Skip to main content
Log in

An assessment of the use of quantitative ultrasound and the Osteoporosis Self-Assessment Tool for Asians in determining the risk of nonvertebral fracture in postmenopausal Chinese women

  • ORIGINAL ARTICLE
  • Published:
Journal of Bone and Mineral Metabolism Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This cross-sectional study aims to assess the effectiveness of a simple, noninvasive scoring system, the Osteoporosis Self-Assessment Tool for Asians (OSTA), and quantitative bone ultrasound (QUS) in assessing nonvertebral fracture risk in Chinese postmenopausal women. A group of 513 community-dwelling women including 271 postmenopausal individuals participated in this study. Speed of sound (SOS m/s) at the radius, phalanx, and tibia were assessed by using the Omnisense prototype (Sunlight Ltd., Israel). Body height and weight were measured, and body mass index (BMI) and OSTA indices were calculated. Self-reported fractures were identified using a structured questionnaire. Phalanx SOS was significantly lower among postmenopausal women with a history of nonvertebral fracture occurred after menopause than those without (3755 m/s vs. 3841 m/s, P = 0.017, adjusted for age and weight), with an AUC of 0.66. The AUC of the OSTA for predicting nonvertebral fracture occurred after menopause was 0.64. SOS at the radius, phalanx, and tibia showed a positive correlation with OSTA index (r = 0.376–0.401, P < 0.001). The prevalence of nonvertebral fractures also increased significantly with the decreasing order of OSTA index (χ2 = 5.432, P = 0.02). The OSTA values of ≤−1 and phalanx QUS T-score of ≤−1.95 can differentiate postmenopausal nonvertebral fracture with sensitivity of 75% and 81%, respectively, and specificity of 48% and 40%, respectively. Combining OSTA and phalanx QUS yielded a sensitivity of 83% and a specificity of 84% to detect postmenopausal nonvertebral fracture, with an AUC of 0.64. We conclude that OSTA and phalanx QUS are simple and effective clinical tools for identifying postmenopausal women at increased risk of nonvertebral fractures and can thereby facilitate the appropriate and more cost-effective use of bone densitometry to prevent osteoporotic fractures in developing countries.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. InstitutionalAuthorNameNIH (2000) ArticleTitleOsteoporosis prevention, diagnosis, and therapy NIH Consensus Statement 17 1–45

    Google Scholar 

  2. SA Wainwright LM Marshall KE Ensrud JA Cauley DM Black TA Hillier MC Hochberg MT Vogt ES Orwoll (2005) ArticleTitleStudy of Osteoporotic Fractures Research Group. Hip fracture in women without osteoporosis J Clin Endocrinol Metab 90 2787–2793 Occurrence Handle15728213 Occurrence Handle10.1210/jc.2004-1568 Occurrence Handle1:CAS:528:DC%2BD2MXkt1Wgtrk%3D

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. D Hans ME Arlot AM Schott JP Roux PO Kotzki PJ Meunier (1995) ArticleTitleDo ultrasound measurements on the os calcis reflect more the bone microarchitecture than the bone mass? A two-dimensional histomorphometric study Bone (NY) 16 295–300 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaK2Mzgs1WqtA%3D%3D

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. CF Njeh D Hans J Li B Fan T Fuerst YQ He E Tsuda-Futami Y Lu CY Wu HK Genant (2000) ArticleTitleComparison of six calcaneal quantitative ultrasound devices: precision and hip fracture discrimination Osteoporos Int 11 1051–1062 Occurrence Handle11256897 Occurrence Handle10.1007/s001980070027 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD3M7osVKjuw%3D%3D

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. F Hartl A Tyndall M Kraenzlin C Bachmeier C Guckel U Senn D Hans R Theiler (2002) ArticleTitleDiscriminatory ability of quantitative ultrasound parameters and bone mineral density in a population-based sample of postmenopausal women with vertebral fractures: results of the Basel Osteoporosis Study J Bone Miner Res 17 321–330 Occurrence Handle11811563 Occurrence Handle10.1359/jbmr.2002.17.2.321 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD38%2FosFSnug%3D%3D

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. E Bossy M Talmant F Peyrin L Akrout P Cloetens P Laugier (2004) ArticleTitleAn in vitro study of the ultrasonic axial transmission technique at the radius: 1-MHz velocity measurements are sensitive to both mineralization and intracortical porosity J Bone Miner Res 19 1548–1556 Occurrence Handle15312257 Occurrence Handle10.1359/JBMR.040513 Occurrence Handle1:CAS:528:DC%2BD2cXlvFWrtrc%3D

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. KM Knapp GM Blake I Fogelman DV Doyle TD Spector (2002) ArticleTitleMultisite quantitative ultrasound: colles fracture discrimination in postmenopausal women Osteoporos Int 13 474–479 Occurrence Handle12107661 Occurrence Handle10.1007/s001980200057 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD38zmsFOrsw%3D%3D

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. D Hans SK Srivastav C Singal R Barkmann CF Njeh E Kantorovich CC Gluer HK Genant (1999) ArticleTitleDoes combining the results from multiple bone sites measured by a new quantitative ultrasound device improve discrimination of hip fracture? J Bone Miner Res 14 644–651 Occurrence Handle10234587 Occurrence Handle10.1359/jbmr.1999.14.4.644 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaK1M3ltVyntA%3D%3D

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. H Burger PLA van Daele D Algra FA van den Ouweland DE Grobbee A Hofman C van Kuijk HE Schutte JC Birkenhager HA Pols (1994) ArticleTitleThe association between age and bone mineral density in men and women aged 55 years and over: the Rotterdam Study J Bone Miner Res 25 1–13 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaK2czjvFOlsQ%3D%3D

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. SL Edelstein E Barett-Connor (1993) ArticleTitleRelation between body size and bone mineral density in elderly men and women Am J Epidemiol 138 160–169 Occurrence Handle8356959 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaK3szmt1KnsA%3D%3D

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. MT Hannan DT Felson JJ Anderson (1992) ArticleTitleBone mineral density in elderly men and women: results from the Framingham Osteoporosis Study J Bone Miner Res 7 547–553 Occurrence Handle1615761 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaK38zht1emsw%3D%3D Occurrence Handle10.1002/jbmr.5650070511

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. TV Nguyen JR Center NA Pocock JA Eisman (2004) ArticleTitleLimited utility of clinical indices for the prediction of symptomatic fracture risk in postmenopausal women Osteoporos Int 15 49–55 Occurrence Handle14593453 Occurrence Handle10.1007/s00198-003-1511-3

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. LK Koh WB Sedrine TP Torralba A Kung S Fujiwara SP Chan QR Huang R Rajatanavin KS Tsai HM Park JY Reginster (2001) ArticleTitleOsteoporosis Self-Assessment Tool for Asians (OSTA) Research Group. A simple tool to identify Asian women at increased risk of osteoporosis Osteoporos Int 12 699–705 Occurrence Handle11580084 Occurrence Handle10.1007/s001980170070 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD3MrjtlWltA%3D%3D

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. PP Geusens MC Hochberg DJ van der Voort H Pols M Van Der Klift E Siris ME Melton J Turpin C Byrnes P Ross (2002) ArticleTitlePerformance of risk indices for identifying low bone density in postmenopausal women Mayo Clinic Proc 77 629–637 Occurrence Handle10.4065/77.7.629

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. SM Cadarette WJ McIsaac GA Hawker L Jaakkimainen A Culbert G Zarifa E Ola SB Jaglal (2004) ArticleTitleThe validity of decision rules for selecting women with primary osteoporosis for bone mineral density testing Osteoporos Int 15 361–366 Occurrence Handle14730421 Occurrence Handle10.1007/s00198-003-1552-7

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. F Richy M Gourlay PD Ross SS Sen L Radican F De Ceulaer W Ben Sedrine O Ethgen O Bruyere JY Reginster (2004) ArticleTitleValidation and comparative evaluation of the osteoporosis self-assessment tool (OST) in a Caucasian population from Belgium Q J Med 97 39–46 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD2c%2Fns1SqsA%3D%3D

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. SR Cummings LJ Melton (2002) ArticleTitleEpidemiology and outcomes of osteoporosis fractures Lancet 359 1761–1767 Occurrence Handle12049882 Occurrence Handle10.1016/S0140-6736(02)08657-9

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. JR Center TV Nguyen D Schneider PN Sambrook JA Eisman (1999) ArticleTitleMortality after all major types of osteoporotic fracture in men and women: an observational study Lancet 353 878–882 Occurrence Handle10093980 Occurrence Handle10.1016/S0140-6736(98)09075-8 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaK1M7ptFOlug%3D%3D

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. EM Lewiecki (2005) ArticleTitleClinical applications of bone density testing for osteoporosis Minerva Med 96 317–330 Occurrence Handle16227947 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD2MrltFCmtg%3D%3D

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. LE Wehren ES Siris (2004) ArticleTitleBeyond bone mineral density: can existing clinical risk assessment instruments identify women at increased risk of osteoporosis? J Intern Med 256 375–380 Occurrence Handle15485472 Occurrence Handle10.1111/j.1365-2796.2004.01397.x Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD2crhsFOqug%3D%3D

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. FE Alenfeld C Wuster C Funck JF Pereira-Lima T Fritz PJ Meeder R Ziegler (1998) ArticleTitleUltrasound measurements at the proximal phalanges in healthy women and patients with hip fractures Osteoporos Int 8 393–398 Occurrence Handle9850344 Occurrence Handle10.1007/s001980050081 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaK1M%2Fmslegsg%3D%3D

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. G Guglielmi M Cammisa A De Serio A Scillitani I Chiodini V Carnevale S Fusilli (1999) ArticleTitlePhalangeal US velocity discriminates between normal and vertebrally fractured subjects Eur Radiol 9 1632–1637 Occurrence Handle10525880 Occurrence Handle10.1007/s003300050899 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaK1Mvlslamtg%3D%3D

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. J Joly R Westhovens H Borghs H Peeters J Tirry J Nijs J Dequeker (1999) ArticleTitleReference curve and diagnostic sensitivity for a new ultrasound device for the phalanges, the DBM Sonic 1200, in Belgian women Osteoporos Int 9 284–289 Occurrence Handle10550444 Occurrence Handle10.1007/s001980050149 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD3c%2FhvFynsg%3D%3D

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. JY Reginster M Dethor H Pirenne W Dewe A Albert (1998) ArticleTitleReproducibility and diagnostic sensitivity of ultrasonometry of the phalanges to assess osteoporosis Int J Gynecol Obstet 63 21–28 Occurrence Handle10.1016/S0020-7292(98)00113-1 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaK1M%2FmsV2muw%3D%3D

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. C Wuster C Albanese D De Aloysio F Duboeuf M Gambacciani S Gonnelli CC Gluer D Hans J Joly JY Reginster F De Terlizzi R Cadossi (2000) ArticleTitlePhalangeal osteosonogrammetry study: age-related changes, diagnostic sensitivity, and discrimination power. The Phalangeal Osteosonogrammetry Study Group J Bone Miner Res 15 1603–1614 Occurrence Handle10934660 Occurrence Handle10.1359/jbmr.2000.15.8.1603 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD3M%2FlsVGksw%3D%3D

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. R Giardino R Rotini F Noia CA Veronesi A Carpi A Nicolini F de Terlizzi M Fini G Giavaresi (2002) ArticleTitlePhalangeal ultrasonography in forearm fracture discrimination Biomed Pharmacother 56 332–338 Occurrence Handle12418580 Occurrence Handle10.1016/S0753-3322(02)00240-8 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD38nlvVCnsw%3D%3D

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. CB Ruff WC Hayes (1988) ArticleTitleSex differences in age-related remodeling of the femur and tibia J Orthop Res 6 886–896 Occurrence Handle3171769 Occurrence Handle10.1002/jor.1100060613 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaL1M%2FhtFWntg%3D%3D

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. S Prevrhal T Fuerst B Fan C Njeh D Hans M Uffmann S Srivastav HK Genant (2001) ArticleTitleQuantitative ultrasound of the tibia depends on both cortical density and thickness Osteoporos Int 12 28–34 Occurrence Handle11305080 Occurrence Handle10.1007/s001980170154 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD3M3ivFKhtA%3D%3D

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. T Diab KW Condon DB Burr D Vashishth (2006) ArticleTitleAge-related change in the damage morphology of human cortical bone and its role in bone fragility Bone (NY) 38 427–431

    Google Scholar 

  30. ES Hsu AG Patwardhan KP Meade TR Light WR Martin (1993) ArticleTitleCross-sectional geometrical properties and bone mineral contents of the human radius and ulna J Biomech 26 1307–1318 Occurrence Handle8262992 Occurrence Handle10.1016/0021-9290(93)90354-H Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaK2c%2Fos1GksA%3D%3D

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. O Louis J Willnecker S Soykens P Van den Winkel M Osteaux (1995) ArticleTitleCortical thickness assessed by peripheral quantitative computed tomography: accuracy evaluated on radius specimens Osteoporos Int 5 446–449 Occurrence Handle8695966 Occurrence Handle10.1007/BF01626606 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaK283ktFarsg%3D%3D

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. F Marin J Gonzalez-Macias A Diez-Perez S Palma M Delgado-Rodriguez (2006) ArticleTitleRelationship between bone quantitative ultrasound and fractures: a meta-analysis J Bone Miner Res 21 1126–1135 Occurrence Handle16813534 Occurrence Handle10.1359/jbmr.060417

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. S Fujiwara T Sone K Yamazaki K Nakatsuka N Masunari S Fujita K Kushida M Fukunaga (2005) ArticleTitleHeel bone ultrasound predicts non-spine fracture in Japanese men and women Osteoporos Int 16 2107–2112 Occurrence Handle16195817 Occurrence Handle10.1007/s00198-005-2008-z Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD28%2FltlCnsg%3D%3D

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. S Maggi M Naole S Giannini S Adami D Defeo G Isaia L Sinigaglia P Filipponi G Crepaldi InstitutionalAuthorNameESOPO Study Group (2006) ArticleTitleQuantitative heel ultrasound in a population-based study in Italy and its relationship with fracture history: the ESOPO study Osteoporos Int 17 237–244 Occurrence Handle16142503 Occurrence Handle10.1007/s00198-005-1985-2 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD28%2FhtV2ktQ%3D%3D

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. JL Hernandez F Marin J Gonzalez-Macias A Diez-Perez J Vila S Gimenez B Galan MS Arenas F Suarez L Gayola G Guillen T Sagredo R Belenguer A Moron E Arriaza InstitutionalAuthorNameECOSAP study investigators (2004) ArticleTitleDiscriminative capacity of calcaneal quantitative ultrasound and of osteoporosis and fracture risk factors in postmenopausal women with osteoporotic fractures Calcif Tissue Int 74 357–365 Occurrence Handle15255073 Occurrence Handle10.1007/s00223-003-0158-6 Occurrence Handle1:CAS:528:DC%2BD2cXjslWrtLY%3D

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. S Hayak I Olkin H Liu M Grabe MK Gould IE Allen DK Owens DM Bravata (2006) ArticleTitleMata-analysis: accuracy of quantitative ultrasound for identifying patients with osteoporosis Ann Intern Med 144 832–841

    Google Scholar 

  37. AW Kung AY Ho WB Sedrine JY Reginster PD Ross (2003) ArticleTitleComparison of a simple clinical risk index and quantitative bone ultrasound for identifying women at increased risk of osteoporosis Osteoporos Int 14 716–721 Occurrence Handle12897978 Occurrence Handle10.1007/s00198-003-1428-x

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. AW Kung AY Ho PD Ross JY Reginster (2005) ArticleTitleDevelopment of a clinical assessment tool in identifying Asian men with low bone mineral density and comparison of its usefulness to quantitative bone ultrasound Osteoporos Int 16 849–855 Occurrence Handle15611839 Occurrence Handle10.1007/s00198-004-1778-z

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. RB Cook D Collins J Tucker P Zioupos (2005) ArticleTitleComparison of questionnaire and quantitative ultrasound techniques as screening tools for DXA Osteoporos Int 16 1565–1575 Occurrence Handle15883661 Occurrence Handle10.1007/s00198-005-1864-x Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD2MnnsVCmsw%3D%3D

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Guang Ning.

About this article

Cite this article

Tao, B., Liu, Jm., Li, Xy. et al. An assessment of the use of quantitative ultrasound and the Osteoporosis Self-Assessment Tool for Asians in determining the risk of nonvertebral fracture in postmenopausal Chinese women. J Bone Miner Metab 26, 60–65 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00774-007-0798-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00774-007-0798-0

Key words

Navigation