Abstract
While contrast venography is considered the gold standard for imaging prior to inferior vena cava (IVC) filter insertion, bedside placement via transabdominal duplex ultrasound (DUS) has been recognized as a safe and effective alternative. To date, there has been no direct comparison of the efficacy of both imaging modalities for IVC filter placement. A concurrent cohort of patients who underwent IVC filter placement at a single institution over a 7-year period with either contrast venography or transabdominal DUS performed at bedside was retrospectively reviewed. Patient demographics, venous thromboembolism risk factors, indications, technical success, and procedural complications were compared. Of 439 patients initially imaged with transabdominal DUS, IVC filter placement was determined to be technically feasible in 382 patients (87%). The procedural technical success rate for IVC filter placement using transabdominal DUS when IVC visualization was adequate was 97.4% (n = 382 patients), compared to 99.7% (n = 318 patients) for contrast venography (p = 0.018). Patients undergoing IVC filter placement with transabdominal DUS more commonly required IVC filter for venous thromboembolism prophylaxis (81.1% vs. 27.8%, p < 0.001), had increased incidence of multiple traumatic injuries (28% vs. 10%, p < 0.001), and had increased risk from immobilization (91.3% vs. 34.1%, p < 0.001). Overall complication rates were 0.6% for venography and 1.8% for transabdominal DUS (p = NS). When IVC visualization was adequate, contrast venography and transabdominal duplex ultrasound both had high rates of success and a low incidence of complications. A technical success advantage was observed for contrast venography; this difference in technical success must be weighed against the bedside insertion advantage offered by DUS, which may be especially important in the immobilized or critically ill patient. Transabdominal DUS remains our preferred technique when feasible, especially when bedside placement is desired.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
CA Athanasoulis JA Kaufman EF Halpern et al. (2000) ArticleTitleInferior vena caval filters: review of a 26-year single-center clinical experience Radiology 216 54–66 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD3czksl2msA%3D%3D Occurrence Handle10887228
H Decousus A Leizorovicz F Parent et al. (1998) ArticleTitleA clinical trial of vena caval filters in the prevention of pulmonary embolism in patients with proximal deep-vein thrombosis. Prevention du Risque d’Embolie Pulmonaire par Interruption Cave Study Group N Engl J Med 338 409–415 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaK1c7hslSltQ%3D%3D Occurrence Handle9459643 Occurrence Handle10.1056/NEJM199802123380701
LJ Greenfield MC Proctor (2000) ArticleTitleThe percutaneous greenfield filter: outcomes and practice patterns J Vasc Surg 32 888–893 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD3M%2FltlKjsQ%3D%3D Occurrence Handle11054220 Occurrence Handle10.1067/mva.2000.110346
TB Kinney (2003) ArticleTitleUpdate on inferior vena cava filters J Vasc Interv Radiol 14 425–440 Occurrence Handle12682199
MS Conners Suffix3rd S Becker RJ Guzman et al. (2002) ArticleTitleDuplex scan-directed placement of inferior vena cava filters: a five-year institutional experience J Vasc Surg 35 286–291 Occurrence Handle11854726 Occurrence Handle10.1067/mva.2002.120372
TC Gamblin DW Ashley S Burch M Solis (2003) ArticleTitleA prospective evaluation of a bedside technique for placement of inferior vena cava filters: accuracy and limitations of intravascular ultrasound Am Surg 69 382–386 Occurrence Handle12769208
JS Matsumura MD Morasch (2000) ArticleTitleFilter placement by ultrasound technique at the bedside Semin Vasc Surg 13 199–203 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD3cvltVCrsg%3D%3D Occurrence Handle11005464
CR Nunn D Neuzil T Naslund et al. (1997) ArticleTitleCost-effective method for bedside insertion of vena caval filters in trauma patients J Trauma 43 752–758 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaK1c%2FltVymsw%3D%3D Occurrence Handle9390485
DF Neuzil CL Garrard RA Berkman et al. (1998) ArticleTitleDuplex-directed vena caval filter placement: report of initial experience Surgery 123 470–474 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaK1c3ht1CgsA%3D%3D Occurrence Handle9551075
InstitutionalAuthorNameRecommended reporting standards for vena caval filter placement and patient follow-up. (1999) ArticleTitleVena Caval Filter Consensus Conference J Vasc Surg 30 573–579 Occurrence Handle10.1016/S0741-5214(99)70088-1
MV Marx JR Tauscher DM Williams LJ Greenfield (1991) ArticleTitleEvaluation of the inferior vena cava with intravascular US after Greenfield filter placement J Vasc Interv Radiol 2 261–268 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaK387ptVyitw%3D%3D Occurrence Handle1799764 Occurrence Handle10.1016/S1051-0443(91)72292-6
WF Oppat AC Chiou JS Matsumura (1999) ArticleTitleIntravascular ultrasound-guided vena cava filter placement J Endovasc Surg 6 285–287 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaK1Mvitlenuw%3D%3D Occurrence Handle10495158 Occurrence Handle10.1583/1074-6218(1999)006<0285:IUVCFP>2.0.CO;2
DW Ashley TC Gamblin ST Burch MM Solis (2001) ArticleTitleAccurate deployment of vena cava filters: comparison of intravascular ultrasound and contrast venography J Trauma 50 975–981 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD3Mzmtl2jtw%3D%3D Occurrence Handle11426110 Occurrence Handle10.1097/00005373-200106000-00002
JL Ebaugh AC Chiou MD Morasch et al. (2001) ArticleTitleBedside vena cava filter placement guided with intravascular ultrasound J Vasc Surg 34 21–26 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD3MznvFehtA%3D%3D Occurrence Handle11436070 Occurrence Handle10.1067/mva.2001.115599
J Garrett MA Passman RJ Guzman et al. (2004) ArticleTitleExpanding options for bedside placement of inferior vena cava filters with intravascular ultrasound when transabdominal duplex ultrasound imaging is inadequate Ann Vasc Surg 18 329–334 Occurrence Handle15354635 Occurrence Handle10.1007/s10016-004-0029-2
MC Corriere MA Passman RJ Guzman et al. (2004) ArticleTitleRetrieving “non-retrievable” inferior vena caval Greenfield filters: a therapeutic option for filter malpositioning Ann Vasc Surg 18 629–634 Occurrence Handle15599618 Occurrence Handle10.1007/s10016-004-0099-1
DF Guthaner JO Wyatt JT Mehigan et al. (1990) ArticleTitleMonorail system for percutaneous repositioning of the Greenfield vena caval filter Radiology 176 872–874 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaK3czls1yjsA%3D%3D Occurrence Handle2389052
GS Hastings S Chughtai DM Radack JG Santilli (2000) ArticleTitleRepositioning the 12-F over-the-wire Greenfield filter J Vasc Interv Radiol 11 1207–1210 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD3cvptVajtQ%3D%3D Occurrence Handle11041480 Occurrence Handle10.1016/S1051-0443(07)61365-7
JP Trigaux S Vandroogenbroek JF Wispelaere ParticleDe et al. (1998) ArticleTitle Congenital anomalies of the inferior vena cava and left renal vein: evaluation with spiral CT J Vasc Interv Radiol 9 339–345 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaK1c7pvF2ruw%3D%3D Occurrence Handle9540920 Occurrence Handle10.1016/S1051-0443(98)70278-7
BD Matthews CS Joels MH LeQuire (2003) ArticleTitleInferior vena cava filter placement: preinsertion inferior vena cava imaging Am Surg 69 649–653 Occurrence Handle12953820
JS Danetz RB McLafferty J Ayerdi et al. (2003) ArticleTitleSelective venography versus nonselective venography before vena cava filter placement: evidence for more, not less J Vasc Surg 38 928–934 Occurrence Handle14603196 Occurrence Handle10.1016/S0741-5214(03)00911-X
J Blebea R Wilson P Waybill et al. (1999) ArticleTitleDeep venous thrombosis after percutaneous insertion of vena caval filters J Vasc Surg 30 821–828 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD3c%2FhvVaqtA%3D%3D Occurrence Handle10550179 Occurrence Handle10.1016/S0741-5214(99)70006-6
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
About this article
Cite this article
Corriere, M.A., Passman, M.A., Guzman, R.J. et al. Comparison of Bedside Transabdominal Duplex Ultrasound versus Contrast Venography for Inferior Vena Cava Filter Placement: What Is the Best Imaging Modality?. Ann Vasc Surg 19, 229–234 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10016-004-0163-x
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10016-004-0163-x