Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Early versus delayed decompression for traumatic cervical spinal cord injury: application of the AOSpine subaxial cervical spinal injury classification system to guide surgical timing

  • Original Article
  • Published:
European Spine Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

Application of AOSpine subaxial cervical spine injury classification system to explore the optimal surgical decompression timing for different types of traumatic cervical spinal cord injury (CSCI).

Methods

A single-center prospective cohort study was conducted that included patients with traumatic CSCIs (C3–C7) between February 2015 and October 2016. After enrollment, patients underwent either early (< 72 h after injury) or late (≥ 72 h after injury) decompressive surgery of the cervical spinal cord. Each group was divided into A0, A1-4, B, C/F4 and F1-3 subgroups. The primary outcomes were ordinal changes in the ASIA Impairment Scale (AIS) and the Spinal Cord Independence Measure III (SCIM version 3) at a 12-month follow-up. The secondary outcomes included length of hospital stay, postoperative neurological deterioration, other complications and mortality.

Results

A total of 402 patients were included. Of these, 187 patients underwent early decompression surgery, and 215 patients underwent delayed decompression surgery. Statistical results included the following comparisons of the early vs late groups: AIS improvement ≥ 1 grade (combined groups: P < 0.0001; A0: P = 0.554; A1-4: P = 0.084; B: P = 0.013; C/F4: P = 0.040; F1-3: P = 0.742); AIS improvement ≥ 2 grades, P = 0.003 for all groups; SCIM version 3 (combined groups: P < 0.0001; A0: P = 0.126; A1-4: P = 0.912; B: P = 0.006; C/F4: P = 0.111; F1-3: P = 0.875).

Conclusion

Type A and F1-3 fractures are not required to undergo aggressive early decompression. Type B and type C/F4 fractures should receive early surgical treatment for better clinical outcomes.

Graphical abstract

These slides can be retrieved under Electronic Supplementary Material.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Newton D, England M, Doll H, Gardner BP (2011) The case for early treatment of dislocations of the cervical spine with cord involvement sustained playing rugby. J Bone Joint Surg Br 93:1646–1652. https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620x.93b12.27048

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Fehlings MG, Vaccaro A, Wilson JR, Singh A, Cadotte DW, Harrop JS, Aarabi B, Shaffrey C, Dvorak M, Fisher C, Arnold P, Massicotte EM, Lewis S, Rampersaud R (2012) Early versus delayed decompression for traumatic cervical spinal cord injury: results of the Surgical Timing in Acute Spinal Cord Injury Study (STASCIS). PLoS ONE 7:e32037. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0032037

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Wilson JR, Singh A, Craven C, Verrier MC, Drew B, Ahn H, Ford M, Fehlings MG (2012) Early versus late surgery for traumatic spinal cord injury: the results of a prospective Canadian cohort study. Spinal Cord 50:840–843. https://doi.org/10.1038/sc.2012.59

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Stevens EA, Marsh R, Wilson JA, Sweasey TA, Branch CL Jr, Powers AK (2010) A review of surgical intervention in the setting of traumatic central cord syndrome. Spine J 10:874–880. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spinee.2010.07.388

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Urrutia J, Zamora T, Campos M, Yurac R, Palma J, Mobarec S, Prada C (2016) A comparative agreement evaluation of two subaxial cervical spine injury classification systems: the AOSpine and the Allen and Ferguson schemes. Eur Spine J 25:2185–2192. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-016-4498-0

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Vaccaro AR, Koerner JD, Radcliff KE, Oner FC, Reinhold M, Schnake KJ, Kandziora F, Fehlings MG, Dvorak MF, Aarabi B, Rajasekaran S, Schroeder GD, Kepler CK, Vialle LR (2016) AOSpine subaxial cervical spine injury classification system. Eur Spine J 25:2173–2184. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-015-3831-3

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Silva OT, Sabba MF, Lira HI, Ghizoni E, Tedeschi H, Patel AA, Joaquim AF (2016) Evaluation of the reliability and validity of the newer AOSpine subaxial cervical injury classification (C-3 to C-7). J Neurosurg Spine 25:303–308. https://doi.org/10.3171/2016.2.spine151039

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Urrutia J, Zamora T, Yurac R, Campos M, Palma J, Mobarec S, Prada C (2017) An independent inter- and intraobserver agreement evaluation of the AOSpine subaxial cervical spine injury classification system. Spine 42:298–303. https://doi.org/10.1097/brs.0000000000001302

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Hadley MN, Walters BC, Grabb PA, Oyesiku NM, Przybylski GJ, Resnick DK, Ryken TC (2002) Management of combination fractures of the atlas and axis in adults. Neurosurgery 50:S140–S147. https://doi.org/10.1097/00006123-200203001-00022

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Chappell ET (2002) Pharmacological therapy after acute cervical spinal cord injury. Neurosurgery 51:855

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Bracken MB, Shepard MJ, Collins WF, Holford TR, Young W, Baskin DS, Eisenberg HM, Flamm E, Leo-Summers L, Maroon J et al (1990) A randomized, controlled trial of methylprednisolone or naloxone in the treatment of acute spinal-cord injury: results of the second national acute spinal cord injury study. N Engl J Med 322:1405–1411. https://doi.org/10.1056/nejm199005173222001

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Ackerman P, Morrison SA, McDowell S, Vazquez L (2010) Using the spinal cord independence measure III to measure functional recovery in a post-acute spinal cord injury program. Spinal Cord 48:380–387. https://doi.org/10.1038/sc.2009.140

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Wyndaele M, Wyndaele JJ (2006) Incidence, prevalence and epidemiology of spinal cord injury: what learns a worldwide literature survey? Spinal Cord 44:523–529. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.sc.3101893

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Furlan JC, Noonan V, Cadotte DW, Fehlings MG (2011) Timing of decompressive surgery of spinal cord after traumatic spinal cord injury: an evidence-based examination of pre-clinical and clinical studies. J Neurotrauma 28:1371–1399. https://doi.org/10.1089/neu.2009.1147

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Liu Y, Shi CG, Wang XW, Chen HJ, Wang C, Cao P, Gao R, Ren XJ, Luo ZJ, Wang B, Xu JG, Tian JW, Yuan W (2015) Timing of surgical decompression for traumatic cervical spinal cord injury. Int Orthop 39:2457–2463. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-014-2652-z

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. La Rosa G, Conti A, Cardali S, Cacciola F, Tomasello F (2004) Does early decompression improve neurological outcome of spinal cord injured patients? Appraisal of the literature using a meta-analytical approach. Spinal Cord 42:503–512. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.sc.3101627

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Fehlings MG, Rabin D, Sears W, Cadotte DW, Aarabi B (2010) Current practice in the timing of surgical intervention in spinal cord injury. Spine 35:S166–S173. https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181f386f6

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Nakashima H, Nagoshi N, Fehlings MG (2015) Timing of surgery in the setting of acute spinal cord injury. Curr Surg Rep 3:1–9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Samuel AM, Grant RA, Bohl DD, Basques BA, Webb ML, Lukasiewicz AM, Diaz-Collado PJ, Grauer JN (2015) Delayed surgery after acute traumatic central cord syndrome is associated with reduced mortality. Spine 40:349–356. https://doi.org/10.1097/brs.0000000000000756

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Croce MA, Bee TK, Pritchard E, Miller PR, Fabian TC (2001) Does optimal timing for spine fracture fixation exist? Ann Surg 233:851–858

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

No funds were received in support of this work.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ding-Jun Hao.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Yong Fan and Jin‑Peng Du are both considered to be the first authors.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (PDF 98 kb)

Supplementary material 2 (PPTX 665 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Du, JP., Fan, Y., Zhang, JN. et al. Early versus delayed decompression for traumatic cervical spinal cord injury: application of the AOSpine subaxial cervical spinal injury classification system to guide surgical timing. Eur Spine J 28, 1855–1863 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-019-05959-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-019-05959-6

Keywords

Navigation