Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Comparison of Bedside Transabdominal Duplex Ultrasound versus Contrast Venography for Inferior Vena Cava Filter Placement: What Is the Best Imaging Modality?

  • Papers Presented at the Twenty-ninth Annual Meeting of the Peripheral Vascular Surgery Society
  • Published:
Annals of Vascular Surgery

Abstract

While contrast venography is considered the gold standard for imaging prior to inferior vena cava (IVC) filter insertion, bedside placement via transabdominal duplex ultrasound (DUS) has been recognized as a safe and effective alternative. To date, there has been no direct comparison of the efficacy of both imaging modalities for IVC filter placement. A concurrent cohort of patients who underwent IVC filter placement at a single institution over a 7-year period with either contrast venography or transabdominal DUS performed at bedside was retrospectively reviewed. Patient demographics, venous thromboembolism risk factors, indications, technical success, and procedural complications were compared. Of 439 patients initially imaged with transabdominal DUS, IVC filter placement was determined to be technically feasible in 382 patients (87%). The procedural technical success rate for IVC filter placement using transabdominal DUS when IVC visualization was adequate was 97.4% (n = 382 patients), compared to 99.7% (n = 318 patients) for contrast venography (p = 0.018). Patients undergoing IVC filter placement with transabdominal DUS more commonly required IVC filter for venous thromboembolism prophylaxis (81.1% vs. 27.8%, p < 0.001), had increased incidence of multiple traumatic injuries (28% vs. 10%, p < 0.001), and had increased risk from immobilization (91.3% vs. 34.1%, p < 0.001). Overall complication rates were 0.6% for venography and 1.8% for transabdominal DUS (p = NS). When IVC visualization was adequate, contrast venography and transabdominal duplex ultrasound both had high rates of success and a low incidence of complications. A technical success advantage was observed for contrast venography; this difference in technical success must be weighed against the bedside insertion advantage offered by DUS, which may be especially important in the immobilized or critically ill patient. Transabdominal DUS remains our preferred technique when feasible, especially when bedside placement is desired.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. CA Athanasoulis JA Kaufman EF Halpern et al. (2000) ArticleTitleInferior vena caval filters: review of a 26-year single-center clinical experience Radiology 216 54–66 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD3czksl2msA%3D%3D Occurrence Handle10887228

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. H Decousus A Leizorovicz F Parent et al. (1998) ArticleTitleA clinical trial of vena caval filters in the prevention of pulmonary embolism in patients with proximal deep-vein thrombosis. Prevention du Risque d’Embolie Pulmonaire par Interruption Cave Study Group N Engl J Med 338 409–415 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaK1c7hslSltQ%3D%3D Occurrence Handle9459643 Occurrence Handle10.1056/NEJM199802123380701

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. LJ Greenfield MC Proctor (2000) ArticleTitleThe percutaneous greenfield filter: outcomes and practice patterns J Vasc Surg 32 888–893 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD3M%2FltlKjsQ%3D%3D Occurrence Handle11054220 Occurrence Handle10.1067/mva.2000.110346

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. TB Kinney (2003) ArticleTitleUpdate on inferior vena cava filters J Vasc Interv Radiol 14 425–440 Occurrence Handle12682199

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. MS Conners Suffix3rd S Becker RJ Guzman et al. (2002) ArticleTitleDuplex scan-directed placement of inferior vena cava filters: a five-year institutional experience J Vasc Surg 35 286–291 Occurrence Handle11854726 Occurrence Handle10.1067/mva.2002.120372

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. TC Gamblin DW Ashley S Burch M Solis (2003) ArticleTitleA prospective evaluation of a bedside technique for placement of inferior vena cava filters: accuracy and limitations of intravascular ultrasound Am Surg 69 382–386 Occurrence Handle12769208

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. JS Matsumura MD Morasch (2000) ArticleTitleFilter placement by ultrasound technique at the bedside Semin Vasc Surg 13 199–203 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD3cvltVCrsg%3D%3D Occurrence Handle11005464

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. CR Nunn D Neuzil T Naslund et al. (1997) ArticleTitleCost-effective method for bedside insertion of vena caval filters in trauma patients J Trauma 43 752–758 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaK1c%2FltVymsw%3D%3D Occurrence Handle9390485

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. DF Neuzil CL Garrard RA Berkman et al. (1998) ArticleTitleDuplex-directed vena caval filter placement: report of initial experience Surgery 123 470–474 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaK1c3ht1CgsA%3D%3D Occurrence Handle9551075

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. InstitutionalAuthorNameRecommended reporting standards for vena caval filter placement and patient follow-up. (1999) ArticleTitleVena Caval Filter Consensus Conference J Vasc Surg 30 573–579 Occurrence Handle10.1016/S0741-5214(99)70088-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. MV Marx JR Tauscher DM Williams LJ Greenfield (1991) ArticleTitleEvaluation of the inferior vena cava with intravascular US after Greenfield filter placement J Vasc Interv Radiol 2 261–268 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaK387ptVyitw%3D%3D Occurrence Handle1799764 Occurrence Handle10.1016/S1051-0443(91)72292-6

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. WF Oppat AC Chiou JS Matsumura (1999) ArticleTitleIntravascular ultrasound-guided vena cava filter placement J Endovasc Surg 6 285–287 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaK1Mvitlenuw%3D%3D Occurrence Handle10495158 Occurrence Handle10.1583/1074-6218(1999)006<0285:IUVCFP>2.0.CO;2

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. DW Ashley TC Gamblin ST Burch MM Solis (2001) ArticleTitleAccurate deployment of vena cava filters: comparison of intravascular ultrasound and contrast venography J Trauma 50 975–981 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD3Mzmtl2jtw%3D%3D Occurrence Handle11426110 Occurrence Handle10.1097/00005373-200106000-00002

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. JL Ebaugh AC Chiou MD Morasch et al. (2001) ArticleTitleBedside vena cava filter placement guided with intravascular ultrasound J Vasc Surg 34 21–26 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD3MznvFehtA%3D%3D Occurrence Handle11436070 Occurrence Handle10.1067/mva.2001.115599

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. J Garrett MA Passman RJ Guzman et al. (2004) ArticleTitleExpanding options for bedside placement of inferior vena cava filters with intravascular ultrasound when transabdominal duplex ultrasound imaging is inadequate Ann Vasc Surg 18 329–334 Occurrence Handle15354635 Occurrence Handle10.1007/s10016-004-0029-2

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. MC Corriere MA Passman RJ Guzman et al. (2004) ArticleTitleRetrieving “non-retrievable” inferior vena caval Greenfield filters: a therapeutic option for filter malpositioning Ann Vasc Surg 18 629–634 Occurrence Handle15599618 Occurrence Handle10.1007/s10016-004-0099-1

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. DF Guthaner JO Wyatt JT Mehigan et al. (1990) ArticleTitleMonorail system for percutaneous repositioning of the Greenfield vena caval filter Radiology 176 872–874 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaK3czls1yjsA%3D%3D Occurrence Handle2389052

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. GS Hastings S Chughtai DM Radack JG Santilli (2000) ArticleTitleRepositioning the 12-F over-the-wire Greenfield filter J Vasc Interv Radiol 11 1207–1210 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD3cvptVajtQ%3D%3D Occurrence Handle11041480 Occurrence Handle10.1016/S1051-0443(07)61365-7

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. JP Trigaux S Vandroogenbroek JF Wispelaere ParticleDe et al. (1998) ArticleTitle Congenital anomalies of the inferior vena cava and left renal vein: evaluation with spiral CT J Vasc Interv Radiol 9 339–345 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaK1c7pvF2ruw%3D%3D Occurrence Handle9540920 Occurrence Handle10.1016/S1051-0443(98)70278-7

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. BD Matthews CS Joels MH LeQuire (2003) ArticleTitleInferior vena cava filter placement: preinsertion inferior vena cava imaging Am Surg 69 649–653 Occurrence Handle12953820

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. JS Danetz RB McLafferty J Ayerdi et al. (2003) ArticleTitleSelective venography versus nonselective venography before vena cava filter placement: evidence for more, not less J Vasc Surg 38 928–934 Occurrence Handle14603196 Occurrence Handle10.1016/S0741-5214(03)00911-X

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. J Blebea R Wilson P Waybill et al. (1999) ArticleTitleDeep venous thrombosis after percutaneous insertion of vena caval filters J Vasc Surg 30 821–828 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD3c%2FhvVaqtA%3D%3D Occurrence Handle10550179 Occurrence Handle10.1016/S0741-5214(99)70006-6

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Division of Vascular Surgery, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA

    Matthew A. Corriere MD, Marc A. Passman MD, Raul J. Guzman MD, Jeffery B. Dattilo MD & Thomas C. Naslund

  2. Division of Vascular Surgery, Marc A. Passman, 1161 22nd Avenue South, D5237 MCN, Nashville, TN, 37232, USA

    Marc A. Passman MD

Authors
  1. Matthew A. Corriere MD
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Marc A. Passman MD
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Raul J. Guzman MD
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Jeffery B. Dattilo MD
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Thomas C. Naslund
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Marc A. Passman MD.

About this article

Cite this article

Corriere, M.A., Passman, M.A., Guzman, R.J. et al. Comparison of Bedside Transabdominal Duplex Ultrasound versus Contrast Venography for Inferior Vena Cava Filter Placement: What Is the Best Imaging Modality?. Ann Vasc Surg 19, 229–234 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10016-004-0163-x

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10016-004-0163-x

Keywords

Search

Navigation