Skip to main content
Log in

Surgical treatment of acromioclavicular dislocation with LARS artificial ligament

  • Original Article
  • Published:
European Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery & Traumatology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The choice of the most appropriate procedure for surgical treatment of type IV–V and VI dislocations of the acromioclavicular joint according to Rockwood’s classification has always been troublesome because of complications such as residual instability of the joint, delayed arthrosis of the A-C, delayed osteolysis of the clavicle, host intolerance towards artificial ligaments and because of the need of early mobilization of the affected limb. In our study, 17 male patients, ranging in age from 21 to 79 years and affected by A-C dislocation grade IV and V, both acute and chronic, underwent surgical reconstruction of the A-C joint capsule and extra-articular ligaments with ligament augmentation and reconstruction system (LARS) artificial ligament. Following surgery, their affected limb was braced for 3 days and thereafter all patients began an early active and passive mobilization programme. Patients eventually all returned to their previous working and recreational activities. Throughout thorough clinical and radiographic evaluation and the use of both Constant score and Simple Shoulder test, the aim of our study is to prove that at mid-term follow-up, the reconstruction of the conoid and trapezoid ligaments with LARS is a valid and safe alternative to other procedures.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Figs. 1, 2
Fig. 3
Figs. 4, 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Bannister GC, Wallace WA, Stableforth PG, Hutson MA (1992) A classification of acute acromioclavicular dislocation: a clinical, radiological and anatomical study. Injury 23:194–196

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Terry CS, Beatty JH (2007) Acromioclavicular joint. In: campbell’s operative orthopaedics, 11th edn. Mosby Elsevier, Philadelphia, pp 3586–3587

  3. Copeland S, Kessel L (1980) Disruption of the acromioclavicular joint: surgical anatomy and biological reconstruction. Injury 11:208–214

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Giannotti S, Bottai V, Dell’Osso G et al (2012) Indices of risk assessment of fracture of the proximal humerus. Clin Cases Miner Bone Metab 9:37–39

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Krenn M et al (2005) Biomechanical analysis of different operative techniques for complete acromioclavicular joint disruptions. Osteo Trauma Care 3:154–159

    Google Scholar 

  6. Rockwood CA, Williams G, Young C (1998) The s houlder. In: Rockwood CA, Matsen FA (eds) Disorders of the acromioclavicular joint, vol 2. W.B. Saunders, Philadelphia, PA, pp 483–554

    Google Scholar 

  7. Trieb K, Blahovec H, Brand M et al (2004) In vivo and in vitro cellular ingrowth into a new generation of artificial ligament. Eur Surg Res 36:148–151

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of interest

No benefits or funds were received in support of this study. None of the authors has any conflict of interests to disclose.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to S. Giannotti.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Giannotti, S., Dell’osso, G., Bugelli, G. et al. Surgical treatment of acromioclavicular dislocation with LARS artificial ligament. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol 23, 873–876 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00590-012-1113-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00590-012-1113-x

Keywords

Navigation