Abstract
The approach-related morbidity resulting from iatrogenic erector spinae injury in posterior lumbar surgery has become an increasing concern for spine surgeons. Many studies have explained the injury mechanisms and reported new surgical approaches to prevent this iatrogenic injury from their own point of views, but there is still no systemic information for a thorough understanding of this iatrogenic erector spinae injury that may give spine surgeons practical advices in their individual operations. We consequently reviewed the literature on the anatomy of erector spinae, causes of injury, and relative minimally invasive approaches. We found that the local anatomic structures make the erector spinae vulnerable to injury during posterior lumbar surgery, especially the medial multifidus which is innervated only by the medial branch of the dorsal ramus, with no intersegmental nerve supply as in the other paraspinal muscles, and the injury factors mainly include dissection, retraction, denervation, and immobility. Studies suggest that the goal of prevention is to preserve the physiological structure of erector spinae and to avoid or limit the injury causes: approaches through spatium intermusculare and approaches with endoscope and tubular retractor system can prevent the erector spinae from injury by less dissection and retraction; non-fusion techniques may prevent the erector spinae from disuse atrophy by preserving the segmental motion and the adjacent erector spinae activity.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Auerbach JD, Jones KJ, Milby AH, Anakwenze OA, Balderston RA (2009) Segmental contribution toward total lumbar range of motion in disc replacement and fusions: a comparison of operative and adjacent levels. Spine 34(23):2510–2517
Boelderl A, Daniaux H, Kathrein A, Maurer H (2002) Danger of damaging the medial branches of the posterior rami of spinal nerves during a dorsomedian approach to the spine. Clin Anat 15(2):77–81
Bogduk N, Wilson AS, Tynan W (1982) The human lumbar dorsal rami. J Anat 134(Pt 2):383–397
Datta G, Gnanalingham KK, Peterson D, Mendoza N, O’Neill K, Van Dellen J, McGregor A, Hughes SP (2004) Back pain and disability after lumbar laminectomy: is there a relationship to muscle retraction? Neurosurgery 54(6):1413–1420
Fan S, Hu Z, Zhao F, Zhao X, Huang Y, Fang X (2010) Multifidus muscle changes and clinical effects of one-level posterior lumbar interbody fusion: minimally invasive procedure versus conventional open approach. Eur Spine J 19(2):316–324
Fitzpatrick JM, Wickham JE (1990) Minimal invasive surgery. Br J Surg 77(7):721–722
Foley KT, Holly LT, Schwender JD (2003) Minimally invasive lumbar fusion. Spine 28(15 Suppl):S26–S35
Franke J, Hesse T, Tournier C, Schuberth W, Mawrin C, LeHuec JC, Grasshoff H (2009) Morphological changes of the multifidus muscle in patients with symptomatic lumbar disc herniation. J Neurosurg Spine 11(6):710–714
Gejo R, Kawaguchi Y, Kondoh T, Tabuchi E, Matsui H, Torii K, Ono T, Kimura T (2000) Magnetic resonance imaging and histologic evidence of postoperative back muscle injury in rats. Spine 25(8):941–946
Gejo R, Matsui H, Kawaguchi Y, Ishihara H, Tsuji H (1997) Serial changes in trunk muscle performance after posterior lumbar surgery. Spine 24(10):1023–1028
Haig AJ, Moffroid M, Henry S, Haugh L, Pope M (1991) A technique for needle localization in paraspinal muscles with cadaveric confirmation. Muscle Nerve 14(6):521–526
Harrop JS, Youssef JA, Maltenfort M, Vorwald P, Jabbour P, Bono CM, Goldfarb N, Vaccaro AR, Hilibrand AS (2008) Lumbar adjacent segment degeneration and disease after arthrodesis and total disc arthroplasty. Spine 33(15):1701–1707
Hodges P, Holm AK, Hansson T, Holm S (2006) Rapid atrophy of the lumbar multifidus follows experimental disc or nerve root injury. Spine 31(25):2926–2933
Hoh DJ, Wang MY, Ritland SL (2010) Anatomic features of the paramedian muscle-splitting approaches to the lumbar spine. Neurosurgery 66(3 Suppl Operative):13–24 discussion 24–5
Hu Y, Leung HB, Lu WW, Luk KD (2008) Histologic and electrophysiological changes of the paraspinal muscle after spinal fusion: an experimental study. Spine 33(13):1418–1422
Hyun JK, Lee JY, Lee SJ, Jeon JY (2007) Asymmetric atrophy of multifidus muscle in patients with unilateral lumbosacral radiculopathy. Spine 32(21):E598–E602
Isaacs RE, Podichetty VK, Santiago P, Sandhu FA, Spears J, Kelly K, Rice L, Fessler RG (2005) Minimally invasive microendoscopy-assisted transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion with instrumentation. J Neurosurg Spine 3:98–105
Kawaguchi Y, Matsui H, Tsuji H (1994) Back muscle injury after posterior lumbar spine surgery. Part 1: histologic and histochemical analyses in rats. Spine 19(22):2590–2597
Kawaguchi Y, Matsui H, Tsuji H (1994) Back muscle injury after posterior lumbar spine surgery. Part 2: histologic and histochemical analyses in humans. Spine 19(22):2598–2602
Kawaguchi Y, Matsui H, Tsuji H (1996) Back muscle injury after posterior lumbar spine surgery. A histologic and enzymatic analysis. Spine 21(8):941–944
Kawaguchi Y, Matsui H, Tsuji H (1997) Changes in serum creatine phosphokinase MM isoenzyme after lumbar spine surgery. Spine 22(9):1018–1023
Kawaguchi Y, Matsui H, Gejo R, Tsuji H (1998) Preventive measures of back muscle injury after posterior lumbar spine surgery in rats. Spine 23(21):2282–2287
Kawaguchi Y, Yabuki S, Styf J, Olmarker K, Rydevik B, Matsui H, Tsuji H (1996) Back muscle injury after posterior lumbar spine surgery: topographic evaluation of intramuscular pressure and blood flow in the porcine back muscle during surgery. Spine 21(22):2683–2688
Khoo LT, Palmer S, Laich DT, Fessler RG (2002) Minimally invasive percutaneous posterior lumbar interbody fusion. Neurosurgery 51:S166–S171
Kim JS, Lee SH, Moon KH, Lee HY (2009) Surgical results of the oblique paraspinal approach in upper lumbar disc herniation and thoracolumbar junction. Neurosurgery 65(1):95–99 discussion 99
Kim K, Isu T, Sugawara A, Matsumoto R, Isobe M (2008) Comparison of the effect of 3 different approaches to the lumbar spinal canal on postoperative paraspinal muscle damage. Surg Neurol 69(2):109–113 discussion 113
Kim KT, Lee SH, Suk KS, Bae SC (2006) The quantitative analysis of tissue injury markers after mini-open lumbar fusion. Spine 31:712–716
Kotil K, Tunckale T, Tatar Z, Koldas M, Kural A, Bilge T (2007) Serum creatine phosphokinase activity and histological changes in the multifidus muscle: a prospective randomized controlled comparative study of discectomy with or without retraction. J Neurosurg Spine 6(2):121–125
Lu K, Liang CL, Chen HJ, Chen SD, Hsu HC, Chen YC, Hsu FF, Cho CL (2003) Nuclear factor-kappaB-regulated cyclooxygenase-2 expression in surgery-associated paraspinal muscle injury in rats. J Neurosurg 98(2 Suppl):181–187
Lu K, Liang CL, Cho CL, Chen HJ, Hsu HC, Yiin SJ, Chern CL, Chen YC, Lee TC (2002) Oxidative stress and heat shock protein response in human paraspinal muscles during retraction. J Neurosurg 97(1 Suppl):75–81
Lu WW, Hu Y, Luk KD, Cheung KM, Leong JC (2002) Paraspinal muscle activities of patients with scoliosis after spine fusion: an electromyographic study. Spine 27(11):1180–1185
Macintosh JE, Bogduk N (1986) The biomechanics of the lumbar multifidus. Clin Biomech 1(4):205–213
Macintosh JE, Bogduk N (1987) Volvo award in basic science. The morphology of the lumbar erector spinae. Spine 12(7):658–668
MacNab I, Cuthbert H, Godfrey CM (1977) The incidence of denervation of the erector spinae muscles following spinal surgery. Spine 2(4):294–298
Mayer TG, Vanharanta H, Gatchel RJ (1989) Comparison of CT scan muscle measurements and isokinetic trunk strength in postoperative patients. Spine 14(1):33–36
Moon KH, Lee SH, Kong BJ, Shin SW, Bhanot A, Kim DY, Lee HY (2006) An oblique paraspinal approach for intracanalicular disc herniations of the upper lumbar spine: technical case report. Neurosurgery 59(4 Suppl 2):ONSE487-8;discussion ONSE488
Panjabi M, Abumi K, Duranceau J, Oxland T (1989) Spinal stability and intersegmental muscle forces. A biomechanical model. Spine 14(2):194–200
Park Y, Ha JW (2007) Comparison of one-level posterior lumbar interbody fusion performed with a minimally invasive approach or a traditional open approach. Spine 32(5):537–543
Remes V, Lamberg T, Tervahartiala P, Helenius I, Schlenzka D, Yrjönen T, Osterman K, Seitsalo S, Poussa M (2006) Long-term outcome after posterolateral, anterior, and circumferential fusion for high-grade isthmic spondylolisthesis in children and adolescents: magnetic resonance imaging findings after average of 17-year follow-up. Spine 31(21):2491–2499
Ringel F, Stoffel M, Stüer C, Meyer B (2006) Minimally invasive transmuscular pedicle screw fixation of the thoracic and lumbar spine. Neurosurgery 59(4 Suppl 2):ONS361-6; discussion ONS366-7
Saito T, Yoshimoto M, Yamamoto Y, Miyaki T, Itoh M, Shimizu S, Oi Y, Schmidt W, Steinke H (2006) The medial branch of the lateral branch of the posterior ramus of the spinal nerve. Surg Radiol Anat 28(3):228–234
Sihvonen T, Herno A, Paljärvi L, Airaksinen O, Partanen J, Tapaninaho A (1993) Local denervation atrophy of paraspinal muscles in postoperative failed back syndrome. Spine 18(5):575–581
Stevens KJ, Spenciner DB, Griffiths KL, Kim KD, Zwienenberg-Lee M, Alamin T, Bammer R (2006) Comparison of minimally invasive and conventional open posterolateral lumbar fusion using magnetic resonance imaging and retraction pressure studies. J Spinal Disord Tech 19(2):77–86
Styf JR, Willen J (1998) The effects of external compression by three different retractors on pressure in the erector spine muscles during and after posterior spine surgery in humans. Spine 23(3):354–358
Taylor H, McGregor AH, Medhi-Zadeh S, Richards S, Kahn N, Zadeh JA, Hughes SP (2002) The impact of self-retaining retractors on the paraspinal muscles during posterior spinal surgery. Spine 27(24):2758–2762
Tessitore E, de Tribolet N (2004) Far-lateral lumbar disc herniation: the microsurgical transmuscular approach. Neurosurgery 54(4):939–942
Tsutsumimoto T, Shimogata M, Ohta H, Misawa H (2003) Mini-open versus conventional open posterior lumbar interbody fusion for the treatment of lumbar degenerative spondylolisthesis: comparison of paraspinal muscle damage and slip reduction. Spine 34(18):1923–1928
Vialle R, Wicart P, Drain O, Dubousset J, Court C (2006) The Wiltse paraspinal approach to the lumbar spine revisited: an anatomic study. Clin Orthop Relat Res 445:175–180
Watkins MB (1953) Posterolateral fusion of the lumbar and lumbosacral spine. J Bone Joint Surg Am 35–A(4):1014–8
Wiltse LL, Spencer CW (1988) New uses and refinements of the paraspinal approach to the lumbar spine. Spine 13(6):696–706
Acknowledgments
The study was sponsored by National Nature Science Fund of China (81171739, 81101378, 81271971, 81271972, 31270997), Natural Science Fund of Zhejiang Province (Y2110372), funds of science and technology department of Zhejiang Province (2009C03014-1), and Zhejiang provincial program for the cultivation of high-level innovative health talents.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare no conflicts of interest.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Hu, ZJ., Fang, XQ. & Fan, SW. Iatrogenic injury to the erector spinae during posterior lumbar spine surgery: underlying anatomical considerations, preventable root causes, and surgical tips and tricks. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol 24, 127–135 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00590-012-1167-9
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00590-012-1167-9