Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Surgical treatment of type II odontoid fractures in elderly patients: a comparison of anterior odontoid screw fixation and posterior atlantoaxial fusion using the Magerl–Gallie technique

  • Original Article
  • Published:
European Spine Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

This single-centre retrospective study compared anterior odontoid screw fixation and posterior atlantoaxial fusion in the surgical treatment of type II B odontoid fractures according to Grauer in elderly patients.

Methods

Between 1994 and 2014, 133 consecutive patients above 60 years presenting with type II B odontoid fracture were treated surgically in our department. They were divided retrospectively into two groups. Group A included 47 patients in whom anterior odontoid screw fixation was performed. Group B with 86 patients underwent posterior atlantoaxial fusion. The clinical and radiological data were analysed. Any reoperation during the follow-up was recorded and evaluated.

Results

The mean age in group A (74.19 years) was significantly less than in group B (78.16 years). The mean operative time in group A (64.5 min) was significantly shorter than in group B (116 min). Again, the mean amount of blood loss in group A (79 ml) was significantly less than in group B (379 ml). The mean postoperative hospital stay was significantly shorter in group A (17.4 days) than in group B (30 days). The mean follow-up was 29.3 months in group A and 32 months in group B. The rate of pseudoarthrosis was significantly higher in group A (25.5%) than in group B (3.5%). Furthermore, the need for revision surgery was significantly increased in group A (23.4%) than in group B (10.47%).

Conclusions

Odontoid screw fixation is a less invasive surgery for type II B odontoid fractures in elderly patients. However, posterior atlantoaxial fusion provides a superior surgical outcome regarding fracture healing and the need for surgical revisions.

Graphical abstract

These slides can be retrieved under Electronic Supplementary Material.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Chapman J, Smith JS, Kopjar B, Vaccaro AR, Arnold P, Shaffrey CI, Fehlings MG (2013) The AO Spine North America Geriatric Odontoid Fracture Mortality Study: a retrospective review of mortality outcomes for operative versus nonoperative treatment of 322 patients with long-term follow-up. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 38(13):1098–1104

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Anderson LD, D’Alonzo RT (1974) Fractures of the odontoid process of the axis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 56(8):1663–1674

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Grauer JN, Shafi B, Hilibrand AS, Harrop JS, Kwon BK, Beiner JM, Albert TJ, Fehlings MG, Vaccaro AR (2005) Proposal of a modified, treatment-oriented classification of odontoid fractures. Spine J 5(2):123–129

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Dobran M, Nasi D, Esposito DP, Iacoangeli M (2016) Posterior fixation with C1 lateral mass screws and C2 pars screws for type II odontoid fracture in the elderly: long-term follow-up. World Neurosurg 96:152–158

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Joestl J, Lang N, Bukaty A, Platzer P (2016) A comparison of anterior screw fixation and halo immobilisation of type II odontoid fractures in elderly patients at increased risk from anaesthesia. Bone Joint J 98(B(9)):1222–1226

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Woods BI, Hohl JB, Braly B, Donaldson W III, Kang J, Lee JY (2014) Mortality in elderly patients following operative and nonoperative management of odontoid fractures. J Spinal Disord Tech 27(6):321–326

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Ryang YM, Török E, Janssen I, Reinke A, Buchmann N, Gempt J, Ringel F, Meyer B (2016) Early morbidity and mortality in 50 very elderly patients after posterior atlantoaxial fusion for traumatic odontoid fractures. World Neurosurg 87:381–391

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Loehrer L, Raschke MJ, Thiesen D, Hartensuer R, Surke C, Ochman S et al (2012) Current concepts in the treatment of Anderson type II odontoid fractures in the elderly in Germany, Austria and Switzerland. Inj J Care Inj 43:462–469

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Bórm W, Kast E, Richter HP, Mohr K, Sonntag VKH, Benzel EC et al (2003) Anterior screw fixation in type II odontoid fractures: Is there a difference in outcome between age groups? Neurosurgery 52:1089–1094

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Magerl F, Seemann P-S (1987) Stable posterior fusion of the atlas and axis by transarticular screw fixation. Cerv Spine I. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-7091-8882-8_59

  11. Harms J, Melcher RP (2001) Posterior C1–C2 fusion with polyaxial screw and rod fixation. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 26:2467–2471

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Frangen TM, Zilkens C, Muhr G, Schinkel C (2007) Odontoid fractures in the elderly: dorsal C1/C2 fusion is superior to halo-vest immobilization. J Trauma Inj Infect Crit Care 63:83–89

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Konieczny MR, Gstrein A, Müller EJ (2012) Treatment algorithm for dens fractures: non-halo immobilization, anterior screw fixation, or posterior transarticular C1–C2 fixation. J Bone Joint Surg Am 94:e144(1–6)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Gallie W (1939) Fractures and dislocations of the cervical spine. Am J Surg 46:495–499

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Faure A, Graillon T, Pesenti S, Tropiano P, Blondel B, Fuentes S (2017) Trends in the surgical management of odontoid fractures in patients above 75 years of age: retrospective study of 70 cases. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res 103(8):1221–1228

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Schroeder GD, Kepler CK, Kurd MF, Paul JT, Rubenstein RN, Harrop JS, Brodke DS, Chapman JR, Vaccaro AR (2015) A systematic review of the treatment of geriatric type II odontoid fractures. Neurosurgery 77(Suppl 4):S6–S14

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Robinson Y, Robinson AL, Olerud C (2014) Systematic review on surgical and nonsurgical treatment of type II odontoid fractures in the elderly. Biomed Res Int 2014:231948

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. DePasse JM, Palumbo MA, Ahmed A, Adams CA, Daniels AH (2016) Halo-vest immobilization in elderly odontoid fracture patients: evolution in treatment modality and in-hospital outcomes. Clin Spine Surg 30(9):E1206–E1210. https://doi.org/10.1097/BSD.0000000000000483

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Patterson JT, Theologis AA, Sing D, Tay B (2017) Anterior versus posterior approaches for odontoid fracture stabilization in patients older than 65 years: 30-day morbidity and mortality in a national database. Clin Spine Surg 30(8):E1033–E1038

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Shen Y, Miao J, Li C, Fang L, Cao S, Zhang M, Yan J, Kuang Y (2015) A meta-analysis of the fusion rate from surgical treatment for odontoid factures: anterior odontoid screw versus posterior C1–C2 arthrodesis. Eur Spine J 24(8):1649–1657

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Iyer S, Hurlbert RJ, Albert TJ (2018) Management of odontoid fractures in the elderly: a review of the literature and an evidence-based treatment algorithm. Neurosurgery 82(4):419–430

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Wagner SC, Schroeder GD, Kepler CK, Schupper AJ, Kandziora F, Vialle EN, Oner C, Fehlings MG, Vaccaro AR (2017) Controversies in the management of geriatric odontoid fractures. J Orthop Trauma 31(Suppl 4):S44–S48

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Han B, Li F, Chen G, Li H, Chen Q (2015) Motion preservation in type II odontoid fractures using temporary pedicle screw fixation: a preliminary study. Eur Spine J 24(4):686–693

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Guo Q, Zhang M, Wang L, Lu X, Guo X, Ni B (2016) Comparison of atlantoaxial rotation and functional outcomes of two nonfusion techniques in the treatment of Anderson–D’Alonzo type II odontoid fractures. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 41(12):E751–E758

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Kuhlman KA (1993) Cervical range of motion in the elderly. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 74(10):1071–1079

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Greaves LL, Van Toen C, Melnyk A, Koenig L, Zhu Q, Tredwell S, Mulpuri K, Cripton PA (2009) Pediatric and adult three-dimensional cervical spine kinematics: effect of age and sex through overall motion. Spine 34(Spine (Phila Pa 1976)):1650–1657

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Alhashash M, Shousha M, Gendy H, Barakat AS, Boehm H (2018) Percutaneous posterior transarticular atlantoaxial fixation for the treatment of odontoid fractures in the elderly: a prospective study. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 43(11):761–766

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Štulík J, Hodasová G, Podhráský M, Nesnídal P, Fojtík P, Naňka O (2018) Anatomy of the dens and its implications for fracture treatment: an anatomical and radiological study. Eur Spine J. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-018-5793-8

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mootaz Shousha.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

None.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (PPTX 522 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Shousha, M., Alhashash, M., Allouch, H. et al. Surgical treatment of type II odontoid fractures in elderly patients: a comparison of anterior odontoid screw fixation and posterior atlantoaxial fusion using the Magerl–Gallie technique. Eur Spine J (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-019-05946-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-019-05946-x

Keywords

Navigation