Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Iatrogenic injury to the erector spinae during posterior lumbar spine surgery: underlying anatomical considerations, preventable root causes, and surgical tips and tricks

  • General Review
  • Published:
European Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery & Traumatology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The approach-related morbidity resulting from iatrogenic erector spinae injury in posterior lumbar surgery has become an increasing concern for spine surgeons. Many studies have explained the injury mechanisms and reported new surgical approaches to prevent this iatrogenic injury from their own point of views, but there is still no systemic information for a thorough understanding of this iatrogenic erector spinae injury that may give spine surgeons practical advices in their individual operations. We consequently reviewed the literature on the anatomy of erector spinae, causes of injury, and relative minimally invasive approaches. We found that the local anatomic structures make the erector spinae vulnerable to injury during posterior lumbar surgery, especially the medial multifidus which is innervated only by the medial branch of the dorsal ramus, with no intersegmental nerve supply as in the other paraspinal muscles, and the injury factors mainly include dissection, retraction, denervation, and immobility. Studies suggest that the goal of prevention is to preserve the physiological structure of erector spinae and to avoid or limit the injury causes: approaches through spatium intermusculare and approaches with endoscope and tubular retractor system can prevent the erector spinae from injury by less dissection and retraction; non-fusion techniques may prevent the erector spinae from disuse atrophy by preserving the segmental motion and the adjacent erector spinae activity.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Auerbach JD, Jones KJ, Milby AH, Anakwenze OA, Balderston RA (2009) Segmental contribution toward total lumbar range of motion in disc replacement and fusions: a comparison of operative and adjacent levels. Spine 34(23):2510–2517

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Boelderl A, Daniaux H, Kathrein A, Maurer H (2002) Danger of damaging the medial branches of the posterior rami of spinal nerves during a dorsomedian approach to the spine. Clin Anat 15(2):77–81

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Bogduk N, Wilson AS, Tynan W (1982) The human lumbar dorsal rami. J Anat 134(Pt 2):383–397

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Datta G, Gnanalingham KK, Peterson D, Mendoza N, O’Neill K, Van Dellen J, McGregor A, Hughes SP (2004) Back pain and disability after lumbar laminectomy: is there a relationship to muscle retraction? Neurosurgery 54(6):1413–1420

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Fan S, Hu Z, Zhao F, Zhao X, Huang Y, Fang X (2010) Multifidus muscle changes and clinical effects of one-level posterior lumbar interbody fusion: minimally invasive procedure versus conventional open approach. Eur Spine J 19(2):316–324

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Fitzpatrick JM, Wickham JE (1990) Minimal invasive surgery. Br J Surg 77(7):721–722

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Foley KT, Holly LT, Schwender JD (2003) Minimally invasive lumbar fusion. Spine 28(15 Suppl):S26–S35

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Franke J, Hesse T, Tournier C, Schuberth W, Mawrin C, LeHuec JC, Grasshoff H (2009) Morphological changes of the multifidus muscle in patients with symptomatic lumbar disc herniation. J Neurosurg Spine 11(6):710–714

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Gejo R, Kawaguchi Y, Kondoh T, Tabuchi E, Matsui H, Torii K, Ono T, Kimura T (2000) Magnetic resonance imaging and histologic evidence of postoperative back muscle injury in rats. Spine 25(8):941–946

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Gejo R, Matsui H, Kawaguchi Y, Ishihara H, Tsuji H (1997) Serial changes in trunk muscle performance after posterior lumbar surgery. Spine 24(10):1023–1028

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Haig AJ, Moffroid M, Henry S, Haugh L, Pope M (1991) A technique for needle localization in paraspinal muscles with cadaveric confirmation. Muscle Nerve 14(6):521–526

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Harrop JS, Youssef JA, Maltenfort M, Vorwald P, Jabbour P, Bono CM, Goldfarb N, Vaccaro AR, Hilibrand AS (2008) Lumbar adjacent segment degeneration and disease after arthrodesis and total disc arthroplasty. Spine 33(15):1701–1707

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Hodges P, Holm AK, Hansson T, Holm S (2006) Rapid atrophy of the lumbar multifidus follows experimental disc or nerve root injury. Spine 31(25):2926–2933

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Hoh DJ, Wang MY, Ritland SL (2010) Anatomic features of the paramedian muscle-splitting approaches to the lumbar spine. Neurosurgery 66(3 Suppl Operative):13–24 discussion 24–5

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Hu Y, Leung HB, Lu WW, Luk KD (2008) Histologic and electrophysiological changes of the paraspinal muscle after spinal fusion: an experimental study. Spine 33(13):1418–1422

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Hyun JK, Lee JY, Lee SJ, Jeon JY (2007) Asymmetric atrophy of multifidus muscle in patients with unilateral lumbosacral radiculopathy. Spine 32(21):E598–E602

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Isaacs RE, Podichetty VK, Santiago P, Sandhu FA, Spears J, Kelly K, Rice L, Fessler RG (2005) Minimally invasive microendoscopy-assisted transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion with instrumentation. J Neurosurg Spine 3:98–105

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Kawaguchi Y, Matsui H, Tsuji H (1994) Back muscle injury after posterior lumbar spine surgery. Part 1: histologic and histochemical analyses in rats. Spine 19(22):2590–2597

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Kawaguchi Y, Matsui H, Tsuji H (1994) Back muscle injury after posterior lumbar spine surgery. Part 2: histologic and histochemical analyses in humans. Spine 19(22):2598–2602

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Kawaguchi Y, Matsui H, Tsuji H (1996) Back muscle injury after posterior lumbar spine surgery. A histologic and enzymatic analysis. Spine 21(8):941–944

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Kawaguchi Y, Matsui H, Tsuji H (1997) Changes in serum creatine phosphokinase MM isoenzyme after lumbar spine surgery. Spine 22(9):1018–1023

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Kawaguchi Y, Matsui H, Gejo R, Tsuji H (1998) Preventive measures of back muscle injury after posterior lumbar spine surgery in rats. Spine 23(21):2282–2287

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Kawaguchi Y, Yabuki S, Styf J, Olmarker K, Rydevik B, Matsui H, Tsuji H (1996) Back muscle injury after posterior lumbar spine surgery: topographic evaluation of intramuscular pressure and blood flow in the porcine back muscle during surgery. Spine 21(22):2683–2688

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Khoo LT, Palmer S, Laich DT, Fessler RG (2002) Minimally invasive percutaneous posterior lumbar interbody fusion. Neurosurgery 51:S166–S171

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Kim JS, Lee SH, Moon KH, Lee HY (2009) Surgical results of the oblique paraspinal approach in upper lumbar disc herniation and thoracolumbar junction. Neurosurgery 65(1):95–99 discussion 99

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Kim K, Isu T, Sugawara A, Matsumoto R, Isobe M (2008) Comparison of the effect of 3 different approaches to the lumbar spinal canal on postoperative paraspinal muscle damage. Surg Neurol 69(2):109–113 discussion 113

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Kim KT, Lee SH, Suk KS, Bae SC (2006) The quantitative analysis of tissue injury markers after mini-open lumbar fusion. Spine 31:712–716

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Kotil K, Tunckale T, Tatar Z, Koldas M, Kural A, Bilge T (2007) Serum creatine phosphokinase activity and histological changes in the multifidus muscle: a prospective randomized controlled comparative study of discectomy with or without retraction. J Neurosurg Spine 6(2):121–125

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Lu K, Liang CL, Chen HJ, Chen SD, Hsu HC, Chen YC, Hsu FF, Cho CL (2003) Nuclear factor-kappaB-regulated cyclooxygenase-2 expression in surgery-associated paraspinal muscle injury in rats. J Neurosurg 98(2 Suppl):181–187

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Lu K, Liang CL, Cho CL, Chen HJ, Hsu HC, Yiin SJ, Chern CL, Chen YC, Lee TC (2002) Oxidative stress and heat shock protein response in human paraspinal muscles during retraction. J Neurosurg 97(1 Suppl):75–81

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Lu WW, Hu Y, Luk KD, Cheung KM, Leong JC (2002) Paraspinal muscle activities of patients with scoliosis after spine fusion: an electromyographic study. Spine 27(11):1180–1185

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Macintosh JE, Bogduk N (1986) The biomechanics of the lumbar multifidus. Clin Biomech 1(4):205–213

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Macintosh JE, Bogduk N (1987) Volvo award in basic science. The morphology of the lumbar erector spinae. Spine 12(7):658–668

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. MacNab I, Cuthbert H, Godfrey CM (1977) The incidence of denervation of the erector spinae muscles following spinal surgery. Spine 2(4):294–298

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Mayer TG, Vanharanta H, Gatchel RJ (1989) Comparison of CT scan muscle measurements and isokinetic trunk strength in postoperative patients. Spine 14(1):33–36

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Moon KH, Lee SH, Kong BJ, Shin SW, Bhanot A, Kim DY, Lee HY (2006) An oblique paraspinal approach for intracanalicular disc herniations of the upper lumbar spine: technical case report. Neurosurgery 59(4 Suppl 2):ONSE487-8;discussion ONSE488

  37. Panjabi M, Abumi K, Duranceau J, Oxland T (1989) Spinal stability and intersegmental muscle forces. A biomechanical model. Spine 14(2):194–200

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Park Y, Ha JW (2007) Comparison of one-level posterior lumbar interbody fusion performed with a minimally invasive approach or a traditional open approach. Spine 32(5):537–543

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Remes V, Lamberg T, Tervahartiala P, Helenius I, Schlenzka D, Yrjönen T, Osterman K, Seitsalo S, Poussa M (2006) Long-term outcome after posterolateral, anterior, and circumferential fusion for high-grade isthmic spondylolisthesis in children and adolescents: magnetic resonance imaging findings after average of 17-year follow-up. Spine 31(21):2491–2499

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Ringel F, Stoffel M, Stüer C, Meyer B (2006) Minimally invasive transmuscular pedicle screw fixation of the thoracic and lumbar spine. Neurosurgery 59(4 Suppl 2):ONS361-6; discussion ONS366-7

    Google Scholar 

  41. Saito T, Yoshimoto M, Yamamoto Y, Miyaki T, Itoh M, Shimizu S, Oi Y, Schmidt W, Steinke H (2006) The medial branch of the lateral branch of the posterior ramus of the spinal nerve. Surg Radiol Anat 28(3):228–234

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Sihvonen T, Herno A, Paljärvi L, Airaksinen O, Partanen J, Tapaninaho A (1993) Local denervation atrophy of paraspinal muscles in postoperative failed back syndrome. Spine 18(5):575–581

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Stevens KJ, Spenciner DB, Griffiths KL, Kim KD, Zwienenberg-Lee M, Alamin T, Bammer R (2006) Comparison of minimally invasive and conventional open posterolateral lumbar fusion using magnetic resonance imaging and retraction pressure studies. J Spinal Disord Tech 19(2):77–86

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Styf JR, Willen J (1998) The effects of external compression by three different retractors on pressure in the erector spine muscles during and after posterior spine surgery in humans. Spine 23(3):354–358

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Taylor H, McGregor AH, Medhi-Zadeh S, Richards S, Kahn N, Zadeh JA, Hughes SP (2002) The impact of self-retaining retractors on the paraspinal muscles during posterior spinal surgery. Spine 27(24):2758–2762

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Tessitore E, de Tribolet N (2004) Far-lateral lumbar disc herniation: the microsurgical transmuscular approach. Neurosurgery 54(4):939–942

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Tsutsumimoto T, Shimogata M, Ohta H, Misawa H (2003) Mini-open versus conventional open posterior lumbar interbody fusion for the treatment of lumbar degenerative spondylolisthesis: comparison of paraspinal muscle damage and slip reduction. Spine 34(18):1923–1928

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Vialle R, Wicart P, Drain O, Dubousset J, Court C (2006) The Wiltse paraspinal approach to the lumbar spine revisited: an anatomic study. Clin Orthop Relat Res 445:175–180

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Watkins MB (1953) Posterolateral fusion of the lumbar and lumbosacral spine. J Bone Joint Surg Am 35–A(4):1014–8

  50. Wiltse LL, Spencer CW (1988) New uses and refinements of the paraspinal approach to the lumbar spine. Spine 13(6):696–706

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The study was sponsored by National Nature Science Fund of China (81171739, 81101378, 81271971, 81271972, 31270997), Natural Science Fund of Zhejiang Province (Y2110372), funds of science and technology department of Zhejiang Province (2009C03014-1), and Zhejiang provincial program for the cultivation of high-level innovative health talents.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Shun-Wu Fan.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hu, ZJ., Fang, XQ. & Fan, SW. Iatrogenic injury to the erector spinae during posterior lumbar spine surgery: underlying anatomical considerations, preventable root causes, and surgical tips and tricks. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol 24, 127–135 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00590-012-1167-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00590-012-1167-9

Keywords

Navigation