of the international criteria. J Korean Med Sci 18:88–92

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Chang HK, Lee SS, Bai HJ et al (2004) Validation of the classification criteria commonly used in Korea and a modified set of preliminary criteria for Behcet’s disease: a multi-center study. Clin Exp Rheumatol 22(supp 34):S21–S26

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. International Team for the Revision of the International Criteria for Behcet’s Disease (2006) Evaluation of the International Criteria for Behcet’s Disease (ICBD). Clin Exp Rheumatol 24(Suppl 42):S13

    Google Scholar 

  22. International Team for the Revision of the International Criteria for Behcet’s Disease (2006) Revision of the International Criteria for Behcet’s Disease (ICBD). Clin Exp Rheumatol 24(Suppl 42):S14–S15

    Google Scholar 

  23. Altenburg A, Bonitsis NG, Papoutsis N et al (2008) Evaluation of diagnostic criteria including ICBD in Adamantiades–Behcet’s disease patients in Germany. Clin Exp Rheumatol 26(Supp 50):S-3

    Google Scholar 

  24. Zhang Z, Zhou W, Hao Y, Wang Y et al (2008) Validation of the International Criteria for Behcet’s Disease (ICBD) in China. Clin Exp Rheumatol 26(Supp 50):S6–S7

    Google Scholar 

  25. Davatchi F, Sadeghi Abdollahi B, Shahram F et al (2010) Validation of the international criteria for Behcet’s disease in Iran. Int J Rheum Dis 13:55–60

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Zouboulis CC (2008) Adamantiades–Behcet’s disease. In: Wolf K, Goldsmith LA, Katz SI et al (eds) Fitzpatrick’s dermatology in general medicine, 7th edn. McGraw-Hill, New York, pp 1620–1626

    Google Scholar 

  27. Kaufman WS, Kaufman Macnamara E, Jorizzo JL (2013) Behcet’s disease. In: Firestein GS, Budd RC, Gabriel SE et al (eds) Kelley’s textbook of rheumatology, 9th edn. Elsevier Saunders, Philadelphia, pp 1525–1532

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  28. International Team for the Revision of the International Criteria for Behçet's Disease (ITR-ICBD), Davatchi F, Assaad-Khalil S, Calamia KT et al (2013) The International Criteria for Behçet’s Disease (ICBD): a collaborative study of 27 countries on the sensitivity and specificity of the new criteria. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. doi:10.1111/jdv.12107

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Kirshwood BR, Sterne JAC (2003) Essential medical statistics, 2nd edn. Blackwell Science, Malden, MA

    Google Scholar 

  30. Youden WJ (1950) Index for rating diagnostic tests. Cancer 3:32–35

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Kraemer HC (2004) Reconsidering the odds ratio as a measure of 2 × 2 association in a population. Stat Med 23:257–270

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Glas AS, Lijmer JG, Prins MH et al (2003) The diagnostic odds ratio: a single indicator of test performance. J Clin Epidemiol 56:1129–1135

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Disclosures

None.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Fereydoun Davatchi.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Davatchi, F., Abdollahi, B.S., Chams-Davatchi, C. et al. Validation of the revised International Criteria for Behcet’s Disease (ICBD) in Iran. Clin Rheumatol 34, 315–320 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10067-013-2411-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10067-013-2411-3

Keywords

Navigation